
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Coffee drinkers face a climate catastrophe, reports The Guardian, reporting on a study published by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) under the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).
According to the Guardian, interviewing Dr Peter Läderach, a CCAFS climate change specialist and co-author of the report;
“If you look at the countries that will lose out most, they’re countries like El Salvador, Nicaragua and Honduras, which have steep hills and volcanoes,” he said. “As you move up, there’s less and less area. But if you look at some South American or east African countries, you have plateaus and a lot of areas at higher altitudes, so they will lose much less.”
Without new strategies, says the study, Brazil alone can expect its current arabica production to drop by 25% by 2050.
“In Brazil, they produce coffee on the plains and don’t have any mountains so they can’t move up,” said Läderach.
Digging a little deeper, it turns out that the study doesn’t actually predict a coffee “catastrophe”.
… The regions where Arabica coffee would be least affected by higher temperatures are East Africa with the exception of Uganda and Papua New Guinea in the Pacific. Mesoamerica would be the most affected region, specifically Nicaragua and El Salvador. Since Arabica coffee is an important export of Mesoamerica, we expect severe economic impacts here. As previously suggested by Zullo [32], strongly negative effects of climate change are also expected in Brazil the world’s largest Arabica producer, as well as India and Indochina. Regions predicted to suffer intermediate impacts include the Andes, parts of southern Africa and Madagascar, and Indonesia, with significant differences among islands [17]. …
And in the conclusion:
… Some countries, such as in Mesoamerica, will lose competitiveness on global markets for quality coffee. They may need to diversify into other products to prevent adverse effects on their rural economies [28]. Other regions such as the Andes, East Africa and Indonesia may take advantage of new market opportunities. But they may require specific policies and strategies to ensure that expansion of coffee farmlands takes place in climatically, pedologically and ecologically suitable areas [17]. …
So even if the predictions of the report are correct, the main outcome will be some very poor countries will gain an economic opportunity. Some richer countries might have to choose between trying to breed a variety of coffee which is better suited to their climate, or growing something else.
Frankly it seems a bit of a stretch, to describe this outcome as a “catastrophe”.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Well, we know that the Guardian always gets it right. I adapted an article from the Guardian in 1998 to produce this for my Economics pupils:
Meltdown for chocoholics
Start hoarding now. A new type of the lethal black pod disease is threatening more than a million tons of cocoa in the Ivory Coast, the world’s largest cocoa producer. In Brazil, another major producer, a fungus known as Witches Broom has been attacking cacao trees. Food experts from the world’s biggest confectioners are predicting a world shortage of chocolate. A leading restaurant owner has warned that chocolate desserts could soon cost the same as a main course.
“There will always be chocolate, it will just be very expensive,” said Eamon Roche, co-owner of Kiosk, a New York restaurant.
The situation is so bad that executives from manufacturers Nestlé, Cadbury, M&M/Mars and Hershey have held urgent talks on the problem.
While worldwide demand for chocolate continues to grow, rainforest, in whose shade cacao trees thrive, is being cut down rapidly. “We may be going back to the early 1900s,” said Mr Roche, “when only rich people could afford to buy chocolate.”
Adapted from an article by Joanna Coles (Guardian 5th May 1998)
Joanna Coles went on to become editor-in-chief of the US edition of Cosmopolitan.
Seems they are still predicting the same disaster; and with respect to the May 1998 prediction, I find this quote priceless:
“In 2000, oversupply of beans saw prices slump to a 27-year low of around $714 a tonne.”
http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/fairtrade-partner-zone/chocolate-cocoa-production-risk
They make so many predictions that just by the law of averages, you’d think they’d get one right now and then, but they never seem to.
Someone should setup a betting shop where people could wager in their predictions. The only problem is that nobody would bet a red cent that they’d ever be right about anything.
Bananas too! The variety we all eat, the Cavendish, has been on the brink of calamity for a couple decades now. So far, people have managed to stay ahead of the blights, despite predictions like this from the NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/opinion/18koeppel.html?_r=0
http://coffeenate.shareist.com/uploads/goaheadmakemycoffee_1313_76_f.jpg
here is the real deal
it is climate change that is going to do in the coffee crops. When the next glaciation comes the coffee crops will be diminished. This is my prediction. Send me grant money and I will make more predictions.
Cold weather is worse for coffee – all seven of mine died over the last winter from cold. One was still making berries long into fall.
I am going to be planning Honey Locust in my currently bare 3/4 acre property. Honey Locust beans and pods are delicious when still green and the beans can be roasted for “coffee”.
I guess genetically modified is a no-no. All these malthusians seem totally unaware how human ingenuity responds to any problem and its huge place in the economics and general wellbeing of the species- To them its a static world and we are all helpless if it changes! It makes them seem…unhuman?
The degree and dynamism of human ingenuity had not progressed far enought to gauge in Malthus’s time so perhaps he can be excused more legitimately than today’s clones who have (unwittingly?) lived through the most remarkable several decades of human ingenuity. I guess you can give a chimp a cell phone and he just pushes the buttons.
I’ve thought that many times, but have never seen it stated so succinctly.
PARIS!!!!! Here we come!
In other words, changes in the climate, which have always occurred, could affect where coffee beans are grown. Just like how they were growing great grapes for wine in England during the Medieval Warm Period, and without gen mod.
Exactly…..
No coffee?
We
are
so
doomed!
It is a catastroffee