Nobel Laureate (Physics 2022) Dr. John Clauser was to present a seminar on climate models to the IMF on Thursday and now his talk has been summarily canceled. According to an email he received last evening, the Director of the Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund, Pablo Moreno, had read the flyer for John’s July 25 zoom talk and summarily and immediately canceled the talk. Technically, it was “postponed.”
By: Admin – Climate Depot
https://co2coalition.org/news/nobel-laureate-silenced/
Nobel Laureate (Physics 2022) Dr. John Clauser was to present a seminar on climate models to the IMF on Thursday and now his talk has been summarily cancelled. According to an email he received last evening, the Director of the Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund, Pablo Moreno, had read the flyer for John’s July 25 zoom talk and summarily and immediately canceled the talk. Technically, it was “postponed.”
Dr. Clauser had previously criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming and told President Biden that he disagreed with his climate policies. Dr. Clauser has developed a climate model that adds a new significant dominant process to existing models. The process involves the visible light reflected by cumulus clouds that cover, on average, half of the Earth. Existing models greatly underestimate this cloud feedback, which provides a very powerful, dominant thermostatic control of the Earth’s temperature.
More recently, he addressed the Korea Quantum Conference where he stated, “I don’t believe there is a climate crisis” and expressed his belief that “key processes are exaggerated and misunderstood by approximately 200 times.” Dr. Clauser, who is recognized as a climate change skeptic, also became a member of the board of directors of the CO2 Coalition last month, an organization that argues that carbon dioxide emissions are beneficial to life on Earth.
#
May 5, 2023 via CO2 Coalition: Dr. John F. Clauser, recipient of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics…received the Nobel Prize, along with two others, for work done in the 1970s that showed “quantum entanglement” allowed particles such as photons, effectively, to interact at great distances, seemingly to require communication exceeding the speed of light. …
According to Dr. Clauser, “The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”
It seems that Dr Clauser had better make clear that he is not depressed and doesn’t possess any dirt on Hillary Clinton. Maybe throw in that he rejects suicide as a viable alternative under any circumstances.
Well, if a physics Nobel Laureate doesn’t know what he’s talking about, who does? None of those who’ve cancelled him, clearly!
Cannot have non-expert IMFers who fund green stuff and not third world coal fired power plants hear climate ‘truth’ from an expert. Nope. Not allowed.
“Shock journalism pseudoscience” is a bit less dated than Cargo Cult Science.
I am aware of no scientific expertise resident in the IMF that qualifies them to pass judgement on the scientific opinions of a Nobel laureate (a real one) in Physics. That means we now live in an era where major economic decisions involving important scientific concepts are made with no basis in scientific principles.
Now what could go wrong with that?
The side that stifles descent is the side that is wrong.
When you control the media, government, and various institutions you make (up) the rules. It’s time we extend boycotts to all of them. It’s the only tool we have considering the courts support an ideology instead of the laws. Anyone that believes is OK to censor because it doesn’t fit your opinion needs to be taught a lesson.
If you´re not part of the “98%”, you will be excluded from the good company. Just took a quick stroll past Wikipedia 11 edits have been made to him today.
For my own part, I have just been deleted from a debate here in Denmark for showing the model Fritz Vahrenholt uses in his 2035 predictions, Maybe it was because I asked the question, what if the Paris Agreement was made in 2016 and not 2015, would they have set their fictitious goal at 1.6 instead of 1.5 …
In other words, this coming from Pablo Moreno:
“Don’t confuse me with the facts, my mind’s already made up.”
I said this was inevitable after Dr Clauser spoke out following his Nobel prize award
It is sad and sickening, yet what we have come to expect from the Marxist blob in these dystopian times
What the blob doesn’t realise, is that each time they martyr a great scientist to their deceitful climate emergency false god, they actually coalesce the realists, the fence sitters, the open minded more solidly together, in greater solidarity, the exact opposite of what they aim to achieve by demonising those who dare speak truths and facts
I personally have never felt more disgusted and ashamed of my so called fellow scientists and Engineers who actively seek to destroy peoples lives and good names, all in the name of the unscientific, unproven climate emergency
Nulla est enim maior turpitudo, quam ea quae fiunt nomine avaritiae et doli
Another Streisand effect in the making.
The ClimateCult™ members are slow learners.
Too bad he didn’t wait until his climate talk to express his criticism of the climate models.
I expect the BBC, CNN and the grauniad are apoplectic with rage that Dr. Clauser has been silenced, and look forward to their coverage of this injustice.
Dr. Clauser:
DO YOUR TALKS ANYWAY. Via videos posted on sites such as this one and CO2 Coalition’s and Jo Nova’s and Paul Homewood’s and Pierre Gosselin’s and CFACT’s and many others.
All of us then sharing them (creating, thus, the “Streisand Effect” mentioned by Mr. Hultquist — heh, heh) will GET THE TRUTH OUT.
Long live data-driven science!
I think it worth noting that a growing number of very serious physicists like Koonin, Clauser, and Dyson have looked at ‘climate science’ and concluded publicly that its ‘alarming’ conclusions are a crock.
Mann, on the other hand, started out to earn a Ph.D in physics and couldn’t cut it.
I really like the sound of Dr. Clauser. he sounds almost normal, even for an American!
From the article: “2022 Nobel Prize-winning scientist Dr. John Clauser declares his climate dissent: ‘There is no real climate crisis’ – Warns ‘climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience’”
There is no way the climate alarmists are going to let someone like Dr. Clauser speak his mind. They and their climate change narrative can’t handle the truth.
I think the tide is slowly turning, despite all the censorship.
The IMF clearly have their own society controlling agenda, and the climate change narrative is simply one of their manipulative levers.
They certainly have zero interest in discussing the accuracy of climate models.
The most important feature of atmospheric physics is the formation of the level of free convection that enables the heat engine producing cumulus clouds during convective instability then the persistence of the high altitude cirrus clouds after the cumulus cloud disperses.
No ocean surface can sustain a temperature above 30C.
Upon pointing out to the CSIRO that their ACCESS climate model has open ocean surface sustaining well above 30C they provided a reference to the GISS model that has 20 vertical atmospheric layers on the basis of it being an impressive resolution. However such low resolution would not have the capability to form a meaningful LFC even if the process was incorporated because each layer will span 5C or more over a tropical ocean.
The corruption of science runs deep. I would like to see Clauser’s proposed presentation. A balanced press would be all over this. What has got the IMF so concerned.
Manabe knows climate models are rubbish but he still accepted the 2021 Nobel Prize. He would do the world a great service to renounce his award and unite with Clauser on the side of science. Has Manabe got the moral fibre to take a stand!
If the CAGW alarmists are so confident in their work they would welcome skeptics to their talks. Alarmists should be able to crush any skeptic because the science is settled. Since the alarmists run away from skeptics it proves alarmists are not only liars and cheats but also cowards.
Does the IMF not understand or appreciate how this will backfire on them? It’s so blatantly obvious why they’ve ‘postponed’ the talk that they’re just making themselves look like complete idiots, which of course they are.
People are going to ask why this has happened and it will take them very little time to work it out. Talk about the IMF shooting themselves in the foot. Both feet, in fact.
Pablo Moreno joined the Independent Evaluation Office as Director in May 2023. A fast work!
He holds a PhD and a BA in economics from Complutense University of Madrid, and an M.A. in public administration from George Mason University on a Fulbright scholarship. Undoubtedly highly qualified for an Independent Evaluation.
I wonder if he has the authority to cancel anything. If not, he shows a proper initiative.
You can censor reality but you can’t avoid the consequences of censoring reality. The consequences including wasting resources by curtailing the use of fossil fuels instead of devising means to efficiently manage fresh water.
Well, so much for real science, and freedom of speech.
It’s pretty sad that almost all international agencies funded primarily by the US are actively working to weaken or destroy our country. It’s time for the next GOP admin to completely remove funding. No incrementalism. Zero for IMF, UN, etc. World governance is their only goal, the thin vail of altruism is basically transparent now.