Record Lobster Production Defies Alarmist Climate Scare

Guest essay by James Taylor

Marine fisheries data show New England lobstermen are benefiting from a new golden age of lobster, thanks in large part to a warming Earth. Yet Democrats in Congress and even lobster lobbyists asserted in House climate hearings earlier in February that global warming is causing a lobster apocalypse. Thankfully, facts and scientific evidence can help us put this latest global warming scare to rest.

On February 7, Democrats in the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife held hearings with the purpose of raising concern about global warming. Democrats called a witness from a Massachusetts lobster association claiming global warming is reducing the number and availability of lobsters to harvest in New England, specifically in the Gulf of Maine. The witness claimed that ocean acidification is making it more difficult for lobsters to calcify their shells and reach maturity. She also asserted that the Gulf of Maine is warming faster than almost any other ocean region in the world, and that the warming is chasing lobsters from coastal shores into deeper waters, where lobstermen have a more difficult time harvesting them. She further claimed global warming is chasing the lobsters north to Canada.

Overlooking for the moment that Democrats’ PETA allies would consider it good news if global warming were inducing lobsters to relocate to waters where lobstermen can’t reach them, let’s take a look at lobster production in Maine and the rest of New England in recent decades. After 30 years of modest global cooling, global temperatures resumed their post-Little Ice Age warming in the late 1970s. The Maine Department of Marine Resources reports Maine lobstermen caught 16.5 million pounds of lobsters in 1975, at the end of that cooling spell. By 2000, Maine lobstermen caught over 50 million pounds per year. In 2016, Maine lobstermen processed 132.5 million pounds of lobsters. Maine lobstermen now catch approximately 800 percent more lobsters than they did when global warming resumed 40 years ago.

And it is not just Maine. The Democratic witness represents lobstermen in Massachusetts. According to the National Marine Fisheries Service, Massachusetts lobster production rose from 6.7 million pounds in 1975 to 15.8 million pounds in 2000 and 17.7 million pounds in 2016. Massachusetts lobster production has nearly tripled as global temperatures modestly rose!

 

In New Hampshire, lobster production has risen from 480,000 pounds in 1975 to approximately 1.7 million pounds in 2009 and 6 million pounds in 2016—more than 12 times more lobster production now than before recent global warming.

Furthermore, as climatologist David Legates testified in the hearing, controlled scientific studies show that adding more carbon dioxide to the air and water aids the growth of crustaceans rather than impedes it.

The irrefutable data show New England lobstermen are benefiting from a mind-blowing increase in lobster production as the Earth has warmed and atmospheric carbon-dioxide levels have increased. Carbon dioxide and global warming appear to have had an even greater and more beneficial impact on lobsters than it has had on global crop production, which is stunning, because crop production has also benefited remarkably. (See here, for the stunning growth in global crop production as the planet has warmed). Yet, somehow, alarmists and even lobster lobbyists claim global warming is causing a lobster apocalypse. How can this be?

The Democratic witness likely believes with all her heart that global warming is harming New England lobster production. The problem is global warming alarmists and the environmental left incessantly barrage people with speculative theories and unsupported claims that global warming is making everything worse. It is easy to fear what we don’t understand, especially when activists tell you that you are becoming a victim as a result.

New England lobstermen will certainly become very worried when they are barraged with claims that global warming is making it tougher for them to succeed at their jobs. The irrefutable facts, however, show that global warming is the best thing that could ever have happened to New England lobstermen.


James Taylor is senior fellow for environment and climate policy at The Heartland Institute.


Then there’s this:

Crawling in crustaceans: Scientists study link between warmer ocean, booming lobster population

Federal scientists are exploring connections between a warming Atlantic ocean and record lobster landings off southwestern Nova Scotia and in the Bay of Fundy.

Adam Cook, lead lobster research scientist for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, said those locations have seen the greatest temperature increases too.

He said there’s clearly a relationship between temperatures and population but other factors are also involved in the remarkable rise in lobster landings, including a decrease in ground fish predators over the same period.

In the lab, warmer temps produce more eggs

With a decade-long rise in temperatures, including record highs in 2012 and 2016, researchers at DFO laboratories in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are now studying the impact of warmer temperatures on egg production, egg quality and moult timing.

“We are seeing often increased egg-development rates, perhaps increased moulting that allows animals to grow faster,” said Cook.

Full story here

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

93 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Walter Sobchak
February 8, 2019 7:03 pm

A warmer world is healhtier, happier, more prosperous world.

Alexander Feht
February 8, 2019 7:18 pm

Russians don’t know, what to do with the extreme amount of fish caught in the Far East amd in the Sea of Japan. Not only lobsters, it’s the whole eco-system, forests, and agriculture thriving with little extra CO2 — but without any “predicted” warming.

Gary
February 8, 2019 8:18 pm

The lobster fishery may be doing well north of Cape Cod, but it’s crashed to the south (NJ, NY, CT, RI). The warmer water may be a cause, although reports of a shell disease are common and the cause may be pollution-related. Cape Cod forms a boundary between the northward flowing Gulf Stream and the southward (counterclockwise) flow of cold currents in the Gulf of Maine.

Johann Wundersamer
February 9, 2019 1:05 am
griff
February 9, 2019 1:07 am
F.LEGHORN
Reply to  griff
February 9, 2019 2:41 pm

Bit of a red herring. And from such a worthy (sarc) organization.

rah
Reply to  Johann Wundersamer
February 9, 2019 4:07 am

This trucker has never hauled live lobster. Just frozen lobster, crab, and fish. Funny thing. They sent me in to pick up a load at an old fishing port north of Boston. Always interesting driving a big rig pulling a 53 ft. refer trailer in those old towns where the roads are based on the old wagon trails and the front doors of the houses open right up on the street. They loaded me with 5 different types of fish. Two of them were imported from China and one from Vietnam, the other two US. The USDA had pulled a carton from a skid for inspection and the shipper tried to load it that way until I called them on it. They replaced the carton. Just the petty crap a driver has to deal with that can get him/her into trouble and the reason I don’t want to pull those kinds of loads. Hauling produce can be just as bad.

Kurt in Switzerland
February 9, 2019 2:14 am

I watched the hearing, which I found rather humorous.
What a crass display of play-acting, emphasizing emotion over rational discourse!

Would love to have been there to offer simple logical counter-points to some of the more ridiculous arguments of the would-be climate protectors, thereby enabling the level-headed panelists to expose the farce.

For example, if ‘Climate Change’ is now causing lobster boats to have to travel further from shore to harvest lobsters, how would ‘Climate Policy’ mitigate this problem for those dependent on lobster?

(Hint: ‘climate policy-makers’ openly favor increasing the price for Diesel fuel, ostensibly to foment low-carbon transportation. So would this help or hinder the lobster-carchers’ bottom line?)

john
February 9, 2019 6:45 am

The larger catches reported include a 3 month shutdown off of the NE coast to protect whales, March-May.

NE restaurants and seafood dealers had to buy lobster from Canada, which remained open.

Prices rocketed from $6.00/lb to $25.00/lb and had to be special ordered.

john
February 9, 2019 7:02 am

Lobsters aren’t the whales problem.

Whale watching boats, high soeed ferrys are.

https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/shipstrike/news/shipstrike03.pdf

john
February 9, 2019 7:09 am

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/jun/27/-sp-whale-watching-boats-pose-greatest-threat-to-whales

Memo to eco fiends…

Keeps your boats away from whales and please do not feed the Polar Bears, lest you become the main course.

stonehenge
February 9, 2019 9:35 am

Good post, but if fishermen catch fish, do lobstermen catch lobst? And if there’s such a thing as lobster lobbyists, what about fish fishbyists?

Johann Wundersamer
Reply to  stonehenge
February 10, 2019 4:32 am

No,

IF

fishermen catch fish,

THEN

lobstemen catch lobs.

Philo
February 9, 2019 1:48 pm

A few years ago, circa mid 2000’s I saw a number of stories about Maine lobstermen going ecological. The catches were dropping and getting smaller. So quite a number of them got together and agreed they were overfishing. So they decided to reduce catches so some lobsters would grow bigger and produce more eggs.

The self regulation apparently worked because there was news a few years later that the catch was up again.

They may or may not have been right, but the graphs above show that the lobster fishery is alive and well. It’s a good story of cooperation in the face of adversity whether or not it had an actual effect.

Reply to  Philo
February 9, 2019 4:56 pm

One strategy that has seemed to be effective in Maine is the practice of V-tailing females with eggs. If a female with eggs is landed a V-notch is cut in its tail and it’s returned alive. Any lobster landed with a V-notch is returned in attempt to maintain the breeding female population.

February 9, 2019 8:52 pm

The Left are convincing me more and more that the earth is Actually flat!They have gone so far left they fell off the edge!Stupid liberals!The left are morons!interesting read!TY Tom,cct

Johann Wundersamer
February 10, 2019 4:22 am

OT: better than 1 XL keystone pipeline – every now and then?

https://goo.gl/images/PtzWN5

DClancy
February 11, 2019 11:46 am

Would be great to see an addendum to this article w/ long-term temp data for the Gulf of Maine. I have seen articles w/ data going back a few decades (one such chart is posted by a commenter above — back to 1982), but they don’t answer the obvious question whether warming in recent decades is part of a slow up-down-up etc.cycle in this region. (Lots of comments here about lobsters living deep down. Good point. But higher-up long-term temp data would at least be circumstantial evidence of what the lobsters are actually experiencing.)

Edwin
February 13, 2019 10:36 am

Once involved in with fisheries management when the lobster “explosion” began back in the 1980s, global warming has damned little to do with the increasing in abundance. The game is basically a predator prey issue. Gross overfishing of ground fish from the Middle Atlantic north the Newfoundland dramatically reduced lobster predators. So surprise you got more lobsters.

Had a friend, a meteorologists, who inherited a lobster license about the time the lobster increase began. He gave up meteorology.