Scientists have confirmed that a “stabilizing feedback” on 100,000-year timescales keeps global temperatures in check
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
The Earth’s climate has undergone some big changes, from global volcanism to planet-cooling ice ages and dramatic shifts in solar radiation. And yet life, for the last 3.7 billion years, has kept on beating.
Now, a study by MIT researchers in Science Advances confirms that the planet harbors a “stabilizing feedback” mechanism that acts over hundreds of thousands of years to pull the climate back from the brink, keeping global temperatures within a steady, habitable range.
Just how does it accomplish this? A likely mechanism is “silicate weathering” — a geological process by which the slow and steady weathering of silicate rocks involves chemical reactions that ultimately draw carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and into ocean sediments, trapping the gas in rocks.
Scientists have long suspected that silicate weathering plays a major role in regulating the Earth’s carbon cycle. The mechanism of silicate weathering could provide a geologically constant force in keeping carbon dioxide — and global temperatures — in check. But there’s never been direct evidence for the continual operation of such a feedback, until now.
The new findings are based on a study of paleoclimate data that record changes in average global temperatures over the last 66 million years. The MIT team applied a mathematical analysis to see whether the data revealed any patterns characteristic of stabilizing phenomena that reined in global temperatures on a geologic timescale.
They found that indeed there appears to be a consistent pattern in which the Earth’s temperature swings are dampened over timescales of hundreds of thousands of years. The duration of this effect is similar to the timescales over which silicate weathering is predicted to act.
The results are the first to use actual data to confirm the existence of a stabilizing feedback, the mechanism of which is likely silicate weathering. This stabilizing feedback would explain how the Earth has remained habitable through dramatic climate events in the geologic past.
“On the one hand, it’s good because we know that today’s global warming will eventually be canceled out through this stabilizing feedback,” says Constantin Arnscheidt, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences (EAPS). “But on the other hand, it will take hundreds of thousands of years to happen, so not fast enough to solve our present-day issues.”
The study is co-authored by Arnscheidt and Daniel Rothman, professor of geophysics at MIT.
Stability in data
Scientists have previously seen hints of a climate-stabilizing effect in the Earth’s carbon cycle: Chemical analyses of ancient rocks have shown that the flux of carbon in and out of Earth’s surface environment has remained relatively balanced, even through dramatic swings in global temperature. Furthermore, models of silicate weathering predict that the process should have some stabilizing effect on the global climate. And finally, the fact of the Earth’s enduring habitability points to some inherent, geologic check on extreme temperature swings.
“You have a planet whose climate was subjected to so many dramatic external changes. Why did life survive all this time? One argument is that we need some sort of stabilizing mechanism to keep temperatures suitable for life,” Arnscheidt says. “But it’s never been demonstrated from data that such a mechanism has consistently controlled Earth’s climate.”
Arnscheidt and Rothman sought to confirm whether a stabilizing feedback has indeed been at work, by looking at data of global temperature fluctuations through geologic history. They worked with a range of global temperature records compiled by other scientists, from the chemical composition of ancient marine fossils and shells, as well as preserved Antarctic ice cores.
“This whole study is only possible because there have been great advances in improving the resolution of these deep-sea temperature records,” Arnscheidt notes. “Now we have data going back 66 million years, with data points at most thousands of years apart.”
Speeding to a stop
To the data, the team applied the mathematical theory of stochastic differential equations, which is commonly used to reveal patterns in widely fluctuating datasets.
“We realized this theory makes predictions for what you would expect Earth’s temperature history to look like if there had been feedbacks acting on certain timescales,” Arnscheidt explains.
Using this approach, the team analyzed the history of average global temperatures over the last 66 million years, considering the entire period over different timescales, such as tens of thousands of years versus hundreds of thousands, to see whether any patterns of stabilizing feedback emerged within each timescale.
“To some extent, it’s like your car is speeding down the street, and when you put on the brakes, you slide for a long time before you stop,” Rothman says. “There’s a timescale over which frictional resistance, or a stabilizing feedback, kicks in, when the system returns to a steady state.”
Without stabilizing feedbacks, fluctuations of global temperature should grow with timescale. But the team’s analysis revealed a regime in which fluctuations did not grow, implying that a stabilizing mechanism reigned in the climate before fluctuations grew too extreme. The timescale for this stabilizing effect — hundreds of thousands of years — coincides with what scientists predict for silicate weathering.
Interestingly, Arnscheidt and Rothman found that on longer timescales, the data did not reveal any stabilizing feedbacks. That is, there doesn’t appear to be any recurring pull-back of global temperatures on timescales longer than a million years. Over these longer timescales, then, what has kept global temperatures in check?
“There’s an idea that chance may have played a major role in determining why, after more than 3 billion years, life still exists,” Rothman offers.
In other words, as the Earth’s temperatures fluctuate over longer stretches, these fluctuations may just happen to be small enough in the geologic sense, to be within a range that a stabilizing feedback, such as silicate weathering, could periodically keep the climate in check, and more to the point, within a habitable zone.
“There are two camps: Some say random chance is a good enough explanation, and others say there must be a stabilizing feedback,” Arnscheidt says. “We’re able to show, directly from data, that the answer is probably somewhere in between. In other words, there was some stabilization, but pure luck likely also played a role in keeping Earth continuously habitable.”
This research was supported in part by a MathWorks fellowship and the National Science Foundation.
###
Written by Jennifer Chu, MIT News Office
JOURNAL
Science Advances
DOI
ARTICLE TITLE
Presence or absence of stabilizing Earth system feedbacks on different timescales
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
16-Nov-2022
Presence or absence of stabilizing Earth system feedbacks on different time scales
Abstract
The question of how Earth’s climate is stabilized on geologic time scales is important for understanding Earth’s history, long-term consequences of anthropogenic climate change, and planetary habitability. Here, we quantify the typical amplitude of past global temperature fluctuations on time scales from hundreds to tens of millions of years and use it to assess the presence or absence of long-term stabilizing feedbacks in the climate system. On time scales between 4 and 400 ka, fluctuations fail to grow with time scale, suggesting that stabilizing mechanisms like the hypothesized “weathering feedback” have exerted dominant control in this regime. Fluctuations grow on longer time scales, potentially due to tectonically or biologically driven changes that make weathering act as a climate forcing and a feedback. These slower fluctuations show no evidence of being damped, implying that chance may still have played a nonnegligible role in maintaining the long-term habitability of Earth.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
‘The new findings are based on a study of paleoclimate data that record changes in average global temperatures over the last 66 million years. ‘
Hmmm, 66 million years sounds very familiar. Could they be looking at the CENOGRID data of Westerhold et al? The same data that, correctly analyzed, strongly shows that plate tectonics, not CO2, has been the primary driver of the Earth’s temperature over this period?
But instead, they invoke silicate weathering as a climate offset in order to maintain the fiction of the CO2 ‘ control knob’, overlain by stochastic calculus to impress the idiots at Eureka Alert.
What a pile of crap!
Since the temperature during a glacial period varies significantly over the ice and warm parts of the cycle, clearly the natural cycles are governed so that we never hit that magical and ominous “tipping point”. Otherwise, the first glaciation would have pushed us over already.
“Silicate weathering” appears to be a handy wild card that can be pulled out and laid on the table in any “CO2 control knob” study. Near-impossible to quantify,even at the present day, and so it can be “modelled” to support any theory of past climate changes. The logic seems to go like this:
Temperature was (higher/lower) in the xx period.
Therefore CO2 was (higher/lower)
Therefore there was (less/more) silicate weathering
Confirmed. Riiight.
“Some say random chance is a good enough explanation…”
When you’re supposed to be the expert and you don’t have the answer, blame it on random chance. How do you disprove that? No expert wants to admit that he simply doesn’t know the answer. It’s like a security expert at a casino who is asked to figure out how the same guy is able to beat the house odds on a regular basis. If he can’t figure out what method the guy is using to cheat the casino, the last thing he wants to do is admit that he’s not very good at his job. So he falls back on the explanation, “the guy is just lucky.”
“There’s an idea that chance may have played a major role in determining why, after more than 3 billion years, life still exists,” Rothman offers.
The thing about “chance” is it is random. It can go either way. To assume that whenever something bad happened over 3 billion years random chance stepped in to save the day is very naive. It would have only taken one time for chance to go the other way for life to be wiped out. What are the odds of that not happening over 3 billion years?
“…there was some stabilization, but pure luck likely also played a role in keeping Earth continuously habitable.”.
Pure luck in units of 100,000 year bits making up 3,000,000,000 yrs sucks the air out of the science of a stabilizing correction. What is the unknown nature of the ‘bullet’, that we have been lucky enough to dodge? Being an equal opportunity sceptic, this looks like a numbers casserole à la climate muddle.
“Earth Can Regulate its Own Temperature Over Millennia, New Study Finds”
You don’t say!!!!!!!!!! What ever gave them the first clue?
hahaha, when I read this:
“A likely mechanism is “silicate weathering” — a geological process by which the slow and steady weathering of silicate rocks involves chemical reactions that ultimately draw carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and into ocean sediments”
that was the place to stop. right after they wrote that they got another couple million in research grants
I think that many of you have missed the importance of this article. The alarmists are continually suggesting that we are quickly approaching some kind of existential Tipping Point. The poorly supported claim that CO2 is not only the ‘control knob,’ but the only influence of concern for global temperatures, is invalid under the conclusions of this article. Therefore, there can be no Tipping Point (A critical condition from which there is no recovery.). This nullifies the moral imperative of doing something quickly because of the imminent approach of a point of no return.
It’s notable that they showed self-stabilization up to hundreds of thousands of year time scales but not over million year and above time scales. However even at hundreds of millions of year timescales temperatures appear somewhat constrained between upper and lower bounds of hot house and ice house. At the end-Permian it may have briefly broken through higher than this bound.
Some more thoughts on climate emergent homeostasis
https://ptolemy2.wordpress.com/2021/11/13/climate-pandemonium/
https://ptolemy2.wordpress.com/2021/07/08/emergent-thermal-homeostasis-a-new-paradigm-for-ex-pluribus-unum-climate-stability/