Some WUWT milestones and some housekeeping

Recently, this blog passed a few milestones that I thought would be worth sharing with readers. For all of our critics and the vitriol all they throw our way, I challenge any of them to find a climate related blog that even comes close to the level of readership we enjoy here. We recently passed 300 million views and 2 million approved comments (more on that later).Here are screen grabs from the WUWT dashboard showing the numbers:

We also recently passed 40,000 email subscribers.

Given these events, I thought it might be time to refresh some of our readers on the most contentious part of operating this blog and that is the comments section. One of the downsides of being number one is that you’re also the biggest target. And being the biggest target we have a plethora of “anonymous cowards” who try to post comments here that are either wildly off-topic, inappropriate, angry, hateful, or otherwise uncivil. Some of the serial offenders use fake IDs, fake e-mail addresses, and even fake IP addresses to try to get their unwelcome point of view or hate-mongering across.

Because of that I’ve had to implement a strong filter to catch a lot of these people so that such inappropriate comments are not published. Occasionally some get through but fortunately readers tend to point them out and they get deleted by moderators or myself because they don’t adhere to site policy. This would be a good opportunity for all readers to review the site policy which you can view here.

Some of our critics say that we should allow for some of the other points of view to be discussed here such as barycentrism, atmospheric pressure theories, chemtrails, electric universe, geo-engineering theories, etc. etc. etc. In the earlier days we did some of that, and quite frankly a lot of that stuff proved to be nothing more than nonsense, and turned into food fights in the comment section. Been there, done that, not going to do it again. There are other venues and blogs to discuss those things, feel free to go there but don’t ask for them to be discussed here or make comments about those topics. They will be deleted. I don’t allow those topics here for the same reason I don’t share my home with a honey-badger; it’s not productive, it’s noisy, and somebody gets hurt in the end. And like a honey-badger meme, I just don’t care. 😉

For those of you that have wondered why some comments may disappear that contain what you seem to think are very innocuous words, this is the reason; some of the most persistent fake commenters use particular word combinations or phrases that are part of their writing style that we have identified, and sometimes regular commenters fall into that trap accidentally. Bear in mind that each comment is reviewed and if it meets the site policy it will be published. Occasionally there are some comments that may not fit into the categories defined by the site policy but don’t get published. That’s why we have a clause for “on an event basis” to cover such instances. There’s no need to e-mail us to say my comment disappeared! We will find it and recover it if it meets site policy, if you don’t see it after a few hours, you can consider it out of bound for site policy.

There is also no need to keep posting the same identical comment dozens of times hoping that if you just keep trying it will somehow get through. All that does is just create extra work for the moderation staff to clean out duplicate comments. Speaking of extra work, we cannot move comments between threads if you somehow accidentally commented on the wrong thread, and generally we don’t have time to edit people’s comments when they request such things. It would be better if you would just post a new comment directly below it saying the previous comment had an error and fix it, or just simply repost the appropriate comment in the appropriate thread.

Some of our critics say that we should publish all comments because otherwise we’re engaging in censorship. To that I say, bollocks. We wouldn’t have reached 2 million comments in my opinion if this blog allowed a Wild West policy for commentators, and I think the success speaks for itself in the numbers. I challenge any other blog that covers climate to show me their numbers.

I’d also like to make a note about e-mail subscribers. We don’t have a management tool for e-mail subscribers because the entire system is run by WordPress.com and it is designed to be self maintaining by the end-user. Therefore if you want to unsubscribe you have to do that yourself. Each e-mail that comes from each blog post contains a link that will allow you to unsubscribe if you look carefully.

Finally, I’d like to mention that occasionally some of the ads here cause some readers problems due to the ads injecting inappropriate code or badly formed code. Over the past year I have worked very closely with WordPress.com to help them weed out some of the advertisers that have done stupid things with their ads like injecting code that causes the scrolling the jump right back to the ad every 5 seconds. Largely as a result of complaints from our readers about these problems and due to the efforts I put into troubleshooting and relaying the information to WordPress.com staff, I’m happy to announce that about two months ago they implemented a “predatory code filter” that weeds out these kinds of advertiser tricks. I’m happy to report that since this has been done the number of complaints I received has dropped to near zero.

That said, I still occasionally get complaints from readers about pages being slow or pages not loading completely, etc. a lot of this has to do with browsers and the state of the computer hosting their web browser. I have noted a common theme in many complaints like this which is: fear of upgrade. The Internet is an evolving animal and if you don’t keep your web browser updated and most importantly your computer updated you may find that you get left behind at the back of the herd. For those that are interested, I consider the best browser for viewing this website is Chrome with at least 4 GB of memory and processor that’s running at least 1.5 GHz. About two years ago Firefox was my browser of choice but it had become buggy and unstable and I abandoned it. If you are still using Firefox you might want to consider downloading Chrome for a better experience.

As always, I thank you the reader for making the success of WUWT possible. I also thank the many moderators and guest contributors that keep this blog running smoothly and make the wide variety of content available here.

My best regards to all – Anthony Watts

[note: about 10 minutes after publication, a number of typos were corrected that came from voice recognition dictation imperfections]

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
266 Comments
Daniel Mannix
March 12, 2017 6:50 pm

PS–I live in Boulder, Colorado, and they do seriously call us “skeptics”, as in KKK

Leon Brozyna
March 12, 2017 6:59 pm

What a journey you’ve taken over the course of a decade, starting with maybe a post a day to, at one time, averaging over 6 posts a day and now calmed down to “only” 5 posts a day, and always maintaining a civilized tone in a era that seems to lack such a calm demeanor.

Well done.

Lance
March 12, 2017 7:04 pm

Well done everyone.

Chris Chantrill
March 12, 2017 7:07 pm

Anthony: thank you for everything you do.

Johann Wundersamer
March 12, 2017 7:11 pm

Daniel Mannix on March 12, 2017 at 6:42 pm

I found out 3 years ago that I was not the only climate change skeptic on the planet when I visited your blog–As a skeptic, I still doube Griff really exists–
____________________________________________

Daniel, YES: the person Griff really doesn’t exist –

“Griff” is a group of conspirators called into live when there’s a need for.

OK?

Johann Wundersamer
Reply to  Johann Wundersamer
March 12, 2017 7:16 pm

Show me I’m wrong and

I laugh at you.

Shano
March 12, 2017 7:32 pm

Thankyou Anthony for the hard work that you do and providing this wonderful site. And Thankyou to the many intelligent, thoughtful and clever commenters that take the time to share their brilliance and expertise in pursuit of honest science. It seems like just a short time ago the 100 mill view was reached.

john karajas
March 12, 2017 8:01 pm

Many thanks to Anthony, all the various moderators and contributors and anybody else behind the scenes that contribute to this welcome provider of sanity when it comes the biggest scam ever perpetrated in the history of science.

ossqss
March 12, 2017 8:11 pm

Is there a metaphor or something here? Word Up ~ Watts Up (⊙¿⊙)

Hopefully at least Janice will see it 😉

Janice Moore
Reply to  ossqss
March 12, 2017 8:47 pm

Dear OssQss,

I am honored that you thought I could figure that one out. You have posted many wonderful videos in the past that I enjoyed a lot. Sorry, but, well …… this one just grossed me out, so I stopped it (something about that disgusting athletic support device — ugh!). If it’s just “word up” and “Watts Up” — then, (pause…. while I look up “word up” ….. Hm. So THAT (I comprehend what you are saying and verify that your statement is true, my good brother.) is what that means. Ha! All these years, I thought it meant “pay attention to what I’m about to tell you.” LOLOLOL. I guess I just concocted that out of coaches saying, “Listen up!”

Given the meaning of “word up” and the verified-by-observation truth put forth by Watts up, I say (finally):

there is “something” here — a parallel/pun sort of something.

Sorry so lame. I tried.

Thanks for your confidence in me. Sorry to sort of let you down. Keep onnnnnnnnnn posting more music and stuff! 🙂

Grateful for your efforts!

Janice

JustAnOldGuy
March 12, 2017 8:13 pm

Thanks very, very much for your dedication. I’ve learned a lot here and most of it revealed the vast expanse of my ignorance. Thanks for that, especially.

anna v
March 12, 2017 8:50 pm

Great job, Anthony. I still have whatsupwithat.com as my home page so I will always check that day’s news, mainly for climate stuff, waiting for the craziness to stop..

Janice Moore
Reply to  anna v
March 12, 2017 9:01 pm

Anna V! Oh, I am so glad that you are still here! (just sad as I notice so many long-timers just “disappear” and hope they are okay — looks like you are (I hope)!) I miss your insights. I wish you would grace us with “anna” (“grace”) more frequently. Lol, you ARE probably still commenting — on the super-serious-science threads that I often do not take the time to work through, these days. I need to start doing that again….

Take care, over there, dear Greek Wonder Woman of Science.

Phil
March 12, 2017 9:47 pm

Congratulations, Anthony. The honor is well deserved. The marketplace of ideas that you have created here is an enormous contribution to the welfare of mankind. Hopefully, we will continue to see more reasonable public policy as a result.

Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
March 12, 2017 9:52 pm

I don’t know where the time goes, these days! Hard to believe that it was a little over four years ago that – thanks to your dedication and that of the moderators, guest contributors and the “commentariate” – WUWT hit the magic 100 million mark.

Casting modesty aside for a moment, I remember how delighted I was that you decided to follow my suggestion at the time 😉 And with this latest and greatest counting of coups, I see that my wish of that day:

May WUWT continue to go and grow from strength to strength (and milestone to milestone!)

has been granted! In the intervening 5+ years, you’ve toiled and you’ve troubled … but that magnificent record has, indeed, more than doubled.

In keeping with my tradition… Mazeltov, to all.

There can be little doubt that the increase in CO2 – in addition to making the world far more green – may well have contributed to making this site more frequently seen.

Now I’ll switch back to my mostly lurking mode these days – and hope that my wish from 5+ years ago will always prevail:- )

Craig
March 12, 2017 10:06 pm

[snip . . . it is very difficult to understand what you have typed. It seems you don’t like our host, do like Hilary Clinton and understand what science is. It is possible that I have misread you entirely. Why not repost using clarity so we can all appreciate your point. Thanks. . . mod]

chrisretusn
March 12, 2017 11:37 pm

Thank for your site. It is my go to site for climate change insight. I even have a shortcut on my Samsung S7 Edge’s home page that opens your site directly in Firefox. I check your site at least daily.

March 13, 2017 12:39 am

Lot of thanks to you Anthony and other writer of WUWT for many interesting articles.

Sad to hear that your relationship with Firefox has ended. I try to live with it (-;

Congratulations of your brilliant milestone achievements!

Reply to  Risto Jääskeläinen
March 13, 2017 12:40 am

sorry: “and other writer” = and other writers

eyesonu
March 13, 2017 1:29 am

WUWT University

Multiple degrees of science, humor, news, and other interesting stuff.

There is no other forum like it and is the brainchild of Anthony Watts! Congratulations!

gerald the mole
March 13, 2017 3:29 am

Congratulations and many thanks. I hope to read a lot more of your site.

March 13, 2017 3:50 am

note: about 10 minutes after publication, a number of typos were corrected that came from voice recognition dictation imperfections

Skynet still has a few years to go before it takes over. 😉

Congratulations on the milestones! Well earned all!

Johann Wundersamer
March 13, 2017 4:12 am

Ich mag das einfach nicht wie du mit der Sally Kohn umgehst.

Bitte lass das.

Vielen Dankeschön – Hans

JJB MKI
March 13, 2017 4:29 am

Thank you Anthony for an amazing site and some regular commenters for their insight and expertise.

I agree that moderating comment threads is critical to keep things on-topic. However I hope that moderation continues to be on the lenient side. I feel that comments and arguments from ‘the other side’ should be encouraged – no matter how irritating – and even ones bordering on rude allowed. It is the best way by far to expose the weaknesses in alarmist orthodoxy, sharpen sceptical argument and hopefully bring more people round to a more questioning point of view.

Keep up the great work!

EarthGround
March 13, 2017 4:33 am

Flagg the stupid comments as such, with a tiny font. Censoring people who are stupid-anonymous is weakness. Let it all stand as indication of the level of intelligence, and ,

EarthGround
Reply to  EarthGround
March 13, 2017 4:40 am

whining abput anonymous cowards, lose cred. Stop whining about fake comments We need an imaculate forum? . Get tougher and smarter!

EarthGround
March 13, 2017 4:42 am

Immaculate.

Dr S.
March 13, 2017 4:44 am

How does one safely make a donation to WUWT? I tried a year or so ago but stopped because I wasn’t sure it was going to the right place. Congratulations on your most successful blog.

Editor
Reply to  Dr S.
March 13, 2017 5:00 am

Look for the donate button on the right-side nav bar near the top, it goes to http://www.surfacestations.org/donate.htm which was/is another project by Anthony that opened a lot of eyes about the flaws in our surface temperature record.

Ken L.
March 13, 2017 5:13 am

Thanks for the site and thanks for the ability to comment here( if not real frequently). And a really big thanks for your efforts, Anthony, in cleaning up the ads that almost daily screwed up my browsing experience in general every time I left this site’s tab open!

Ethan Brand
March 13, 2017 5:28 am

Hi Anthony

Thank you for an astonishing site. Facilitating a (relatively) civil and rational discussion on the turbid waters of the internet is difficult to say the least.

Given my daily interactions with people, I find my self somewhat surprised and encouraged that there are in fact quite a few folks out there that want to, like to, and are capable of discussing a plethora of topics with a modicum of civility and disciplined thought. I have learned a lot here by following discussions and the embedded links to other sites and papers.

Anonymity is both a curse and occasionally a blessing. With obvious exceptions, I find that any discussion or interaction where both parties are at least somewhat identified greatly facilitates the above more constructive interactions. Would you consider a periodic post with the sole purpose of encouraging this? Straw man suggestion: Post Title : “Civility”. Discussion (summary):

The purpose of this post is to facilitate civility in discussions. To this end, you are encouraged to post your real name and a VERY brief summary of who/where/what you are. If you wish not to provide your real name and any other identifying data, then you are encouraged to provide some discussion as to why not, and why you can still engage in constructive interactions.

I would suggest perhaps a month recurrence, and very strong moderation.

With Great Respect,

Ethan Brand
Retired Engineer
Roscommon MI

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Ethan Brand
March 13, 2017 6:36 am

I use my nickname after having my original pseudonym stolen by giving out too much info.
I’m very grateful to Dave the (former) mod for alerting me and helping out. If people can figure out your login email address they can (and obviously will) spoof your presence here and say trollish things. People who give out their real name (and mine is very unique) risk being more directly impersonated on additional levels. If you google my last name a bunch of research papers, books and patents come up, (all of which I have nothing to do with) but those are relatives and I don’t want to embarrass my name by having it show up on google searches saying thing I did not say.

I will use my name when I can protect it with a password.

Reply to  Ethan Brand
March 14, 2017 2:20 pm

The purpose of this post is to facilitate civility in discussions. To this end, you are encouraged to post your real name and a VERY brief summary of who/where/what you are. If you wish not to provide your real name and any other identifying data, then you are encouraged to provide some discussion as to why not, and why you can still engage in constructive interactions.

I have a Government job (local). My local Government has “Gone Green”. I am not yet retired. The Green Goons don’t play nice. They, along with the goons of other causes that ascribe to “the end justifies the means”, would consider it some sort of victory to mess with the life of just one one who doesn’t agree with them.
Genocide is acknowledged as wrong and racist. Ideacide?