Climate Insanity on steroids!

Economies collapsing, Middle East imploding – and Obama & Pals obsess over … the climate!

Guest essay by Paul Driessen

The Middle East is imploding. Islamic State butchers are annihilating Christian and other communities. Putin is sending arms to Assad. Under the Obama-Iran nuclear deal, the mullahs will get $100+ billion to expand their proxy terror war on Israel and the West. Saudi Arabia has 100,000 empty air-conditioned tents but won’t take any of the millions who’ve been driven from their homes. Neither will most of the other 22 Arab League nations or 57 Organization of Islamic Cooperation member countries.

Instead, millions of mostly Muslim migrants, militants and refugees are heading to Europe – with limited money, education, job skills, or desire to assimilate. They demand entry into EU countries whose energy, economic, employment and welfare systems are already foundering or nearing collapse.

EU nations have hobbled their nuclear and carbon-based energy systems so completely that unsubsidized German and Danish electricity prices are almost ten times higher than in US states that still rely on coal-fired generation. Industrial giant Siemens is cutting 1,600 jobs in its power and gas division, companies are hard-pressed to compete internationally, and 0.5% annual economic growth is deemed “robust.”

So naturally, President Obama, Pope Francis, the European Commission, United Nations, and many poor countries are obsessed with – climate change! It’s insanity on steroids. The alarmist assertions are absurd.

“Climate change is already disrupting our agriculture and ecosystems, our water and food supplies,” Obama recently inveighed. “If we do nothing, Alaskan temperatures are projected to rise between six and twelve degrees by the end of the century.”

Projected by whom? Who concocts these fables? Nature-driven climate change has disrupted lives throughout human history. Seas have risen 400 feet since the last mile-thick glaciers melted off the northern half of Asia, Europe and North America. How did “imperiled” Pacific islands survive that?

Some Alaskan glaciers have been retreating for decades, but Hubbard is growing and Glacier Bay’s ice retreat began around 1750. Arctic sea ice has increased some 26% (400,000 square miles) since 2012, in a cycle that’s continued for millennia. The sea ice “was thick in the 1920s, thin in the 1930s and 1940s, thick again in the 1960s and 1970s, and thinner in recent decades,” oceanographer Igor Polyakov noted in 2004.

“Not only in the summer, but in the winter the [Bering Sea region] was free of ice, sometimes with a wide strip of water up to at least 200 miles away from the shore,” Swedish explorer Oscar Nordkvist reported in 1822. “We were astonished by the total absence of ice in the Barrow Strait,” Francis McClintock, captain of the Fox, wrote in 1860. “I was here at this time in 1854 – still frozen up – and doubts were entertained as to the possibility of escape.” How did cars and power plants cause all that?

Meanwhile Greenland’s ice mass has grown by some 200 cubic kilometers (48 cubic miles) just since 2014. Vikings built homes, grew crops and raised cattle in Greenland between 950 and 1300, before they were frozen out by the Little Ice Age and encroaching pack ice and glaciers. Antarctic sea ice set another record in May, the US National Snow and Ice Data Center reports, climbing 12% above the long-term 1981-2010 average, to reach 12.1 million square kilometers (800,000 square miles) – almost as much as Alaska and Texas combined!

If it’s global warming and climate change, shouldn’t melting phenomena be constant and global?

Pope Francis nevertheless plans to meet with President Obama September 23, to discuss “dangerous manmade climate change” and how to ensure “preferential treatment of the poor,” by building “clean” energy economies and stopping “carbon pollution.” Their concerns and solutions are illusory.

They disdain fossil fuels and capitalism – though they have brought greater health and well-being to more people than any other systems in history. They prefer the socialism, centralized government control, higher energy prices, fundamental economic transformations and wealth redistribution schemes advanced by the UN and Climate Crisis, Inc. By denying the world’s poorest people energy, jobs and economic growth, this agenda will sentence them to perpetual poverty, disease and early death. By mandating the use of biofuels, wind turbines and solar panels, it will turn food into fuel, increase malnutrition, convert wildlife habitats into enormous inefficient energy facilities, and kill countless millions of birds and bats.

The pope and president dismiss these impacts. They insist that climate change is a far worse problem, and that modern energy, housing and living standards for the world’s poor would not be “sustainable.” They believe “morality,” “climate justice” and “preferential treatment” mean protecting people from hypothesized, exaggerated and fabricated climate disasters 25, 50 or 100 years from now – by destroying millions of jobs and keeping the world’s poor energy-deprived and impoverished now and in perpetuity.

The pope and president denigrate plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide as “carbon pollution” and say this 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere has replaced the powerful natural forces that have always driven climate and weather fluctuations and events. They disregard satellite and weather balloon data and records from East Anglia University, which show there has been no planetary warming since at least late 1997, if not 1995.

They studiously ignore the fact that even full implementation of EPA’s fraudulent and destructive Clean Power Plan would at best prevent a global temperature increase of only 0.03 degrees F and a sea-level rise of barely 0.01 inches by 2100. And those “benefits” assume CO2 is the culprit in climate change.

Like other climate alarmists, they refuse to recognize that some 2,300 coal-fired power plants are already operating worldwide, and almost 2,200 more are being proposed, developed or built. Nearly 900 are planned for China and India alone. In barely ten years, Asia’s energy consumption will increase 31% and some two-thirds of that demand will be oil, natural gas and coal. So a US shutdown would do nothing.

Developed countries have dug a tiger trap – and walked into it. Their constant rants about “catastrophic manmade climate change” are driving policies that shut down carbon-based energy, economic growth and job creation in Formerly Rich Countries, while telling developing nations to hold us for climate ransom.

Following Obama’s recent GLACIER conference in Anchorage, China, India and Russia (three of the four biggest CO2-emitting nations) refused to sign a nonbinding declaration seeking greater international action to combat Arctic melting and climate change. Nearly all developing countries oppose agreements calling for binding emission targets or even “obligatory review mechanisms” of their voluntary efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, they now insist on $100 billion to $400 billion per year in climate change “mitigation, adaptation and compensation,” plus free energy technology transfers.

Denmark is dropping plans to phase out coal-fired power plants and be fossil-fuel-free by 2050. Britain is junking its wind energy subsidies and pushing ahead with fracking for gas to fuel more power plants. But meanwhile, Mr. Obama is thumbing his nose at Congress and American voters and unemployed workers – and imposing ever more restrictions on coal and natural gas use, and more taxpayer subsidies for wind, solar and biofuel programs, on top of water, ozone and other regulations. This will cost trillions of dollars, inflict heavy costs on poor and middle class families, and bring few or no health or ecological benefits.

The agenda being driven by President Obama, Pope Francis, the UN and Climate Crisis, Inc. means our huddled masses will be forced to share ever-greater scarcity, ever-lower living standards, ever-fewer jobs and opportunities. But of course it all will be apportioned “fairly and equitably” – by ruling elites and their cronies, whose desk jobs, six-figure salaries and upper crust life styles will be protected by the same executive powers they employ to protect the planet from climate raptors and hobgoblins.

It’s time for Congress to pass bills dismantling and defunding Obama’s energy and climate dictates – and dare Democrats to vote against them and in favor of this destructive Executive Branch power grab.


 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death, and coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

259 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
alex
September 21, 2015 7:17 am

Why you cry?
Cheap oil means less money for IS, Assad, Mullahs and Putin.
So why you cry?

Gail Combs
September 21, 2015 7:33 am

Maybe the betrayal of the Middle-east was part of what what Obama was promising Putin when he was caught with an open mike.

…. in an unscripted moment picked up by camera crews, the American president was more blunt: Let me get reelected first, he said; then I’ll have a better chance of making something happen.
“On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space,” Obama can be heard telling Medvedev, apparently referring to incoming Russian president — and outgoing prime minister — Vladimir Putin.
“Yeah, I understand,” Medvedev replies, according to an account relayed by an ABC News producer, who said she viewed a recording of the discussion made by a Russian camera crew. “I understand your message about space. Space for you . . .”
“This is my last election,” Obama interjects. “After my election, I have more flexibility.”…..
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-tells-medvedev-solution-on-missile-defense-is-unlikely-before-elections/2012/03/26/gIQASoblbS_story.html

Catcracking
Reply to  Gail Combs
September 21, 2015 12:45 pm

Gail,
Good point, just look at where his priorities lie, difficult to believe it is the same as most in the USA

Monroe
September 21, 2015 7:59 am

Conrad Black’s latest essay in The National Post also speaks to this topic.

Gary Pearse
September 21, 2015 8:05 am

Why can’t an essay like this be put before the American public more broadly. So much good stuff seems to be only presentable to the like-minded and the debunked, ideological agenda puffery is broadly cast.

Alf
September 21, 2015 8:07 am

Luke, you are right it was climate change. Global grain prices went up because of mandated ethanol production. Fourty percent of the corn in the U.S. goes for ethanol.

TRM
September 21, 2015 8:08 am

This type of political nonsense is just your opinion Paul and while you are entitled to it spewing the following rubbish does nothing but weaken your argument on climate. Yes there are lots of problems bigger than CO2 but really?
“Putin is sending arms to Assad.”
Because the USA is the only country that should be arming countries. The USA is the one destroying countries in the middle east. The USA wants a regime change in Syria so a more compliant regime could be put in place so a gas pipeline from Qatar to Europe can be built to deprive Russia of its primary gas market. In case you missed the memo here is what the whole Syrian situation is about
http://cdn.timesofisrael.com/blogs/uploads/2015/08/syria_pipelines.png
“Under the Obama-Iran nuclear deal, the mullahs will get $100+ billion to expand their proxy terror war on Israel and the West. ”
Ha ha ha. You made me laugh on that one. So who has been funding Wahabi version of Islam for 5+ DECADES? That would be Saudi Arabia. Who are supplying terrorist groups with fanatics? Saudi Arabia.
You are very much wrong on the middle east. Maybe you should look at your own countries actions rather than spewing this obviously WRONG political drivel in a climate blog.

Marcus
Reply to  TRM
September 21, 2015 8:24 am

Now , Now Mr. Oblama…the adults are talking here, please go back to your La La fantasy land !!!

Silver ralph
Reply to  TRM
September 21, 2015 11:26 am

While you are right that Saudi Arabia has been promoting Wahabi fundamentalism and terrorism across the globe, Iran is still a threat to Israeli and Western security. Even after the Obama capitulation on nuclear technology for Iran, Iran is STILL calling for the destruction of Israel. How can any sane Western leader give nuclear technology to a nation that is overtly calling for a nuclear war? The answer, of course, is that Obama is neither sane nor Western.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/khamenei-israel-wont-survive-next-25-years
As to your theory about regime change in Syria because of oil, that is just typical Muslim taquiyya – dissembling. — Anything to blame the West, instead of taking responsibility for Muslim political incompetence.
In reality, the civil war in Syria is exactly the same as the 1981 civil war, and for exactly the same reasons. Look up the Hamma massacre. And those reasons have nothing to do with oil, gas Russia or America. This is an old dispute that goes back 1,300 years, when the invading Muslim army placed the Alawites at the bottom of Syrian society and grievously persecuted them for more than 1,000 years. But the French put the Alawites into power in the 20th century, and the Sunnies have long hated the Alawite rise to power and wanted to depose them. And the Alawites are grimly hanging onto power, because they know what will happen if they relinquish it.
THIS is the true reason for the current civil war in Syria. Nothing to do with oil, gas, Russia or America. If Europe wanted to put a gas pipeline in, they could go through Jordan and Israel, and then ship to Europe – Just as Britain ships from Algeria.
So you are wrong on all counts. Iran IS a problem. And the Syria dispute is a local issue dating back more than a millennium. This is why our politicians need to understand history, society and religion rather better than they do.
Ralph

MarkW
Reply to  Silver ralph
September 21, 2015 12:44 pm

But don’t you know. There were no problems in the Middle East until America and those Jews butted in.
I’ve been told that by several sources that consider themselves to be quite reliable.

TRM
Reply to  Silver ralph
September 21, 2015 12:57 pm

I would not trust any Iranian “quote” translated by western news media. Remember the “Israel must be wiped off the map” quote? Turns out what was really said was “The regime which occupies Jerusalem must be erased from the pages of history”. One is talking genocide the other regime change.
I disagree with theocracy of any stripe but I’ll not trust the “Times of Israel” to translate Farsi to English.
If Iran does have a nuke (and I’m willing to bet they do) they bought it from Pakistan a decade ago when Pakistan was in one of its regular upheavals. That would explain why the Israelis haven’t attacked Iran. The retaliation would be fatal.
It has EVERYTHING to do with oil and gas and which currency is used to buy/sell it. Without that the USA’s status as reserve currency is gone. Check out the history of every country that has tried to sell oil & gas for non-US dollars in the past 40 years. Assad said no to the Qatari gas line and shortly thereafter all hell breaks loose.
No I’m not a fan of Assad or any other dictator but causing the destruction that has gone on in Libya and Syria falls on the shoulders of the USA. Maybe you are unaware of General Clarke’s statements:

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. Taking a bit longer to accomplish than planned and it doesn’t look like Syria and Iran are going to get beat any time soon. His comments on oil are very true.

Bart
Reply to  Silver ralph
September 21, 2015 1:39 pm

Clark is a loon. And, the idea that Sunni Pakistan, whose atomic program was funded by Sunni Saudi Arabia, would sell nukes to Shite Iran, the Saudi bankroller’s greatest regional adversary, is way, way out in the fever swamps.

ralfellis
Reply to  Silver ralph
September 21, 2015 3:27 pm

The regime which occupies Jerusalem must be erased from the pages of history”. One is talking genocide the other regime change.
____________________________________
Nonsense. Do you not read the Hadith? Do you not understand the subtext of Islamic speech??
Being an eschatologist, on 24th Sept 2012 at the U.N., President Ahmadinejad predicted the End of Times and the coming of the 12th Imam, the Mahdi. He did not mention the destruction of Israel at all, so the UN was happy. But he did not have to mention the destruction of Israel, because every Shia Muslim would know EXACTLY what he meant – because the Hadith says (on many occasions):
Quote:
Judgment Day will not come unless Muslims fight the Jews. Muslims will defeat and kill Jews. The Jew will hide behind the stone and the tree, and the stone or tree will say: ‘Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him! Only the Gharqad tree will not say because it is the tree of Jews. (Fitan, 82)
So the End of Times speech specifically includes the destruction of Israel. Get the idea?
And eschatology was not peculiar to Ahmadinejad, it is a central component of Shia doctrine. And so if the Shia are looking for the coming of the Mahdi in the near future, they must also be planning for the destruction of Israel in the near future. And soon they will have Obama’s nuclear weaponry to achieve it.
Don’t be led astray, by liberal apologists in the Grauniad or BBC (or CNN). The Western Selbsthass ‘intelligenstia’ will be the chief architects of the decline and fall of Western civilisation. And like the mad or bad prophet, Jeremiah, they will revel in their own destruction.
Ralph

BFL
Reply to  TRM
September 21, 2015 12:08 pm

“So who has been funding Wahabi version of Islam for 5+ DECADES? That would be Saudi Arabia. Who are supplying terrorist groups with fanatics? Saudi Arabia. ”
AND this is the country offering to build as many mosques in Europe as they need and then staffing them with their imams (Wahabi is the most intolerant and radical of the Islamic religions). I agree with Steyn on this one, what with a severely decreasing continental population birth rate and a huge influx of this political group (which is what Islam is) that will procreate much faster than the original culture, Europe is in a world of hurt in just a few decades or much less. Note also that the Saudi’s have not offered to take any/zero of the migrants. With the regions huge armies the locals could easily take care of any problems there, but choose not to, perhaps because it is working out so well with Europe and the migrants, which is no doubt a long range goal.

MarkW
Reply to  TRM
September 21, 2015 12:43 pm

I see that Putin’s internet brigades are in full force today.

TRM
Reply to  MarkW
September 21, 2015 1:00 pm

As are Israel’s and the USA’s. I’m not a fan of Putin but if you want to stop terrorism you may want to see how it is done effectively. Unless defeating terrorists like IS isn’t really the objective.

TRM
September 21, 2015 8:17 am

Hey Paul. Rather than spewing at Russia and Iran how about looking at your own government’s record of overthrowing democratically elected governments.
Oh while you were not looking your government (USA) destroyed the Ukraine and lost Crimea (permanently) and now Russia will show you how to deal with terrorists. The USA has had more than a year to destroy IS and has done nothing. Let’s check the progress the Russian plan will have achieved in one year. So I’m betting by September 2016 IS will be in Iraq and shrinking. They will have got their butts kicked out of Syria with huge losses.
Congratulations Paul. While you, and people in the USA like you, are drinking your government’s Kool-Aid you have lost another country (Syria) that you tried to destroy. Keep it up and the whole world will be laughing “LOSER” at you soon.

MarkW
Reply to  TRM
September 21, 2015 12:45 pm

I see that Putin’s internet brigades can still spout their talking points with the best of them.

Resourceguy
Reply to  TRM
September 21, 2015 12:57 pm

Is that what KGB students do when they can’t pass malware school of coding? They become just another group of message managers like NGOs and MoveOn youth squads.

September 21, 2015 8:19 am

Reblogged this on "Mothers Against Wind Turbines™" Phoenix Rising… and commented:
Government-induced climaphobia…..what a waste of time, money, and effort!

Scott
September 21, 2015 8:33 am

This is what half the CAGW argument is really about:
http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/09/20/update-leader-of-effort-to-prosecute-skeptics-under-rico-paid-himself-his-wife-1-5-million-from-govt-climate-grants-for-part-time-work/
The other half is those who believe in a “One World Government” where the “rich” responsible for the evils of colonialism and horrible climate disruption must be made to pay……
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/un-ipcc-official-admits-we-redistribute-the-worlds-wealth-by-climate-policy/question-3934033/
The argument has left science and spun off into the area of pure Money and Politics.

Ralph Kramden
September 21, 2015 8:50 am

It’s insanity on steroids. The alarmist assertions are absurd.
Time marches on and madness takes it’s toll.

Eliza
September 21, 2015 8:51 am

Re Bogota above :South American’s in the main don’t believe in AGW but they love it as a concept to get money out of gringos in Europa and US, so currently they (meteorological services), are all playing the game For starters, I know that outside it is 33C(digital well placed thermometer) but they predicted 40C and wunderbar says it is 37C using thermometer over boiling tar at local airport. This is being repeated daily for the past 6 years to pander to IPCC demands who fork out the cash to make sure temps are seen to be rising.

tonyM
September 21, 2015 8:56 am

When an essay by a skeptic starts to cherry pick so obviously it reflects the same nonsense as employed by warmists.
I cound not read beyond Greenland having increased ice since 2014 (wow must be a record., is it??) or that in May, Antarctica had set a record without reference to the most recent sea ice data.
Pity as this sort of gambit gives no confidence in believing anything else which might be genuine..

Reply to  tonyM
September 21, 2015 9:55 am

Tony if you think someone is incorrect in their submission you should be more specific on what is incorrect and show us some proof that your version is true. Otherwise why should we believe your statement with out any evidence that you are not lying.

Catcracking
Reply to  Matt Bergin
September 21, 2015 1:04 pm

Matt,
Good point, some people cannot accept the facts because it does not fit into their agenda, so they question them without and proof.

Catcracking
Reply to  Matt Bergin
September 21, 2015 2:06 pm

Matt,
Just read the link which offers scientific documentation of Greenland recovery and explain where it is in error..

Catcracking
Reply to  Matt Bergin
September 21, 2015 7:49 pm

Sorry my post should have been directed to Tony not Matt

MarkW
Reply to  tonyM
September 21, 2015 12:48 pm

It really is pathetic how the warmists cling to their bad data, even as the rest of the world fails to live up to their nightmares.
Do you deny that Greenland has gained ice mass over the last year, your fabled models claim that this wasn’t possible.
So Antarctica has lost a little bit of ice, coming off 10 years in a row of breaking record highs, that not much of a surprise.
Speaking of gambits, yours has failed.

tonyM
Reply to  tonyM
September 21, 2015 4:19 pm

Matt Bergin:
I am against any hyped claims whether it be from warmers or from skeptics.
Re Antarctica: yes May was high but it has been at or below below the average for well over a month now. That should have been stated and is commonly available knowledge.
Re: Greenland: I don’t dispute the numbers but it is similarly a useless statistic unless there is some comparison. It is the style use by warmers such as gazillions of joules gained by the oceans (ie a minuscule increase in T) or equally the US west coast still being in the grips of the the climate change monster.
The latter point clearly is one which relates to energy balances where the east coast froze its butt off in a fairly atypical style but is compensated elsewhere in the world. And no, the warming phenomena should not be constant and global as the writer suggests given it is supposed to be a few watts/m2 in a maelstrom of weather activity. The Arctic is more susceptible to any earth warming; sea ice extent there is just over two std deviations from the mean.
This was, for me, sufficient to ignore the rest of the essay as I simply could no longer trust his views. But I don’t question anyone else’s disposition on the matter.

Dodgy Geezer
September 21, 2015 9:22 am

… Islamic State butchers are annihilating Christian and other communities….
Actually, fundamentalist Muslims are not going to be too hard on Christian communities. They pay a special tax and will be subordinated to Muslims, as the Prophet prescribes, but they are not annihilated.
Muslims with a slightly different view to other Muslims (think Sunni vs Shia) are to be slaughtered out of hand as apostates. It’s safer to be Christian.

Paul Westhaver
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
September 21, 2015 9:46 am

“It’s safer to be Christian”….for now.
First they have to exterminate the apostates, the homosexuals, the Atheists, Pagans, the Jews, the Buddhists and Hindus, then the Christians. If a few Christians get slaughtered along the way, no big wow, they will get to them eventually.

BFL
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
September 21, 2015 12:17 pm

Historically they have lived off of others, which is why they tend to be (fortunately) mostly incompetent and unproductive and depending on expertise from modern cultures. A take over by these groups would eventually result in an even more savage return to pre-industrial times.

ralfellis
Reply to  BFL
September 21, 2015 3:44 pm

Historically, Islam is only one huge great Protection Racket. That is why the Jizya tax is called protection money. And Islam worked on exactly the same principle as the Chicago Mob – pay the Jizya tax or we beat you up and burn your shop down. And it was the Jizya protection-money tax that funded the Muslim aristocracy and army.
However, you can only have so many racketeers, and extort so much tax, before you kill the goose with the golden eggs. And that is what happened all across Mesopotamia during the 8th to 11th centuries, when governors like Musa the son of Musab grievously overtaxed the kuffer unbelievers until he reduced the region to penury and poverty. And then the harsh rules for unbelievers – the Covenant of Dhimitude – were so bad that many people just fled. And this resulted in the Dead Cities of Aleppo – 900 towns and villages that lay abandoned even to this day.
And this was why the Crusades were organised, to liberate these Christian cities. Remember that when Baldwin the Count of Boulogne entered Edessa, the first city to be liberated, he was welcomed into the city as a liberating hero. I know this is not what our educational establishment or Hollywood like to portray, but it is the truth. Most of these cities were still majority Christian, while some were majority Jewish.
Ralph
Srjilla. One of the abandoned Christian cities in northern Syria. Still there, after 1,200 years.comment image

rw
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
September 21, 2015 12:42 pm

“It’s safer to be Christian.”
You certainly aren’t keeping up with current events. What may be the greatest ethnic cleansing in human history is going on right now in Muslim countries. (I happen to think that part of this is some kind of social hysteria – somewhat like what’s currently going on in the inner cities in the US. Standard Islam gives them the rationale – but they’re taking it to the limit.)

Catcracking
Reply to  rw
September 21, 2015 7:52 pm

+ 10,

MarkW
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
September 21, 2015 12:49 pm

One side gives facts, and you give some form of pablum about how they really shouldn’t be behaving that way.

Reply to  MarkW
September 21, 2015 10:33 pm

Here’s a few facts, Mark W:
http://www.jpost.com/Features/In-Thespotlight/This-Week-in-History-The-King-David-Hotel-bombing
I especially like the part where the perps “disguised as Arab hotel workers, managed to sneak in”. Of course you are aware that the principle leaders of the Irgun and Haganah were also the founders of Israel’s modern -day Mossad? What is it you want to decry about “terrorists” and “bombing”?
How about these facts? : http://www.gtr5.com
http://www.gtr5.com/evidence/warcrimes.pdf
Does someone really want to call the 207 wounded/killed US Navy veterans “anti-semites ” because they want the truth to be told?
Let’s not even digress to the multiple problems of serious espionage our “friend” has perpetrated against the US.
Nor to the problems of their own nuclear stockpile, which they won’t let anyone inspect either, and which they denied until a person of conscience blew the whistle (and whom they promptly threw in prison).
Hey Mark W. , just where did they get all that plutonium and yellow cake anyway?
Who has their ideological blinders on?

Catcracking
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
September 21, 2015 2:09 pm

I guess the video of Christian Egyptians loosing their heads was fabricated??

Claude Roessiger
September 21, 2015 9:40 am

The promotion of Zionism and Zionist views has no place in the discussion of climate change. Mr. Driessen ought to have kept to his subject. There was ample subject matter without straying from the path.

MarkW
Reply to  Claude Roessiger
September 21, 2015 12:50 pm

Wow, the anti-semites really hate it when the actions of their compatriots are exposed.
Funny how pointing out that muslims are killing Jews is somehow twisted into a complaint that we are promoting Zionism.

Reply to  Claude Roessiger
September 21, 2015 9:07 pm

Watch out Claude, the next thing you know you will not only be called an “anti-semite”, but a “denier” too. Classic ad hominem! Now where have I heard that before?
I guess Mark W. doesn’t know that a substantial number of “zionists” are Christian and not Jewish, and that Arabs are also “semites”.

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 21, 2015 9:18 pm

That should read : and Arabs, even the Muslim ones, are also “semites”.

September 21, 2015 9:41 am

Oh dear, a right wing rant. TL;DNR.

MarkW
Reply to  Hans Erren
September 21, 2015 12:51 pm

Did someone post a link to this site at strormfront again?

Reply to  MarkW
September 21, 2015 9:36 pm

No, I believe it was posted at the Netanyahu Fanboi site.

Christopher Hanley
Reply to  MarkW
September 22, 2015 12:44 am

It gets even nuttier from here.

Reply to  Hans Erren
September 21, 2015 9:35 pm

Thanks for your comment Hans.
Glad it isn’t just me that smells the reek of Bovine Scat, from right field this time. Does the opening of this essay remind you of the theme of “we have to offer up scary scenarios ” too?
When people find it necessary to start quoting scripture ( the original “pal-reviewed” publications), in order to bolster their “arguments” in subsequent comments, you know you are fighting a battle of wits with the unarmed.

Michael Jankowski
September 21, 2015 9:42 am

Don’t we all know by now that climate change is the cause of Middle East instability? Lol

Reply to  Michael Jankowski
September 21, 2015 10:41 pm

Great Scott! I think you nailed it!
+1

Mike Bromley the Kurd
September 21, 2015 10:13 am

Saudis: Sunni. Refugees: Mostly Shiite. The REAL refugees, that is. Not the “embedded” Sunni “migrants”, basically ISIS-in-waiting. The Tent Cities will remain empty, so including them in the above list is irrelevant.

September 21, 2015 10:20 am

Thank you, Paul Driessen.
This is an excellent, very complete article.
Yes, this is climate insanity. But even with failing models the UN’s IPCC keeps on pushing its way to Paris. I think they will fail, as always, but feign to come out as “robust”.
Almost all global temperature data sets show the beginning of a pause after the big El Niño of 1998. The satellite-based data sets show it most clearly.

Silver ralph
September 21, 2015 10:32 am

The Gulf States not taking any refugees? Surprise, surprise.
What the wastern MSM will not tell you, is this is an age-old Muslim policy for conquest. It is called al-Hijra – the sometimes forced exile of Muslims to other regions, so they settle there and take over the region.
This is how Islam conquered Christian North Africa, Christian Syria, Christian Anatolia, Christian Spain, and Christian Balkans. This is why we think of North Africa as being ‘Arab’ when it was originally Phoenician, Roman, Berber and Vandal. This is why we think of Anatolia as being ‘Turkish’, when it was originally Greek.
This is a deliberate policy of colonisation, and the worrying aspect is it is a thoroughly anti-Reformation and anti-Enlightenment colonisation.
Ralph

All Hail Baal
September 21, 2015 11:12 am

Shout out to Jimbo and Gary Pearse: Loved your comments. Hey Gary, thx for using the English language so well while making your points. This may not be a compliment in your paradigm but your writing reminds me of the apostle Paul. This is a huge compliment from my habitat. Rock on.

Dawtgtomis
Reply to  All Hail Baal
September 21, 2015 11:39 am

All Hail Baal, I find your handle quite appropriate biblically. I have often compared the warmunists to the prophets of Baal.

Simon
September 21, 2015 11:49 am

“Instead, millions of mostly Muslim migrants, militants and refugees are heading to Europe – with limited money, education, job skills, or desire to assimilate. They demand entry into EU countries whose energy, economic, employment and welfare systems are already foundering or nearing collapse.”
Wow!! I’m wondering abut this paragraph.
1. Why the relevance of the religious beliefs of the refugees is important?
2. How the writer knows these people have limited skills and education?
3. Why he thinks they would not want to assimilate?
My understanding is these are terrified people desperate to get out of an horrific dangerous situation. But I guess it is easier to dismiss helping human beings when they are lazy, dangerous, ignorant foreigners.

BFL
Reply to  Simon
September 21, 2015 12:28 pm

Islam is not “just” a religion, it is also a political force and a thoroughly unchangeable repressive ideology that requires termination for those wanting to leave it. “Normal” religions can be assimilated, not so this one. However, it may appear safe enough for present cultures with low population levels, but that won’t be so when their percentages increase to a “tipping point” and there are easy examples of that to find on the European continent.

Resourceguy
Reply to  BFL
September 21, 2015 12:51 pm

Exactly.

MarkW
Reply to  BFL
September 21, 2015 12:55 pm

Police in London and parts of France, already refer to heavily Muslim portions as “no go” zones.
Incidents of rape are up dramatically in recent years, but the papers never manage to tell their readers that almost all of the accused rapists are of middle eastern descent.

Reply to  BFL
September 21, 2015 2:50 pm

Perhaps if Obama or the leaders of the European countries they are fleeing to put them through one of those “Diversity and Inclusion” classes before granting entry?

Reply to  BFL
September 21, 2015 10:50 pm

One could easily substitute the word “Christianity” of the not-so-distant-past for “islam” in this context. My own ancestors were forced to convert to Christianity at the point of a broadsword. Those that didn’t convert died on the spot.

MarkW
Reply to  Simon
September 21, 2015 12:53 pm

1) The relevance of their religion is why 2 and 3 are so important.
2) The evidence is in front of you.
3) 50 years of non-assimilation should be a clue, pre-supposing you were actually interested in having a clue.
Most of these people aren’t even from Syria.

Reply to  Simon
September 21, 2015 1:02 pm

Simon says:
1. Why the relevance of the religious beliefs of the refugees is important?
2. How the writer knows these people have limited skills and education?
3. Why he thinks they would not want to assimilate?

May I? Thank you:
1. Why the relevance of the religious beliefs of the refugees is important?
The U.S. is (officially) taking in more than 280,000 Arab speakers every year from Middle Eastern countries. That’s the number they admit to, anyway. Do you recal September 11, 2001? Remember who committed that atrocity? And dozens of similar atrocities?
Now, our of 280,000 admitted immigrants, do you think a fraction of them might be similarly inclined? If so, give us your fraction. If not, then I’m commenting to rational readers, not to you. But I assume you’re rational, so, what fraction would be your guess?
2. How the writer knows these people have limited skills and education?
Wrong question. Because it doesn’t matter if everyone of them is another Einstein with PhD’s in the hard sciences. The question is: why do they insist on going to EU countries? There are other, relatively safe and civilized countries much closer to their homes:
http://40.media.tumblr.com/8f1b1bcaca9f271800c8eedc20074a9a/tumblr_nu7ryre3bw1r2qr2so1_1280.jpg
3. Why he thinks they would not want to assimilate?
Because as we observe in every country, they do not want to assimilate! There are areas in the UK where non-Arabs had best not be seen. Then there’s Dearborn, Michigan. And so on.
Commenting on the same illegal invasion of the Roman empire in the 5th Century AD, Historians Will and Ariel Durant wrote:
If Rome had not engulfed so many men of alien blood in so brief a time, if she had passed all these newcomers through her schools instead of her slums, if she had treated them as men with a hundred potential excellences, if she had occasionally closed her gates to let assimilation catch up with infiltration, she might have gained new racial and literary vitality from the infusion, and might have remained a Roman Rome, the voice and citadel of the West.
But we know what happened: The Roman empire lacked the will to control its borders. So dozens of barbarian tribes like the Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Picts, Alemanni, Franks, Jutes, Alans, Saxons, Vandals, etc., flooded into the empire, unopposed.
In less than a century it was all over: Rome fell in 410 AD, and a barbarian ruled the empire. Roman citizens were enslaved, their houses and estates were confiscated, and civilization entered a long road into the Dark Ages. And almost all because the empire’s borders were wide open to any foreign immigrants who managed to get to them.
The Durants also wrote:
The concentration of population and poverty in great cities may compel a government to choose between enfeebling the economy with the dole, or running the risk of riot and revolution.
Sound familiar?

Catcracking
Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 2:12 pm

Looks like the Administration playbook!

Barbara
Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 3:10 pm

The economy of Dearborn is thriving compared to the surrounding communities. These are good business people and they want to keep the area prosperous.
Maybe Detroit itself could be re-vitalized by middle-eastern refugees?

BFL
Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 3:21 pm

“Now, our of 280,000 admitted immigrants, do you think a fraction of them might be similarly inclined?”
It’s not just that, as I don’t recall where any Muslim organizations or groups have condemned these actions. Usually just the opposite with open support or no response at all. Pretty much a reminder of what their real intentions are. Their organizations also typically issue complaints and threats (cartoons) when such is suggested but they are allowed to freely attack and complain without recourse (political correctness).

BFL
Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 3:38 pm

“Maybe Detroit itself could be re-vitalized by middle-eastern refugees?”
Well, maybe, IF you are willing to accept being the eventual underdog (nearly 2 million views):

http://www.clarionproject.org/news/american-muslims-stone-christians-dearborn-michigan

Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 3:43 pm

Db, if we were back in the time of the Inquisition or the Crusades, I could cite from Scripture where both are contrary to the Gospel, the Good News, of what Jesus Christ came for and accomplished. (The “finale” is yet to come.)
Will an Iman please speak up and say what ISIS and the 9/11 and what other Muslim terrorist have done is against the Koran.
Maybe they have and I just missed it.
If so, someone please provide a reference.

ralfellis
Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 3:52 pm

If Rome had not engulfed so many men of alien blood in so brief a time, if she had passed all these newcomers through her schools instead of her slums.
__________________________________
More importantly – “if she had disarmed them”.
Traditionally Rome took immigrants, disarmed them, split them up and sent them to different places all over the Empire. But when the Goths invaded, Commander Stilicho failed to disarm them and failed to divide them up. (Part of the problem is that Stillicho was an immigrant himself.) And so the Goths went on the rampage, and sacked Rome.
R

Reply to  dbstealey
September 21, 2015 11:03 pm

“Sound familiar ?”
Allow me. Yes, sounds like 1) Orthodox Jewish 2) Hasidic Jewish 3) Westboro Baptist Christian 4) Fundamentalist Mormons 5) Pentecostal Christians 6) Jehova’s Witnesses and most immigrants of any other group one cares to name.
Don’t you ever wonder why there is a “Chinatown” in virtually every major US city? I guess not!

Simon
Reply to  dbstealey
September 22, 2015 11:35 am

I just think it is a very dangerous thing using religion as a reason to discriminate against a whole group of people. There are many muslims who are repulsed by the violence of the extremest groups too. And let’s not forget there are extremist christians out there who do some pretty awful stuff. Granted not so much recently, but through history you don’t have to look very hard. And there is some pretty vile hate stuff that comes out of conservative USA in the name of the Christian God. And for the record I am not religious….. just causes trouble.

Reply to  dbstealey
September 22, 2015 12:47 pm

Simon says:
I just think it is a very dangerous thing using religion as a reason to discriminate against a whole group of people.
You’ve got your ‘discrimination’ backward. I think ≈3,000 people were pretty decisively discriminated against on 9/11/2001 by fanatics of that particular religion. There are dozens of similar examples. You may not agree, but the Islamic religion is the common denominator in almost all terrorist acts.
Next:
There are many muslims who are repulsed by the violence of the extremest groups too.
They sure keep it to themselves, don’t they?
…let’s not forget there are extremist christians out there who do some pretty awful stuff.
There is no comparison at all. Islamists have the category “pretty awful stuff” sewed up, by at least 100 – 1. I took several classes in Ancient History, and I can assure you that it was always the same: Muslim atrocities were the high scorers over anything done by Christians. But then, it’s not a good idea to compare different eras in history. People then just didn’t think like we do, and vice-versa.
Next:
there is some pretty vile hate stuff that comes out of conservative USA in the name of the Christian God human nature. <–(now your comment is fixed.) The bottom line is that there's no comparison. Western civilization is… civilized. Not so your pals.
Finally, you claim you’re not religious, but really, you are. You just don’t see it. From your many other comments, this describes you:
Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism. Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban atheists. Why do I say it’s a religion? Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths.
There’s an initial Eden; a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature. There’s a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability. Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide-free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs imbibe.
[source]
Many people crave answers that they can’t find through the Scientific Method, reason, or observations. So they fall back on faith that they must be right. Others try to rise above that, and rationally look for answers via the Scientific Method, which depends about 97% on verifiable, uncorrupted and accurate data.
In science nothing is more important than data. Measurements are data. The problem with this issue — unrestricted illegal immigration — is that we lack data. We have no measurements of the number of illegals, or where they are coming from. We really have no idea of the number of people here illegally. The Census Bureau is not even allowed to ask a person’s immigration status. The numbers you see are no more than a guess — and you can be certain that the gov’t is lowballing its guesstimates for political reasons.
So, bottom line: the group being discriminated against are not “Muslims”. Legal U.S. citizens and legal residents are the ones being discriminated against, 24/7/365.25. We are being discriminated against by every illegal who jumps the fence and gets in line for taxpayer-paid benefits — and that means all of them.
We are being invaded. Do you have a better term?

Reply to  dbstealey
September 22, 2015 1:17 pm

msbehavin says:
Don’t you ever wonder why there is a “Chinatown” in virtually every major US city?
No, because the reason is pretty clear: people want to be around their own kind. No one is forcing any Chinese to live there. It’s completely voluntary.
Next:
When I wrote “Sound familiar?” above, it followed this comment — written not by me, but by Historians Will and Ariel Durant describing reasons for the fall of the Roman empire:
The concentration of population and poverty in great cities may compel a government to choose between enfeebling the economy with the dole, or running the risk of riot and revolution.
So your comment doesn’t follow.
My point was that what happened then is happening now in many cities like Baltimore, Detroit, DC, and others, and it is happening to a greater degree.
Our economy is already being enfeebled by what the Durants called the dole (transfer payments). On top of that, we get the riots anyway, based on any excuse at all (the ‘gentle giant’; ‘black lives matter’, etc.) And millions upon millions of illegals keep invading. Is there any doubt? Every one of them who gets here is immediately plugged into a network of their countryfolks who are already here, and they instantly learn where to get cash assistance, food stamps, EBT cards, housing assistance, medical care, etc., etc.
That is a HUGE drain on our resources! None of it is free, it has to be paid for by the taxpayers. Illegals keep flooding in, 24/7/365, and the invasion is accelerating. Instead of trying to make this what it is not: a religious debate, perhaps you have a solution to this immense and growing problem?

Simon
Reply to  dbstealey
September 22, 2015 8:37 pm

DB
I find the concept of judging people before I know them, on an individual basis unacceptable, be they gay Muslim, Christian, black, white or pink. Just a rule I live by and in my perfect world so would everyone. I realise when I read the stuff you write that there are people out there who are happy to do the opposite. I work with a diverse range of immigrants and people with varying religious beliefs… including Muslim. We celebrate it and it is a highlight for me. I hope you live in a nice white middle class suburb so you too can celebrate your perfect world.
I guess you have some comfort in the fact you don’t believe all the nonsense these climate scientists (and the US military ) are telling us about possible future issue with climate refugees. Now I am picking they would ruin your day.

Reply to  dbstealey
September 22, 2015 10:09 pm

Simon sez:
DB
I find the concept of judging people before I know them…
&etc.
Simon, you’re doing an exemplary job of judging me, but you don’t even know me. The term “hypocrite” comes to mind…
And your nonsense about “climate refugees” is so ridiculous that I won’t even bother to answer that crapola.
And as usual, you never answer any questions. That’s because your mind is made up and closed tight. You Believe in the ‘dangerous AGW’ false alarm. It’s your eco-religion. Science has nothing to do with it.

Simon
Reply to  dbstealey
September 22, 2015 10:17 pm

DB
Tell me I’m wrong. Tell you respect individuals whether gay, black, Hispanic, Muslim, Hindu or otherwise. Your writing says otherwise.

Reply to  dbstealey
September 23, 2015 8:21 am

Simon,
You’re wrong. I don’t care about race, tribes, countries, languages, or any of the othe boxes you try to put me in. If people respect me I respect them.
The problem is disrespect: Americans, and the West in general, is being disrespected big time. Millions of criminals disrespect our laws and borders. Why are you blind to that fact?
And as usual, you never answer any questions. That’s because your mind is made up and closed tight. You Believe in the ‘dangerous AGW’ false alarm. It’s your eco-religion. Science has nothing to do with it. You still deflect, and refuse to answer any questions even though I’ve replied to your questions in detail.

JohnKnight
Reply to  dbstealey
September 24, 2015 8:49 pm

Simon,
“I find the concept of judging people before I know them, on an individual basis unacceptable, be they gay Muslim, Christian, black, white or pink.”
Do you mean not judging them either negatively or positively? If you mean just not negatively, that is false judgment too, is it not? I mean you surely believe their are some very nasty people at least pretending they are Muslims, doing some very nasty things in the world these days, right? And extremely violent “drug cartels” and such, operating in a big way to our South, right?
Please explain your moral reasoning in regard to just letting whoever happens to show up in, when one knows that some very nasty people are likely among them . . it’s no big feat to explain why letting saints in en mass is fine, but we’re not dealing with such a potential, by any stretch of my imagination anyway.

Reply to  Simon
September 21, 2015 11:38 pm

” My understanding is these are terrified people desperate to get out of an horrific dangerous situation. But I guess it is easier to dismiss helping human beings when they are lazy, dangerous, ignorant foreigners.”
Sounds like you are a fully functional human being who doesn’t believe in bogeymen, but who also recognizes that sociopaths do exist, They exist in every culture, political system, and religion. .
You get it.
Thanks

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 22, 2015 1:29 pm

msbehavin says:
You get it.
Neither of you gets it.
Answer this:
How many citizens of foreign countries are we obligated to “help”:
a) 34 million
b) 115 million
c) all of them
Also, what is it about “illegal” that has you confused?

Simon
Reply to  msbehavin'
September 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Db
You know you really come across as a hard liner. I’m thinking you would be happy to nuke them all (muslims I mean)

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 22, 2015 1:44 pm

dbstealey, Who is our neighbour?
And how often should you forgive our brother?
The answers are found in the Book of Truth.
But what is Truth (as the politician asks)?
Answer:
Love is the fulfilment of the Law (Romans 13:10).
And where is Janice Moore ?

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 22, 2015 5:00 pm

Simon,
Thanx for the gratuitous criticism. It takes the place of answering questions, or proposing solutions. It’s easier to label someone a mass murderer. Sort of like calling someone a Holocaust denier, eh? Or, just a ‘denier’.
So instead of misdirecting/deflecting the conversation to “muslims”, why don’t you just answer the questions, which never mentioned muslims, or religion. Got any answers?
MCourtney,
I honestly don’t understand your point. I’m not much up on the Bible, except as a historical reference (although I like the Ten Commandments).
Next, what does Janice Moore have to do with anything?
And finally, Pontius Pilate was an appointee, not a politician. But he did ask a good question…

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 23, 2015 4:42 pm

dbstealy:
I read your prior reply (but unfortunately could not reply there because my reply link was not lit) so I will respond here to both of your comments.. I acknowledge your perspective but I think it is incredibly skewed (the MSM ensures that it is) , and the Durants were writing many years ago. They didn’t speak to anything new, Aristotle pointed out virtually the same thing thousands of years ago..
The threat to our economies doesn’t come from immigrants , or even “illegal immigrants”, even if they do go on the dole. The threat to our economies comes from the central banks (including our own private Federal Reserve Bank who all by itself has almost bankrupted us) and the sociopaths who are running them and a lot of other things . Sociopaths want you to focus on something else besides them.
One Bernie Madoff caused more economic damage to ordinary taxpayers and communities and our country than all the illegal immigrants and people on the dole of the past ten years at least. You are focusing on hyped phony “bogeymen” committing street crime (they are easy to “recognize” because they probably look, speak and act differently from you) while the real crime and criminals are committing their deeds in plain sight and getting off scott free. Some of those people might be the people you see at a fraternal club, or even on the board of some “philanthropic” organization (kind of like Peter Gleik being on the Ethics committee of a major science org )
Where were you when Donald Rumsfeld announced there were $3 TRILLION dollars missing and unaccounted for from the Pentagon on 9/10/2011? Whose money bailed out all those savings and loans and banks that went belly up through intentional mismanagement and outright fraud?Whose trillions went to cover the damage done by all of the unindicted cohorts of Bernie’s ilk when we were on the verge of collapse in 2008? Whose money went to bail out all the people defrauded by Enron? How big of a fine did BofA pay for financing drug cartels in Mexico (the same ones that many “illegals” are trying to get away from). I could go on but I think I’ve made my point.
I get it just fine, and I get it better than you do, thanks.

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 23, 2015 5:10 pm

dbstealey:
your focus is on the wrong “illegals”, or lawbreakers, although we can both agree the US immigration system needs an overhaul (but it won’t be anytime soon, lip service aside, because it pays, and pays extravagantly well,,to keep people focused on the left hand they won’t be aware of what the right hand is doing)

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 23, 2015 5:12 pm

msbehavin,
I don’t know enough facts that support your comments about banks, drug cartels, etc., so I’ll assume you know what you’re talking about.
But instead of answering my question: “How many citizens of foreign countries are we obligated to help?”, you posted on other things I never commented on. I’d still like an answer to my question. Give me a number.
I also didn’t say what you implied. Sure, immigrants contribute to society. But this is an uncontrolled invasion and it’s accelerating. America took in lots of immigrants in the first few decades of the 20th century. Back then there were no government benefits, except one: freedom.
But the flood of illegals pouring across our borders now all immediately get on the dole. Some get work, but just about all of them pay little or no taxes, and they abuse our generosity. They are an immense drain on our resources. Bringing up Bernie Madoff doesn’t change the problems or the expense caused by this illegal invasion.
THAT was my central point. So, what is “incredibly skewed” about it? Did I write something inaccurate? Are those things not happening?

Reply to  msbehavin'
September 24, 2015 2:57 pm

dbstealey
September 23, 2015 at 5:12 pm
msbehavin,
I don’t know enough facts that support your comments about banks, drug cartels, etc., so I’ll assume you know what you’re talking about.
But instead of answering my question: “How many citizens of foreign countries are we obligated to help?”, you posted on other things I never commented on. I’d still like an answer to my question. Give me a number.
I also didn’t say what you implied. Sure, immigrants contribute to society. But this is an uncontrolled invasion and it’s accelerating. America took in lots of immigrants in the first few decades of the 20th century. Back then there were no government benefits, except one: freedom.
But the flood of illegals pouring across our borders now all immediately get on the dole. Some get work, but just about all of them pay little or no taxes, and they abuse our generosity. They are an immense drain on our resources. Bringing up Bernie Madoff doesn’t change the problems or the expense caused by this illegal invasion.
THAT was my central point. So, what is “incredibly skewed” about it? Did I write something inaccurate? Are those things not happening?

This may or may not relate.
I saw a story in the last day or two about LA having homeless crisis. The mayor and the city council is considering declaring an emergency to free up more of the taxpayers money to deal with the problem.
What was not in the story was that LA is a “sanctuary city”, that is, local law enforcement has been told to ignore state and federal immigration laws.
Again, I don’t know if there’s a connection here.
There’s definitely nothing wrong with helping those in need. But when any system intended to help is run by Government, leeches on the system will arise. An individual or a private group can scrape the leeches off.
Those fleeing the Muslim extremist? There’s nothing wrong with checking to make sure that we’re not letting in leeches and snakes.

JohnKnight
Reply to  msbehavin'
September 25, 2015 2:58 am

M Courtney
“Who is our neighbour?”
The people who live near us. Is their something wrong with your dictionary?
“And how often should you forgive our brother?”
As often as he repents and asks forgiveness. Have you not read that Book?
“Love is the fulfilment of the Law”
Right, and love they neighbor as thyself includes actual neighbors, strange as they may sound these days, who have needs and a society of law they depend on. It’s not like a “point and click” affair, wherein I am to ignore everyone but those the mass media talking heads tells me I am to love exclusively.
And inevitably it is my poor neighbors who bear the brunt of the influx of cheap labor, and the brunt of the violence letting criminals into our midst will naturally result in. Shall I not love them, O wielder of a partial verse or two?

Dawtgtomis
September 21, 2015 12:09 pm

I ‘m going to reiterate here, that the envelope of science has been stretched by this quest to destroy the current socio-economic paradigm to the point it can no longer cover the ugly implications with sufficient “justifiable scientific cause”.
The envelope of religion is then used to enclose the torn science envelope, but it is old and tattered so it does a poor job of obscuring the dangerous contents.
The only hope they have is the binding tape of the legal system to keep things from busting out of both envelopes.

Resourceguy
September 21, 2015 12:52 pm

So the Pope is cautious about politics in dictatorial Cuba. I doubt there is any holding back in the U.S. visit, where the universal rule of no consequences applies.

Reply to  Resourceguy
September 21, 2015 1:10 pm

Resourceguy,
Nope. No holding back…
http://moonbattery.com/graphics/obama-francis-on-board.jpg

September 21, 2015 1:53 pm

For the past 6+ years, America’s economy and the Obama administration have been kept afloat by shale oil and gas.

Richard of NZ
September 21, 2015 3:01 pm

So, when do we see the Pope emulating his saviour and travelling either on foot, by ass or in a small hand made, oar or wind propelled wooden boat? Until that happens I cannot see a leader but a dictator. The same applies to the other pretend leader.

Verified by MonsterInsights