Why do Earth’s hemispheres look equally bright when viewed from space?

[More about how the “science is settled”, yawn –cr]

Weizmann Institute scientists offer a solution to this 50-year-old mystery

Peer-Reviewed Publication

WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE

When looking at the Earth from space, its hemispheres – northern and southern – appear equally bright. This is particularly unexpected because the Southern Hemisphere is mostly covered with dark oceans, whereas the Northern Hemisphere has a vast land area that is much brighter than these oceans. For years, the brightness symmetry between hemispheres remained a mystery. In a new study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Weizmann Institute of Science researchers and their collaborators reveal a strong correlation between storm intensity, cloudiness and the solar energy reflection rate in each hemisphere. They offer a solution to the mystery, alongside an assessment of how climate change might alter the reflection rate in the future.

As early as the 1970s, when scientists analyzed data from the first meteorological satellites, they were surprised to find out that the two hemispheres reflect the same amount of solar radiation. Reflectivity of solar radiation is known in scientific lingo as “albedo.” To better comprehend what albedo is, think about driving at night: It is easy to spot the intermittent white lines, which reflect light from the car’s headlights well, but difficult to discern the dark asphalt. The same is true when observing Earth from space: The ratio of the solar energy hitting the Earth to the energy reflected by each region is determined by various factors. One of them is the ratio of dark oceans to bright land, which differ in reflectivity, just like asphalt and intermittent white lines. The land area of the Northern Hemisphere is about twice as large as that of the Southern, and indeed when measuring near the surface of the Earth, when the skies are clear, there is more than a 10 percent difference in albedo. Still, both hemispheres appear to be equally bright from space.

In this study, the team of researchers, led by Prof. Yohai Kaspi and Or Hadas of Weizmann’s Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, focused on another factor influencing albedo, one located in high altitudes and reflecting solar radiation – clouds. The team analyzed data derived from the world’s most advanced databases, including cloud data collected via NASA satellites (CERES), as well as data from ERA5, which is a global weather database containing information collected using a variety of sources in the air and on the ground, dating back to 1950. ERA5 data was utilized to complete cloud data and to cross-correlate 50 years of this data with information on the intensity of cyclones and anticyclones.

Next, the scientists classified storms of the last 50 years into three categories, according to intensity. They discovered a direct link between storm intensity and the number of clouds forming around the storm. While Northern Hemisphere and land areas in general are characterized by weaker storms, above oceans in the Southern Hemisphere, moderate and strong storms prevail. Data analysis showed that the link between storm intensity and cloudiness accounts for the difference in cloudiness between the hemispheres. “Cloud albedo arising from strong storms above the Southern Hemisphere was found to be a high-precision offsetting agent to the large land area in the Northern Hemisphere, and thus symmetry is preserved,” says Hadas, adding: “This suggests that storms are the linking factor between the brightness of Earth’s surface and that of clouds, solving the symmetry mystery.”

Could climate change make one of the hemispheres darker?

Earth has been undergoing rapid change in recent years, owing to climate change. To examine whether and how this could affect hemispheric albedo symmetry, the scientists used CMIP6, a set of models run by climate modeling centers around the world to simulate climate change. One of these models’ major shortcomings is their limited ability to predict the degree of cloudiness. Nevertheless, the relation found in this study between storm intensity and cloudiness enables scientists to assess future cloud amounts, based on storm predictions.

Models predict global warming will result in a decreased frequency of all storms above the Northern Hemisphere and of weak and moderate storms above the Southern Hemisphere. However, the strongest storms of the Southern Hemisphere will intensify. The cause of these predicted differences is “Arctic amplification,” a phenomenon in which the North Pole warms twice as fast as Earth’s mean warming rate. One might speculate that this difference should break hemispheric albedo symmetry. However, the research shows that a further increase in storm intensity might not change the degree of cloudiness in the Southern Hemisphere because cloud amounts reach saturation in very strong storms. Thus, symmetry might be preserved.

“It is not yet possible to determine with certainty whether the symmetry will break in the face of global warming,” says Kaspi. “However, the new research solves a basic scientific question and deepens our understanding of Earth’s radiation balance and its effectors. As global warming continues, geoengineered solutions will become vital for human life to carry on alongside it. I hope that a better understanding of basic climate phenomena, such as the hemispheric albedo symmetry, will help in developing these solutions.”

Other collaborators in conducting this study include Dr. George Datseris and Prof. Bjorn Stevens of Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Germany; Dr. Joaquin Blanco and Prof. Rodrigo Caballero of Stockholm University, Sweden; and Dr. Sandrine Bony of Sorbonne University, France.

Prof. Yohai Kaspi is head of the Helen Kimmel Center for Planetary Science. His research is supported by the Yotam Project and Rene Braginsky.


JOURNAL

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

DOI

10.1073/pnas.2208778120 

2.1 19 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rah
February 27, 2023 1:55 am

Why do the bulbs that write this kind of drivel seem to get ever dimmer?

Paul B
February 27, 2023 3:25 am

Serious question. Why has temperature (an energy proxy) been elevated to a primary consideration when energy flux balance (or imbalance if you like) is the true issue in warming?

It seems to me that we are measuring the speeds at a race track by assaying rubber left on the asphalt.

February 27, 2023 5:39 am

Clouds. My reflexive answer to the headline question, before beginning to read the article. Wow, some mystery.

Next topic.

(of course, their real point was to try and frighten us with baseless speculation that climate change could upset the balance. WE’RE DOOMED, I tell you.)

February 27, 2023 5:40 am

I see a planet where the dark oceans and bright continents are visible along with white clouds. And the sun shines equally on all. What am I missing?

KevinM
Reply to  sskinner
February 27, 2023 9:14 am

the sun shines equally on all. 
Does it?

davemar
February 27, 2023 6:53 am

It’s worse than we thought.

JCM
February 27, 2023 8:08 am

The article describes how they are symmetrical, but not why.

For this one must take a step back – to recognize that the clouds are not external to the system, but that they are coupled to equilibrium process.

Not by albedo, but by equilibrium cloud cover fraction (and cloud height).

The observed albedo is a consequence of cloud cover fraction and cloud height equilibrium process.

The equilibrium OLR is the sum of Surface Net IR Transmission and Cloudy Sky Net IR emission.

The observed albedo is the consequence of the equilibrium all sky atmospheric emission i.e. equilibrium cloud cover and cloud height.

The current hypotheses are flawed because the energy balance requirement is described in the form Solar (1 – albedo)/4 = OLR = solar absorbed.

Where the albedo is disconnected from equilibrium process, as an ad-hoc externality.

JCM
Reply to  JCM
February 27, 2023 8:32 am

For clarity:

the northern hemisphere is better at transmitting surface IR flux, due to relative dryness and surface properties.

The southern hemisphere is likely less effective at transmitting surface IR flux, due to surface properties.

The southern hemisphere equilibrium process has “decided” it does better through cloud emission.

The equilibrium process is optimized through factors of maximum entropy production principles.

Temperature will be minimized within the physical constraints of the system, while the entropy production is maximized. The system has many degrees of freedom and possibilities to achieve this.

February 27, 2023 8:44 am

“Models predict global warming will result in a decreased frequency of all storms above the Northern Hemisphere and of weak and moderate storms above the Southern Hemisphere.”

So the models predict LESS storms yet the media and the watermelons trumpet we’re all going to die from MORE storm activity.

No climate consensus, and no integrity either!

February 27, 2023 12:37 pm

Stephens and O’Brien, 2015, is an earlier paper with the same findings.
Which is CLOUDS.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014RG000449

wazz
February 27, 2023 4:32 pm

In late 2015 I blogged about the Ralph Ellis online paper ” Albedo regulation of Ice Ages, with no CO2 feedbacks.”
http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri15/ralph_ellis_oct15.html
Ralph was drawing attention to the effect of dust.
My blog was http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/?p=4019
In Jan 2016 Ellis published a paper which I blogged about in Jan 2016.

goracle
February 27, 2023 7:04 pm

This study is the answer to a question no one asked.