Salmon may lose the ability to smell danger as carbon emissions rise University of Washington

From Eurkealert

Public Release: 18-Dec-2018

This is the head of an adult coho salmon. Credit Andy Dittman/Northwest Fisheries Science Center Usage Restrictions Photo credit required.

The ability to smell is critical for salmon. They depend on scent to avoid predators, sniff out prey and find their way home at the end of their lives when they return to the streams where they hatched to spawn and die.

New research from the University of Washington and NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center shows this powerful sense of smell might be in trouble as carbon emissions continue to be absorbed by our ocean. Ocean acidification is changing the water’s chemistry and lowering its pH. Specifically, higher levels of carbon dioxide, or CO2, in the water can affect the ways in which coho salmon process and respond to smells.

“Salmon famously use their nose for so many important aspects of their life, from navigation and finding food to detecting predators and reproducing. So it was important for us to know if salmon would be impacted by future carbon dioxide conditions in the marine environment,” said lead author Chase Williams, a postdoctoral researcher in Evan Gallagher’s lab at the UW Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences.

The study, appearing online Dec. 18 in the journal Global Change Biology, is the first to show that ocean acidification affects coho salmons’ sense of smell. The study also takes a more comprehensive approach than earlier work with marine fish by looking at where in the sensory-neural system the ability to smell erodes for fish, and how that loss of smell changes their behavior.

“Our studies and research from other groups have shown that exposure to pollutants can also interfere with sense of smell for salmon,” said Gallagher, senior co-author and a UW professor of toxicology. “Now, salmon are potentially facing a one-two punch from exposure to pollutants and the added burden of rising CO2. These have implications for the long-term survival of our salmon.”

The research team wanted to test how juvenile coho salmon that normally depend on their sense of smell to alert them to predators and other dangers display a fear response with increasing carbon dioxide. Puget Sound’s waters are expected to absorb more CO2 as atmospheric carbon dioxide increases, contributing to ocean acidification.

In the NOAA Fisheries research lab in Mukilteo, the research team set up tanks of saltwater with three different pH levels: today’s current average Puget Sound pH, the predicted average 50 years from now, and the predicted average 100 years in the future. They exposed juvenile coho salmon to these three different pH levels for two weeks.

After two weeks, the team ran a series of behavioral and neural tests to see whether the fishes’ sense of smell was affected. Fish were placed in a holding tank and exposed to the smell of salmon skin extract, which indicates a predator attack and usually prompts the fish to hide or swim away. Fish that were in water with current CO2 levels responded normally to the offending odor, but the fish from tanks with higher CO2 levels didn’t seem to mind or detect the smell.

After the behavioral tests, neural activity in each fish’s nose and brain — specifically, in the olfactory bulb where information about smells is processed — was measured to see where the sense of smell was altered. Neuron signaling in the nose was normal under all CO2 conditions, meaning the fish likely could still smell the odors. But when they analyzed neuron behavior in the olfactory bulb, they saw that processing was altered — suggesting the fish couldn’t translate the smell into an appropriate behavioral response.

Finally, the researchers analyzed tissue from the noses and olfactory bulbs of fish to see if gene expression also changed. Gene expression pathways were found to be altered for fish that were exposed to higher levels of CO2, particularly in their olfactory bulbs.

“At the nose level, we think the neurons are still detecting odors, but when the signals are processed in the brain, that’s where the messages are potentially getting altered,” Williams said.

In the wild, the fish likely would become more and more indifferent to scents that signify a predator, Williams said, either by taking longer to react to the smell or by not swimming away at all. While this study looked specifically at how altered sense of smell could affect fishes’ response to danger, it’s likely that other critical behaviors that depend on smell such as navigation, reproduction and hunting for food would also take a hit if fish aren’t able to adequately process smells.

The researchers plan to look next at whether increased CO2 levels could affect other fish species in similar ways, or alter other senses in addition to smell. Given the cultural and ecological significance of salmon, the researchers hope these findings will prompt action.

“We’re hoping this will alert people to some of the potential consequences of elevated carbon emissions,” said senior co-author Andy Dittman, a research biologist at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. “Salmon are so iconic in this area. Ocean acidification and climate change are abstract things until you start talking about an animal that means a lot to people.”

###

Other co-authors are Paul McElhany, Shallin Busch and Michael Maher of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center; and Theo Bammler and James MacDonald of the UW Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences.

This study was funded by Washington Sea Grant and the Washington Ocean Acidification Center, with additional support from the UW Superfund Research Program, the NOAA Ocean Acidification Program and the Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
73 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MarkW
December 19, 2018 8:06 am

Fish were placed in a holding tank

That invalidates their study right there.

Joel Snider
December 19, 2018 8:12 am

Are these people just a bunch of bobble-heads sitting around agreeing with each other?

I mean how much bias HAS to exist to just come up this study?

James Clarke
December 19, 2018 8:26 am

Many Christmases ago, I boarded an airplane in Ft. Myers, Florida and flew to St. louis to spend the Holidays with Family. It was 81 degrees when I got on the plane. Hours later, I stepped out of the terminal in St. Louis and was greeted with an air temperature of -5 degrees. My lungs convulsed and I started coughing. I felt sick for the next 2 days, as my body adapted to the much lower humidity and cold air. My nose was so stuffy, I couldn’t smell anything for a day or two, not even salmon predators!

Then I adapted to the change and enjoyed my time with family and friends. This post is powerful evidence that I did not go extinct. Consequently, I have complete faith that the salmon will do just fine adjusting to tiny changes in their environment over the course of decades.

I realize that everyone before me has already made this point, yet I am compelled to reiterate it with verve and conviction!

Tim Mantyla
Reply to  James Clarke
December 19, 2018 11:33 pm

The analogy reveals a lack of the elementary scientific skepticism and discernment that should have dissuaded you from posting it.

It’s impossible to predict that any other species, let alone such a vastly separated branch of creatures on the “tree” of evolution, will respond/adapt in similar ways you did, or with any success, for several crucial reasons:

1) Temperature may be, but humidity certainly is not a relevant issue regarding the salmon!

2) You don’t share remotely equivalent biology with salmon, other than being bilaterally symmetrical vertebrates with distinct organs!

3) You weren’t isolated in a tank!

4) Your experience was in an uncontrolled, self-chosen environment you already knew with extremely high certainty, based on your (likely) previous and many others’ very public experiences, that you’d eventually adapt to the different conditions. It’s not as if humans have never experienced extreme changes in temps and humidity!

5) Your experience happened only to you, not thousands of randomized subjects similar to you but with only marginally different individual characteristics (the salmon). Therefore your highly individual experience bears ZERO relationship or significance to a randomized, professionally conducted scientific experiment with proper control subjects for comparison.

6) Your faith in the adaptive capabilities of salmon is TOTALLY irrelevant to anything that can or might happen to them. You don’t get to decide or with any credibility weigh in on what’s “just fine” for salmon, especially based on something as ephemeral and meaningless to reality as faith.

Sooo..in essence, you have some (incredibly unrealistic) opinions on this issue. Alrighty then!

Might it be best to stick to enjoying and surviving your travels, without trying to compare them to scientific examinations of global warming scenarios?

ResourceGuy
December 19, 2018 8:38 am

Let’s see now this is from the same state where Amazon almost single handedly increased road freight emissions in the world. see IEA report

Nat Whilk
December 19, 2018 9:22 am

I recently cleaned my microwave for the first time in a year, and I can testify that salmon doesn’t lose its ability to smell.

James Clarke
Reply to  Nat Whilk
December 19, 2018 10:03 am

+1

Stephen Singer
December 19, 2018 10:12 am

This bogus claim has been made a couple of times in the last 2-3 years. I think also from researchers from UW.

Tim Mantyla
Reply to  Stephen Singer
December 19, 2018 11:37 pm

Your evidence it’s bogus??

The lack of a posted credible refutation leads to the fair assumption…there isn’t one.

Gary Kerkin
December 19, 2018 12:40 pm

This is a good subject for some enterprising person to submit to the GWPF competition (“CHRISTMAS COMPETITION: THE TALLEST CLIMATE TALES OF 2018”). https://www.thegwpf.com/the-tallest-climate-tales-of-2018/?utm_source=CCNet+Newsletter&utm_campaign=8409b2a722-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_12_19_01_44&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fe4b2f45ef-8409b2a722-36406133

Farmer Ch E retired
December 19, 2018 1:18 pm

I can personally testify that the salmon are successfully navigating to their spawning tributaries in SE Alaska despite rising CO2 concentrations. My wife and I, with the aid of a 10-hp fishing boat, caught our limits (6 each) by 7-am this past July. I was told by a local pro that the pinks & cohos were moving up the tributaries to the tune of about 10,000 fish per day – just in this one small bay.

December 19, 2018 1:27 pm

The salmon are obviously smarter than the people studying them. The salmon will not lose their sense of smell or go extinct, but for those studying them this is a real possibility.

December 19, 2018 5:05 pm

ocean pH at just over 8

puget sound pH at around 7.7

river pH at just over 7

So this shows that when the salmon move around today;

from stream, to river, to Sound, to ocean (with the areas of the ocean they swim through varying more than the estimated future in the future Puget Sound), to Sound, to river, to spawning stream; all with significantly varying pH;

that either salmon don’t depend on their sense of smell, or THE STUDY IS SHIT.

December 19, 2018 7:04 pm

Well, the Orcas are having problems, and if the fish can’t smell the danger – that just means an easier dinner for the Orcas.

I see win-win here.

Andrew Ward
December 21, 2018 10:20 am

On the heels of the UW/Cliff Mass article of a few days ago, I see UW and immediately think “Isn’t that the place where the Dean of the Atmospheric Science Dept was strong-arming “his” professors into supporting his pet (pro CAGW) ballot measure?”

That’s enough to drop my interest in a dubiously headlined publication from “take a quick look” to “why bother?”

Good job on your institution’s (already waning) credibility, Dean.

Johann Wundersamer
December 26, 2018 6:20 am

In the NOAA Fisheries research lab in Mukilteo, the research team set up tanks of saltwater with three different pH levels: today’s current average Puget Sound pH, the predicted average 50 years from now, and the predicted average 100 years in the future. They exposed juvenile coho salmon to these three different pH levels for two weeks.”

For the next study, the NOAA butchers drew sheep up on chains and pulleys up to different height marks in order to determine up to which falling heights the sheep meat was still usable.