Cruise Ship to Dare the North West Passage

Crystal Serenity, By bert76 07:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1108921
Crystal Serenity, By bert76 07:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1108921

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

The North West passage is an infamous graveyard of ships, where the weather can turn deadly without warning, and floating ice is an ever-present peril. But this arctic track record of disaster is not deterring the owners of the Crystal Serenity, and passengers reportedly paying a staggering $22,000 + per berth, from attempting a daring journey from Alaska to New York starting on August 16th this year.

A new Titanic? US and Canada prepare for worst as luxury Arctic cruise sets sail

The loss of Arctic sea ice cover, due to climate change, has spurred a sharp rise in shipping traffic – as well as coast guard rescue missions – and increased the risks of oil spills, shipping accidents, and pollution, much to the apprehension of native communities who make their living on the ice.

It’s into these turbulent waters that the luxury cruise ship Crystal Serenity will set sail next August, departing from Seward, Alaska, and transiting the Bering Strait and Northwest Passage, before docking in New York City 32 days later.

The scale of the Crystal – 1,700 passengers and crew – and the potential for higher-volume traffic in the Arctic has commanded the attention of the coast guard, government officials and local communities, all trying to navigate an Arctic without year-round ice.

“If something were to go wrong it would be very, very bad,” said Richard Beneville, the mayor of the coastal town of Nome, which the Crystal is due to visit. “Most cruise ships that get here have passenger manifests of 100, maybe 150. This is a very different ship.”

Prices for the journey aboard the 14-deck luxury liner start at nearly $22,000 rising to $120,000 for a deluxe stateroom – and this year’s cruise is sold out, according to the company.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/28/us-canada-arctic-cruise-ship-titanic-emergency-training-coast-guard

You know what? I wish I had a berth. I can completely understand why the ship is fully booked, despite the risk. The Arctic is beautiful, and utterly alien, compared to more temperate regions. I only visited the Arctic once in my life, a week in Bodø in April. The snow covered mountains, the familiar seaside sights, mixed with the utterly unfamiliar, the sun which hangs just above the horizon for 18 hours, before dipping into a brief twilight, the people, the strange landscape. I would love to see places like Nome, one of the stops on the planned route.

If it all ends badly, as seems a real possibility, at least everyone is embarking on this adventure with their eyes open – unlike the ridiculous ship of fools, the Crystal Serenity owners appear to be taking the safety of the passengers seriously.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
159 Comments
David
March 30, 2016 6:52 am

There don’t seem to be many lifeboats….

Bloke down the pub
Reply to  David
March 30, 2016 7:01 am

I wouldn’t want to spend any time in a life-raft in those waters.

Don K
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
March 30, 2016 10:00 am

If you had to take to a lifeboat, it probably wouldn’t be far to shore. However, once there, it would likely be a fair walk — maybe 400km — to the nearest pub.

Reply to  Bloke down the pub
March 30, 2016 1:53 pm

You could always take a sled like Amundsen did to get to the nearest telegraph office, so that he could let the King know that he had successfully completed the NW Passage (800km).

kim
Reply to  David
March 30, 2016 7:06 am

More than enough; it’s unsinkable.
I wanna know if there’ll be a live orchestra on board.
===============

Steve Fraser
Reply to  kim
March 30, 2016 9:25 am

Live music, yes.
Here is the link to cruise activities. They are even taking a climatologist.
http://www.crystalcruises.com/alaska-cruises/northwest-passage–6319/entertainment

Glenn999
Reply to  kim
March 30, 2016 12:19 pm

I want to know if the orchestra has learned the song “the morning after”?

R Shearer
Reply to  kim
March 30, 2016 3:21 pm

Is the climatologist teaching the photoshop class?

george e. smith
Reply to  kim
March 30, 2016 4:05 pm

Well only up to the time the deck gets too steep for the orchestra to remain seated. They will likely play Handel’s Water Music over and over again.
g

Reply to  kim
March 30, 2016 4:58 pm

Steve, I reckon the climatologist will be downgraded to “tourist” should they stuck, same as they did with the Ship of Fools (it suddenly was a tourist ship instead of the earlier proclaimed science vessel). I reckon there’ll be plenty of greens aboard too, all ready to dance the CAGW dance should they get through.

Steve Fraser
Reply to  David
March 30, 2016 9:16 am

Floor plan shows 10 full size tenders, and 2 smaller. Should be fine for 1700 Innuit…

CaligulaJones
Reply to  David
March 31, 2016 7:36 am

Warmists walk on water, they don’t need lifeboats.

Bloke down the pub
March 30, 2016 6:59 am

Under investment, by the Canadian and US governments, in ice breakers over recent decades, has left the area with a shortage of resources to cope with an emergency of the scale that this cruise could result in. The nearest suitable vessels, able to provide assistance, are probably those belonging to the oil industry.

Reply to  Bloke down the pub
March 30, 2016 8:07 am

Bloke,
Even the oil industry has few (if any) vessels there, as the waters in Prudhoe bay are not very deep and half a year frozen. Most work from shore to production units is done by helicopters, but these can’t fly more that a few hundred km before refueling. That means that large parts of the trip can’t be reached by helicopter. Additionally, in summer most roads – as far as there are – are not passable…
Seems to me that they are taking too much risk with this trip…

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Ferdinand Engelbeen
March 30, 2016 10:26 am

All will be well. They will have a climatologer aboard.

commieBob
March 30, 2016 7:03 am

When I was a pup and spent time in the arctic, we spent a lot of time listening to the short wave pleadings of arctic adventurers who got into all kinds of trouble. They, and their friends, may have thought they were heros; we had another opinion.
The Canadian Government doesn’t have many heavy icebreakers. None of them are remotely capable of handling 1700 souls for more than a few hours. They have heads (washrooms) and food handling for a crew of about 50. That means the survivors might be better off in their lifeboats. I’m guessing that there might be about 20 helicopters scattered around the Canadian arctic. It would take them hours to get to the scene. A landing strip could be built if the ice were thick enough. Fuel for the helicopters could be tankered in by DC-3 or Twin Otter. If the survivors were ferried to somewhere like Resolute the facilities there would be strained. The available aircraft are mostly used for freight, they don’t have many seats. I wouldn’t be surprised if it took a hundred trips. It wouldn’t take much to turn the situation into a logistical nightmare.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  commieBob
March 30, 2016 7:32 am

Just imagine if they ran out of banana milkshakes. The horror!

exSSNcrew
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 30, 2016 9:14 am

or ran out of Gin!

CaligulaJones
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 30, 2016 9:40 am

I can imagine their delight, though, when they discover that seal blubber is still gluten-free.
Although they might want to ration the seal meat though, as I don’t know if human tissue has been tested for it.

ClimateOtter
Reply to  commieBob
March 30, 2016 10:28 am

A Twin Otter….? Oh. Yes that would be large enough to fuel a couple of helicopters.

commieBob
Reply to  ClimateOtter
March 30, 2016 12:06 pm

Helicopters are notoriously thirsty. Here’s one solution to transporting fuel on aircraft the size of a Twin Otter.

Reply to  commieBob
March 30, 2016 12:52 pm

The Canadian Government shut down its mid Canada Search and Rescue Centres. Now there is just Victoria, BC on the west coast; Halifax, Nova Scotia on the east coast; and Trenton, Ontario which covers everything from Quebec to Alberta, and the US border to the Arctic. The last time we had a big crash in the North, it took the Hercules S&R crew a couple of days to get there due to weather. I spent a week in Inuvik waiting to fly out on one trip. Days in Yellowknife too. Getting weathered in is common.
Imaging waiting in the North West Passage for assistance from S&R thousands of kilometres away, not knowing if they will even be able to assist you if they get there. That’s life in the Canadian Arctic.
Good thing they have an icebreaker along as S&R up there is more likely to come from exploration companies and locals than from the Canadian government. ( “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you” isn’t even a joke up there.)
Nevertheless, I am sure the posts from the ship will be entertaining.

commieBob
Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
March 30, 2016 1:39 pm

… S&R up there is more likely to come from exploration companies and locals than from the Canadian government.

Absolutely. Mind you, a whole bunch of the ‘locals’ work for the Canadian government. Resolute is a logistics hub for various aviation companies plus the Polar Continental Shelf Project (PCSP). Every year ‘stuff’ happens and we never hear about it because folks just deal with it. Calling in the SAR TECHs is relatively uncommon.

Paul Westhaver
March 30, 2016 7:31 am

I nobody gets hurt.

Paul Westhaver
Reply to  Paul Westhaver
March 30, 2016 7:32 am

hope

March 30, 2016 7:35 am

The article simply says there will be “an icebreaking escort vessel carrying two helicopters” but gives no further details. If the Crystal Serenity gets into trouble, odds are she will require assistance from one of Russia’s fleet of nuclear icebreakers; the US is down to just a single heavy-duty ice breaker (the Polar Star).
On the other hand, since our military transport helicopters are no longer needed for such things as quick reaction force delivery to besieged embassies, they have nothing better to do than rescue stranded eco-tourists (unless they’re busy taking the First Canine on another POTUS vacation).

David Ball
March 30, 2016 7:52 am

Classic Canadianna w/ Stan Rogers
Haunting;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVY8LoM47xI

John Robertson
March 30, 2016 7:56 am

Rescue?
Probably not gonna happen.
Two years ago we lost Helicopter,pilot and Coastguard Captain of Icebreaker.
Death by hypothermia, because there was no second helicopter to perform a rescue.
Our icebreakers are old, depend on refuelling from auxiliary tankers (if attempting extended tours) as there are very few port facilities in the Arctic.
For a nation claiming Arctic sovereignty we are very poorly prepared.

tadchem
Reply to  John Robertson
March 30, 2016 9:08 am

Russia makes the best icebreakers, including 10 that are nuke-powered. They have become excellent capitalists since the fall of the Soviet Union, and I’m sure they would love to contract with us for a few.

tty
Reply to  John Robertson
March 31, 2016 9:56 am

There are actually a few Swedish and Finnish icebreakers powerful enough to be useful. Particularly “Oden” which is the most powerful noin-nuclear icebreaker. That’s the one I would hired as an escort.

michael hart
March 30, 2016 8:23 am

I presume the Crystal Serenity will have an indoor sun-deck. The weather can be a little inclement in those places.

March 30, 2016 8:29 am

I doubt anyone has properly assessed the risk to underwrite this voyage even with the high cost of passage. I also don’t believe there are any pilots with experience or skill for any of the channels and straights. With the variable ice conditions they are certainly going to make it up as they go. I believe the risk is unacceptable. Anyone who would take on this task has more bravado than common sense. This has remarkably high potential for tragedy.

Don K
Reply to  Steve Lohr
March 30, 2016 10:21 am

More than one cruise ship has gotten into trouble already. For example the MS Explorer — which was actually designed to handle ice — was lost near Antarctica in 2007. see http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/cruises/738940/What-can-we-learn-from-Explorer.html and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/cruises/738945/Are-we-cruising-for-a-bruising.html

March 30, 2016 8:38 am

Long, boring, cold, risky.
I’ll stick with the Caribbean, thanks.

Reply to  wallensworth
March 30, 2016 11:07 am

My guess too. Based on my trips north of the Aleutians (False Pass/Dutch Harbor to Nome a few times), there is not much to see by ship. If the stop at Nome is a highlight then i’d pass. The ice flows out of the Yukon and minimizing the direct collisions with the big ice in late spring was one of the few entertaining aspects.
(And even at the high latitudes you can get a very nasty sunburn if you fall asleep on top of the wheelhouse).

ossqss
March 30, 2016 8:43 am

Curious George
March 30, 2016 8:58 am

The real danger of global warming is that the Arctic will be full of rich fools. And they will get indoctrinated about dangers of global warming.

March 30, 2016 9:09 am

Spose at least they may be able to rescue a few of Al’s polar bears clinging desperately onto the few remaining ice cubes.

Editor
March 30, 2016 9:54 am

Thanks for the post, Eric. While this is interesting news, it is also that great oxymoron called “old news”, as it was covered here on WUWT back in 2014 …
w.

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
March 30, 2016 1:02 pm

Excellent ref and Article Willis. A good reminder and it will be interesting to see how it turns out. Looking at your post, it wouldn’t be a big surprise to see the passengers arriving in New York at JFK from Nome …

Reply to  Eric Worrall
March 30, 2016 4:33 pm

My bad, you are totally correct … you’re just too subtle for me.
w.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
March 31, 2016 12:44 am

Eric Worrall March 30, 2016 at 6:11 pm

I should have made the link to your post more prominent Willis, sorry about that.

No worries, amigo, it’s good to see the work carried forward.
Thanx,
w.

March 30, 2016 10:02 am

Cruise ships lately have a dismal record in normal sea conditions. Sounds foolish.

Resourceguy
March 30, 2016 10:13 am

Space heaters are extra.

March 30, 2016 10:35 am

“The loss of Arctic sea ice cover, due to climate change, has spurred a sharp rise in shipping traffic…” Perhaps it is the “sharp rise in shipping traffic” that is a major contributor to “The loss of sea ice”?

Tom Judd
March 30, 2016 10:47 am

I wonder how serene it’s going to be on the Crystal Serenity when the ship’s manifest of modern day, seafaring, Donner party passengers run out of food (after the ship’s been trapped in ice for six months with no rescue) and begin to eat one another?
Well sir, what red wine (which, unfortunately, cannot escape being chilled) do you believe would be a good pairing with that butt roast?

Glenn999
Reply to  Tom Judd
March 30, 2016 12:35 pm

When the winds kicked up and ocean roared with freezing death, the Crystal Calamity was caught in a vise of skyscraper-sized icebergs. The only thing heard above the roar of wind and ocean was the unforgettable screeching straining of metal being torn and twisted in never imagined ways. The water so cold it takes your breath and drops you in its tracks; paralyzed and helpless. Days later the straggling few faced the final twist of fate in this ill-gotten voyage of the Crystal Calamity, the masters of the land, the giants of the Ursidae.

Resourceguy
March 30, 2016 10:58 am

How many “climate” grantees does it take to fill a ship of fools?

March 30, 2016 11:17 am

I wonder if part of that $22,000+ fare has gone into the purchase of arctic-water immersion survival suits. What good would life jackets be in those waters?
http://www.mustangsurvival.com/recreational/immersion-suits?country=25

Reply to  Stephen Rasey
March 31, 2016 4:34 pm

SOLAS (Safety of Life At Sea) requires immersion suits unless the ship is restricted to tropical waters. Some 18 years ago, the Long Suffering Mrs. Jewett made a passage with me on the SS SeaLand Producer (23,510 Gross Tons, 32,000 SHP geared steam turbine container ship). The passage was from Long Beach CA to New Orleans LA vial the Panama Canal.
Upon departure from Long Beach, we had the required safety drill. Mrs. Jewett refused to put on her immersion suit because it was “stupid”. (It does make you look like a big orange Gumby.) We “had words”.
I had sailed with a Chief Mate Robert Cusick who had survived the sinking of the SS Marine Electric. The ship had gone down on 12 February 1983, about 30 miles off the coast of Virginia, during a winter storm.
As I recall from hearing his story some 25 years ago.
His story is below, but there are a couple of items that I remember. When it was obvious that they had to abandon ship, he put on ALL of his clothes that he could. They acted like a “wet suit” while he was submerged in the swamped lifeboat. Second, he told us that he could hear his shipmates in the dark, calling for help.
http://web.archive.org/web/20061109120644/http://www.webandwire.com/cold_comfort.htm

http://seamenschurch.org/article/the-sinking-of-the-ss-marine-electric
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Marine_Electric
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/02/20/us/crewmen-testify-about-surviving-ship-s-sinking.html

James at 48
March 30, 2016 11:20 am

That part of the Arctic may not ever be completely ice free this year. The good ice is all in that area, on either side of the date line. The MSM BS makes it sound like the ice is poor everywhere in the Arctic this year, but that is simply not the case. Only the area that straddles the Prime Meridian has poor ice.

March 30, 2016 11:40 am

These people are flaming idiots, how in the heck did they make 22,000 $$ pp (and more). If the Canadian government had any sense they would stop this immediately, it is insanity.

Reply to  asybot
March 30, 2016 5:06 pm

I bet some fares are payed for them. You know, climate funding to go out there and prove there’s no ice. Something like that. It would not surprise me at all.

tommyterroir
March 30, 2016 11:49 am

Weeks at sea, stuck indoors looking at ice through a small window except for brief moments outside in the wind until your face freezes off, getting drunk with 1500 other bored passengers. With a meteorologist for entertainment, no less. Sounds like a lot fun to me. Hope the pool is heated.

Don B
March 30, 2016 11:53 am

Will the life rafts be tiny ice breakers?

skeohane
Reply to  Don B
March 30, 2016 1:11 pm

Maybe ice skates?

jeanparisot
Reply to  Don B
March 30, 2016 2:14 pm

I believe the polar bears will refer to them as hors d’oeuvre trays.

markopanama
March 30, 2016 12:01 pm

Wow. There is just enough time before departure to write a quick novel – the people who signed up, the auspicious beginning and then – OMG – Things start to go wrong!
Imagine if eco-terrorists deliberately disabled the ship, holding the passengers hostage until we all abandoned fossil fuels. The possibilities are endless – the Russians refuse to send their nuke icebreakers until the US (fill in our favorite scenario) – how about gives up all claims to Arctic petroleum resources? Remember, Obama will still be in office.
The fingers are itching. And if things DID go wrong, well, just call me Nostradamus.