
This essay from director of NSIDC, Mark Serreze, is provided for reference. You may remember Serreze who once said “the Arctic is screaming” while botching and then backpedaling on claims of “ice free summers” on the near horizon for the Arctic that never happened. Give it all the consideration it is due. For some perspective, see my article on a previous 100 degree event above the Arctic circle over 100 years ago. By the way, with 24 hours daylight above the Arctic circle, and near 24 hour daylight in Siberia this time of year, (the first day of summer aka the summer solstice) is it any surprise it would get warm? – Anthony
100 degrees in Siberia? 5 ways the extreme Arctic heat wave follows a disturbing pattern
Mark Serreze, University of Colorado Boulder
The Arctic heat wave that sent Siberian temperatures soaring to around 100 degrees Fahrenheit on the first day of summer put an exclamation point on an astonishing transformation of the Arctic environment that’s been underway for about 30 years.
As long ago as the 1890s, scientists predicted that increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would lead to a warming planet, particularly in the Arctic, where the loss of reflective snow and sea ice would further warm the region. Climate models have consistently pointed to “Arctic amplification” emerging as greenhouse gas concentrations increase.
Well, Arctic amplification is now here in a big way. The Arctic is warming at roughly twice the rate of the globe as a whole. When extreme heat waves like this one strike, it stands out to everyone. Scientists are generally reluctant to say “We told you so,” but the record shows that we did.
As director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center and an Arctic climate scientist who first set foot in the far North in 1982, I’ve had a front-row seat to watch the transformation.
Arctic heat waves are happening more often – and getting stuck
Arctic heat waves now arrive on top of an already warmer planet, so they’re more frequent than they used to be.
Western Siberia recorded its hottest spring on record this year, according the EU’s Copernicus Earth Observation Program, and that unusual heat isn’t expected to end soon. The Arctic Climate Forum has forecast above-average temperatures across the majority of the Arctic through at least August.

Why is this heat wave sticking around? No one has a full answer yet, but we can look at the weather patterns around it.
As a rule, heat waves are related to unusual jet stream patterns, and the Siberian heat wave is no different. A persistent northward swing of the jet stream has placed the area under what meteorologists call a “ridge.” When the jet stream swings northward like this, it allows warmer air into the region, raising the surface temperature.
Some scientists expect rising global temperatures to influence the jet stream. The jet stream is driven by temperature contrasts. As the Arctic warms more quickly, these contrasts shrink, and the jet stream can slow.
Is that what we’re seeing right now? We don’t yet know.
Swiss cheese sea ice and feedback loops
We do know that we’re seeing significant effects from this heat wave, particularly in the early loss of sea ice.
The ice along the shores of Siberia has the appearance of Swiss cheese right now in satellite images, with big areas of open water that would normally still be covered. The sea ice extent in the Laptev Sea, north of Russia, is the lowest recorded for this time of year since satellite observations began.
The loss of sea ice also affects the temperature, creating a feedback loop. Earth’s ice and snow cover reflect the Sun’s incoming energy, helping to keep the region cool. When that reflective cover is gone, the dark ocean and land absorb the heat, further raising the surface temperature.
Sea surface temperatures are already unusually high along parts of the Siberian Coast, and the warm ocean waters will lead to more melting.
The risks of thawing permafrost
On land, a big concern is warming permafrost – the perennially frozen ground that underlies most Arctic terrain.
When permafrost thaws under homes and bridges, infrastructure can sink, tilt and collapse. Alaskans have been contending with this for several years. Near Norilsk, Russia, thawing permafrost was blamed for an oil tank collapse in late May that spilled thousands of tons of oil into a river.
Thawing permafrost also creates a less obvious but even more damaging problem. When the ground thaws, microbes in the soil begin turning its organic matter into carbon dioxide and methane. Both are greenhouse gases that further warm the planet.
In a study published last year, researchers found that permafrost test sites around the world had warmed by nearly half a degree Fahrenheit on average over the decade from 2007 to 2016. The greatest increase was in Siberia, where some areas had warmed by 1.6 degrees. The current Siberian heat wave, especially if it continues, will regionally exacerbate that permafrost warming and thawing.

Wildfires are back again
The extreme warmth also raises the risk of wildfires, which radically change the landscape in other ways.
Drier forests are more prone to fires, often from lightning strikes. When forests burn, the dark, exposed soil left behind can absorb more heat and hasten warming.
We’ve seen a few years now of extreme forest fires across the Arctic. This year, some scientists have speculated that some of the Siberian fires that broke out last year may have continued to burn through the winter in peat bogs and reemerged.

A disturbing pattern
The Siberian heat wave and its impacts will doubtless be widely studied. There will certainly be those eager to dismiss the event as just the result of an unusual persistent weather pattern.
Caution must always be exercised about reading too much into a single event – heat waves happen. But this is part of a disturbing pattern.
What is happening in the Arctic is very real and should serve as a warning to everyone who cares about the future of the planet as we know it.
[Get our best science, health and technology stories. Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter.]
Mark Serreze, Research Professor of Geography and Director, National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Boulder
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Has this 100F actually been verified yet ?
As far as I can see, actual records for the day only reach 97F.
definitely needs a follow-up with verified temp.
“As long ago as the 1890s, scientists predicted that increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would lead to a warming planet”
In the 1890s Arrhenius was trying to explain glaciation cycles with atmos co2 but he failed to do so. That explanation came about 20 years later from Milankovitch and it has nothing to do with CO2. It was not until 1938 that Callendar published the world’s first co2 global warming paper with reference to the 38-year warming trend 1900-1938 and 7 years later it turned into a 30 year cooling trend 1945-1975.
https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/02/18/arrhenius/
Anyone recall the Great Moscow Heatwave of 2010? Caused by low solar activity during the solar minimum – via jet stream blocking. What are we now in? The next even deeper solar minimum. Déjà vu all over again.
glaciation cycles… explanation came about 20 years later from Milankovitch and it has nothing to do with CO2
The alt-hypothesis was plausible, profitable, and well suited – designed, even – to exploit for social, political, and economic leverage.
I dont know where they get the scorching hot spring. These are Ventusky’s siberian temps for the weeks leading up to the 28 june 2020. The original article says it’s been way above average since march 20. Vertusky must be very wrong?
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=60;-175;2&l=temperature-2m&t=20200425/0300
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=69.7;130.3;3&l=temperature-2m&t=20200516/0300
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=67.8;154.9;3&l=temperature-2m&t=20200530/0300
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=67.8;154.9;3&l=temperature-2m&t=20200606/0300
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=67.8;154.9;3&l=temperature-2m&t=20200613/0300
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=67.8;154.9;3&l=temperature-2m&t=20200620/0300
and the last weekend
https://www.ventusky.com/?p=67.8;154.9;3&l=temperature-2m&t=20200627/0300
Maybe they are right ? Maybe minus5c is 8*c above average? But claiming that to be ‘wildly high’, is painting a distorted picture.
Sure, this warming will have these AGW modelers working hard on seeing how to fit such a hot spot signature in their models,
which suck… the models that make the bases of Paris accord or whatever.
Do such events that do not fit in the models actually, maybe raise more doubts about the claim of models predicting climate or climate change!
Last time I checked, the tropical hot spot still happens to be the expected AGW signature, not the polar one.
cheers
All this hoo haa about the perma frost melting the peat burning and the organic matter in the soil producing CO2. One only needs a small amount of logic to conclude that vegetation was growing there once before it got cold.
I can only hope that the world warms back up to what it once was.Much more productive and more comfortable for everybody.
Paul Homewood has pointed out the claimed record of 38 °C for 20 June has been removed, perhaps for checking (see image and link below).<br /><br /><br /> <br />https://climexp.knmi.nl/data/xgdcnRSM00024266.dat<br /><br />
The highest (verified) temperature at Verhojansk is currently 37.3 °C on 25 July 1988.
Additionally, the highest (verified) temperature for the Arctic is 37.8 °C, which was set in in Alaska in 1915. If the new record is verified it would mean 0.2 °C increase in more than 100 years – not much to be worried about.
yakukst still will be -40c in the winter
…not saving for a dacha there anytime soon. Although I do own a dacha in lipetsk.
The question I have is was there a similar destruction of the permafrost, a so-called “methane bomb”, during the Holocene warming, an event which lasted thousands of year, and featuring temperatures warmer than today’s? The current permafrost is less than 6000 years old, some of it far younger.
No, and there was none duing the previous interglacial when temperatures in NE Sibeia was TEN degrees warmer than now (NB Celsius degrees, not Fahrenheit)
Thanks for replying …I figured that, but it’s kind of a great unmentionable. Their prognoses are ahistorical to say the least.
Relatively NO
AIR
TRAFFIC
I’ve never seen such clear skies in June thus far, for 20 years.
That whole mess that contrails create, leaving the sky a mess of silvery cloud cover, has been absent.
The last time I remember a sky like that for that period was almost 30 years ago.
In Siberia summers that start hot tend to turn cold later:
https://www.gismeteo.ru/news/weather/snezhnoe-poholodanie-na-juge-sibiri-video/
Here’s the translation:
A hot start of summer is regularly interrupted by sharp short cold snap. For example, in Novosibirsk on June 4–6, the average daily temperature dropped to +10. A similar strong cooling occurred last weekend. At night, the thermometer showed +5, frosts were noted in some places. Snow fell in the Sayan Mountains.
Original Russian:
Жаркое начало лета периодически прерывается острыми короткими похолоданиями. Например, в Новосибирске 4–6 июня среднесуточная температура понижалась до +10. Аналогичное сильное похолодание произошло в минувшие выходные. Ночью столбик термометра показал +5, местами отмечались заморозки. В Саянах выпал снег.
So heat wave followed by cold snap and snow. In July. Guess which one the media publicizes? Guess which one they ignore.
“The ice along the shores of Siberia has the appearance of Swiss cheese right now in satellite images, with big areas of open water that would normally still be covered.”
Now if that was due to the heatwave in Siberia, you might expect that the ice along the coast would have melted, but not the ice offshore. But it is the other way around:
http://masie_web.apps.nsidc.org/pub/DATASETS/NOAA/G02186/latest/4km/masie_all_r04_4km.png
What you have here is what is called a “landråk” in Swedish (I don’t think there is a English word for it). There is fast ice along the shore, while southerly winds moves the sea-ice offshore, leaving open water in between.
30 years is nothing in Earth’s climate history. This one is from roughly 60 year cycle of the almost 20 year lap cycle of Jupiter and Saturn roughly coinciding with the NH summer solstice. e.g. 1901, 1961, 2020.
It does not seem to happen the same with the SH summer solstice as that coincides with their oppositions about every 60 years, e.g. 1930, 1989, 2050.