This has nothing to do with the climate and very little to do with politics.
My thoughts are with the victim. I hope she is protected from retribution and can move on with her life.
“Despite all the troubles, 133 [of 209] national federations still put their trust in me, not just for football development, but also to try and find a solution,” Mr. Blatter said on Saturday.
[ … ]
Asked if he was worried about being arrested down the road, Blatter says: “Arrested for what? Next question.” http://www.wsj.com/articles/fifa-president-sepp-blatter-digs-heels-in-after-re-election-1432988582
I do believe Josh’s cartoon eludes to the possibility that our friend my be guilty of breaking laws that lined his pockets.
Often people who’s behavior is unsavory in one aspect often isn’t in others.
Not necessarily so, I know. But if I were a betting man……
Harry Passfield
May 30, 2015 11:54 am
Pachauri: Surely, a model of probity and sanctity – that (also) failed to match reality.
PiperPaul
May 30, 2015 11:54 am
son of mulder
May 30, 2015 12:25 pm
97% found him not guilty but the other 3% were empirical.
jimheath
May 30, 2015 12:52 pm
Looks like Fagin, acts like Fagin, how any intelligent person could have ever trusted someone like this amazes me. He makes Hitler look good.
Bruce Cobb
May 30, 2015 1:30 pm
Next comes; Climate “Scientists” –
Guilty!
Admad
May 30, 2015 2:05 pm
knr
May 30, 2015 2:52 pm
The fun part is to come , the rewriting of IPCC history so this once heavily promoted ‘hero’ now becomes ‘unimportant ‘ and ‘just another employee ‘
For man who had the world leaders numbers on speed dial that is going to hurt.
rogerknights
May 30, 2015 3:49 pm
From steamy to seamy.
rogerknights
May 30, 2015 4:05 pm
From gilty to guilty.
(gilty = rich)
markl
May 30, 2015 8:17 pm
What’s next is probably nothing will happen given the country and their history. He’s already out of his IPCC position so that will probably be counted as his punishment. Misogyny is still accepted in many corners of the earth. Even the IPCC should be free of guilt by association.
Physics Major
May 30, 2015 9:26 pm
I think that Josh is really easy on old Pachy. He is much better looking in Josh’s drawings than he is in the photos.
David Cage
May 31, 2015 12:47 am
The real question should now be “how many of the people he has selected were either there because he wished to exploit them and knew they would be suitably rewarded for obedience and favours of all varieties or were just as immoral and dishonest as he was so he could readily relate to them.”
97% of the girls interviewed said he was definitely a perv.
knr
May 31, 2015 6:52 am
I take it the following was a typcial question asked by those females interviewed for a job at TERI
‘Is that a hockey stick in your pants or are you just pleased to see me ? ‘
Funding someone guilty of sexual harassment is funny?
Well, he won the Nobel prize, so that evens it out.
/sarc
He like it hot
He will go back to the old caboose.
He will make tracks.
He will take the line of least resistance.
He will hear that lonesome whistle blow.
if you can’t stand the heat…………………………………
He only wanted to get his pause on her…
How does this affect his views on cagw? I thought we were against Ad Hominem.
This has nothing to do with the climate and very little to do with politics.
My thoughts are with the victim. I hope she is protected from retribution and can move on with her life.
“Despite all the troubles, 133 [of 209] national federations still put their trust in me, not just for football development, but also to try and find a solution,” Mr. Blatter said on Saturday.
[ … ]
Asked if he was worried about being arrested down the road, Blatter says: “Arrested for what? Next question.”
http://www.wsj.com/articles/fifa-president-sepp-blatter-digs-heels-in-after-re-election-1432988582
Pachauri who?
Or perhaps that should be ‘Pachauri what?’
John
I do believe Josh’s cartoon eludes to the possibility that our friend my be guilty of breaking laws that lined his pockets.
Often people who’s behavior is unsavory in one aspect often isn’t in others.
Not necessarily so, I know. But if I were a betting man……
Pachauri: Surely, a model of probity and sanctity – that (also) failed to match reality.
97% found him not guilty but the other 3% were empirical.
Looks like Fagin, acts like Fagin, how any intelligent person could have ever trusted someone like this amazes me. He makes Hitler look good.
Next comes; Climate “Scientists” –
Guilty!
The fun part is to come , the rewriting of IPCC history so this once heavily promoted ‘hero’ now becomes ‘unimportant ‘ and ‘just another employee ‘
For man who had the world leaders numbers on speed dial that is going to hurt.
From steamy to seamy.
From gilty to guilty.
(gilty = rich)
What’s next is probably nothing will happen given the country and their history. He’s already out of his IPCC position so that will probably be counted as his punishment. Misogyny is still accepted in many corners of the earth. Even the IPCC should be free of guilt by association.
I think that Josh is really easy on old Pachy. He is much better looking in Josh’s drawings than he is in the photos.
The real question should now be “how many of the people he has selected were either there because he wished to exploit them and knew they would be suitably rewarded for obedience and favours of all varieties or were just as immoral and dishonest as he was so he could readily relate to them.”
97% of the girls interviewed said he was definitely a perv.
I take it the following was a typcial question asked by those females interviewed for a job at TERI
‘Is that a hockey stick in your pants or are you just pleased to see me ? ‘