Jun 30, 2021
The sky isn’t falling, but scientists have found that parts of the upper atmosphere are gradually contracting in response to rising human-made greenhouse gas emissions.
Combined data from three NASA satellites have produced a long-term record that reveals the mesosphere, the layer of the atmosphere 30 to 50 miles above the surface, is cooling and contracting. Scientists have long predicted this effect of human-driven climate change, but it has been difficult to observe the trends over time.
“You need several decades to get a handle on these trends and isolate what’s happening due to greenhouse gas emissions, solar cycle changes, and other effects,” said Scott Bailey, an atmospheric scientist at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, and lead of the study, published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. “We had to put together three satellites’ worth of data.”
Together, the satellites provided about 30 years of observations, indicating that the summer mesosphere over Earth’s poles is cooling four to five degrees Fahrenheit and contracting 500 to 650 feet per decade. Without changes in human carbon dioxide emissions, the researchers expect these rates to continue.

Credits: NASA/HU/VT/CU-LASP/AIM/Joy Ng
Since the mesosphere is much thinner than the part of the atmosphere we live in, the impacts of increasing greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, differ from the warming we experience at the surface. One researcher compared where we live, the troposphere, to a thick quilt.
“Down near Earth’s surface, the atmosphere is thick,” said James Russell, a study co-author and atmospheric scientist at Hampton University in Virginia. “Carbon dioxide traps heat just like a quilt traps your body heat and keeps you warm.” In the lower atmosphere, there are plenty of molecules in close proximity, and they easily trap and transfer Earth’s heat between each other, maintaining that quilt-like warmth.
That means little of Earth’s heat makes it to the higher, thinner mesosphere. There, molecules are few and far between. Since carbon dioxide also efficiently emits heat, any heat captured by carbon dioxide sooner escapes to space than it finds another molecule to absorb it. As a result, an increase in greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide means more heat is lost to space — and the upper atmosphere cools. When air cools, it contracts, the same way a balloon shrinks if you put it in the freezer.
This cooling and contracting didn’t come as a surprise. For years, “models have been showing this effect,” said Brentha Thurairajah, a Virginia Tech atmospheric scientist who contributed to the study. “It would have been weirder if our analysis of the data didn’t show this.”
While previous studies have observed this cooling, none have used a data record of this length or shown the upper atmosphere contracting. The researchers say these new results boost their confidence in our ability to model the upper atmosphere’s complicated changes.The team analyzed how temperature and pressure changed over 29 years, using all three data sets, which covered the summer skies of the North and South Poles. They examined the stretch of sky 30 to 60 miles above the surface. At most altitudes, the mesosphere cooled as carbon dioxide increased. That effect meant the height of any given atmospheric pressure fell as the air cooled. In other words, the mesosphere was contracting.
Earth’s Middle Atmosphere
Though what happens in the mesosphere does not directly impact humans, the region is an important one. The upper boundary of the mesosphere, about 50 miles above Earth, is where the coolest atmospheric temperatures are found. It’s also where the neutral atmosphere begins transitioning to the tenuous, electrically charged gases of the ionosphere.

Explore an expanded version of this infographic.
Even higher up, 150 miles above the surface, atmospheric gases cause satellite drag, the friction that tugs satellites out of orbit. Satellite drag also helps clear space junk. When the mesosphere contracts, the rest of the upper atmosphere above sinks with it. As the atmosphere contracts, satellite drag may wane — interfering less with operating satellites, but also leaving more space junk in low-Earth orbit.
The mesosphere is also known for its brilliant blue ice clouds. They’re called noctilucent or polar mesospheric clouds, so named because they live in the mesosphere and tend to huddle around the North and South Poles. The clouds form in summer, when the mesosphere has all three ingredients to produce the clouds: water vapor, very cold temperatures, and dust from meteors that burn up in this part of the atmosphere. Noctilucent clouds were spotted over northern Canada on May 20, kicking off the start of the Northern Hemisphere’s noctilucent cloud season.
Because the clouds are sensitive to temperature and water vapor, they’re a useful signal of change in the mesosphere. “We understand the physics of these clouds,” Bailey said. In recent decades, the clouds have drawn scientists’ attention because they’re behaving oddly. They’re getting brighter, drifting farther from the poles, and appearing earlier than usual. And, there seem to be more of them than in years past.
“The only way you would expect them to change this way is if the temperature is getting colder and water vapor is increasing,” Russell said. Colder temperatures and abundant water vapor are both linked with climate change in the upper atmosphere.
Currently, Russell serves as principal investigator for AIM, short for Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere, the newest satellite of the three that contributed data to the study. Russell has served as a leader on all three NASA missions: AIM, the instrument SABER on TIMED (Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics), and the instrument HALOE on the since-retired UARS (Upper Atmospherics Research Satellite).
TIMED and AIM launched in 2001 and 2007, respectively, and both are still operating. The UARS mission ran from 1991 to 2005. “I always had in my mind that we would be able to put them together in a long-term change study,” Russell said. The study, he said, demonstrates the importance of long-term, space-based observations across the globe.
In the future, the researchers expect more striking displays of noctilucent clouds that stray farther from the poles. Because this analysis focused on the poles at summertime, Bailey said he plans to examine these effects over longer periods of time and — following the clouds — study a wider stretch of the atmosphere.
By Lina Tran
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, Md.
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2021
Editor: Lina Tran
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I thought the models indicated an upper tropospheric hotspot that hasn’t been found? So now we have a cold spot?
The first diagram here looks like hotspots to me and not just one of them
TRANS EQUATORIAL RADIO PROPAGATION
SWS – Other Topics – Transequatorial Radio Propagation (bom.gov.au)
Climate change is being promoted to coverup what is really going on.
19680002906.pdf (nasa.gov)
Barium
Tracers – Clouds and Trails | NASA
Barium Salts and Chemtrails
Barium
Chemtrails and Barium Salts – Chemtrails Spraying and Barium Salts – BARIUM SALTS Chemtrail Information – Stop Chemtrail Spraying in California! (stopsprayingcalifornia.com)
adding heat energy to an open system causes gas to contract.. right
whoever wrote that should be on criminal charges
Chart for
CO2 at 80, 90 and 100km
http://saber.gats-inc.com/images/wn_0315_2.png
The article from the paper
http://saber.gats-inc.com/news.php
Currently the total of CO2, CH4 and N2O = 560 ppm. We are there at the doubling.
Lets celebrate.
Oh no, the atmosphere is contracting. It’s an emergency! When are we going to run out of air?
Every time data, usually from a new sensor application, is introduced someone tries to explain it. Usually that explanation is nothing more than theory and such is the case here.
Quantum Mechanics and Raman Spectroscopy Refute Greenhouse Theory
Blair D. Macdonald
https://principia-scientific.org/publications/PROM/PROM-Macdonald-Quantum-Raman-Atmosphere.pdf
N2 and the entire atmosphere absorbs IR
radiation directly from the Sun and other matter. With these findings,
greenhouse theory as it stands is misconceived – all gases are greenhouse gases
– and the theory is in need of review.
Thanks for the link PR. I hadn’t seen this before. It sure does
raise some interesting questions about the physics of the climate models.
This posting presents a good opportunity to ask abut something that has bothered me for some time; a good opportunity to parade my ignorance.
Start with something much denser: water. Sunlight penetrates water, depending upon what is suspended in the water, at least as much as 100 meters if I remember correctly. While more and more of the energy is absorbed as depth increases, what penetrates the furthest is the shortest wave lengths, the most energetic part of the spectrum: the UV that makes it through the atmosphere to the water.
On the other hand, the even shorter wave length, even more energetic UV is almost entirely absorbed in the least dense part of the upper atmosphere. Up there, molecules tend to be relatively far apart. For most human purposes it qualifies as a good vacuum. So how is it these few molecules, so thinly distributed, are able to gobble up all the good UVC while letting the more casual UVA slip by? Somehow this seem not very consistent with CO2 molecules are far apart up there so the lumbering, long wave IR gets through with little interference.
What causes auroras? | HowStuffWorks
This relates to how lower frequencies of UV reach deep into the oceans while higher frequencies of UV are all absorbed in very tenuous atmosphere? I don’t see any connection.
Article on atmosphere size and the mesosphere with no mention of the solar cycle? No mention of solar wind? Utter laughable junk. Do these bimbos imagine that such politically inconvenient phenomena just disappear if they are not mentioned? You can do that to people, but not the universe or reality.
It is mentioned…several times actually. In fact, the first mention is right there in the introduction at section 1, paragraph 3, line 12. Hervig 2019 and Li 2020 are references that specifically focus on the solar cycle and its effects on the mesosphere.
I was referring to the journalist’s homily, not the paper. The homily mentions greenhouse warming in practically every paragraph. But the solar cycle or even the words “solar” or “sun” or “sunspot” – not once.
It’s the SUN stupid.
[[Since the mesosphere is much thinner than the part of the atmosphere we live in, the impacts of increasing greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, differ from the warming we experience at the surface. One researcher compared where we live, the troposphere, to a thick quilt.
“Down near Earth’s surface, the atmosphere is thick,” said James Russell, a study co-author and atmospheric scientist at Hampton University in Virginia. “Carbon dioxide traps heat just like a quilt traps your body heat and keeps you warm.” In the lower atmosphere, there are plenty of molecules in close proximity, and they easily trap and transfer Earth’s heat between each other, maintaining that quilt-like warmth.
That means little of Earth’s heat makes it to the higher, thinner mesosphere. There, molecules are few and far between. Since carbon dioxide also efficiently emits heat, any heat captured by carbon dioxide sooner escapes to space than it finds another molecule to absorb it. As a result, an increase in greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide means more heat is lost to space — and the upper atmosphere cools. When air cools, it contracts, the same way a balloon shrinks if you put it in the freezer.]]
Like the fabled Devil, the IPCC lie machine knows it’s in its last days and is stirring up great trouble while it can keep stealing trillions. It just can’t give up their big CO2 global warming fake physics hoax while the cash registers are ringing.This time it’s trying to claim that cooling is proof of warming, but not at the surface where all weather is, but way up 30 mi. (48 km) high.
CO2 molecules easily trap and transfer Earth’s heat between each other to maintain quilt-like warmth? An ice quilt maybe. They do nothing to change Earth’s atmospheric lapse rate, which drops the Earth’s surface temperature by 80C (20C to -60C) in the first 14 km (8 mi.) of altitude. By only 4 km altitude air temperatures drop to 0C, despite CO2. What universe does the IPCC live in?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/adiabatic-lapse-rate
For the umpteenth time, CO2 doesn’t absorb, store, or emit heat. Its only infrared absorption/emission wavelength is 15 microns, which has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice, and is way outside Earth’s surface temperature range of -50C to +50C,meaning that each day Earth’s real surface heat radiation travels right through it untouched.Only the Sun’s radiation warms the Earth’s surface, and the atmosphere just cools it by several processes including radiation, evaporation, and convection, none of which can rewarm it, much less raise the temperature higher than the Sun did. All real weather is at the surface where we live, not way up in the sky where we don’t. How desperate the IPCC has become to keep scaring people into accepting being robbed.
-80C is a joke to call heat. Why doesn’t the giant army of well-paid IPCC so-called climate scientists address this little problem? Because it spells the end of their careers and of their trillion dollar power grab. So many big plans built on a hoax, what a bold Marxist swindle.Hardcore Marxists always have pushed any hoax if it advances their political ambitions. Too bad, with help of Big Tech shadow banning, they’re winning walking away with their swindle by feeding their herds of useful idiots ridiculous lies like this one while muting critics.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-concentration-of-CO2-in-the-atmosphere-when-it-becomes-saturated-and-adding-more-CO2-would-have-no-additional-effect-on-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
Here’s why co2 is the boooogyman, first you have to put the pieces together.
anything above VHF frequencies is a problem for CO2 UHF is the starting point for millimeter waves 1m-0.1mm
Radio spectrum – Wikipedia
Impact on birds
Radioactive Pollution: Ionizing & Non-Ionizing Radiation | PMF IAS
Is this just coincidental or is there a reason the temperature of the tropopause (Earths first electromagnetic field line) over the equator is close to the same temperature at which CO2 freezes.
Tropopause (code7700.com)
At What Temperature Does CO2 Freeze? – YouTube
At all heights above the emission level, CO2 cools the atmosphere as the data show.
Over these altitudes CO2 also contributes to IR albedo. Incoming solar IR is re-radiated back to space by CO2. So rising CO2 slightly increases global albedo (the IR part) and decreases total incoming solar energy.
I think this article was originally published in The Onion.
Yay! The Warmists got a prediction right.
At last.
Upper atmosphere cooling by CO2 is a thing on Venus also:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/95RG00118
Benestad 2016 in a statement of the greenhouse effect says that:
The reason is that an increase in ZT 254K [the emission height] will lead to a warming at the surface as long as the lapse-rate γ is approximately constant.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00704-016-1732-y.pdf
But if the CO2-IR effect is to make the lower atmosphere (below emission height) warmer and the upper atmosphere cooler then – that assumption is destroyed. The lapse rate has been increased.
Something is wrong.
The GHE predicted respond to elevated emission level is the opposite – a warming of the newly raised emission height to restore radiative balance which represents a reduction, not increase, in the lapse rate.
There’s another big factor here that we are not seeing.