New study from Scripps puts a crimp on claims of recent rising ocean temperatures

This is interesting, and revealing. Using a new method of measuring krypton and xenon ratios in Antarctic ice core, an estimated temperature rise of just 0.1°C over the last 50 years was determined. This is well below many other estimates of ocean temperature increase.  Mean global ocean temperature increased by 2.57 ± 0.24 degrees Celsius over the last glacial transition (20,000 to 10,000 years ago).

From UCSD Scripps:

New Study Identifies Thermometer for Global Ocean

Researchers now able to reconstruct past ocean temperatures

There is a new way to measure the average temperature of the ocean thanks to researchers at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California San Diego. In an article published in the Jan. 4, 2018, issue of the journal Nature, geoscientist Jeff Severinghaus and colleagues at Scripps Oceanography and institutions in Switzerland and Japan detailed their ground-breaking approach.

Determining changes in the average temperature of the entire world’s ocean has proven to be a nearly impossible task due to the distribution of different water masses. Each layer of water can have drastically different temperatures, so determining the average over the entirety of the ocean’s surface and depths presents a challenge.

Severinghaus and colleagues were able to bypass these obstacles by determining the value indirectly. Instead of measuring water temperature, they determined the ratio of noble gases in the atmosphere, which are in direct relation to the ocean’s temperature.

“This method is a radically new way to measure change in total ocean heat,” said Severinghaus. “It takes advantage of the fact that the atmosphere is well-mixed, so a single measurement anywhere in the world can give you the answer.”

In the study, the scientists measured values of the noble gases argon, krypton, and xenon in air bubbles captured inside ice in Antarctica. As the oceans warm, krypton and xenon are released into the atmosphere in known quantities. The ratio of these gases in the atmosphere therefore allows for the calculation of average global ocean temperature.

Measurements were taken from ice samples collected during the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) Divide coring project, of which Severinghaus is a leader. Over the course of six field seasons in Antarctica, a drill removed ice in cylindrical samples 2.7 meters (just under 9 feet) in length. The final sample was taken at a depth of 3,405 meters (over 11,000 feet) in 2011. This record spans nearly 100,000 years and the age of the layers can be determined to within 50 years. Earth’s atmosphere mixes on a scale of weeks to months, so a measurement of these air bubbles gives what is essentially a global average. For this study, scientists focused on samples 8,000 to 22,000 years old, and collected data in increments averaging 250 years in resolution.

New insights into the glaciation cycles that occurred on Earth long before humans began affecting the temperature of the atmosphere and oceans are now possible using the technique of measuring noble gas quantities. The study determined that the average global ocean temperature at the peak of the most recent ice age was 0.9 ºC (33.6 ºF). The modern ocean’s average temperature is 3.5 ºC (38.3 ºF). The incremental measurements between these data points provide an understanding of the global climate never before possible.

“The reason this study is so exciting is that previous methods of reconstructing ocean heat content have very large age uncertainties, [which] smooths out the more subtle features of the record,” said co-author Sarah Shackleton, a graduate student in the Severinghaus lab at Scripps. “Because WAIS Divide is so well dated, this is the first time that we’ve been able to see these subtle features in the record of the deglaciation. This helps us better understand the processes that control changes in ocean heat content.”

This paper is the result of fifteen years of work for Severinghaus, along with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars in his lab. Discussions with another professor at Scripps, atmospheric scientist Ralph Keeling, brought about the idea. Keeling studies the argon levels in the atmosphere to get a similar record of ocean heat going back a few decades. However, air bubbles trapped in ice don’t preserve argon levels accurately. Severinghaus discovered that xenon and krypton are well preserved in ice cores, which provides the temperature information that can then be used by scientists studying many other aspects of the earth’s oceans and atmosphere over hundreds of thousands of years.

Going forward, the ratios of these same noble gases can be determined from atmospheric samples taken anywhere in the world. For example, a measurement from the Ellen Browning Scripps Memorial Pier in La Jolla represents a global average of ocean temperature. Severinghaus hopes to fine tune the procedure.

“Our precision is about 0.2 ºC (0.4 ºF) now, and the warming of the past 50 years is only about 0.1 ºC,” he said, adding that advanced equipment can provide more precise measurements, allowing scientists to use this technique to track the current warming trend in the world’s oceans.

With this study, Severinghaus and colleagues have shown that measurements of noble gases in the atmosphere provide the historical record long sought by the scientific community, and can be further optimized to gain insights into modern ocean temperature changes as well.

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant numbers 05-38630 and 09-44343), and the Swiss National Science Foundation.


The paper: Mean global ocean temperatures during the last glacial transition

Abstract:

Little is known about the ocean temperature’s long-term response to climate perturbations owing to limited observations and a lack of robust reconstructions. Although most of the anthropogenic heat added to the climate system has been taken up by the ocean up until now, its role in a century and beyond is uncertain. Here, using noble gases trapped in ice cores, we show that the mean global ocean temperature increased by 2.57 ± 0.24 degrees Celsius over the last glacial transition (20,000 to 10,000 years ago). Our reconstruction provides unprecedented precision and temporal resolution for the integrated global ocean, in contrast to the depth-, region-, organism- and season-specific estimates provided by other methods. We find that the mean global ocean temperature is closely correlated with Antarctic temperature and has no lead or lag with atmospheric CO2, thereby confirming the important role of Southern Hemisphere climate in global climate trends. We also reveal an enigmatic 700-year warming during the early Younger Dryas period (about 12,000 years ago) that surpasses estimates of modern ocean heat uptake.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25152

Reconstructing past ocean temperatures

Many techniques exist to reconstruct past ocean temperatures. The majority of these approaches, however, can be used to study only specific depths or seasons, or are based on complicated and poorly understood biological processes. Bernhard Bereiter and colleagues use noble gases in ice cores to build a high-resolution reconstruction of mean ocean temperature from the Last Glacial Maximum to the early Holocene. They find an overall ocean warming of about 2.5 ℃ over this period, which is closely correlated with variations in Antarctic ocean temperature. A dramatic ocean warming exceeding that of the modern era occurred during the Younger Dryas period—a time of sharp cooling over much of the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere land mass.

Figure 1: Schematic of the four-box model used to derive MOT, including the modern (‘Today’) and LGM characteristics of the boxes.
Figure 2: Mean Ocean Temperature records relative to today derived from three different atmospheric noble gas ratios and their mixture.
Figure 3: Comparison of our best-estimate MOT record with other palaeoclimatic records for the last glacial transition.
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
104 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian_UK
January 5, 2018 12:09 am

All this is a bit academic, according to UK’s Lancaster University. On BBC News this morning, they reported on a global coral bleaching problem caused by climate change and warming oceans. Apparently, the corals can cope with gradual warming (1deg so far) but sudden changes, as induced by, eg, El Ninos, can’t be tolerated. Also apparent is that this is a very modern phenomenon.

I can’t find a link to the source story yet.

Ian_UK
Reply to  Ian_UK
January 5, 2018 12:13 am
tty
Reply to  Ian_UK
January 5, 2018 2:13 am

“Also apparent is that this is a very modern phenomenon.”

It isn’t. How do you think all the reef flats just below high tide in the tropics originated? By reefs growing up close to the surface and then getting bleached/killed by low water.

Remember that the Great Barrier Reef is dead 90% of the time, it is only a living reef during interglacials. Most of the time it is just a low range of barren limestone hills.

Reply to  Ian_UK
January 5, 2018 3:54 pm

Ian_UK January 5, 2018 at 12:09 am

All this is a bit academic, according to UK’s Lancaster University. On BBC News this morning, they reported on a global coral bleaching problem caused by climate change and warming oceans. Apparently, the corals can cope with gradual warming (1deg so far) but sudden changes, as induced by, eg, El Ninos, can’t be tolerated. Also apparent is that this is a very modern phenomenon.

I can’t find a link to the source story yet.

As usual, Ian, nature is much more complex. Bleaching is the natural reaction of coral to thermal changes. It can be induced by cold as well as heat. As tty mentions above, it’s what happens on reef flats.

The key to understanding bleaching is that a coral reef has two parts—the inhabitants, and the apartment house. The apartment house is the white coral skeleton, which is built slowly but surely by the inhabitants. But what happens when conditions change? Say the winds and currents shift, and some coral reef apartment house is too hot for the inhabitants?

What happens is that the inhabitants die.

However, the apartment house is still there … and nature abhors a vacuum. So who moves in to the already-built structure? Well, inhabitants who can live in warmer temperatures … and they’ll live there until such time as conditions change again.

This is not modern, it’s unbelievably ancient. It is how coral reefs have dealt with changing conditions since forever—the strain of coral polyps that are living there all die out and are replaced by new polyps which can tolerate the new conditions. It’s their version of ongoing local evolution.

For the same reason, it’s not a tragedy. It only takes a couple of years for the apartment house to be fully repopulated. Why so fast?

Because the habitat is already built. So the new inhabitants don’t have to expend any energy on building, they can put it all into growth.

Best to you,

w.

ptolemy2
January 5, 2018 3:58 am

Any new accurate proxy of past conditions is to be welcomed.

Archie Lever
January 5, 2018 6:12 am

Interesting stuff about the new method of measuring ocean temperature increase. As far as Argo is concerned; I have never been convinced about the averaging of Argo results to measure differences in OHC. The fact is that they move around spacially and report at different times.

If I were measuring the average CHANGE in temperature of any body between times t1 and t2, I would expect that the temperature sensors would be placed spacially over the body as uniformly as possible; then a snapshot taken of ALL the sensor temperatures at t1 and t2 to calculate an accurate difference.

Applied to the Earth’s oceans; this would mean many many fixed tethered buoys at a range of depths, lats and longs; each measuring a fixed chunk of ocean. They would ALL record temperature instantaneously at t1, t2, t3 et al. in order for a snapshot temperature to be taken at t1 and compared with similar snapshots at t2 etc for the whole planet.

Technically this would be a massive task with huge problems setting up planet wide fixed tethered buoys and reporting from depth.

thomho
January 6, 2018 9:53 pm

While not the main issue in this interesting blog there are a number of conflicting descriptions of the Argo floats that seem to need resolution, Some posts on this blog have described the floats as hovering at 1000 metres then ascending taking temperatures and other data eg salinity which they report to satellites when they reach the surface Other posts say they hover at 1000 metres then descend to 2000 metres before then ascending to the surface.
In the past, comments on WUWT have been critical of such Argo operations as it has been said that given the average depth of the oceans is 3500 metres that the floats only measure data from the top 57% by depth (and possibly much less by volume)..
A more recent article now claims the Argo floats descend to the sea floor (cited as 5,500 metres) before ascending.
http://argofloats.wikispaces.com/Argo+Floats
That article also states there are about 3800 floats administered by some 27 nations with the USA administering by far the largest number (over 2000) of floats (Australia about 500). It also says that the reason for their hovering at 1000 metres is that currents are less at that depth plus sea life such as molluscs etc which might over time encrust the floats and thus affect the accuracy of their measurements, do not exist at that depth.

As its seems it could be useful to establish the operation of the Argo floats as a basis for future discussion, can any reader confirm those facts ?