The scientific community has long held an understanding about the effect of temperature on sperm production in mammals, but this new study sheds light on how spermatogenesis in insects is hampered at extreme temperatures.
In the new scientific paper, published in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology, and an academic letter recently published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, University of Lincoln evolutionary ecologist Dr Graziella Iossa and behavioural ecologist Dr Paul Eady explain how the temperature at which an animal develops can impact its reproductive behaviour and physiology.
Dr Iossa said: “It is well known that the reason why testes are usually located outside the body cavity in male mammals is because sperm is damaged by excessive heat inside the body. However, it is now becoming clear that when subjected to heat stress, males become infertile before females do.
“It is not only intriguing that males and females show different sensitivity to temperature stress, it may also tell us something about how species will be affected by climate change and how we might buffer or tackle these sensitivities.”
Dr Iossa and Dr Eady, from the School of Life Sciences at Lincoln, have been leading research in this area for a number of years. Their most recent work, published in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology, examined sperm production and the copulatory behaviour of male and female Indian meal moths.
The Indian meal moth produces two types of sperm – a fertilizing eupyrene and a non-fertilizing apyrene sperm. The production of both sperm types is hampered by rising temperatures.
The moths were exposed to different temperatures (ranging from 20 – 33°C) during their development and up to the point when, as adults, they were ready to mate. The study found that sperm got shorter (and were therefore less effective) the higher the temperature the moths were exposed to, and that both males and females were less likely to engage in copulation when reared at the highest and lowest temperatures. Where they did copulate, the duration also decreased with increasing developmental temperature.
Studies looking at the impact of climate change on species have looked so far at the ability of species to survive under heat stress. Dr Iossa and Dr Eady are among the first scientists to examine how different temperatures impact on the reproductive behaviour of a species and thus fertility.
Previous work on other insects and also plants has found that you can mate females who have been heat stressed to non-stressed males, and they can produce offspring, however the reverse doesn’t work – heat-stressed males are often infertile. This shows that spermatogenesis (the production of sperm) appears more sensitive to heat stress than oogenesis (the production of eggs).
“These results are interesting because it is extremely important to understand how different species and different sexes will be affected by rising temperatures as the climate is changing,” explained Dr Iossa. “Models of the long-term impact of climate change on populations have focused on upper and lower critical thermal limits (CTLs), beyond which species survival is compromised. However research now suggests that species may become infertile – and therefore could become extinct – at a much lower temperature.
“Our study is consistent with current evidence that the production of sperm and mating behaviour are sensitive to developmental temperature and, in an era of global warming, further research in this area – examining both male and female fertility – is vital. The survival of natural populations ultimately depends on individuals being able to reproduce.”
###
Dr Iossa and Dr Eady’s paper, Temperature-induced developmental plasticity in Plodia interpunctella: reproductive behaviour and sperm length, is available to read in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology online. Dr Iossa’s letter on Sex-specific differences in Thermal Fertility Limits is published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution online.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Placing a man’s nuts in boiling water will keep a woman from becoming pregnant.
The “four footsie foreplay” stock photo used to illustrate this post begged me to add a fifth foot. So I found the high-res version and added the mithing fifth foot. It runs in the family. My father once filed an extra notch into a wooden cam inside his cuckoo clock so at midnight it struck thirteen.
Which tropical country has experienced this condition, Dr Iossa?
Which warmer Optimum of the Holocene impaired human fecundity, Dr Iossa?
Why do you bother wearing insulating clothes, Dr Iossa?
Just more confirmation bias where the researcher find their own beliefs.
It’s got to be obvious by now that ctm posts EurekAlert! news releases as a form of ridicule.
Well, that explains why the reproduction rates are so low in nations and nature along the equator!
The Middle East has an area called “The Fertile Crescent”.
Now we have “The Infertile Circle”!
It would be nice if impact researchers remembered that AGW doesn’t actually cause “extreme temperatures”. That’s weather. AGW (all else being equal) just makes things slightly warmer than they would be over periods of time much longer than any insect’s lifespan.
Any biological creature incapable of surviving in the face of the tiny impact on actual temperatures from the gradual change in temperature anomaly would have gone extinct long ago from actual weather.
This IS a bigger problem that needs to be addressed regarding infertility .
“There is increasing concern that the use of mobile phones may be associated with decreased semen quality and infertility. … Cell phone radiation may negatively affect sperm quality in men by decreasing the semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm count, motility, and viability, thus impairing male fertility”
http://www.journal-ina.com/article.asp?issn=2394-2916;year=2018;volume=5;issue=1;spage=1;epage=5;aulast=El-Hamd
“A team of researchers at the University of Newcastle (UON) have drawn a link between mobile phone radiation and a negative impact on sperm motility – the ability of sperm to swim – highlighting the potential danger of storing a mobile phone near male genitalia for prolonged periods.”
https://www.newcastle.edu.au/newsroom/featured-news/the-mobile-phone-in-your-pocket-could-be-stunting-your-swimmers
Or, alternatively, we might just suddenly start reproducing like rabbits. That’s well within the usual brackets of climate change science. Odd this. I would have thought the totes would present this as a good news story.
I wonder how they think that insects survived during the age of the dinosaurs, or even the Carboniferous, when (thanks to excess O2 levels) they grew to enormous sizes. Seems to me that they’ve not taken account of the fact that (unless we are talking about bugs at latitudes where the sun does not set in summer time) night comes pretty much everywhere in the world and with it, falling temperatures. I can see where UHI might cause issues for some insects, but then again, there tends to not be as great a diversity of bugs in concrete jungles anyway.
There are precious few places on earth where average night time temps would fail to fall below 35c, even if the earth gets a couple of degrees warmer overall.
Another take on the subject:
https://youtu.be/waO8KKtVgaQ
BTW, which University of Lincoln?
I am surprised. I got to end of the comments without finding a single ‘Shrinkage’ comment.
My nipples don’t shrink in cold. But yeah, men in Africa usually don’t have any shrinkage feature, so warming apparently deals with it. I’m confessing if I shaved better, I’d pass well for a lady in cold water. Won’t post the pics though.
It seems strange that the countries with the highest human fertility rate all seem to be quite warm.
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/total-fertility-rate/
must be why there are few kids in central Africa and the Middle east, India, Pakistan, ect.. oh wait
More junk science
Not only that and the amount of Icelanders, but EurekAlert did a good job with Betteridge’s law.
The answer to the headline’s question is ‘No.’
Good call.
We hope that the good Dr. didn’t use his own sperm to this comparative study – to women who were looking for help in his clinic:
Following his skiing holidays, following
his return from Caribbean holidays.