From NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
Climate has influenced the distribution patterns of Adélie penguins across Antarctica for millions of years. The geologic record tells us that as glaciers expanded and covered Adélie breeding habitats with ice, penguins in the region abandoned their colonies. When the glaciers melted during warming periods, the Adélie penguins were able to return to their rocky breeding grounds.

Now, a NASA-funded study by University of Delaware scientists and colleagues at other institutions reports that this warming may no longer be beneficial for Adélie penguins. In a paper published June 29 in the journal Scientific Reports, the researchers project that approximately 30 percent of current Adélie colonies may be in decline by 2060, and approximately 60 percent of the present population might be dwindling by 2099. They also found the penguins at more southerly sites in Antarctica may be less affected by climate change.
The study results suggest that changes in climate, particularly sustained periods of warmer than usual sea surface temperatures, are detrimental to Adélie penguins. While the specific mechanisms for this relationship remain unknown the study focuses attention on areas where climate change is likely to create a high frequency of unsuitable conditions during the 21st century.
“It is only in recent decades that we know Adélie penguins population declines are associated with warming, which suggests that many regions of Antarctica have warmed too much and that further warming is no longer positive for the species,” said the paper’s lead author, Megan Cimino, who earned her doctoral degree at University of Delaware in May and is now a postdoctoral scholar at Scripps Institute of Oceanography in La Jolla, California.
The Adélie penguin is a species that breeds across the entire Antarctic continent. The penguins are experiencing population declines along the West Antarctic Peninsula, which is one of the most rapidly warming places on Earth. Conversely, Adélie populations in other areas of Antarctica where the climate is stable or even cooling remain steady or are increasing.
The researchers’ objective was to understand the effects of climate change on Antarctic Adélie penguin colonies. The study, funded through the NASA Biodiversity program, used satellite data and global climate model projections to understand current and future population trends on a continental scale. They analyzed satellite observations from 1981 to 2010 of sea ice concentration and bare rock locations, as penguins need ice- and snow-free terrain with pebbles to make their nests. The scientists also took into account data from previous studies that had used satellite imagery to detect the presence or absence of penguin populations. Finally, the team also analyzed sea surface temperature data, which, together with bare rock and sea ice, was used as an indicator of the quality of penguins’ nesting habitats.
“From other studies that used actual ground counts — people going and physically counting penguins — and from high-resolution satellite imagery, we have global estimates of Adélie penguin breeding locations, meaning where they are present and where they are absent, throughout the entire Southern Ocean. We also have estimates of population size and how their populations have changed over last few decades,” said Cimino. “We used all these data to run habitat suitability models.”
“When we combined this data with satellite information and future climate projections of sea surface temperature and sea ice, we can look at past and future changes in Adélie penguin habitat suitability,” Cimino said. “Satellite data allowed me to look at all Adélie penguin habitats throughout the entire Southern Ocean and over multiple decades, which otherwise would not be possible using data solely collected on land or by ship.”
By analyzing past satellite observations, the researchers examined the number of years from 1981 to 2010 that had novel or unusual climate –when sea surface or ice temperatures deviated from average– during the Adélie penguin chick-rearing period and then used an ensemble of global climate models to make predictions about Adélie penguin habitat suitability from 2011 to 2099. The team validated the models with documented population trends.


According to Cimino, the southern regions of the West Antarctic Peninsula, associated islands and northern regions of the Peninsula, which are already experiencing population declines, are projected to experience the greatest frequency of unusual climate this century due to warm sea surface temperatures. This suggests that warm sea surface temperatures may cause a decrease in the suitability of chick-rearing habitats at northerly latitudes.
“Penguin colonies near Palmer Station on the West Antarctic Peninsula have declined by at least 80 percent since the 1970s,” Cimino said. “Within this region we saw the most novel climate years compared to the rest of the continent. This means the most years with warmer than normal sea surface temperature. These two things seem to be happening in the West Antarctic Peninsula at a higher rate than in other areas during the same time period.”
By contrast, the study also suggests several refugia–areas of relatively unaltered climate–may exist in continental Antarctica beyond 2099, which would buffer a species-wide decline. Understanding how these refugia operate is critical to understanding the future of this species.
“The Cape Adare region of the Ross Sea is home to the earliest known penguin occupation and has the largest known Adélie penguin rookery in the world,” Cimino said. “Though the climate there is expected to warm a bit, it looks like it could be a refugia in the future, and if you look back over geologic time it was likely a refuge in the past,”
The researchers reported that climate change impacts on penguins in the Antarctic will likely be highly site-specific based on regional climate trends, and that a southward contraction in the range of Adélie penguins is likely over the next century.
“Studies like this are important because they focus our attention on areas where a species is most vulnerable to change,” concluded Cimino. “The results can have implications for other species that live in the area and for other ecosystem processes.”
###
Speechless I am. The AGW nuts need a new poster child since the polar bear has defied their doom and gloom and is thriving. Based on recent studies they have settled on penguins, A smart choice since penguins are relatively harmless and beloved for their Charlie Chaplin antics, whereas polar bears are just about the most vicious predators existing in the world. They even routinely stalk humans. Almost no other species on earth does that. Unfortunately for them their data on penguins is as flawed as their data on polar b
Clearly you are mistaken about poley bears. I mean, just look at this guy:
http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Frazier-Animal-Mascots-Climate-Change-1200.jpg
poley bears not so nice!
https://youtu.be/1y_kfWUCFDQ
Obviously nature (God) got it wrong. We must relocate the polar bears to Antarctica where they can keep the Walrus population in checkerboard needing to swim for hundreds of miles to feast and relocate the penguin populations to the arctic since they get their food supply from the ocean
Dipped by spell check again..
“Checkerboard” should have been … population in “check without” needing to swim
Somebody tried to give this guy Pepsi.
Opps,
This is the guy that got the Pepsi.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0BuvID10bgY/TIa2kQuHedI/AAAAAAAAC8A/NR3YGZDBiKI/s1600/polar%2Bbear%2B2.jpg
The Polar Bear seal of approval
The warmists are getting desperate so they’re dumping the polar bear in favor of the penguin. i guess polar bears aren’t cute ‘n cuddly enough (in light of the pause) anymore…
Only someone with no knowledge of nature would consider a polar bear to be cute and cuddly.
Unfortunately, that category includes most environmentalists these days.
Penguins are found on shoreline habitats of Antarctica, South America, Africa, and Australia, as well as numerous islands generally south of the equator (the Galapagos Islands are ON the equator, and host the Galapagos Penguins). There are 18-20 surviving species, and at least 32 species that are *known* to have become extinct, through NATURAL processes. Unless climate change totally eliminates shoreline habitats, either through a Noachian flood or through total evaporation of the world’s oceans, there will always be shoreline habitats for penguins to enter, adapt to, and exploit.
Still remember the warmist ABC show Catalyst doing a disappearing sea ice show on Antartica ,only to show polar bears in the background .
I thought Antartica was getting colder so surely this would not help the Penguins nesting .
Transferring polar bears to the Antarctic would be pretty rough on the penguin populations.
Ken Stewart has posted his update for UAH data up to June 2016. All the planet’s regions have been graphed with most still showing the pause. The south polar region shows slight cooling since Dec 1978.
Australia shows a faster cooling trend than other regions and the USA.
https://kenskingdom.wordpress.com/2016/07/08/the-pause-update-june-2016/
How is it that colonies that are increasing, stable and declining can all be in the same area as they should be influenced by the same local climate?
Seriously what are the findings? Might, maybe, maybe not, perhaps, and i am paraphrasing! So what decisions do we make based on this? Piffle, drivel and who the hell would pay for this?
I come to the conclusion that a large group of researchers might be researching the effects of unemployment if they keep up this this sort of rubbish.
– You guys realise that nobody’s listening right now. With all this Trump/Clinton stuff and that Brexit nonsense on the other side of the pond we’re getting shoved on the back burner. So what have we not done for a while that might get us some attention? Ideas, guys, please.
– It’s a while since we did penguins.
– Yeah, right. Penguins. We could do something there. Those little cutie ones. What are the called again?
– Adelies?
– Yeah, them. Go see what we’ve got that could turn into something about how global warming will cause them all to disappear or eat each other or something scary.
A few comments. If (a big if) temperatures go up strongly in the Antarctic I would expect that the adelie penguins would simply move into new areas. Note that there is not a single colony in the whole Weddell sea area today. Reason: no reliably open water in summer.
Also I would expect penguin numbers to start declining throughout the Southern Ocean fairly soon. Reason: penguin numbers have exploded in in the last half century or so since the baleen whales were hunted to near-extinction, freeing a vast new food resource for penguins. As whale stocks start to recover, penguins can be expected to decline.
This might even have bearing on adelie penguins in the peninsula. Whaling stopped earlier in the South Atlantic and you definitely see a lot more baleen whales in the Drake Passage than e. g. south of New Zealand.
This study is based on RCP 8.5. It is totally worthless.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/06/30/rcp-8-5-to-exterminate-antarcticas-penguins-by-2100/
So, I guess the conclusion is that this study ain’t what it’s quacked up to be?
Just so long as you don’t duck the issue.
While the specific mechanisms for this relationship remain unknown
we know Adélie penguins population declines are associated with warming
===================================
what utter nonsense. in one sentence they say they don’t know the cause, then in the next breath they say they are certain.
you cannot be certain of a cause and effect relationship if you don’t know how the cause and effect operates. at best you have an unexplained correlation. it is just as likely that studying the penguins has a detrimental effect on them.
do a correlation on the number of people visiting penguin colonies with the population of the colonies, you are more likely to find that is the mechanism you are observing at work. the penguins are likely moving to more remote locations to escape the human researchers/observers than they are trying to escape climate change.
On top of that, all of the observational evidence indicates that the penguin populations have been more adversely affected by cooling, rather than warming.
The climate change we have been experiencing is caused by the sun and the oceans and Mankind does not have the power to change it so we have no power to change the climate situation. There is no real evidence that CO2 has any effect on climate.
Well…There’s at least a little evidence that it has at least an insignificant effect.
Please provide that evidence.
CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas. Increasing its concentration in the atmosphere will increase radiative forcing. Without the greenhouse effect, the average surface temperature of the Earth would be about 30°C cooler than it currently is.
This is basic physics.
Humans are responsible for about half of the rise in atmospheric CO2 since the mid-1800s.
The degree to which anthropogenic forcing has affected or will affect the bulk temperature of the atmosphere is unknown. All of the observational evidence indicates that it is insignificant (0 to 1.5°C per doubling of CO2).
This is at least a little evidence that it has at least an insignificant effect.
So, in theory, there should be evidence. We just can’t point to it. Too much noise in the system. Tricky, that.
While there’s a lot of noise, it’s tougher than separating signal from noise. It’s trying to separate one specific signal out of a multitude of signals. It’s like looking for one specific needle in a stack of needles.
Is the sea getting warmer?
It depends on the time frame.
They can’t even get the unmodelled parts correct:
“The Adélie penguin is a species that breeds across the entire Antarctic continent. “