Claim: NASA Satellites See Upper Atmosphere Cooling and Contracting Due to Climate Change

From NASA

Jun 30, 2021

The sky isn’t falling, but scientists have found that parts of the upper atmosphere are gradually contracting in response to rising human-made greenhouse gas emissions.

Combined data from three NASA satellites have produced a long-term record that reveals the mesosphere, the layer of the atmosphere 30 to 50 miles above the surface, is cooling and contracting. Scientists have long predicted this effect of human-driven climate change, but it has been difficult to observe the trends over time.

“You need several decades to get a handle on these trends and isolate what’s happening due to greenhouse gas emissions, solar cycle changes, and other effects,” said Scott Bailey, an atmospheric scientist at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, and lead of the study, published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. “We had to put together three satellites’ worth of data.”

Together, the satellites provided about 30 years of observations, indicating that the summer mesosphere over Earth’s poles is cooling four to five degrees Fahrenheit and contracting 500 to 650 feet per decade. Without changes in human carbon dioxide emissions, the researchers expect these rates to continue.

Moving satellite images show electric blue and white clouds swirling around a top-down view of the North Pole.
These AIM images span June 6-June 18, 2021, when the Northern Hemisphere noctilucent cloud season was well underway. The colors — from dark blue to light blue and bright white — indicate the clouds’ albedo, which refers to the amount of light that a surface reflects compared to the total sunlight that falls upon it. Things that have a high albedo are bright and reflect a lot of light. Things that don’t reflect much light have a low albedo, and they are dark.
Credits: NASA/HU/VT/CU-LASP/AIM/Joy Ng

Since the mesosphere is much thinner than the part of the atmosphere we live in, the impacts of increasing greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, differ from the warming we experience at the surface. One researcher compared where we live, the troposphere, to a thick quilt.

“Down near Earth’s surface, the atmosphere is thick,” said James Russell, a study co-author and atmospheric scientist at Hampton University in Virginia. “Carbon dioxide traps heat just like a quilt traps your body heat and keeps you warm.” In the lower atmosphere, there are plenty of molecules in close proximity, and they easily trap and transfer Earth’s heat between each other, maintaining that quilt-like warmth.

That means little of Earth’s heat makes it to the higher, thinner mesosphere. There, molecules are few and far between. Since carbon dioxide also efficiently emits heat, any heat captured by carbon dioxide sooner escapes to space than it finds another molecule to absorb it. As a result, an increase in greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide means more heat is lost to space — and the upper atmosphere cools. When air cools, it contracts, the same way a balloon shrinks if you put it in the freezer.

This cooling and contracting didn’t come as a surprise. For years, “models have been showing this effect,” said Brentha Thurairajah, a Virginia Tech atmospheric scientist who contributed to the study. “It would have been weirder if our analysis of the data didn’t show this.”

While previous studies have observed this cooling, none have used a data record of this length or shown the upper atmosphere contracting. The researchers say these new results boost their confidence in our ability to model the upper atmosphere’s complicated changes.The team analyzed how temperature and pressure changed over 29 years, using all three data sets, which covered the summer skies of the North and South Poles. They examined the stretch of sky 30 to 60 miles above the surface. At most altitudes, the mesosphere cooled as carbon dioxide increased. That effect meant the height of any given atmospheric pressure fell as the air cooled. In other words, the mesosphere was contracting.

Earth’s Middle Atmosphere

Though what happens in the mesosphere does not directly impact humans, the region is an important one. The upper boundary of the mesosphere, about 50 miles above Earth, is where the coolest atmospheric temperatures are found. It’s also where the neutral atmosphere begins transitioning to the tenuous, electrically charged gases of the ionosphere.

The layers of the atmosphere
This infographic outlines the layers of Earth’s atmosphere. Click to explore in full size.Credits: NASA
Explore an expanded version of this infographic.

Even higher up, 150 miles above the surface, atmospheric gases cause satellite drag, the friction that tugs satellites out of orbit. Satellite drag also helps clear space junk. When the mesosphere contracts, the rest of the upper atmosphere above sinks with it. As the atmosphere contracts, satellite drag may wane — interfering less with operating satellites, but also leaving more space junk in low-Earth orbit.

The mesosphere is also known for its brilliant blue ice clouds. They’re called noctilucent or polar mesospheric clouds, so named because they live in the mesosphere and tend to huddle around the North and South Poles. The clouds form in summer, when the mesosphere has all three ingredients to produce the clouds: water vapor, very cold temperatures, and dust from meteors that burn up in this part of the atmosphere. Noctilucent clouds were spotted over northern Canada on May 20, kicking off the start of the Northern Hemisphere’s noctilucent cloud season.

Because the clouds are sensitive to temperature and water vapor, they’re a useful signal of change in the mesosphere. “We understand the physics of these clouds,” Bailey said. In recent decades, the clouds have drawn scientists’ attention because they’re behaving oddly. They’re getting brighter, drifting farther from the poles, and appearing earlier than usual. And, there seem to be more of them than in years past.

“The only way you would expect them to change this way is if the temperature is getting colder and water vapor is increasing,” Russell said. Colder temperatures and abundant water vapor are both linked with climate change in the upper atmosphere.

Currently, Russell serves as principal investigator for AIM, short for Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere, the newest satellite of the three that contributed data to the study. Russell has served as a leader on all three NASA missions: AIM, the instrument SABER on TIMED (Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics), and the instrument HALOE on the since-retired UARS (Upper Atmospherics Research Satellite).

TIMED and AIM launched in 2001 and 2007, respectively, and both are still operating. The UARS mission ran from 1991 to 2005. “I always had in my mind that we would be able to put them together in a long-term change study,” Russell said. The study, he said, demonstrates the importance of long-term, space-based observations across the globe.

In the future, the researchers expect more striking displays of noctilucent clouds that stray farther from the poles. Because this analysis focused on the poles at summertime, Bailey said he plans to examine these effects over longer periods of time and — following the clouds — study a wider stretch of the atmosphere.


By Lina Tran
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
,

Greenbelt, Md.

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2021

Editor: Lina Tran

2.6 21 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

165 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robber
July 1, 2021 2:28 pm

I thought the models indicated an upper tropospheric hotspot that hasn’t been found? So now we have a cold spot?

jmorpuss
Reply to  Robber
July 3, 2021 3:18 am

The first diagram here looks like hotspots to me and not just one of them

TRANS EQUATORIAL RADIO PROPAGATION
SWS – Other Topics – Transequatorial Radio Propagation (bom.gov.au)

jmorpuss
July 1, 2021 5:07 pm

Climate change is being promoted to coverup what is really going on.

Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences —- PRESENT AND FUTURE PLANS OF FEDERAL AGENCIES IN W EATHER-CLIMATE MODIFICATION June 20, 1966 Prepared by the ICAS Select Panel on Weather Modification

This report was prepared by the ICAS Select Panel on Weather modification for consideration by the Interdepar-tanental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences as requested by the Chairman at the ky 13, 1966, meeting. summary of the goals, program approach and facilities of the Federal Departments and Agencies engaged in weather and climate modification activities for FY 1967 and FY 1970. A brief summary statement by each Department or Agency is also included to supplement the budgetary material. It presents a budget Attention is invited to the following points of interest illustrated by the matrix presentation. 1. The primary emphasis of the Federal goals in weather modification appears to be in the category of precipitation modification. FY 1967 FY 1970 $4.70 million out of $9.33 million total ‘$99.60 million out of $146.83 million total 2. The largest percentage and over-all increases from FY 1967 to FY 1970 in weather modification are planned by ESSA and the Bureair of Reclamation. ESSA – $1.55 million in 1967 to $59.70 million Bureau of Reclamation – $3.00 million in 1967 in 1970 60 $70.00 million in 1970 3. The .Department of Agriculture is planning to support a reasonably broad-based weather modification program by FY 1970 (from ‘$0.5 million to $9.35 million) expanding into hail suppression, biological aspects, and boundary layer exchange. 4. The Department of Defense is holding level and will not expand significantly unless a mission breakthrough is ‘imminent. 5. Field experiments show as one would expect–very expensive. /–c &&..A /.j 9 ~(/L+–+ /* 4-LEarl G. Droessler Chairman, ICAS Select Panel on Weather Modification . June 20, 1966 

19680002906.pdf (nasa.gov)

Barium

Barium is used to study the motion of both ions and neutrals in space. A fraction of a barium cloud ionizes quickly when exposed to sunlight and has a purple-red color. Its motions can be used to track the motion of the charged particles in the ionosphere. The remainder of the barium release is neutral, having a different color, and can be used to track the motion of the neutral particles in the upper atmosphere. A small quantity of strontium or lithium is sometimes added to the barium mixture to enhance the neutral barium emissions, making it easier to track the neutral cloud. Since the observer must be in darkness while the barium cloud is in sunlight, the technique is limited to local time observations near sunset or sunrise.

Tracers – Clouds and Trails | NASA

Barium Salts and Chemtrails
Barium

Barium levels found in chemtrail samples were at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.”Barium is toxic to humans and animals and causes a dramatic drop in potassium levels in the body. For this reason (and others), barium is known to considerably increase the frequency of heart attacks in persons 65 years and older.

Barium can be compared to the toxicity of arsenic. Barium is known to adversely affect the heart. Aluminum has a history of damaging brain function. Independent researchers and labs continue to show off-the-scale levels of these poisons. A few “anonymous” officials have acknowledged this on-going aerosol spraying.

Barium is toxic to humans and animals and causes a dramatic drop in potassium levels in the body. For this reason (and others), barium is

known to considerably increase the frequency of heart attacks in persons 65 years and older

Chemtrails and Barium Salts – Chemtrails Spraying and Barium Salts – BARIUM SALTS Chemtrail Information – Stop Chemtrail Spraying in California! (stopsprayingcalifornia.com)

Prjindigo
July 1, 2021 5:55 pm

adding heat energy to an open system causes gas to contract.. right

whoever wrote that should be on criminal charges

July 1, 2021 6:00 pm

Chart for
CO2 at 80, 90 and 100km
http://saber.gats-inc.com/images/wn_0315_2.png
The article from the paper
http://saber.gats-inc.com/news.php

Currently the total of CO2, CH4 and N2O = 560 ppm. We are there at the doubling.
Lets celebrate.

Robber
July 1, 2021 7:20 pm

Oh no, the atmosphere is contracting. It’s an emergency! When are we going to run out of air?

markl
July 1, 2021 8:19 pm

Every time data, usually from a new sensor application, is introduced someone tries to explain it. Usually that explanation is nothing more than theory and such is the case here.

Paul Redfern
July 1, 2021 9:03 pm

Quantum Mechanics and Raman Spectroscopy Refute Greenhouse Theory
Blair D. Macdonald
https://principia-scientific.org/publications/PROM/PROM-Macdonald-Quantum-Raman-Atmosphere.pdf

N2 and the entire atmosphere absorbs IR
radiation directly from the Sun and other matter. With these findings,
greenhouse theory as it stands is misconceived – all gases are greenhouse gases
– and the theory is in need of review.

Reply to  Paul Redfern
July 4, 2021 8:09 am

Thanks for the link PR. I hadn’t seen this before. It sure does
raise some interesting questions about the physics of the climate models.

July 1, 2021 11:05 pm

This posting presents a good opportunity to ask abut something that has bothered me for some time; a good opportunity to parade my ignorance.

Start with something much denser: water. Sunlight penetrates water, depending upon what is suspended in the water, at least as much as 100 meters if I remember correctly. While more and more of the energy is absorbed as depth increases, what penetrates the furthest is the shortest wave lengths, the most energetic part of the spectrum: the UV that makes it through the atmosphere to the water.

On the other hand, the even shorter wave length, even more energetic UV is almost entirely absorbed in the least dense part of the upper atmosphere. Up there, molecules tend to be relatively far apart. For most human purposes it qualifies as a good vacuum. So how is it these few molecules, so thinly distributed, are able to gobble up all the good UVC while letting the more casual UVA slip by? Somehow this seem not very consistent with CO2 molecules are far apart up there so the lumbering, long wave IR gets through with little interference.

jmorpuss
Reply to  AndyHce
July 2, 2021 4:05 am

As the charged particles of solar winds and flares hit the Earth’s magnetic field, they travel along the field lines.Some particles get deflected around the Earth, while others interact with the magnetic field lines, causing currents of charged particles within the magnetic fields to travel toward both poles — this is why there are simultaneous auroras in both hemispheres. (These currents are called Birkeland currents after Kristian Birkeland, the Norwegian physicist who discovered them — see sidebar.)When an electric charge cuts across a magnetic field it generates an electric current (see How Electricity Works). As these currents descend into the atmosphere along the field lines, they pick up more energy.When they hit the ionosphere region of the Earth’s upper atmosphere, they collide with ions of oxygen and nitrogen.The particles impact the oxygen and nitrogen ions and transfer their energy to these ions.The absorption of energy by oxygen and nitrogen ions causes electrons within them to become “excited” and move from low-energy to high-energy orbitals (see How Atoms Work).When the excited ions relax, the electrons in the oxygen and nitrogen atoms return to their original orbitals. In the process, they re-radiate the energy in the form of light. This light makes up the aurora, and the different colors come from light radiated from different ions.

What causes auroras? | HowStuffWorks

Reply to  jmorpuss
July 4, 2021 11:34 am

This relates to how lower frequencies of UV reach deep into the oceans while higher frequencies of UV are all absorbed in very tenuous atmosphere? I don’t see any connection.

July 2, 2021 12:02 am

Article on atmosphere size and the mesosphere with no mention of the solar cycle? No mention of solar wind? Utter laughable junk. Do these bimbos imagine that such politically inconvenient phenomena just disappear if they are not mentioned? You can do that to people, but not the universe or reality.

bdgwx
Reply to  Hatter Eggburn
July 2, 2021 10:01 am

It is mentioned…several times actually. In fact, the first mention is right there in the introduction at section 1, paragraph 3, line 12. Hervig 2019 and Li 2020 are references that specifically focus on the solar cycle and its effects on the mesosphere.

Reply to  bdgwx
July 2, 2021 11:37 am

I was referring to the journalist’s homily, not the paper. The homily mentions greenhouse warming in practically every paragraph. But the solar cycle or even the words “solar” or “sun” or “sunspot” – not once.

Olavi Vulkko
July 2, 2021 5:38 am

It’s the SUN stupid.

July 2, 2021 9:32 am

[[Since the mesosphere is much thinner than the part of the atmosphere we live in, the impacts of increasing greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, differ from the warming we experience at the surface. One researcher compared where we live, the troposphere, to a thick quilt.
“Down near Earth’s surface, the atmosphere is thick,” said James Russell, a study co-author and atmospheric scientist at Hampton University in Virginia. “Carbon dioxide traps heat just like a quilt traps your body heat and keeps you warm.” In the lower atmosphere, there are plenty of molecules in close proximity, and they easily trap and transfer Earth’s heat between each other, maintaining that quilt-like warmth.
That means little of Earth’s heat makes it to the higher, thinner mesosphere. There, molecules are few and far between. Since carbon dioxide also efficiently emits heat, any heat captured by carbon dioxide sooner escapes to space than it finds another molecule to absorb it. As a result, an increase in greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide means more heat is lost to space — and the upper atmosphere cools. When air cools, it contracts, the same way a balloon shrinks if you put it in the freezer.]]

Like the fabled Devil, the IPCC lie machine knows it’s in its last days and is stirring up great trouble while it can keep stealing trillions. It just can’t give up their big CO2 global warming fake physics hoax while the cash registers are ringing.This time it’s trying to claim that cooling is proof of warming, but not at the surface where all weather is, but way up 30 mi. (48 km) high.

CO2 molecules easily trap and transfer Earth’s heat between each other to maintain quilt-like warmth? An ice quilt maybe. They do nothing to change Earth’s atmospheric lapse rate, which drops the Earth’s surface temperature by 80C (20C to -60C) in the first 14 km (8 mi.) of altitude. By only 4 km altitude air temperatures drop to 0C, despite CO2. What universe does the IPCC live in?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/adiabatic-lapse-rate

For the umpteenth time, CO2 doesn’t absorb, store, or emit heat. Its only infrared absorption/emission wavelength is 15 microns, which has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice, and is way outside Earth’s surface temperature range of -50C to +50C,meaning that each day Earth’s real surface heat radiation travels right through it untouched.Only the Sun’s radiation warms the Earth’s surface, and the atmosphere just cools it by several processes including radiation, evaporation, and convection, none of which can rewarm it, much less raise the temperature higher than the Sun did. All real weather is at the surface where we live, not way up in the sky where we don’t. How desperate the IPCC has become to keep scaring people into accepting being robbed.

-80C is a joke to call heat. Why doesn’t the giant army of well-paid IPCC so-called climate scientists address this little problem? Because it spells the end of their careers and of their trillion dollar power grab. So many big plans built on a hoax, what a bold Marxist swindle.Hardcore Marxists always have pushed any hoax if it advances their political ambitions. Too bad, with help of Big Tech shadow banning, they’re winning walking away with their swindle by feeding their herds of useful idiots ridiculous lies like this one while muting critics.

http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-concentration-of-CO2-in-the-atmosphere-when-it-becomes-saturated-and-adding-more-CO2-would-have-no-additional-effect-on-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow

jmorpuss
Reply to  TL Winslow
July 2, 2021 4:53 pm

For the umpteenth time, CO2 doesn’t absorb, store, or emit heat. Its only infrared absorption/emission wavelength is 15 microns,

Here’s why co2 is the boooogyman, first you have to put the pieces together.

Consider the CO2 molecule ( Figure 7-10 ). Its vibrational state is defined by a combination of three normal vibrational modes and by a quantized energy level within each mode. Vibrational transitions involve changes in the energy level (vibrational amplitude) of one of the normal modes (or rarely of a combination of normal modes). In the “symmetric stretch” mode the CO2 molecule has no dipole moment, since the distribution of charges is perfectly symmetric; transition to a higher energy level of that mode does not change the dipole moment of the molecule and is therefore forbidden. Changes in energy levels for the two other, asymmetric, modes change the dipole moment of the molecule and are therefore allowed. In this manner, CO2 has absorption lines in the near-IR. Contrast the case of N2 ( Figure 7-10 ). The N2 molecule has a uniform distribution of charge and its only vibrational mode is the symmetric stretch. Transitions within this mode are forbidden, and as a result the N2 molecule does not absorb in the near-IR.


anything above VHF frequencies is a problem for CO2 UHF is the starting point for millimeter waves 1m-0.1mm
Radio spectrum – Wikipedia

Health Impacts

  • Every antenna on cell phone tower radiates electromagnetic radiation (power).
  • One cell phone tower is being used by a number of operators, more the number of antennas more is the power intensity in the nearby area.
  • The power level near towers is higher and reduces as we move away.
  • EMR may cause cellular and psychological changes in human beings due to thermal effects that are generated due to the absorption of microwave radiation.
  • The exposure can lead to genetic defects, effects on reproduction and development, Central Nervous System behaviour etc.
  • EMR can also cause non-thermal effects which are caused by radio frequency fields at levels too low to produce significant heating and are due to movement of calcium and other ions across cell membranes.
  • Such exposure is known to be responsible for fatigue, nausea, irritability, headaches, loss of appetite and other psychological disorders.
  • The current exposure safety standards are purely based on the thermal effects considering few pieces of evidence from exposure to non-thermal effects.

Impact on birds

  • The surface area of a bird is relatively larger than their body weight in comparison to the human body, so they absorb more radiation.
  • Also, the fluid contained in the body of the bird is less due to small body weight, so it gets heated up very fast.
  • The magnetic field from the towers disturbs birds’ navigation skills; hence when birds are exposed to EMR they disorient and begin to fly in all directions.
  • A large number of birds die each year from collisions with telecommunication masts.

Radioactive Pollution: Ionizing & Non-Ionizing Radiation | PMF IAS

jmorpuss
Reply to  TL Winslow
July 2, 2021 10:17 pm

Is this just coincidental or is there a reason the temperature of the tropopause (Earths first electromagnetic field line) over the equator is close to the same temperature at which CO2 freezes.

Typically, the tropopause temperature is -50°C over the poles and –80°C over the equator. Another feature of the tropopause is that, rather than show a gradual change in height between the equator and the poles, there are breaks in the tropopause where large temperature differentials occur.

Tropopause (code7700.com)

At What Temperature Does CO2 Freeze?. Part of the series: Chemistry & Biology. CO2, or carbon dioxide, will freeze at -78 degrees Celsius at normal pressure…

At What Temperature Does CO2 Freeze? – YouTube

July 2, 2021 10:18 am

At all heights above the emission level, CO2 cools the atmosphere as the data show.

Over these altitudes CO2 also contributes to IR albedo. Incoming solar IR is re-radiated back to space by CO2. So rising CO2 slightly increases global albedo (the IR part) and decreases total incoming solar energy.

Josh
July 2, 2021 2:08 pm

I think this article was originally published in The Onion.

RoHa
July 2, 2021 10:06 pm

Yay! The Warmists got a prediction right.

At last.

July 4, 2021 4:03 am

Upper atmosphere cooling by CO2 is a thing on Venus also:

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/95RG00118

July 4, 2021 4:46 am

Benestad 2016 in a statement of the greenhouse effect says that:

The reason is that an increase in ZT 254K [the emission height] will lead to a warming at the surface as long as the lapse-rate γ is approximately constant.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00704-016-1732-y.pdf

But if the CO2-IR effect is to make the lower atmosphere (below emission height) warmer and the upper atmosphere cooler then – that assumption is destroyed. The lapse rate has been increased.

Something is wrong.

The GHE predicted respond to elevated emission level is the opposite – a warming of the newly raised emission height to restore radiative balance which represents a reduction, not increase, in the lapse rate.

There’s another big factor here that we are not seeing.

Verified by MonsterInsights