Princeton University, Engineering School
Widespread use of autonomous vehicles (AVs) could either massively increase or drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions depending, in large part, on public policy, according to new research from Princeton University.
“We need fuel economy standards to ensure the cars are clean, and policies to encourage ridesharing to reduce vehicle miles traveled,” said Judi Greenwald, non-resident fellow at Princeton’s Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment and co-author of a Jan. 4 paper published in the journal Energy Policy.
The researchers found that well-managed autonomous vehicles “could increase mobility, improve safety, reduce traffic congestion and make fleet management companies rich, while lowering emissions and reducing energy use.” But, they said, poorly managed ones could make “things significantly worse on all these fronts.”
By allowing passengers to work or relax en route, automated vehicles would greatly improve the experience of traveling in an automobile. But planning, management and carefully crafted regulations are essential to reducing vehicle emissions and avoiding additional miles traveled by the vehicles, specifically vehicles traveling with few passengers or without any passengers at all.
“Two big changes are coming — automation and mobility as a service,” said Greenwald, who served as deputy director for climate, environment and energy efficiency in the Department of Energy during the Obama administration. “Depending on how they interact, and how clean the fuel is, it could really end up a lot better or worse off for the environment,” said Greenwald, who is a Princeton engineering alumna.
Greenwald and co-author Alain Kornhauser, professor of operations research and financial engineering who has a Ph.D. in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Princeton, found that the best way to ensure a good outcome is to deploy AVs in managed fleets rather than as personal vehicles, and to implement rigorous fuel efficiency standards for the vehicles. Fleet managers have strong incentives to use the most efficient fuels and to minimize the amount of time on the road that cars spend with few or no passengers.
“Fleets are motivated to deliver as many person-miles out of each vehicle as they possibly can,” said Kornhauser, who is also director of Princeton’s Program in Transportation. “If you’re getting two person-miles out of each vehicle-mile traveled (because there are two passengers in the vehicle), energy use and pollution are chopped in half, regardless of the fuel source.”
The authors conducted the study during Greenwald’s tenure in spring 2018 as an inaugural Gerhard R. Andlinger Visiting Fellow in Energy and the Environment at the Andlinger Center. The program brings in seasoned professionals in energy and the environment to collaborate on research and enrich the center’s education efforts. For the study, the authors examined a large body of earlier research by Kornhauser, with one study showing that a properly managed fleet, combined with public transit, could cut vehicle travel by 43 percent in New Jersey. They also pointed to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2016 report that showed that AVs could triple fuel use due to easier travel and an increase in empty vehicle miles traveled.
Greenwald said policy will play a big role in controlling which players are able to operate these vehicles and how. High barriers to market entry, such as expensive licenses similar to a commercial trucking license, could discourage individuals from buying autonomous vehicles. Regulations could also prohibit the technology from being sold to individuals, the report said.
“While a future with autonomous vehicles may seem far off, we must be planning for them today to ensure they deliver on their promise versus set us back,” said Rob Freudenberg, vice president for energy and environment at Regional Plan Association, an urban research and advocacy organization focused on the tri-state area, and unaffiliated with the study. “That includes everything from encouraging the right technology, to integrating with existing public transportation networks, to completely reimagining our streets for the better.”
“We need public policy to ensure that we align the economic incentives with what we want from a societal perspective,” said Greenwald. “It’s really up to us.”
###
Public Release: 12-Mar-2019
If our leftist politicians get substantially involved in constructing Public Policy…I’ll put my money on Disaster.
Lefties do EVERYTHING for their own political gain….so everything they touch eventually becomes a disaster.
Pedestrians beware!
Worry!
The cannabis rides are here…..with tax credits.
Fuel Economy or Energy Economy.
There is a difference.
I love how all the “right thinking folks” pushing AVs ignore what will almost immediately be big business for some, the robbing of AVs who are boxed in and stationary. It happens on a daily basis in most big cities to commuters unable to do anything but sit there and take it – with the notable exception of those who take the concept ‘You Are Your Own First Responder’ seriously and have weapons ready.
It seems to me that the most logical place for a widescale rollout of autonomous vehicles would be in truck fleets on the interstate highways. Drivers could drive manually in city traffic or in more highly congested areas, and be on hand to deal with an emergency or a breakdown. Perhaps when running loads from depot to depot, one driver could be responsible for several rigs.
The commercial benefits are much greater, while the technical problems are much smaller.
‘“We need public policy to ensure that we align the economic incentives with what we want from a societal perspective,” said Greenwald. “It’s really up to us.”’
It’s up to them to make sure that society develops as they want it to.
The arrogance of these guys is mind blowing.
“We need public policy to ensure that we align the economic incentives with what we want from a societal perspective,” said Greenwald. “It’s really up to us.”
Who is “We,” and why is what they want such a great thing?
Spoiler alert: “We” are Greenwald and the policy wonks of Princeton, whose desires trump everyone else’s because, well, they’re just that much smarter and better than we are.
After the indictments the FBI put out yesterday about how some get into places like Princeton one has his doubts about their competence to do anything.
What would a wild fire evacuation look like with autonomous vehicles?
And what happens when these vehicles start to say things like “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that”
The professionals and people posting in wuwt are some smart science professionals. When are you going to get into the reality there will be no humans or biology. It sounds nice to call it wireless communication, these are microwave EMFs and we aren’t electrically compatible. Brainwaves at 7.8 Hz, .2 Hz when sleeping or healing and microwaves millions or billions of cycles.
Here is what Boeing Engineers used for safety of Wi-Fi in airplanes. http://thermoguy.com/boeing-engineers-using-potatoes-for-wi-fi-safety-on-airlines-isnt-reassuring-creates-unrealized-consequences/
Should have used chocolate bars!
The biggest benefactor from these vehicles will be the Bars and Caberets. No more DUI charges.
Currently reading “No one at the wheel” which warns of the impending arrival of AV’s. It will be a difficult process with many surprises and unanticipated consequences. The conflict between pedestrians, cyclists and AV’s will be a major battle ground and will likely require major changes to city and highway design. Lets hope we can get on top of this without playing too many win/lose games!
” found that the best way to ensure a good outcome is to deploy AVs in managed fleets rather than as personal vehicles”
Yup.
#1. Google can ban employees from driving to work and just have its fleet of AVs drive employees to work
and then take off during the day to steal business from Uber.
#2. The EPA can also ban employees from driving and do the same thing.
Seems like a good experiment. no harm in letting google and an the EPA employees show us how this will work.
Drive by the wire: Looking at my crystal ball I predict traffic will move at the slowest possible speed. Think about it.
So did the AV have to stand in line at the DMV like I did with my kids? Did it have to run around gathering documents to get a license? Breaking in line has its advantages.
Wow! I can’t wait to get my hands on this new autonomous BMW motorcycle…
https://www.motorcycle.com/mini-features/bmw-develops-autonomous-r1200gs.html
Oh, wait! …… Never Mind!
Any one know how these things are supposed to operate in North American winters with snow covered highways? How do they follow lanes or sense the highway edge?
You Yanks been paying attention on your doorstep? https://waymo.com/
It’s already on the waymo just like interactive cruise, lane guidance, remote parking, AEB for cars and pedestrians, rain sensing wipers, headlight sensing yada yada… The latest Hyundai Sorrento won’t even let passengers out the door if something’s coming with all their acronyms-
https://www.hyundainews.com/models/hyundai-santa_fe-2019-santa_fe
If you’re thinking of getting a new analogue ICE car you’d better think carefully about shelling out for all the latest safety fruit like that with a view to ownership costs and resale in a few years time or you’re going to take a big financial hit. In Oz where we were dragging our feet with autos even the value of manual cars has dropped off a cliff in the last 5 years and carmakers have responded accordingly with their model offerings.
Get with the program as they’re progressively going to get rid of the weak link with an economic sledgehammer as the stats show up in bodily and property insurance costs for the analogue clunkers. AVs don’t have to be 100% autonomous or safe just yet but just multiples safer than you old timer getting left behind and paying through the nose.
What would you rather get in? The tube bus or tram with a cast of anonymous 100s or a few 5 star like feedbacks in the people mover? Send me the autonomous Roller as I feel like being alone in luxury today with the platinum Uber.
Oops! Santa Fe but they’re all getting the same.
“Waymo One is rolling out in the Metro Phoenix area first.”
Is it purely coincidental that Phoenix is just about the only major snow-free city in the US? And with less than two rainy days per month?
I am very hopeful for autonomous vehicles – especially useful for the elderly.
It would be great to have an automated 12 hr drive to Chicago so we could relax.
Highway speeds could likely increase.
Lane changes and beserko road warriors could be eliminated.
Fatalities would decrease dramatically.
Insurance rates would decrease.
Night time driving for seniors or the blind would be a benefit.
Deer strikes could likely be radically reduced. (this is a huge problem by the way)
Pub and restaurant business would benefit greatly.
If you had a little buzzer to ferry you wherever you wanted to go in urban areas – parking could be eliminated – think of that waste of space and expense.
People could still have their cherished chariots and take little buzzers for beater travel.
What’s not to like?
Erm.. I bring it up again. What about insurance ? I signal for an AV and it doesn’t arrive. People come round and ask what I’ve done with it. Its had a minor malfunction or my postcode is actually rather extensive. (True) . Someone else takes it and goes to say Croydon. Do I pay? How does it know it’s me? Who is the insurer? What premium? Endless shambles. Never happen