James Cook University @jcu censures a climate skeptic – help him fight back

UPDATE: I made this a “top post” that will remain at the top of WUWT until we reach the goal. New content will appear below. UPDATE2: as of 12:30 PM PST on 2/2/18 we are within 5% of reaching the goal. If you haven’t already, now is the time to help.

UPDATE 3: BOOM! Thanks to everyone!!!! A last minute donation of $5,000 by Rodney Hackett put it over the top! There were other people who also gave $1000 or more. Peter tells me he’ll be in touch with everyone to send thanks. He says this now:

I am astonished, very relieved and most importantly incredibly grateful for the support. I would also particularly like to thank Anthony, Jennifer Marohasy, Jo Nova, Willie Soon, Benny Peiser and many others for getting the issue up on blogs and spreading the word.

—-

Last week we covered this ugly saga of how a colleague of the late Dr. Bob Carter has been singled out for criticism and ruin by his university: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/01/29/the-power-of-grant-money-on-display-at-james-cook-university/

Now we have this announcement from Dr. Jennifer Marohasy, reposted below.

I ask three things of our readers.

  1. Retweet and repost this story wherever you can, Twitter, Facebook, blogs, etc.
  2. To show support, buy a copy of the book in which he says the Great Barrier Reef alarmism is just that.
  3. If possible, donate to his campaign to fight back against the university- link below.

Peter Ridd Asks for your Help – Now

Peter Ridd and Jennifer Marohasy speaking about the need for quality assurance in science last November in Sydney.

PROFESSOR Peter Ridd is a physicist at James Cook University who has dared to question scientific findings that purport to show the Great Barrier Reef is in trouble. Specifically, he has been formally censured by the University and told to remain quiet about the matter – or risk his job.

The issue dates back to August 2017, and comments he made on television promoting the book I edited last year – Climate Change: The Facts 2017.

Peter wrote the first chapter in this book, and in it he suggests that there are major problems with quality assurance when it comes to claims of the imminent demise of the reef. He has also published in the scientific literature detailing his concerns about the methodology used to measure calcification rates, including a technical paper in Marine Geology (volume 65).

After some reflection over the last couple of months, and some thousands of dollars on legal fees – so far paid by the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) that first published the book that got him into trouble – Professor Ridd has decided to fight the final censure.

In short, he has decided he would rather be fired than be quiet.

But he is now going to have to find about A$95,000!

So, this university Professor has set-up a crowdfunding account. It is now your turn to show support and help fight the case.

https://www.gofundme.com/peter-ridd-legal-action-fund


There is also this story in The Australian:

Marine scientist Peter Ridd has refused to accept a formal censure and gag order from James Cook University and expanded his Federal Court action to defend academic freedoms and free speech.

James Cook University professor Peter Ridd. Picture: Cameron Laird

A revised statement of claim alleges JCU trawled through private email conversations in a bid to bolster its misconduct case against him.

JCU had found Professor Ridd guilty of “serious misconduct”, ­including denigrating a co-worker, denigrating the university, breaching confidentiality, publishing information outside of the university and disregarding his obligations as an employee.

Professor Ridd has asked the Federal Court to overturn the university ruling and confirm his right not to be silenced.

In the revised statement of claim, Professor Ridd has dropped an earlier claim of conflict of interest against JCU vice-chancellor Sandra Harding, but has alleged other senior staff had been biased and had not acted fairly or in good faith.

Professor Ridd’s Federal Court action is seen as a test of academic freedom and free speech, and has been supported by the Institute of Public Affairs.

Professor Ridd said he would seek public donations to continue the fight against JCU. He first took court action in November in a bid to stop a JCU disciplinary process against him for comments he made to Sky News presenter Alan Jones.

The university said by expressing concerns about the quality of some reef science, Professor Ridd had not acted in a “collegiate” manner.

Professor Ridd told Sky News: “The basic problem is that we can no longer trust the scientific ­organisations like the Australian Institute of Marine Science, even things like the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.”

He said a lot of the science was not properly checked, tested or replicated and “this is a great shame because we really need to be able to trust our scientific institutions and the fact is I do not think we can any more”.

A JCU spokesman said the university’s lawyers had invited Professor Ridd to discontinue his proceedings. “(He) has amended his proceedings. His decision to do so is a matter for him,” he said.

“The university intends to vigorously defend those proceedings (but) as these matters are before the courts, JCU will not comment further.”

Lawyers for JCU wrote to Professor Ridd on November 28 confirming the university had determined he had engaged in “serious misconduct” and issued him with a “final censure”.

“The disciplinary process and all information gathered and recorded in relation to the disciplinary process (including the allegations, letters, your client’s responses and the outcome of the disciplinary process) is confidential pursuant to clause 54.1.5 of the university enterprise agreement,” the JCU lawyers said.

Professor Ridd has subsequently published his concerns about the quality of reef science in a peer-reviewed journal. He said he was determined to speak freely about his treatment “even though it will go against explicit directions by JCU not to”.

“This is as much a case about free speech as it is about quality of science,” he said.


Again, I ask three things of our readers.

  1. Retweet and repost this story wherever you can, Twitter, Facebook, blogs, etc.
  2. To show support, buy a copy of the book in which he says the Great Barrier Reef alarmism is just that.
  3. If possible, donate to his campaign to fight back against the university- link below.

https://www.gofundme.com/peter-ridd-legal-action-fund

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

177 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Latitude
February 1, 2018 11:24 am

They can’t use science to disprove him….so they threaten him

Carbon Bigfoot
Reply to  Latitude
February 1, 2018 4:14 pm

Love to send him some money but the site won’t recognize by Discover Card. mods what’s up?

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 1, 2018 9:33 pm

I live in Australia and initially it rejected my donation. Rectified by reloading Australia as the country in the drop down menu. Probably you might need a ‘mainstream’ card.

Paddy
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 1, 2018 11:42 pm

Seemed to work ok with my GB Visa card, so gave my widow(er)’s mite. Funding seems to be going well at present, but will repeat if required.

Bryan A
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 2, 2018 9:54 am

Just looked at Go Fund Me stats for most gathered and Professor Ridd should top the list but unfortuantely he isn’t even mentioned on the particular page I located from GoFundMe
Even their Trending Page should have him in Second place with almost ALL the needed funds gathered in a single 24 hour period
https://www.gofundme.com/trending

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 2, 2018 12:25 pm

Concurr it should be on that trending page
but it isn’t listed even though $89,832 of $95,000 goal raised in 2 days

icisil
Reply to  Latitude
February 2, 2018 2:19 pm

Rodney Hackett in for the slam dunk – $5K > $99,312. Whoom!

TG
February 1, 2018 11:31 am

As far as Australia is concerned PROFESSOR Peter Ridd is a candle in the wind. When will sanity come to that country?

Mark from Oz
Reply to  TG
February 1, 2018 1:59 pm

A long way from sanity here, my own feeling is that the progressives are more aggressive towards ‘non believers’ of any of their political ideology in our country. The news media here is nearly left leaning with all the expected coverage and opinions that come with that. There are a few of us attempting to wake the sheeple and critically think and reason, but its a battle, especially when ‘feelings’ are used to justify a position.

Reply to  TG
February 3, 2018 2:14 pm

I strongly expect never. The groupthink mental illness of liberalism is a function of easy-living reality-divorced coastal metroplises. For obvious ecological reasons Australia is mostly comprised of those benighted tumours.

Robert Houston
Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 1, 2018 12:10 pm

Tried to donate but the expiry month drop down will only go as far as April.

Mr Bliss
Reply to  Robert Houston
February 1, 2018 12:58 pm

Robert, it only shows 4 months in the drop down box – but there is a slider to give access to the rest!

Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 1, 2018 4:39 pm

Is anyone in communication with Dr Jordan Peterson? This is certainly within the realm of his fight against the universities and I am aware he’s been making bank through crowd funding. The reason I suggest this is because his current exposure is walking up the masses to logic and reason, self awareness, and personal responsibility.
I could see him potentially donating since decent money and/or providing another medium for exposure.
I’ll donate money Friday when my Trump tax incentive hits my account. Our company just gave everyone a grand, so after the theft I stand to see $600. I’m sure I could throw $100 at it.

Matheus Carvalho
Reply to  honestliberty
February 1, 2018 8:16 pm

I thought the same, it would be fantastic if Jordan Peterson mentioned this case!

Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 1, 2018 7:40 pm

Note that the donation is in Australian dollars, which is 80 cents to the US dollar, so a $125 AU donation will only cost $100 US.

February 1, 2018 11:37 am

done

Robin
February 1, 2018 11:38 am

Donated

PaulH
February 1, 2018 11:39 am

As per CAGW profiteers’ standard operating procedure, Professor Ridd was declared guilty of wrong-think and informed of his penalty. Any hearing will simply confirm the verdict.
Classy people, eh?

ResourceGuy
February 1, 2018 11:39 am

Science in Australia is threatened. Stand up!

eyesonu
February 1, 2018 11:46 am

The words say it all

eyesonu
Reply to  eyesonu
February 1, 2018 3:04 pm

Please don’t forget our host that brought us here. There’s a button somewhere.

Old44
February 1, 2018 11:49 am

It is difficult to know which imminent demise he is talking about as they come along every three years.

Keen Observer
February 1, 2018 11:53 am

One of the few times I’ve felt compelled to participate financially.

Scarface
February 1, 2018 11:56 am

Done

spen
February 1, 2018 11:59 am

What ever happens now let us not forget that JCU is off the spectrum as a respected scientific university. Until they rejoin the true scientific community just treat them as a. Joke.

ColA
Reply to  spen
February 4, 2018 2:15 pm

The JCU has been off the charts CAGWatolagists for many years, look into their history they hounded Bob Carter out as well they have not respect for freedom of speech or scientific method just leftard café late airheads with no grounding in reality! And the rest of our Universities should all be renamed Leftofunverses,
I did read somewhere that this was intentionally instrumented by a former Labor (left/socialist/green) government!

knr
February 1, 2018 12:05 pm

A show trail and mafia style threats , just what has that to do with science?
Sadly now the university has gone ‘all-in’ they cannot now publicly back down.
And if he wins any court case he will find , they will neither forgive nor forget the lose of face which of course they will take no ownership for.
Best he can hope for is an under the table deal and someone from HR , not necessarily the right someone , being thrown under the bus.

Edwin
February 1, 2018 12:05 pm

Once upon a time the Roman Catholic Church’s trial and censure of Galileo was used by thinking academics as an example of how critical thinking and science should not be persecuted. I guess those at James Cook U missed that lesson.

Ozwedge
Reply to  Edwin
February 1, 2018 4:23 pm

Galileo was never censured for his science, but rather for his commentary on theological matters.

Alan Tomalty
Reply to  Ozwedge
February 1, 2018 8:45 pm

Was Galileo an athiest? If so my respect for him has increased immensely even though He already has always been considered the Grandfather of Astronomy.

JohnKnight
Reply to  Ozwedge
February 2, 2018 1:39 pm

“Was Galileo an athiest?”
Of course not, he was a Christian . . that’s essentially where/who science (in the modern sense of the word) comes from; Christian intellectuals. Even in recent times, about two thirds of all Nobel prizes in physics, chemistry and medicine were won by people who self identify as Christians.
Does that do anything to boost your respect of Christians/Christianity?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Ozwedge
February 2, 2018 5:36 pm

“Does that do anything to boost your respect of Christians/Christianity?”
Nope.

Bridget
February 1, 2018 12:08 pm

Saw this on the Global Warming Policy Foundation site and donated. Well worth it!!

MikeN
February 1, 2018 12:08 pm

I predict they will try to have GoFundMe remove the Professor.

Reply to  MikeN
February 1, 2018 12:52 pm

MikeN
February 1, 2018 at 12:08 pm
Could they really do that?
Anyway, made a small donation and passed the WUWT post onto a couple of colleagues…I’m not into social media! Will buy the book too. This is an important battle.

Matheus Carvalho
February 1, 2018 12:09 pm

Donated and distributed to my colleagues in my university.

ivor ward
February 1, 2018 12:14 pm

Donated. Freedom of speech is under attack throughout the Western World. We have Appeaser May and her anti “fake news” department. I can’t do much about that other than write to my MP (done) and I can’t do much for Peter Ridd other than donate a tiny percentage of my pension. That has been done as well. ( I do resent the banks taking a cut in exchange rate conversion and transaction fees though)

HotScot
Reply to  ivor ward
February 1, 2018 1:17 pm

ivor ward
Can you post the letter you sent to your MP please, I would like to do something similar but I’m not sure where to start. Suitably redacted of course.

Peter Campion
Reply to  HotScot
February 1, 2018 7:04 pm

Hotscot
I just sent this to JCU via their engagement@jcu.edu.au email. I’m planning to build from this for my local MPs here in FNQ.
Dear JCU management team
Your actions against Professor Ridd are becoming big news throughout the scientific community and not in a good way.
As a taxpayer, a resident of FNQ and a science enthusiast I am very, very disappointed in JCU.
So dimly is JCU being viewed, some are arguing you should be required to relinquish the name “James Cook”. The venerable sea captain would be rolling in his grave…
Anyway, I have questions.
Since JCU was established under state legislation I presume you’re bound by the Public Sector Ethics Act, 1994. How do you account for your censure of Ridd in the context of your responsibilities under that legislation?
Secondly, would you please explain how censuring Ridd benefits good science, particularly in light of past upsets of ‘consensus science’ (e.g. eugenics, plate tectonics, heliocentrism, lunar crater formation and stomach ulcers)?
I await your reply
Peter Campion

HotScot
Reply to  HotScot
February 4, 2018 9:59 am

Peter,
Excellent, thank you. Suitably modified version has been sent from me.

Doug Hilliard
February 1, 2018 12:15 pm

Donated!

John Bell
February 1, 2018 12:15 pm

The Left eating their own, been reading up on it lately.

Dave
February 1, 2018 12:45 pm

donated

Hum
February 1, 2018 12:57 pm

50 is done.

u.k.(us)
February 1, 2018 1:04 pm

As a kid (we’re talking the late 60’s) my parent(s) led me to believe Captain Cook was part of the lineage
on my moms side, my grandma Cook being the proof.
I’ve never done a genealogy search, but being killed by the natives in Hawaii sounds just about right 🙂

Louis
February 1, 2018 1:12 pm

If a university tried to silence a global-warming believer, we would hear screams of ‘censorship’ and ‘anti-science’ from all around the globe. Why isn’t it censorship and anti-science to silence any scientist? Why not invite healthy debate? If you can’t defend your position against the naysayers, you really don’t know as much as you think you do. These people are the same type who would want to silence Albert Einstein for questioning anything to do with the “established science” of Newtonian physics.

techgm
February 1, 2018 1:15 pm

Done.
And may I suggest that we stop using the left’s pejorative term “climate denier.” Let’s use “climate realist” or something similarly positive and accurate.

Reply to  techgm
February 1, 2018 2:51 pm

Climate Scientist works well.

Reply to  philohippous
February 1, 2018 3:54 pm

+1

Paddy
Reply to  philohippous
February 1, 2018 11:51 pm

Climate + scientist akin to witch + doctor.

Peter Campion
Reply to  techgm
February 1, 2018 7:06 pm

Onto it, Techgm
Also “political correctness” is really “progressive conformity”.

hunter
Reply to  Peter Campion
February 2, 2018 5:57 am

PC is really “leftist tyranny”.

Reply to  techgm
February 2, 2018 8:28 am

How about Climate contrarian or panic-party pooper or nattering-nabob naysayer?

Reply to  Roger Knights
February 2, 2018 8:42 am

Or a “disaster dissenter”?

Reply to  Roger Knights
February 2, 2018 9:07 am

Or a doomsday dissenter or doomsday denier.

don't drink the koolaid
Reply to  techgm
February 5, 2018 7:27 am

‘Heretic’ seems to be the more precise substitute sobriquet for the nonsensical term “climate denier”.

1 2 3 5