News Release 1-Aug-2019
Lehigh University team are the first to use a single enzyme biomineralization process to create a solar-driven water splitting catalyst that produces hydrogen with the potential to be manufactured sustainably, cheaply and abundantly
IMAGE: Steven McIntosh et al. Enzymatic synthesis of supported CdS quantum dot/reduced graphene oxide photocatalysts
Credit: Courtesy of Green Chemistry
Engineers at Lehigh University are the first to utilize a single enzyme biomineralization process to create a catalyst that uses the energy of captured sunlight to split water molecules to produce hydrogen. The synthesis process is performed at room temperature and under ambient pressure, overcoming the sustainability and scalability challenges of previously reported methods.
Solar-driven water splitting is a promising route towards a renewable energy-based economy. The generated hydrogen could serve as both a transportation fuel and a critical chemical feedstock for fertilizer and chemical production. Both of these sectors currently contribute a large fraction of total greenhouse gas emissions.
One of the challenges to realizing the promise of solar-driven energy production is that, while the required water is an abundant resource, previously-explored methods utilize complex routes that require environmentally-damaging solvents and massive amounts of energy to produce at large scale. The expense and harm to the environment have made these methods unworkable as a long-term solution.
Now a team of engineers at Lehigh University have harnessed a biomineralization approach to synthesizing both quantum confined nanoparticle metal sulfide particles and the supporting reduced graphene oxide material to create a photocatalyst that splits water to form hydrogen. The team reported their results in an article entitled: “Enzymatic synthesis of supported CdS quantum dot/reduced graphene oxide photocatalysts” featured on the cover of the August 7th issue of Green Chemistry, a journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
The paper’s authors include: Steven McIntosh, Professor in Lehigh’s Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, along with Leah C. Spangler, former Ph.D. student and John D. Sakizadeh, current Ph.D. student; as well, as Christopher J. Kiely, Harold B. Chambers Senior Professor in Lehigh’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Joseph P. Cline, a Ph.D. student working with Kiely.
“Our water-based process represents a scalable green route for the production of this promising photocatalyst technology,” said McIntosh, who is also Associate Director of Lehigh’s Institute for Functional Materials and Devices.
Over the past several years, McIntosh’s group has developed a single enzyme approach for biomineralization?the process by which living organisms produce minerals of size-controlled, quantum confined metal sulfide nanocrystals. In a previous collaboration with Kiely, the lab successfully demonstrated the first precisely controlled, biological way to manufacture quantum dots. Their one-step method began with engineered bacterial cells in a simple, aqueous solution and ended with functional semiconducting nanoparticles, all without resorting to high temperatures and toxic chemicals. The method was featured in a New York Times article: “How a Mysterious Bacteria Almost Gave You a Better TV.”
“Other groups have experimented with biomineralization for chemical synthesis of nanomaterials,” says Spangler, lead author and currently a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. “The challenge has been achieving control over the properties of the materials such as particle size and crystallinity so that the resulting material can be used in energy applications.”
McIntosh describes how Spangler was able to tune the group’s established biomineralization process to not only synthesize the cadmium sulfide nanoparticles but also to reduce graphene oxide to the more conductive reduced graphene oxide form.
“She was then able to bind the two components together to create a more efficient photocatalyst consisting of the nanoparticles supported on the reduced graphene oxide,” says McIntosh. “Thus her hard work and resulting discovery enabled both critical components for the photocatalyst to be synthesized in a green manner.”
The team’s work demonstrates the utility of biomineralization to realize benign synthesis of functional materials for use in the energy sector.
“Industry may consider implementation of such novel synthesis routes at scale,” adds Kiely. “Other scientists may also be able to utilize the concepts in this work to create other materials of critical technological importance.”
McIntosh emphasizes the potential of this promising new method as “a green route, to a green energy source, using abundant resources.”
“It is critical to recognize that any practical solution to the greening of our energy sector will have to be implemented at enormous scale to have any substantial impact,” he adds.
###
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

It’s a small but good step.
The rest of the story will be the cost of upscaling the process.
Water, whatever, still is insignificant to the CO, CO2 and NOx emissions from burning H2 in IC engines (ICE). It simply is complete BOLLOX to even consider H2 as a fuel for ICE over petrol/diesel. Not only do we have the 1st law of thermodynamics to lie about, we have the 2nd law to overcome. It will never happen for a replacement fuel for ICE forgiving ALL the other problems this as a fuel brings.
Hydrogen fuel cells, now that is another ballgame however, H2 is still “cracked” from CH4 and it is a very very energy consuming process producing much CO2. You may was well simply BURN the CH4 instead of trying to crack H2 from it.
Silly silly silly!
Let’s get crackin’ ? Time will tell…..
The statement “Both of these sectors currently contribute a large fraction of total greenhouse gas emissions” is true only if you ignore the fact that approximately 95% of total greenhouse gas emissions are natural, and redefine “total” to only mean “human-caused”. Our contributions are less than the uncertainties in the estimated contributions of the rest of the world. It would be honest to point this out, but not politically viable.
The only way this would be viable would be if it is significantly more efficient and cost effective than using the electricity from a PV array to make hydrogen from water the old-fashioned way. For example, we can synthesize glucose in a lab. We don’t do this on an industrial scale because plants do it far more efficiently.
Missing are the practical application gotchas that need to be overcome with this process. Problems with hydrogen fueled vehicles are already known and mostly overcome as witnessed by already announced and in use public vehicles. The devil is in the details.
The greenies are not interested in the environment. They are using it as a pathway to socialism. They don’t want a cure for the made up problem of global warming other than the Green New Deal or something similar.
What is efficiency of this process ?
Cheaply remains to be verified.
The metaphor for green = nature is breaking down. CO2 gives you green. Lots of green. More CO2, the more green. With up to four times the CO2 we have now. Now they say inorganic hydrogen is green. They keep using that word. I don’t think it means what they say it means.
Unless I’m missing something, conservation of energy requires that the total energy required to split the H2O bond is the same as the energy released by burning or recombining in a fuel cell minus all the inevitable losses. Since that energy is apparently solar, that implies thousands of acres of solar collection somewhere for any commercially useful amount of energy. Unless the overall efficiency of this process is substantially greater than photovoltaic cells or solar thermal and the net cost for construction and maintenance and operation per kWh for a commercial scale facility is competitive with existing solar technologies, this is nothing more than an interesting dead-end technology.
It takes 48kwh to produce
1 kg of hydrogen. Which
Is equivalent to 1 gallon of gas.
Good luck trying to use solar when you don’t need the power.
… waaaait a minute.
○¿●
I have to assume that oxygen is also a result of splitting hydrogen from water, just as in hydrolysis with an anode and cathode. With hydrolysis, the hydrogen and oxygen can be captured separately. How do the two elements of water get captured with this new method? Are the two gasses mixed?
Could the technology be used for back country dwellings? Having a solar powered supply of hydrogen (just enough for light and a small stove) would be awesome.
We have multiple technologies for this look up
Ipowertower thermoelctric generator on YouTube 5v and 12vdc
Thank you.
The pipe-dream of the “Hydrogen Economy” rises yet again. While hydrogen may be a very good fuel for a narrow range of applications, the extreme difficulty of safely storing, transporting, and delivering it to an end use make it a practical impossibility on any sort of massive scale.
“Our water-based process represents a scalable green route for the production of this promising photocatalyst technology”
“synthesize the cadmium sulfide nanoparticles”
Unfortunately Cadmium is toxic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium_poisoning
“The generated hydrogen could serve as […] a transportation fuel”
You have to store Hydrogen in order to use it as transportation fuel. Now, due to its low density, it can only be done at high pressure (~350 bar). Not a good idea, for accidents happen, and if the storage tank explodes, everyone is doomed.
The only rational use of Solar power is at a desalination plant, because the end product (fresh water) can be stored cheaply and abundantly (unlike electricity), and solar power is intermittent. In spite of this less than 1% of desalination is done worldwide using solar power. Why?