Guest essay by David Archibald
Two useful things we would like to know are the length of Solar Cycle 24 and the amplitude of Solar Cycle 25. Figure 1 below shows the NOAA version of Solar Cycle 24 progression with the 23/24 transition copied onto the end of their projection. This crude method (we don’t have another) suggests that the 24/25 transition will be at the end of 2021 which would make Solar Cycle 24 twelve years long. Solar physicists have generally given up forecasting Solar Cycle 25 amplitude. The only extant forecast is Livingstone and Penn’s forecast of an amplitude of seven. In the bigger picture, almost a decade after Schatten and Tobiska forecast a return to a Maunder Minimum-like level of activity, another solar physicist, Mark Giampapa of the National Solar Observatory in Tuscon, Arizona, is of the opinion that “we are heading into a Maunder Minimum” that could last until 2080.
Figure 1: Solar Cycle 24 Progression
Figure 2: Interplanetary Magnetic Field
While in recent days the surface of the Sun became almost blank of sunspots, some solar activity parameters have taken off. The interplanetary magnetic field reached a peak higher than it reached during Solar Cycle 20.
Figure 3: Solar Wind Flow Pressure
Similarly, solar wind flow pressure is now higher than it was during most of Solar Cycle 23.
Figure 4: Oulu Neutron Count
Neutron count generally takes a year to respond to the solar wind flow pressure and the interplanetary magnetic field so we may not have seen the lows in neutron count for this solar cycle. That may be in mid-2016. Solar Cycle 24 may be going stronger for longer, to borrow a term from the financial community.
Figure 5: Heliospheric Current Sheet Tilt Angle
All we can say at the moment from this figure is that Solar Cycle 24 seems to have had a broader top than any of the previous three cycles.
Figure 6: Sum of Solar Polar Field Strengths
The magnetic poles of the Sun reverse at solar maximum when the sum of the polar field strengths falls to near zero. Sunspot activity showed a double top for Solar Cycle 24 and this is supported by Figure 6 which shows that the Sun had about a year at solar maximum.
Figure 7: North America Ex-Greenland Monthly Snow Cover
Onset of an ice age requires snow to survive through the summer and cool the earth due to its higher albedo. Despite the recent cold winters, we have yet to see summer snow survival get back to the levels of the 1970s cooling period.
Figure 8: Lebanon, New Hampshire Average Monthly Temperatures 2000 – 2015
As a followup to this post on the cold start to the year in Maine, this figure shows average monthly temperature for Lebanon, New Hampshire just to the west of Maine. The years 2000-2014 are used as the reference period as this is the period of the pause and people’s most recent personal reference point. The year 2015 to date is shown as the dark blue smoothed line. February 2015 was 12.1°F colder than the average for the fifteen year of 2000-2014 with an average of 11.6°F. This is the second coldest February back to 1900 with the coldest being 1934 at 8.1°F.
The biggest dispersion in average monthly temperatures is in January and then it tightens up such that the spread in June is only 3°F. The temperature for April was back in the pack though 1.3°F cooler than the average of the prior 15 years. All that can be said is that it will be interesting to see how it goes.
David Archibald, a visiting fellow at the Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C., is the author of Twilight of Abundance (Regnery, 2014)
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Dr. S, would you care to comment on this? (see article below)
Or maybe William Astley can tell us what causes the the solar hemispheres to rotate at different speeds and how a speeding up of solar rotation might interfere with the formation of sunspots by a shearing of magnetic fields.
Not an interruption in solar cycle but a speeding up of solar rotation…interfering with formation of fields geometry.
“Solar surface rotation: N-S asymmetry and recent speed-up”
L. Zhang1;2, K. Mursula1, and I. Usoskin1;3
Accepted 20 January 2015
“””Conclusions. The rotation of both hemispheres has been speeding up at roughly the same rate since the late 1990s, with the southern
hemisphere rotating slightly faster than the northern hemisphere.
This period coincides with the start of a significant weakening of the
solar activity, as observed in sunspots and several other solar, interplanetary, and geomagnetic parameters.”””
Not finished with the Solar Sectors Structure, article yet Dr. S. trouble with relaxation at the new location………….
As we show here http://www.leif.org/research/ast10867.pdf
solar rotation slows down with increasing activity, thus speeds up with decreasing activity. This is no news and is easy to understand as an interplay between the Reynolds and the Maxwell stresses.
Jay Hope
May 11, 2015 at 3:01 pm
Salvatore, don’t waste your time debating with this guy, you might as well be talking to a brick wall!
___________________________
“Another brick in the wall,” maybe. But not a brick wall.
More like a foundational cornerstone brick. eh
No more protected from the wreaking-ball of time than any other.
If Leif’s opinion should change (if he should conclude as time goes along at some point that the sun is not acting normal) would zoom my confidence on what the sun may or may not do going forward.
For now the diversity of opinions leaves me in a wait and see mode.
As long as Leif says the sun is acting normal makes me doubt if the sun is not acting normal.
Leif a question. What if the sun had a triple peak of activity ? Would that not be the first time? if it did what would that suggest if anything. I do not think it will happen but for fun if it did what would that suggest?
No, it would not be the first time. E.g. SC14 had 6 or 7 peaks:
http://www.leif.org/research/SC14-peaks.png
lsvalgaard commented
Curious, any theories on the cause of the oscillations as the cycle peaked?
Thanks
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog.