FSB, Climate Cabal expand power and wealth, by targeting financial and insurance industries
Foreword:
A powerful international organization, the Financial Stability Board, includes a task force that is helping to coordinate numerous attacks on financial, investing, insurance and other firms … and their clients … in the name of preventing dangerous manmade climate change. By locking up centuries of fossil fuel reserves, the FSB’s army of agitators hope to benefit immensely – at the expense of ordinary people everywhere.
The vice-chair of the FSB’s climate disclosure task force says the world will have to spend $93 trillion over the next 15 years on “renewable, sustainable” energy and low-carbon infrastructure programs, as part of the Climate Crisis, Inc. plan to de-carbonize and de-industrialize the planet. Naturally, most of that money will flow to its crony corporatist allies. Their ultimate goal is to enrich and empower themselves … and fundamentally transform the global economy – to our detriment, and especially the detriment of the world’s poorest families – using our taxpayer, consumer, and investment, retirement, insurance and pension fund money!
The $1.5-trillion Climate Crisis industry is not about to go quiet into that dark night, or to strut but an hour upon the stage, to then be heard no more. In these desperate times, it is unleashing even more sound and fury, and assaulting new targets, in a frantic effort to expand its heavily subsidized global empire.
The Donald Trump Administration and Scott Pruitt EPA continue to emphasize fossil fuels, job creation and economic growth, and deemphasize the Obama obsession with climate change. News headlines hail the shale revolution’s new world order, a huge oil discovery in Alaska and declining OPEC clout. As German industries head to foreign shores and 330,000 Deutsch households cannot afford electricity due to soaring prices, its Chancellery Minister announced to thundering applause that Germany would no longer pursue its unilateral climate, CO2-reduction, energy efficiency and renewable energy policies.
Britain and Australia are also second-guessing their wind, solar, biofuel and climate commitments. China, India and a hundred other emerging economies continue to build more coal-fueled power plants, expand vehicle fleets, and import more oil and gas, to modernize and improve living standards. The future of the Paris climate semi-treaty and Global Climate Fund wealth redistribution scheme are increasingly in doubt.
That’s why, as the July 2017 G20 economic summit in Hamburg, Germany draws near, the Climate Cabal is in overdrive. Alarmist scientists, politicians, activists, industrialists and financiers are ramping up their rhetoric about the massive, imminent climate crisis allegedly facing our planet, unless we slash our carbon dioxide emissions, by keeping centuries of oil, gas and coal reserves locked up in the ground.
That means companies that own those reserves, finance or insure fossil fuel projects, or hold investment interests in those reserves or projects will end up with trillions of dollars in “stranded assets” – energy that will be made permanently off limits, once the world has shifted to a totally “decarbonized” global economy. In fact, selling off holdings in fossil fuel enterprises will not be nearly enough. “The freed-up assets must be redirected to more sustainable businesses.”
At least that is the view of AXA Insurance climate and sustainability director Christian Thimann – who also serves as vice-chair of the international Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure. He intends to harness the FSB’s significant power and influence to advance his ideologies and investments – doing so in league with an unbelievable army of like-minded interests, all of whom have enormous political and financial stakes in the outcome of this global policy battle.
Among them are UBS Financial Services and the $5-trillion BlackRock global financial management firm, which now has an index fund for people and organizations that want to divest from companies that BlackRock, AXA and the Cabal have targeted with their anti-carbon campaigns. The tax-exempt anti-carbon pressure group Natural Resources Defense Council has put $70 million into the fund.
Former NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg – having given millions to tax-exempt anti-fossil fuel agitator groups – is now chairman of the FSB’s Climate Financial Disclosure Task Force. Not surprisingly, it is allied with the state attorneys general who spearheaded the nasty campaign to silence and punish energy companies and think tanks that dared to question the “97% consensus” on manmade climate chaos.
Also onboard are state and city comptroller and treasurer offices (CA, CT, NY, PA, RI, VT), various state and city employee pension funds, the Ceres Investor Network on Climate Risk, and numerous radical environmentalist groups like the Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists and Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, notes E&E Legal senior fellow Chris Horner.
They will all “profit off environmental policies that they advocate with very close friends in government,” while “amassing wealth in large part through government contracts,” Horner observes – adding that his organization will “work aggressively to reveal the unethical actions” of every party involved.
The unethical behavior begins with claims about climate cataclysms that are not happening in the real world. Dangerous, unprecedented, runaway warming is not occurring. Seas are rising at seven inches a century, not 20 feet. Hurricanes and tornadoes, floods and droughts have not increased in frequency or intensity. There is no proof that manmade CO2 drives climate change or that it will be catastrophic.
Equally deceptive are claims that the technologies and business interests advocated by the FSB, Climate Cabal and their political comrades are in any way “sustainable.” As any rational analysis demonstrates, the metals and other raw materials required, human rights affected, cropland, habitat, wildlife and human health impacts involved, and massive taxpayer and consumer subsidies needed for wind and solar power, ethanol, biodiesel, wood pellets, anaerobic digesters and other “renewable” energy schemes make one thing absolutely clear: the entire sustainability concept is politicized, agenda-driven and unsustainable.
All these inconvenient truths notwithstanding, the FSB has announced that it is going to establish protocols that will supposedly improve the financial sector’s ability to “incorporate climate-related issues in financial reporting” and “enable stakeholders to understand concentrations of carbon-related assets in the financial sector and the financial system’s exposures to climate-related risks.”
Translated into plain English, this means the FSB will help pressure groups with a political/financial stake in the outcome to identify, target, stigmatize, harass and intimidate any entities that they deem are too involved in fossil fuels or insufficiently invested in renewable energy and sustainable businesses. It plans to work with the above-identified activists to secure “voluntary disclosures” and other compliance.
In practice, this means relying less on the federal government and more on friendly international, state and local governing bodies, agitator groups, organizations like the Climate Accountability Scorecard, and the so-called “Equator Principles” that financial institutions “should follow” in energy investing. Their primary targets for these “name and shame” campaigns will likely include the World Bank, private banks, insurance providers, institutional investors and their advisors, pension funds and universities.
The California Insurance Commission has helpfully launched a Climate Risk Carbon Initiative, a searchable database that will make it easy for attack groups to develop target hit lists. A primary tactic will be accusing targets of having inadequate “plans on climate change preparedness and sustainability,” to justify efforts to damage stock portfolio values and demand defunding or divestment.
Meanwhile, major financial and debt issues are growing for numerous nations, states and cities. The FSB and Climate Cabal want us to ignore them, focus on climate change – and have the G20 do likewise.
Even though it is already overly complex, the current financial reporting system works. It deals with real, measurable, familiar risks, and helps countries address and overcome those risks. Politicizing the system, and forcing it to refocus on conjectural, exaggerated and fabricated climate and sustainability risks would upend the entire international energy, insurance and financial system. It would bring disastrous results for jobs and families – but no climate, environmental or sustainability benefits. And it would do absolutely nothing about the unreliable energy, health risks, environmental impacts, child labor and other problems embedded in the renewable and sustainable schemes the Cabal promotes so passionately, and deceitfully.
But the rewards of this FSB/Climate Cabal deceit are enormous – incomprehensible to normal people. Says Thimann: “Over the next 15 years, an estimated $93 trillion will be needed for investments in low-carbon infrastructure.” That’s five times the size of the entire 2015 US economy!
Perhaps worst of all, these FSB and other government officials, unelected bureaucrats, industrialists, and tax-exempt pressure groups are colluding to enrich and empower themselves … and fundamentally transform the global economy – to our detriment, and especially the detriment of the world’s poorest families – using our taxpayer, consumer, and investment, retirement, insurance and pension fund money!
Congress, the Trump Administration and responsible state officials need to investigate, terminate and punish this deception, self-dealing, extortion, and incalculable harm to businesses, workers and families that rely on reliable, affordable carbon-based energy (and will for decades to come).
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org), and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death and other books on the environment.
Kleptocracy as practised in “The Civilized World” requires the big Lie, theft by persuasion.
Parasites will not voluntarily give up, before they are bloated ,as ticks, and must fall off.
It is their nature.
These people are religious zealots and flat-out nutters. They are every bit as deluded and evangelical as the swindlers who papered the world with the mortgage-backed garbage that gullible fools swallowed.
(I am a business-schooled, CFA-ed, “buy-side” investment researcher with a long perspective and experience of “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and The Madness of Crowds” )
It astounds me that any rational adult would pay the slightest bit of attention to their crackpot ideas.
I agree with that analogy John. In many cases they are the same people and institutions.
I’ll bet they are all taking short positions in fossil fuels and looking to make a killing by driving the stock prices down.
Ah. The malevolence of benevolence rought in fine detail. The wolf in sheep’s clothing finally made transparent. The entire crowd, not just the boy, can see the emperor’s tallywhacker. The wool pulled down over our eyes has gotten itchy…ok I’m done.
Why is energy efficiency being lumped in with renewables and and anti-carbon policies? Improving energy efficiency of things that use energy is good, regardless of whether or not manmade climate change is going to be a problem.
More sanity otherwise lost in the politicized-ideology manipulation-noise. Thanks…
Depends on how much the efficiency improvements cost.
Other than that, spot on.
You can’t ‘mandate’ improvements to efficiency. Just as Obama’s 50mpg was a stupid and impossible fantasy, trying to demand improvements to energy efficiency are pure madness. If it’s possible to increase efficiency then it will be done, for perfectly normal economic reasons. If it isn’t then no amount of law or regulations will change that.
“The Donald Trump Administration and Scott Pruitt EPA continue to emphasize fossil fuels, job creation and economic growth, and deemphasize the Obama obsession with climate change.”
Just found out that Obama worked for the Joyce Foundation in his earlier days and this organization helped create the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX which had Gore and Maurice Strong in it).
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7526
Goldman Sachs purchased a 10% stake in the CCX in ’06.
In 2008, a Bloomberg article said: “May 30 (Bloomberg) — The world market for carbon-dioxide emissions may be worth as much as $20 trillion a year within a decade, according to Richard Sandor, chairman of Climate Exchange Plc, owner of emissions markets in London and Chicago.”.
And then Blythe Masters, who “developed and marketed credit derivatives” in the 90s also was working on derivates for carbon:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-09-12/blythe-masters-jpmorgans-credit-derivatives-guru-is-not-sorry
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/02/the-howling-wilderness-of-carbon-credits/70817/
Looks to me like rich people saw a huge opportunity to score huge $$$ rent for decades from us at our expenses. Unfortunately, they still see AGW as an opportunity to garnish us of more of our wealth.
And to top it off, many people and organizations are calling for a carbon tax with the revenue in part being helped to fund government programs and deficit reduction. In other words, they want the middle class to pay the brunt of taxes to the US treasury so they can keep more of their wealth. This is the same thing with obamacare, its set up so that the middle class is funding the brunt of the program and paying for the poor’s healthcare.
Never thought I’d change my mind on going after the rich’s wealth. I’ve always been and always will be a conservative who has nothing against the rich (those who have earned their wealth by their own hard work). But when I see the rich trying to pass on the costs of social programs to us middle class, then that makes me want to increase their taxes massively so that they fund the brunt of these programs. And believe me, they want these programs because if they didn’t exist, there would be social strife and riots going on that would prevent or make it harder for them to enjoy their wealth. They aren’t stupid, they just don’t want to pay with their own money (well, they do pay but the proportion of what they pay is like most people here dropping a dime in a salvation army pot).
Nooooow your getting the gist of it. Its NOT an attack on the rich for the sake of being RICH. Its the selling out of their LOYALTY to our country that is the issue. The country needs to base its wealth on REALITY not some make up socially engineered AND MANDATED scam program. CAGW is a spoke in the wheel of social engineering. It has no basis in reality. The RICH in collusion with NGOs are pushing and FIXING the system to FAVOR the execution of a contrived mandate.
It has to to stop or we will no longer have a valid country based on reality.
Bring on a TASK FORCE as one would do for an RICO style cabal and seize the momentum that this election has given us.
I HATE monopoly in any form – the Financial Stability Board is simply that, a monopoly.
How is the FSB not a global conspiracy, involving hundreds of organizations and tens of thousands of people. All of them pretending concern for the environment, while enriching themselves at the expense of the rest of humanity. Can we officially declare that tin foil hatters aren’t crazy.
Gee, no gas for heating or cooking? If the power goes out in a storm in the summer, it does’t matter quite so much. But in the winter, if the power goes out I can still light my gas stove with kitchen matches, and start a fire in the Franklin stove to keep warm since the furnace won’t run. So if I’m not able to use gas for heating or cooking, or burn wood in the Franklin stove in an emergency, does this mean I’m supposed to just freeze and starve to death?
Ha! Not gonna happen. I think those bozos like Bloomberg, et al., need their own planet – and soon, too.
Deevo March 17, 2017 at 4:51 pm
“Perhaps Solomon Green you should have referred to something a bit more recent? Talk about intellectual dishonesty, Solomon you take the cake! The COTS was the greatest threat to the Great Barrier Reef until the two latest coral bleaching events, which have been far more devastating that COTS ever were. You must have seen the reports on that and yet you chose to ignore it. That’s simply contemptuously pathetic. What little credibility you had is now gone.”
Deevo, Is this report sufficiently up to date? Please note the Authority that issued it.
The Nature Conservancy
Last updated August 30, 2016
“COTS Outbreaks
…..However, anthropogenic and other stresses combined with more frequent COTS outbreaks can result in significant damage to reefs, and
COTS are now considered a main source of coral mortality on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
COTS outbreaks appear to be increasing in frequency over the last several decades…”
“What Causes COTS Outbreaks?
Scientists are not sure what causes outbreaks of COTS, but one of the most widely accepted hypothesis is that COTS outbreaks are predominantly controlled by phytoplankton availability. Nutrient enrichment from agricultural land run-off may lead to COTS outbreaks because elevated nutrient levels cause phytoplankton blooms which provide a necessary food source for COTS larvae.
For example, in the Great Barrier Reef, doubled concentrations of large phytoplankton were linked to nearly a 10-fold increase in larval development, growth and survival of COTS.
Other scientists believe that COTS outbreaks are linked to the timing of El Niño events or are driven by removal of COTS predators.”
Resources
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS): Crown-of-thorns research
The AIMS Long Term Monitoring Program Surveys
Crown-of-thorns starfish on the Great Barrier Reef (pdf, 356k)
Case study on community-based COTs management in the Philippines (pdf, 2.8)
Copyright © 2016