Claim: 170F (76c) Heat waves will make Persian Gulf Uninhabitable by 2100

UAE-heat

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

A new study claims that, by the end of this century, some cities in the Persian Gulf will be uninhabitable by humans, thanks to extreme temperatures up to 170F (76c).

The abstract of the study;

Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability

A human body may be able to adapt to extremes of dry-bulb temperature (commonly referred to as simply temperature) through perspiration and associated evaporative cooling provided that the wet-bulb temperature (a combined measure of temperature and humidity or degree of ‘mugginess’) remains below a threshold of 35 °C. (ref. 1). This threshold defines a limit of survivability for a fit human under well-ventilated outdoor conditions and is lower for most people. We project using an ensemble of high-resolution regional climate model simulations that extremes of wet-bulb temperature in the region around the Arabian Gulf are likely to approach and exceed this critical threshold under the business-as-usual scenario of future greenhouse gas concentrations. Our results expose a specific regional hotspot where climate change, in the absence of significant mitigation, is likely to severely impact human habitability in the future.

Read more: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2833.html

Unfortunately the main study is paywalled, but according to the press release in Time Magazine;

Temperatures could reach 170ºF

A number of cities in the Persian Gulf region may be unlivable the end of the century due to global warming if humans do not curb greenhouse gas emissions, according to new research.

The study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, projects that by the end of the century heat waves in Doha, Abu Dhabi and Bandar Abbas could lead to temperatures at which humans physically cannot survive over a sustained period of time by around 2100. The threshold, estimated around 170ºF, takes into account heat and humidity that prevent humans from exercising natural functions that allow the body to cool.

“Such severe heat waves are expected to occur only once every decade or every few decades,” said study author Elfatih A. B. Eltahir, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “But when they happen they will be quite lethal.”

http://time.com/4087092/climate-change-heat-wave/

According to Wikipedia, the hottest temperature ever recorded was 57c (134F) in Death Valley, in 1913. 76c (170F) might not seem like much of a leap from 57c, but the cities Doha, Abu Dhabi and Bandar Abbas are all coastal cities which experience substantial Summer rainfall.

Summer rainfall and storms are natural air conditioning. When temperatures soar, evaporation, convection and storm activity remove vast amounts of excess heat from the surface and transport the heat straight up to the edge of space. The heat laden water vapour keeps rising until it condenses – the vapour simply punches straight through the bulk of the world’s greenhouse blanket, soaring into the upper reaches of the troposphere, until it finds a height at which it can dump its vast store of heat.

thunderstorm big

Anyone who has spent time in the tropics, who has seen the towering thunderheads which form in Summer, has experienced this cooling phenomenon in action. The air is always very perceptibly cooler after a major thunderstorm.

Abhu Dhabi, Bandar Abbas and Doha aren’t going to run out of “coolant” – as coastal cities, any evaporation is immediately replaced from the inexhaustible waters of the world’s oceans.

If the world warms, what is surely more likely than implausibly high maximum heatwave temperatures, is that the temperature would stay about the same, but Summer rainfall would increase.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
279 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
indefatigablefrog
October 27, 2015 11:59 am

I recently found myself watching a documentary on the examination of historical, archeaological and geographical evidence for the possible location of the “Garden of Eden” described in the Bible.
Here’s a short clip from a similar documentary. (Not the one that I watched).
It starts with the words: “He discovered that Saudi Arabia had not always been a desert – During an interglacial period, Arabia was much wetter than it is today”.
No shit, Sherlock…
Anyway, this silly clip then goes on to claim that 6000-7000 years ago the waters of the Gulf were 150m lower than today. I suspect that this is a simple error and that they meant to say 150feet lower.
The documentary that I watched claimed 200ft lower, 6000 years ago.
I looked up the topic and found a paper claiming 100-120 meters relative rise since 18,000 years ago.
Suffice to say, this rapid rate of change flies in the face of alarmist claims that relatively trivial observed modern changes are clear evidence of the catastrophic influence of minor GHGs.
Even the lower figure of 200feet equates to an average ascent of 0.4inch per year. Above the maximum claimed global average of 3.4mm for today.
Anyway, documentaries about subjects that are related to climate but not part of the CAGW disinformation machine, should be more careful about accidentally giving credence to the claims of skeptics!!! (sarc)
P.S. I am not a Christian and do not wish to propose support for the literal truth of Genesis.
I include the following clip, purely for the merit of the presentation of non-AGW climate change extremes:

October 27, 2015 12:30 pm

SergeiMK
October 27, 2015 at 11:20 am
Hmm. I am sure you are technically correct but does it actually happen?
Having spent a fair bit of time above +40 in deserts, since I am alive, I can only assume the humidity was less than 100%. So, the question must be: How often, if ever, would you have +40C and 100% humidity? I have ridden my horse in the Persian Gulf surf at +40C and it was actually quite pleasant. We didn’t die so I assume the humidity wasn’t really high under the blue skies in the ocean.
Doesn’t look like it happens in the US (the NOAA heat index only goes to 110F and 40% humidity and an HI of 136):
https://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper_149894.htm

October 27, 2015 12:34 pm

Steve P
October 27, 2015 at 12:06 pm
Ok, you covered it with 95% and 149 HI. What did it say about deaths caused by these instances? Curious.
Thanks.
Wayne

Steve P
Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
October 27, 2015 6:41 pm

Wayne Delbeke
October 27, 2015 at 12:34 pm
“What did it say about deaths caused by these instances? Curious.”
I don’t know what you mean by “it.” If you’re referring to the Wikipedia article I quoted, “it” didn’t address mortality, nor did I. I always try to look at the numbers first, such as they are, to see if the argument holds any water.
So It is curious, that of the cities cited by the Wiki article for having a high heat index, none are in the Persian Gulf.
Futher, Appleton, Wisconsin is a long way from any ocean.

Dodgy Geezer
October 27, 2015 12:35 pm

…A new study claims that, by the end of this century, some cities in the Persian Gulf will be uninhabitable by humans…
Nice to see that they’ve learned NOT to predict a catastrophe in THEIR lifetimes…

Resourceguy
October 27, 2015 1:59 pm

Does this mean there is a sale going on for office space in the world’s largest skyscraper?

Andrew
October 27, 2015 3:02 pm

What’s uninhabitable about a freak heatwave every few decades? Stay indoors, keep aircon on. The tropics experiences about once a week conditions that are uninhabitable by humans in open air (a tropical cyclone). That doesn’t make them deserted.

October 27, 2015 3:10 pm

This is just more scaremongering; red meat for the alarmist cult.
Global T has been much higher at times, without any adverse effects on the biosphere. But most of the time, it has been much colder:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47brotherthebig/04images/Antarctica/415k-year-temp-graph.jpg
Another view:comment image
Over the past 4+ billion years, global T has varied between ≈12ºC and ≈22ºC:
http://www.kogagrove.org/sams/agw/images/paleomap.png
We are currently much closer to 12ºC. (Actually, just above ≈14ºC).
Warmer episodes are much rarer than cold times:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cHhMa7ARDDg/SsVwqCgB-LI/AAAAAAAABKo/U92CnYMmeSU/s1600-h/Vostok-400Kd.jpg
The alarmist narrative that temperatures will skyrocket is based on pseudo-science and regional cherry-picking. But it is unprecedented in the planet’s history. There has never been ‘runaway’ global warming, even when CO2 was 18 – 20X higher than now.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/GeoColumn.gif
There are always heat waves in the Persian Gulf. Just like the Antarctic is always very cold. But there is no global warming. That stopped almost twenty years ago. The alarmist crowd would have been much better off making the scare over global cooling. That is the real concern.

Curious George
October 27, 2015 4:02 pm

Note that these “scientists” don’t make any predictions. Wisely, they stay with projections. Projections are just projections; they are automatically true – “In 2000 I projected a temperature rise of 1 degree in 2015. It did not happen; fortunately it was not a prediction, and it undoubtedly was a valid projection based on data available in 2000”.

James at 48
October 27, 2015 5:27 pm

Perhaps the Sahara and other semi-tropical desert zones might start to green. But I think that is wishful thinking. I doubt the warm period will actually last long enough for that.

October 27, 2015 5:57 pm

According to Wikipedia, the hottest temperature ever recorded was 57c (134F) in Death Valley, in 1913.

Enrico Fermi was a strong advocate of “back of the envelope” calculations as a simple check on whether you are in the realm of reality. His example, IIRC, was a class asked to calculate the volume of the fruit in a bowl, and got answers smaller than an atom and larger than the Hoover Dam. Whereas a quick check: What’s the volume of a simple cube containing that fruit bowl? would have given the students a clue their answer was baloney.
This is a similar case. ~20C more than the highest T EVER recorded? The emission of radiation from Earth in the CO2 wave band is determined by the height at which CO2 is so thin that a photon emitted there has a “clear line of sight” to outer space. Since temperature decline with height is limited by the adiabatic lapse rate, if it is 20C hotter down here, it has to be 20C hotter (or something near to that) up there – actually, maybe even more, since with so much more H2O around, the wet adiabatic lapse rate being less, the temp. might of necessity be even hotter. But if photons at that height are still able to “see” outer space, then radiation of energy will be massive, since emission is proportional to the fourth power of the temperature. So photons there cannot “see” outer space if this allegation is correct. We have to go higher, until radiation loss from the planet equals the energy balance. That is the level at which T is the same as it now is. So he is saying that the CO2 conc. will be so high that we have to go higher far enough to drop T by a full 20C before a photon can “see” outer space? How many doublings of CO2 will that entail? This is beyond impossible.
And BTW, I am assuming no change in the radiation from the water layer. But if that goes up, as Le Chatelier’s principle insists it must, then even less radiation must be emitted by the CO2 layer, meaning even more doublings. They should have their physics degree confiscated.

Steve R
Reply to  Ron House
October 27, 2015 7:29 pm

76 C That is about the temperature estimated to have occurred in the Mediterranean basin some 5 km below sea level during the Messinian Salinity Crisis at the end of the Miocene when the Straights of Gibraltar closed and the Mediterranean dried up to a few hypersaline puddles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messinian_salinity_crisis

jdgalt
October 27, 2015 6:23 pm

I would love it if this were true. Because it’s the only way those horrible tyrannies and the culture that demands them are ever likely to be wiped off the face of the earth.

Steve P
October 27, 2015 7:55 pm

“but the cities Doha, Abu Dhabi and Bandar Abbas are all coastal cities which experience substantial Summer rainfall.”
Well, not really. In fact, none of these cities gets much summer rain.
According to Wikipedia, Bandar Abbas averages 171.4 mm (6.748″) rain, but most of that falls between Dec. and Apr. The other two places are bone dry. Doha gets about 75.2 mm (2.961″), none of it in the Summer, while Abu Dhabi manages just 57.1 mm (2.249″), again with very little in the Summer.
Record highs for Doha
Record high °C (°F)
Jan 31.2 (88.2)
Feb 36.0 (96.8)
Mar 39.0 (102.2)
Apr 46.0 (114.8)
May 47.7 (117.9)
Jun 49.0 (120.2)
Jul 48.2 (118.8)
Aug 48.0 (118.4)
Sep 45.5 (113.9)
Oct 43.4 (110.1)
Nov 38.0 (100.4)
Dec 32.2 (90)
Year 49.0 (120.2)
Record high for Abu Dhabi is 49.2°C (120.6°F)
For Bandar Abbas it is 51°C (123.8°F)
“In the summer, Bandar Abbas sees some of the highest average dew points of any city in the world, averaging 27 °C (81 °F) and frequently exceeding 30 °C (86 °F). As a result, heat indices generally top 50 °C (122 °F) for most days during the summer. This immense humidity causes summer diurnal ranges to be quite low, and is a result of air flow from the warm waters of the Persian Gulf.”
–Wikipedia

Steve P
Reply to  Steve P
October 27, 2015 9:29 pm

Steve P
October 27, 2015 at 10:41 am
In my sample listing of hot cities upstream…
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/27/claim-170f-76c-heat-waves-will-make-persian-gulf-uninhabitable-by-2100/#comment-2057701
I reported the record for Doha:
Qatar, 50.4 °C (122.7 °F), Doha, 14 July 2010
(from Wikipedia’s list of weather records)
But the entry for Doha itself reports record high is 49.2°C (120.6°F)
WUWT?
Note too that more than a few records on Wiki’s list were set in 2010.
The best weather record data also includes length of record, previous record(s), and number of times record has been broken over period of data.

Svend Ferdinandsen
October 28, 2015 4:49 am

To reach 140F equal to 60c they need 100 to 150W/m2 ekstra downwelling radiation relative to 35c to compensate the upwelling from the hot soil. That is very close to impossible.

amirlach
Reply to  Svend Ferdinandsen
October 30, 2015 6:25 pm

What if there was one hundred BILLION W/m2 of downwelling radiation?
“Dr. Evil: Okay, here’s the plan. We get the warhead and then hold the world ransom for… 1 MILLION W/m2!
Number Two: Sir, strictly speaking, a million dollars will not go very far these days. Virtucon alone makes over 9 billion dollars a year.
Dr. Evil: Really? Okay then… we hold the world ransom for one… hundred… BILLION W/m2!!!”

Corey S.
October 28, 2015 5:36 am
Steve R
Reply to  Corey S.
October 28, 2015 8:32 am

You must be a subscriber, All I get with that link is an abstract and an invitation to view the article for a fee.

Ed
October 28, 2015 6:56 am

“We project using an ensemble of high-resolution regional climate model simulations…” Gosh, what could possibly go wrong here? Years ago I saw a stock market projection that said the DJA would be at about 200,000 by now.

timetochooseagain
November 2, 2015 3:37 pm

Let’s use climate models to project something we know climate models are especially bad at projecting, and then scare the crap out of people with it! Brilliant!
No seriously. The modelers admit that their models generally are not good at getting the absolute value of temperatures correct, which is why they always want comparisons to be done with anomalies
(Well, that, and we’re not too good at measuring absolute temperatures on a global scale, either, so we can’t even tune models to get the right average absolute surface temperature)
So we know models don’t have the right absolute global temperature, generally speaking.
Then, modelers admit they aren’t very good at projecting at regional scales like this.
Finally, they admit that climate models aren’t good at projecting weather. So we’re supposed to believe a model projection of the frequency of days certain cities will have absolute temperatures above a certain threshold? Something even modelers admit models can’t do?
This is a joke, right?