From CERN
Our planet’s pre-industrial climate may have been cloudier than presently thought, shows CERN’s CLOUD experiment in two papers published in Nature.
CERN experiment points to a cloudier pre-industrial climate
In two papers1,2 published today in the journal Nature, new results from the CLOUD3experiment at CERN4 imply the baseline pristine pre-industrial climate may have been cloudier than presently thought. CLOUD shows that organic vapours emitted by trees produce abundant aerosol particles in the atmosphere in the absence of sulphuric acid. Previously it was thought that sulphuric acid – which largely arises from fossil fuels – was essential to initiate aerosol particle formation. CLOUD finds that these so-called biogenic vapours are also key to the growth of the newly-formed particles up to sizes where they can seed clouds.
“These results are the most important so far by the CLOUD experiment at CERN,” said CLOUD spokesperson, Jasper Kirkby. “When the nucleation and growth of pure biogenic aerosol particles is included in climate models, it should sharpen our understanding of the impact of human activities on clouds and climate.”
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) considers that the increase in aerosols and clouds since pre-industrial times represents one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate change5. CLOUD is designed to understand how new aerosol particles form and grow in the atmosphere, and their effect on clouds and climate.
CLOUD also finds that ions from galactic cosmic rays strongly enhance the production rate of pure biogenic particles – by a factor 10-100 compared with particles without ions. This suggests that cosmic rays may have played a more important role in aerosol and cloud formation in pre-industrial times than in today’s polluted atmosphere.
A paper published simultaneously in Science (Bianchi, F., et al. Science, doi 10.1126/ science.aad5456(link is external), 2016) describes an observation of pure organic nucleation at the Jungfraujoch observatory by the same mechanism reported by CLOUD. The measurements did not involve CLOUD directly but most of the authors are also members of the CLOUD collaboration.
“The observation of pure organic nucleation at the Jungfraujoch is very satisfying,” said Kirkby. “It confirms that the same process discovered by CLOUD in the laboratory also takes place in the atmosphere.”
Footnote(s)
1. Kirkby, J., et al. Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles. Nature, doi 10.1038/nature 17953(link is external) (2016).
2. Tröstl, J., et al. The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere. Nature, doi 10.1038/nature18271(link is external) (2016).
3. The CLOUD experiment consists of a large instrumented chamber in which the atmosphere can be precisely simulated, and the formation and growth of aerosol particles and the clouds they seed can be studied under precisely controled atmospheric conditions. Unwanted contaminants can be suppressed well below the part-per-trillion level. The CLOUD experiment uses a beam from CERN’s Proton Synchrotron to simulate cosmic rays – particles bombarding the atmosphere from space.
The experimental collaboration comprises 21 institutes: Aerodyne Research, California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, CERN, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Goethe University Frankfurt, Helsinki Institute of Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Lebedev Physical Institute, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Stockholm University, Tofwerk, University of Beira Interior, University of Eastern Finland, University of Helsinki, University of Innsbruck, University of Leeds, University of Lisbon, University of Manchester, and University of Vienna.
4. CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, is the world’s leading laboratory for particle physics. Its headquarters are in Geneva. Its Member States are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Romania is a Candidate for Accession. Cyprus and Serbia are Associate Member States in the pre-stage to Membership. Pakistan and Turkey are Associate Member States. European Union, India, Japan, JINR, Russian Federation, UNESCO and United States of America have Observer status.
5. Boucher, O. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Stocker, T.F. et al.) 571–658 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Supporting information to press briefing on Nature publications by the CLOUD collaboration:
Kirkby, J. et al. Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles. Nature, doi 10.1038/nature17953 (2016).
Tröstl, J. et al. The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere. Nature, doi 10.1038/nature18271 (2016).
The background to the CERN CLOUD experiment. CLOUD is studying how new aerosol particles form or “nucleate” in the atmosphere and grow to sizes where they modify clouds and climate. Using a particle beam from the CERN Proton Synchrotron, CLOUD is also investigating whether these processes are affected by ionisation from galactic cosmic rays. Atmospheric aerosol particles cool the climate by reflecting sunlight and by forming more numerous but smaller cloud droplets, which makes clouds brighter and extends their lifetimes. Cooling due to increased aerosol particles from human activities has offset part of the warming caused by increased greenhouse gases. To determine the amount of cooling requires knowledge of the aerosol state of the pre-industrial atmosphere. Unfortunately we cannot directly measure this since there are almost no regions of today’s atmosphere that are perfectly free of pollution. So the pre-industrial atmosphere must be simulated with climate models based on sound measurements of the underlying microphysical processes obtained by laboratory experiments. CLOUD brings together fundamental experiments with climate modeling in a single international collaborative effort.
What has CLOUD studied? CLOUD has studied the formation of new atmospheric particles in a specially designed chamber under extremely well controlled laboratory conditions of temperature, humidity and concentrations of nucleating and condensing vapours. In the present experiments we measured the formation and growth of particles purely from organic vapours emitted by trees (so-called biogenic vapours). The particular vapour studied was alpha- pinene, which gives pine forests their characteristic pleasant smell. Alpha-pinene is rapidly oxidised on exposure to ozone, creating vapours with extremely low volatilities but only tiny concentrations of around one molecule per trillion (1012) air molecules.
What’s special about the CLOUD experiment? Using CERN know-how, the CLOUD chamber has achieved much lower concentrations of contaminants than all previous experiments, allowing us to measure particle nucleation and growth from biogenic vapours in the complete absence of contaminant vapours such as sulphuric acid. The collaboration has developed state-of-the-art instruments to measure the vapours, ions and aerosol particles at ultra low concentrations in the air sampled from the CLOUD chamber. We measure how these vapours and ions form molecular clusters and which vapours control the subsequent particle growth. A special feature of CLOUD is its capability to measure nucleation enhanced by cosmic-ray ionisation generated by a CERN pion beam – or with all the effects of ionisation completely suppressed by an internal electric field.
What has CLOUD discovered? CLOUD has found that oxidised biogenic vapours produce abundant particles in the atmosphere in the absence of sulphuric acid. Previously it was thought that sulphuric acid – which largely arises from sulphur dioxide emitted by fossil fuels – was essential to initiate particle formation. We found that ions from galactic cosmic rays strongly enhance the production rate of pure biogenic particles – by a factor 10-100 compared with particles without ions, when concentrations are low. We also show that oxidised biogenic vapours dominate particle growth in unpolluted environments, starting just after the first few molecules have stuck together and continuing all the way up to sizes above 50-100 nm where the particles can seed cloud droplets. The growth rate accelerates as the particles increase in size, as progressively higher-volatility biogenic vapours are able to participate. We quantitatively explain this with a model of organic condensation.
Why is it important for our understanding of climate? Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles may have important consequences for pristine climates since it provides a hitherto-unknown mechanism by which nature produces particles without pollution. And, once embryonic particles have formed, related but more abundant oxidised biogenic vapours cause the particle growth to accelerate. Rapid growth of the new particles while they are still small and highly mobile implies a larger fraction will avoid coagulation with pre-existing larger particles and eventually reach sizes where they can seed cloud droplets and influence climate. Pure biogenic nucleation and growth may raise the baseline aerosol state of the pristine pre-industrial atmosphere and so may reduce the estimated anthropogenic radiative forcing from increased aerosol-cloud albedo over the industrial period. Ion- induced pure biogenic nucleation may also shed new light on the long-standing question of a physical mechanism for solar-climate variability in the pristine pre-industrial climate.
A paper published simultaneously in Science (Bianchi, F. et al. Science, doi 10.1126/science.aad5456, 2016) reports observations made at the Jungfraujoch of pure organic nucleation in the free troposphere, confirming the relevance of the CLOUD measurements to the atmosphere.
Wait just a minute here…The trees did it??
And why does he feel the atmosphere was ‘pristine’ before the Industrial Revolution? Were the cavemen using solar? Or how about all those folks in pre-1750 Europe? Did they just now discover all those windmills have been rotting away for 200 years and decided to put them to good use to fire up electric candles? Or that in (at least the Western Hemisphere)controlled burning was used to manage paradise?
Inquiring minds want to know!
If you had an inquiring mind you would not need to ask the question.How many friggin “cavemen” do you think there were on Earth?
You tell me since you seem to know…and while you at it, explain “pristine”
“hat they have published so far is obviously very limited but it’s a start to understanding cloud formation which is one of poorest understood yet most important factors in understanding climate.

The key to the late 20th c. changes in climate that got everyone into an alarmist spin seems to lie in the stratosphere where sulphate aerosols initially cause warming ( hence blocking solar energy from the lower atmosphere ) but after a few years produce net cooling below the pre-eruption temperatures. This implies a warming of lower atmosphere.
https://climategrog.wordpress.com/uah_tls_365d/
Sorry, second graph was not the one I intended.
Read the article for more detail on how volcanic induced changes in the stratosphere seem to be the cause of the warming in the 80s and 90s, that got falsely attributed to CO2.
https://climategrog.wordpress.com/uah_tls_365d/
What is the vapor pressure of sulfuric acid, at atmospheric Temperatures ??
What is the surface tension of sulfuric acid at Atmospheric Temperatures ??
G
I thought the paper had some important ‘holes’ due to pressure from the ‘dark forces’, which neatly takes me to a new article from NASA:
Scientist suggests possible link between primordial black holes and dark matter
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-scientist-link-primordial-black-holes.html
with a scary animation.
Maybe dark matter is actually dark matter.
Mt. Everest demoted. Chimborazomountain peak in Ecuador is the ‘closest’ place to space on Earth.
I have lived in Central America and clouds build very rapidly over the rain forest. then it pours, cools off, clears, then clouds form again. Its seems the less green a region, the less cloud formation. The rain forest acts like a heat sink. The less of it, the more regional heat, it seems. Same thing in South Eastern United States, the more they pave over the woodlands and marshes, the hotter its gonna get.
Don’t forget the snows of Kilimanjaro.
G
Oh Noes! We stopped burning coal, so the SOx isn’t keeping the sky clear, the higher concentration of CO2 is feeding the trees, and the clouds are coming back! Now we will freeze!
The role of dimethyl sulphoxide from plankton on cloud formation has been known since 1987 http://www.jameslovelock.org/page35.html
whereas that of the non methane hydrocarbons emitted from forests and terrestrial plants has also been known since at least 1997: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/276/5315/1052.full
So these effects were known to climate modelers but ignored in their rush to isolate carbon dioxide as the climate villain. The CERN experiments are only concerned with establishing the physics and chemistry of how they work not that they work as forests were planted to induce rainfall and their effects on mountain slopes near oceans are well known.
In terms of unintended consequences it would be interesting to know how the replacement of rain forests in Indonesia by Palm oil or in S America by sugar cane etc for the production of biofuels has limited the emissions of these key chemicals and had a detrimental effect on climate. It would be good to show that the Greens area major cause of the recent warming, just as their love affair with bio diesel has caused increased deaths from cancer in cities like London, though they no doubt consider these to be acceptable collateral impacts!
One explanation for the warm, equable climate of the Cretaceous is that the oceans were so hot that biological productivity fell, making fewer CCN available.
GCMs can’t model Cretaceous climate without preposterously high climate sensitivity to CO2, which was elevated then but not enough to reproduce apparent warmth with the models.
“Mongol hordes gave up on conquering Europe due to wet weather”
Analysing tree rings in the region, Di Cosmo and his colleagues found that Hungary had a cold, wet winter in early 1242. This probably turned Hungary’s central plain into a huge swamp.
Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University, University Park, says the study is interesting, but he warns against over-interpreting the influence of climate on historic events. “I’m sceptical that such ‘climate determinism’ holds nearly as universally as some authors seem to think,” he says. The changes in weather the study reported seemed “modest”, he says
He is sceptical about over-interpreting Tree data? I should think so after he created a whole new data set, climate change and global warming, with just one tree in Yamal, Siberia.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2090335-mongol-hordes-gave-up-on-conquering-europe-due-to-wet-weather/?utm_source=NSNS&utm_medium=ILC&utm_campaign=webpush&cmpid=ILC%257CNSNS%257C2016-GLOBAL-webpush-mongols
This study is getting ink:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/27/global-warming-scaled-back-say-two-new-s
Not that Reason magazine is all that widely read.
The cloud cover / rain was measured with the return of a rainforest with spectacular local ecological results.
http://www.ted.com/talks/willie_smits_restores_a_rainforest?language=en
Because of observations most oft referred to as unscientific anecdotal / wisdom personal experience the result of more was to be expected.
Moreover its the missing results because of the reductive science experiment limited findings. Results such the size and quality of the “natural” nucleation.
Experience in living next to and in a west coast rain forest is the afternoon rain, better described as afternoon mist. Or the one experience of camping in the east coast smokey mountains / a mist.
Moreover the quality of the molecular or micro nutrient content of the different nucleation processes and the using different sources for the water vapor is missing.
This puts the value of the experiment about the nucleation at near zero in relationship to the impacts of the “the climate change” issue or the unspeakable terms of a pending mass extinction of complex life. The reason behind the funding?
These kinds of reductive science experiment are not comprehensive, inclusive or complex enough to be of much value for anyone to decide on taking any kind of global action on the pending mass extinction.
This type of limited experiment seem to be use to come to any bias or convenient conclusion experimenters desire including asking for more funding.
What was of the greatest ire, the members of group in other public statements used the limited new reductive findings to broadcast an unwarranted conclusion global warming will not be as great.
So when I check their bias ( and we all have one) of past viewpoints wow not good. The experiment should be expanded and the group should be replaced with another to add to its value and verify the results.
Shame on CERN and the NSF.