Climate Change and a Subtropical Canada?

Guest essay by F.J. Shepherd

Canada-satellite[1]

Real climate change could be realized by having a region with a cold temperate climate transforming into a warm temperate climate. This article will explore what it would take to achieve such an event in Canada.

It might seem strange to have the words, “subtropical” and “Canada” in the same line, for as most Canadians and some others know, Canada is a very cold country. The annual mean temperature for Canada is 0.6°C, but you will not likely find that information in any public documents. I had to work that figure out with collected data.

Statistics Canada published a report in 2011 titled Temperature Trends in Canada that gave an ominous warning. Over the period from 1948 to 2009 for Canada: “The linear trend indicates an increase in mean temperature of 1.4°C over the 62 years in the record.”

Since global temperature rise is not quite 1° C in 135 years, Canada’s warming rate is almost three times as great.

The report`s findings, surely, was enough to make Canadians shiver in their boots for fear, was it not? Well, if Canadians were shivering in their boots, it was more than likely from the winter temperatures because Canada remains a very cold country.

The major climate zones in Canada are polar, subpolar, humid continental and oceanic. Almost 90% of Canadians live within the humid continental zone since most Canadians live in the southern part of the nation no more than 200 miles from the American border. This climate zone is virtually the same as that experienced within the US north eastern states and northern midwest regions, plus northern and eastern Europe, and large areas of Russia.

Following the Koppen/Trewartha climate classification system, the humid continental climate has the following characteristics:

(1) distinct 4 seasons with a warm to hot summers, and a cold winters

(2) precipitation is evenly distributed throughout the year

(3) mean temperature for the coldest month of the year is below freezing

(4) there should be from 4 to 7 months within the year that have a mean temperatures at or exceeding 10° C.

Within a warming trend, the natural progression would be for a humid continental region to climb to the humid subtropical climate classification. Fortunately, with the modifications done by Trewartha (1966) to the Koppen (1899) climate classification system, it has made the distinctions between climate classifications easier. The original Koppen climate classification scheme left the boundaries between some climates, somewhat vague.

I have lived in the Toronto Canada region of southern Ontario for the past 50 years. The Toronto area has one of the warmer humid continental climates in Canada with an annual mean temperature of 9.4° C. There is quite a range of annual mean temperatures possible within a humid continental climate zone. For instance, further west and north of Toronto on the Canadian prairies, almost 2,000 miles away lies the small Saskatchewan city of Melfort. Its annual mean temperature is only 1° C with its much colder winters and cooler summers. However, this cold little prairie town still resides within a humid continental climate zone even though its annual mean temperature is 8.4° C colder than that of Toronto.

Table 1: Toronto monthly mean temperatures, 1981-2010 data, in Celsius

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year
-3.7 -2.6 1.4 7.9 14.1 19.4 22.3 21.5 17.2 10.7 4.9 -0.5 9.4

Note in Table 1 for existing Toronto monthly mean temperatures that the coldest month, January, has a mean temperature below freezing, and there are six months wherein the mean monthly temperature is 10° C or greater. This is a typical humid continental climate configuration, added with the other features in that for Toronto, precipitation does fall relatively evenly throughout the year and we do have 4 very distinct seasons.

Now how do we convert Toronto to a humid subtropical climate? Pretty much everything is well in place except for temperature. In order to comply with the parameters to achieve a humid subtropical climate, we need to rid Toronto of monthly mean temperatures below freezing and increase from 6 months to 8 months wherein monthly mean temperatures is 10° C or more. That is easy. All we have to do is increase the monthly mean temperatures by a factor of 5.1°C and the mission is accomplished. Here is the result:

Table 2: Toronto monthly mean temperatures for a humid subtropical climate

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year
1.4 2.5 6.5 13.0 19.2 24.5 27.4 26.6 22.3 15.8 10.0 4.6 14.5

After I performed this procedure in a spreadsheet, I wanted to check against a city in North America that is relatively close in distance to Toronto and that actually does have a “legitimate” humid subtropical climate. This is the control variable in the experiment.

In order to do so I had to search through nearby US cities because no city exists in Canada with a humid subtropical climate. I emphasized the word “legitimate” because I found that some cities, like New York NY, Philadelphia PA, and Wilmington DE may claim to have a humid subtropical climate but they do not really have one; although they do appear to be very close. The nearest humid subtropical climate I found was in Baltimore MD. Here is Baltimore’s current temperature scheme:

Table 3: Baltimore monthly mean temperatures, 1981-2010 data, in Celsius

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year
4.2 7.3 8.0 13.7 16.9 24.5 27.1 26.1 22.3 15.6 10.2 4.1 15.2

Note that from April to December (9 months), the monthly mean temperatures for Baltimore and the projected Toronto temperatures are so very close. This satisfied me that if Toronto was to shift into a humid subtropical climate, the projections I made using the 5.1° C bump, is more or less what it would take. The spread of temperatures in my Toronto projections also seemed reasonable when compared with Baltimore’s current monthly temperatures.

An obvious question arises. Given the accelerated warming that Canada seems to be experiencing and which is almost triple the global warming rate, how long would it take for real climate change to come to Toronto Canada?

The answer is simply a matter of basic arithmetic. If the overall temperature rise for Canada as a whole continues on its present rate of 1.4° C every 60 years, it will take about 218 years for Toronto to achieve the needed overall temperature rise of 5.1° C. Now supposing that the rate of temperature rise in Canada triples what it has been doing for the last 60 years and rises at a rate of 4.2° C every 60 years. Toronto will still have a long time to wait for its humid subtropical climate – at least another 73 years.

However, there is another factor to consider. For if you peruse the report mentioned above from Statistics Canada, Temperature Trends in Canada, there are some charts that the report links to. You will see that Toronto resides in the defined Great Lakes and St. Lawrence region, and that the temperature in this region has not been rising at the overall Canada rate of 1.4° C, but rather closer to 0.6 to 0.7° C within 60 years. Of course that puts a whole new perspective on things since such a rate is half of the national rate. See Chart 1 in the Report. So we have to “adjust” those time-frames wherein 218 years becomes now 436 years, and 73 years becomes 146 years, waiting for Toronto’s humid subtropical climate to finally come.

Summary

The above was merely an exercise I went through to see what it would take for one of the warmer cities in Canada to change from a humid continental climate to a humid subtropical climate. It is feasible but it would take many, many years to occur and that is providing that the world keeps warming. I understand that some people think that such warming would be a tragic event, but for those of us who experience this cold temperate climate who live in Toronto, would love for it to change to a humid subtropical climate. For me the real tragedy is that such a change won`t happen soon enough, if it does happen at all.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
116 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tadchem
November 24, 2015 12:14 pm

One of my favorite tropes (from The Frantics): ‘…giving his entire ten million dollar fortune to the good people of Calgary…so they can move somewhere decent.”

CaligulaJones
Reply to  tadchem
November 24, 2015 1:31 pm

Well, that was from the 80s, but now they have a liberal Muslim for a mayor, and a socialist premier, so we’ve been told that Calgary is actually Rilly, Rilly Kewl.

Allencic
November 24, 2015 12:52 pm

Thirty or so years ago when the whole AGW insanity was just getting started, I was teaching an Intro college Earth Science class with a fair amount of weather and climate included. The “green” students (long hair, Birkenstocks, nubby natural fiber clothing, wool cap over the ears in hot weather) had their panties in a very tight bunch because I told them I thought climate change was absolute nonsense with its emphasis only on CO2. Taking the worst case scenario at that time, the warming predicted that Detroit, MI would become uninhabitable like that tropical cesspool of disease, body odor and sweat, Dayton, OH. Oh the horror, oh the humanity (to paraphrase the Hindenberg disaster).

Reply to  Allencic
November 25, 2015 11:18 am

See you had it right, Detroit did become uninhabitable.
However due to a progressive disorder not any warmer weather.

Roy
November 24, 2015 1:05 pm

It might seem strange to have the words, “subtropical” and “Canada” in the same line,
Yes, you can say that again!
Unfortunately Canadians should not start anticipating a subtropical climate yet if Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert is correct.
German Professor: NASA Has Fiddled Climate Data On ‘Unbelievable’ Scale
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/24/german-professor-nasa-fiddled-climate-data-unbelievable-scale/
A German professor has confirmed what skeptics from Britain to the US have long suspected: that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has largely invented “global warming” by tampering with the raw temperature data records.

Mick
Reply to  Roy
November 24, 2015 1:47 pm

And as I have mention here before, the local newspapers anomalous high daily temperatures have not been corrected according to Environment Canada’s website. I have caught the newspaper saying the high for a certain date (1940s and 50s) were not the same as the dates in the almanac. The Environment Canada dates show 2 anomalies in November to be recent(1995 and 2013) while the newspaper says that for the same date the high occurred in 1940s or 50s. I haven’t gone through the whole almanac day by day, but I assume many more have been changed by EC to show a warming trend.
Here is the link for you locals in the Vancouver area. EC seems to be erasing the old data, and the newspaper hasn’t been informed yet.
http://vancouver.weatherstats.ca/almanac/temperature.html

November 24, 2015 1:16 pm

Interesting post. Thanks.
I wonder if the energy content of planet earth as changed all the much over the eons. Certainly we think that at times area of the planet have been much warmer, and at times much colder. Canada and the northeastern US was under several kilometers of ice until just recently and further back we think there was eons with no glacification at all. Canada with no ice!
What if the total energy content of the planet has not changed all that much over time? What if the distribution of heat has been changing but not the total amount? The oceans carry warmth here and there but we don’t know how changes in current might change the local temperatures around the globe. Do we? And the oceans do have tremendous capacity to retain or give up heat.
Of course this idea is way off message so the IPCC would not look at it I guess.

FJ Shepherd
Reply to  markstoval
November 24, 2015 1:29 pm

markstoval – You have a very interesting thought there. From what I have been able to understand about earth’s past history for the last million years is that there were 8-9 major glaciation periods with warm and very short interglacial periods coming in between. In essence, during glaciation the northern hemisphere became much colder with two large ice sheets forming – one on North America and one on Eurasia. However, the tropics still remained the tropics – still very hot, although much drier in many parts. The areas that became colder were specific regions, whereas the rest of the planet carried on as usual.

getitright
Reply to  markstoval
November 25, 2015 11:14 am

“Certainly we think that at times area of the planet have been much warmer, and at times much colder”
This is the kind of language the CAGW like to use. One has to consider that the earths temp is regulated, centered, close to the freezing point of Water 273K. There are many folks who mistakenly believe that a temp change of 5C to 10C is doubling of temp.
Also the CAGW like to use the “anomaly” terminology which makes a 0.2C change per some selected period seem like an Earth shaking event.
So “much warmer” becomes, say, a change from 283K to 285K which is like less than 1%. Over the history of the earth the “average temp” will have changed about 10% or so, quite stable for over billions of years.
No offense intended here, but I do believe we must begin to educate folks who pay less attention to these finer distinctions by using more correct terminology ourselves.
He who controls the language controls the debate.

Ill Tempered Klavier
November 24, 2015 1:45 pm

When Bama Lama Bama Loo went to Alaska, they didn’t dare show the audience for his speech real time. otherwise when he made that dumb crack about Alaska getting 8-12 degrees warmer the wild cheering would have spoiled the whole show 🙂 Since the principle strain in my ethnic makeup is Aleut (native Alaskan), I can with some authority, inform everyone while we can handle cold better than the palefaces, we don’t like being cold any better :):)

November 24, 2015 2:57 pm

I think that 436 years is too long for Canadians to wait for a decent climate. They should make their move south sooner than that to enjoy the rest of their lives. Or, just perhaps, it is all nonsense and they have no hope at all unless they move south anyway, without waiting.

Resourceguy
November 24, 2015 2:59 pm

I’ve got some swamp land in Canada to sell to the highest bidder. Actually, the bidding starts at $1 million per acre since the UN, World Bank, IMF, OECD, IEA, Vatican Bank, and FEMA will be bidders.

RoHa
November 24, 2015 3:58 pm

Subtropical Canada? I bet that prospect has them quaking in their fur-lined boots in Yellowknife.

Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
November 24, 2015 4:16 pm

I have seen the annual march of temperature anomalies over different parts of Canada. Some sow very little change and some others show large change. The other important feature is large intra-annual variations in later part. Why these differences? Is it due to ecological changes?
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy

November 24, 2015 4:46 pm

Some of the first explorers that arrived in what is now Southern Alberta advised that the climate was too extreme for major settlement. It is snowy and cold today in Calgary. The weekend is forecast to be mild and pleasant. We’ll see what happens.

John
November 24, 2015 5:55 pm

Plowing the Tiaga is the way to go!
Those sugar plumb trees are delicious.

Barbara
November 24, 2015 6:55 pm

Merritt Herald, B.C., Canada, Nov.24, 2015
‘Clark applauds Alberta carbon tax plan’
“Alberta plans to provide ’emissions rights’ to operations with 100,000 tonnes or more of annual emissions, and also allowing them to buy carbon offsets and purchase rights granted to another company.”
http://www.merrittherald.com/clark-applauds-alberta-carbon-tax-plan

Barbara
Reply to  Barbara
November 24, 2015 7:56 pm

Calgary Herald, Nov.5, 2014
‘Mintz and Williams: Smart fiscal policy can help our environment’
http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/mintz-and-williams-smart-fiscal-policy-can-help-our-environment
“Both are members of the advisory board of Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission.”
Mintz is on the Board of Imperial Oil Ltd., Calgary which as of Dec.31, 2012 was 69.6 % owned by Exxon.
Williams is with Suncor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Oil

Barbara
Reply to  Barbara
November 25, 2015 9:20 am

Ontrario Newsroom, Nov.24, 2015
‘Ontario Releases New Climate Change Strategy’
“The strategy also supports Ontario’s proposed cap and trade program …’
https://news.ontario.ca/opo/en/2015/11/ontario-releases-new-climate-change-strategy.html
Just in time for COP 21!

Barbara
Reply to  Barbara
November 25, 2015 10:34 am

Alberta Government
Alberta’s Climate Change Advisory Panel, formed in the summer of 2015
Andrew Leach, Chair.
Linda Coady, Chief Sustainability officer for Enbridge
Gordon Lambert, Suncor Sustainability executive
Stephanie Cairns, works with Sustainable Prosperity organization
Angela Adams, Director of Education Unifor
http://www.alberta.ca/climate/leadership-discussion.cfm

Barbara
Reply to  Barbara
November 25, 2015 2:43 pm

the Natural Step, Canada
Gordon Lambert: short biography
http://www.naturalstep.ca/gordon-lambert
Board includes:
Karen Clarke-Whistler, affiliated with Pembina Institute
Toby Heaps, Corporate Knights Magazine
David Love

Barbara
Reply to  Barbara
November 25, 2015 4:05 pm

LINKEDIN: Stephanie Cairns
Board of IISD/International Institute for Sustainable Development
Board of Pembina Institute
Sustainable Prosperity
Alberta Climate Change Advisory Panel 2015
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/stephanie-cairns-79a33449

Brian H
November 24, 2015 10:14 pm

Polar and nearby regions will warm, tropics will expand somewhat … what’s not to like? Max AGW, pls!

mike slater
November 24, 2015 11:16 pm

ugh – It is -16C right now and the NDP are putting a $0.06 tax on gas to combat global warming. Just a very convenient reason to tax and spend

November 24, 2015 11:29 pm

When I studied geography at the University of Western Ontario in 1958, I was surprised to discover that Point Pelee, Ontario, Canada (north shore of Lake Erie) was the same latitude as northern California.
To see the status of Point Pelee’s subtropical vegetation you can Google three words:
“point pelee” subtropical
There is nothing new about Canada having this little corner of the subtropics, especially nothing related to climate change since 1950.

FJ Shepherd
Reply to  Frederick Colbourne
November 25, 2015 8:48 am

Point Pelee’s climate is not anywhere near subtropical. It is a humid continental climate. Here is the climate data:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_Pelee_National_Park#Climate

James at 48
Reply to  FJ Shepherd
November 25, 2015 11:35 am

It’s Humid Continental but can swing Humid Subtropical for weeks at a time. It’s the one place in Canada that is a reasonable facsimile of the Mid Atlantic States.

Filippo Turturici
November 25, 2015 3:31 am

Aren’t Baltimore winter temperature data from mean maximum temperatures, and not mean daily temperatures, as all the others (both March-November and Toronto’s)?

FJ Shepherd
Reply to  Filippo Turturici
November 25, 2015 8:19 am

You will find the monthly mean temperatures for Baltimore here. The do have to be calculated as just the monthly mean highs and lows are given:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore#Climate

November 28, 2015 1:29 am

Here is a taste of subtropical weather…http://www.intellicast.com/Local/WxMap.aspx
and here for Alturas California which came within 4F of tying the record low last night. They may make it this night..http://www.intellicast.com/Local/ObservationsSummary.aspx?location=USCA0023
My area has reached 19F the last two nights and currently it is around 18F. Going to get real cold in another 4 hours.