Earth is on a budget – an energy budget. Our planet is constantly trying to balance the flow of energy in and out of Earth’s system. But human activities are throwing that off balance, causing our planet to warm in response.
Radiative energy enters Earth’s system from the sunlight that shines on our planet. Some of this energy reflects off of Earth’s surface or atmosphere back into space. The rest gets absorbed, heats the planet, and is then emitted as thermal radiative energy the same way that black asphalt gets hot and radiates heat on a sunny day. Eventually this energy also heads toward space, but some of it gets re-absorbed by clouds and greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The absorbed energy may also be emitted back toward Earth, where it will warm the surface even more.
Adding more components that absorb radiation – like greenhouse gases – or removing those that reflect it – like aerosols – throws off Earth’s energy balance, and causes more energy to be absorbed by Earth instead of escaping into space. This is called a radiative forcing, and it’s the dominant way human activities are affecting the climate.
A simplified animation of Earth’s planetary energy balance: A planet’s energy budget is balanced between incoming (yellow) and outgoing radiation (red). On Earth, natural and human-caused processes affect the amount of energy received as well as emitted back to space. This study filters out variations in Earth’s energy budget due to feedback processes, revealing the energy changes caused by aerosols and greenhouse gas emissions.Credits: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image LabDownload the panels in this GIF from NASA Goddard’s Scientific Visualization Studio
Climate modelling predicts that human activities are causing the release of greenhouse gases and aerosols that are affecting Earth’s energy budget. Now, a NASA study has confirmed these predictions with direct observations for the first time: radiative forcings are increasing due to human actions, affecting the planet’s energy balance and ultimately causing climate change. The paper was published online March 25, 2021, in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
“This is the first calculation of the total radiative forcing of Earth using global observations, accounting for the effects of aerosols and greenhouse gases,” said Ryan Kramer, first author on the paper and a researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. “It’s direct evidence that human activities are causing changes to Earth’s energy budget.”
NASA’s Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project studies the flow of radiation at the top of Earth’s atmosphere. A series of CERES instruments have continuously flown on satellites since 1997. Each measures how much energy enters Earth’s system and how much leaves, giving the overall net change in radiation. That data, in combination with other data sources such as ocean heat measurements, shows that there’s an energy imbalance on our planet.
“But it doesn’t tell us what factors are causing changes in the energy balance,” said Kramer.

Other satellites and instruments – like CERES – monitor incoming energy from the Sun and energy that is emitted back into space.Credits: NASA’s Scientific Visualization StudioDownload this image from NASA Goddard’s Scientific Visualization Studio
This study used a new technique to parse out how much of the total energy change is caused by humans. The researchers calculated how much of the imbalance was caused by fluctuations in factors that are often naturally occurring, such as water vapor, clouds, temperature and surface albedo (essentially the brightness or reflectivity of Earth’s surface). For example, the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) instrument on NASA’s Aqua satellite measures water vapor in Earth’s atmosphere. Water vapor absorbs energy in the form of heat, so changes in water vapor will affect how much energy ultimately leaves Earth’s system. The researchers calculated the energy change caused by each of these natural factors, then subtracted the values from the total. The portion leftover is the radiative forcing.
The team found that human activities have caused the radiative forcing on Earth to increase by about 0.5 Watts per square meter from 2003 to 2018. The increase is mostly from greenhouse gases emissions from things like power generation, transport and industrial manufacturing. Reduced reflective aerosols are also contributing to the imbalance.
The new technique is computationally faster than previous model-based methods, allowing researchers to monitor radiative forcing in almost real time. The method could be used to track how human emissions are affecting the climate, monitor how well various mitigation efforts are working, and evaluate models to predict future changes to the climate.
“Creating a direct record of radiative forcing calculated from observations will allow us to evaluate how well climate models can simulate these forcings,” said Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) in New York City. “This will allow us to make more confident projections about how the climate will change in the future.”
Header image caption: A NASA supercomputer model shows how greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide (CO2) – a key driver of global warming – fluctuate in Earth’s atmosphere throughout the year. Higher concentrations are shown in red. Credits: NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio / NASA’s Global Modeling and Assimilation Office. Download this image from NASA Goddard’s Scientific Visualization Studio.
By Sofie Bates
NASA’s Earth Science News Team
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2021Editor: Sofie Bates
We have been ‘throwing off’ the energy budget of Earth for the last 8000 years or more by farming and probably megafauna hunting. If we had not done so, we would be in an ice age right now. I don’t see a problem. We are part of the world. Get used to it.
Hooray for the scourge and the plague?
+0.5W/m^2 is enough to throw an alarmist off balance?
I’m familiar with CERES. I read this doc recently:
“Despite recent improvements in satellite instrument calibration and the algorithms used to
determine SW and LW outgoing top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes, a sizeable imbalance
persists in the average global net radiation at the TOA from CERES satellite observations. With
the most recent CERES Edition4 Instrument calibration improvements, the SYN1deg_Edition4
net imbalance is ~4.3 W m-2
, much larger than the expected observed ocean heating rate ~0.71 W
m-2 (Johnson et al. 2016). This imbalance is problematic in applications that use Earth
Radiation Budget (ERB) data for climate model evaluation, estimations of the Earth’s annual
global mean energy budget, and studies that infer meridional heat transports.”
https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/documents/DQ_summaries/CERES_EBAF_Ed4.0_DQS.pdf
But Zoe, you haven’t applied “climate statistics™” to that data yet… 😉
Just decide what you want to find, and invent a new method..
For laughs, please read:
http://phzoe.com/2020/04/12/lunar-warming/
30 year trailing average of TSI.
.
I use 30 years because it is “climate” 😉
Data… Greg Kopp
.
A small meteor rock would kick up more moon dust than the moon landing astronauts did. !
Have they managed to prove that we also caused the Medieval Warm Period, the following Little Ice Age, and, of course, the current warming, and demonstrated that we are the reason why the current warming has not yet reached the warmth of 6,000 years ago?
Actual measurements/observations yielded less than model predictions.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.10605.pdf
RADIATIVE FORCING BY CO2 OBSERVED AT TOP OF ATMOSPHERE FROM 2002-2019A PREPRINT Chris Rentsch∗Midland, MI 48642rentcp@gmail.comNovember 5, 2020ABSTRACTSpectroscopic measurements at top of atmosphere are uniquely capable of attributing changes in Earth’s outgoing infrared radiation field to specific greenhouse gasses. The Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) placed in orbit in 2002 has spectroscopically resolved a portion of Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation for over 17 years. Concurrently, atmospheric CO2rose from 373 to 410 ppm, or28% of the total increase over pre-industrial levels. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) multi-model ensemble average predicts 0.477 Wm−2clear-sky longwave effective radiative forcing from this increase. Global measurements under nighttime, clear-sky conditions reveal 0.360±0.026 Wm−2of CO2-induced longwave radiative forcing, or 75±5% of model predictions
RADIATIVE FORCING BY CO2 OBSERVED AT TOP OF ATMOSPHERE FROM 2002-2019
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.10605.pdf
“The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report predicted 0.508±0.102 Wm−2RF resulting from this CO2 increase, 42% more forcing than actually observed. The lack of quantitative long-term global OLR studies may be permitting inaccu-racies to persist in general circulation model forecasts of the effects of rising CO2 or other greenhouse gasses.”
They got it wrong. CERES all sky data clearly shows earth LW radiation to space increasing by about a watt. This is the stuff CO2 is supposed to be decreasing. It also shows Increased solar SW absorption (not leaving by reflection) is driving the net reduction in energy to space called warming by about 1.5 watts. There’s their half a watt.