Claim: Climate change 'may' be responsible for the abrupt collapse of Tibetan civilization around 2000BC

From Washington State University: Closing the Case on an Ancient Archeological Mystery

Solving 4,000-year-old mystery helps WSU archeologist find useful resource for a warmer future

Barley cultivation in Jiuzhaigou National Park hasn't changed much in nearly 2,000 years. The park is located in the Min Shan mountain range, Northern Sichuan in South Western China. Credit: Washington State University
Barley cultivation in Jiuzhaigou National Park hasn’t changed much in nearly 2,000 years. The park is located in the Min Shan mountain range, Northern Sichuan in South Western China. Credit: Washington State University

PULLMAN, Wash.–Climate change may be responsible for the abrupt collapse of civilization on the fringes of the Tibetan Plateau around 2000 B.C.

WSU archaeologist Jade D’Alpoim Guedes and an international team of researchers found that cooling global temperatures at the end of the Holocene Climatic Optimum, a 4,000 year period of warm weather, would have made it impossible for ancient people on the Tibetan Plateau to cultivate millet, their primary food source.

Guedes’ team’s research recently was published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Her results provide the first convincing explanation for why the area’s original inhabitants either left or so abruptly changed their lifestyles.

They also help explain the success of farmers who practiced wheat and barley agriculture in the region 300 years later.

Unlike millet, wheat and barley have high frost tolerance and a low heat requirement, making them ideally suited for the high altitudes and cold weather of eastern Tibet. Guedes argues this made the two crops an important facet of subsistence immediately after their introduction around 1700 B.C.

“Wheat and barley came in at the opportune moment, right when millets were losing their ability to be grown on the Tibetan Plateau,” Guedes said. “It was a really exciting pattern to notice. The introduction of wheat and barley really enabled Tibetan culture to take the form it has today, and their unique growth patterns may have played a crucial rule in the spread of these crops as staples across the vast region of East Asia.”

One offshoot of the research: The ancient millet seeds that fell out of cultivation on the Tibetan Plateau as the climate got colder might soon be useful again as the climate warms up.

“Right now, these millets have almost become forgotten crops,” Guedes said. “But due to their heat tolerance and high nutritional value, they may be once again be useful resources for a warmer future.”

An archaeological enigma

At Ashaonao, Haimenkou, and other archeological sites in the Tibetan highlands, researchers for years had noticed a growing trend. An abundance of ancient wheat and barley seeds found at the sites suggested the crops rapidly replaced millet as the staple food source of the region during the second millennium BCE.

The findings were puzzling considering that the scientific consensus of the time was the region’s climate would have actually favored millet, due to its shorter growing season, over wheat or barley.

The conundrum intrigued Guedes so she dove into the agronomy literature to investigate. She found agronomists tended to use a different measurement than archaeologists to determine whether crops can grow in cold, high altitude environments like the Tibetan Plateau. They used total growing degree days or the accumulated amount of heat plants need over their lifetime rather than the length of a growing season.

“My colleagues and I created a new model based off what we found in the literature,” Guedes said. “It revealed that global cooling would have made it impossible to grow millet in the Eastern Tibetan Highlands at this time but would have been amenable to growing wheat and barley. Our work turned over previous assumptions and explained why millet is no longer a staple crop in the area after 2000 BCE.”

Guedes’ work points to climate cooling as the culprit behind the collapse of early civilization on the Tibetan Plateau. Ironically, the region is today one of the areas experiencing the most rapid climate warming on the planet. There are some areas in the southeastern plateau where temperatures are 6 degrees Celsius higher than they were 200 years ago.

Rapid temperature increase is making it difficult for the region’s inhabitants to raise and breed yaks, a staple form of subsistence in the central Asian highlands, and grow cold weather crops, once again endangering their survival.

“So now we have a complete reversal and climate warming is having a big impact on the livelihood of smaller farmers on the Tibetan Plateau,” Guedes said.

###

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
78 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 29, 2015 1:41 pm

“There are some areas in the southeastern plateau where temperatures are 6 degrees Celsius higher than they were 200 years ago.”

Which what part of that warming was post-1950 when the IPCC says anthropogenic CO2 was sufficient to begin altering climate?

more soylent green!
April 29, 2015 1:57 pm

Climate changes all the time, so why not? I think this bolsters the skeptical argument.

rogerthesurf
April 29, 2015 2:15 pm

“Climate change ‘may’ be responsible for the abrupt collapse of Tibetan civilization around 2000BC”
Right and the change was anthropogenic right? Too much itinerant sword sharpening maybe?
Someone has forgotten that the perceived problem is that humans are causing the current natural climate change.
Cheers
Roger
http;//www.rogerfromnewzealand.com

BunkerHill Jim
April 29, 2015 3:47 pm

Go Cougars … only 4 years to go …

BunkerHill Jim
Reply to  BunkerHill Jim
April 29, 2015 3:48 pm

4 K years ! I’ve fat old guy fingers !

BunkerHill Jim
Reply to  BunkerHill Jim
April 29, 2015 3:49 pm

But, via Al G. it could only be 4 years ….

High Treason
April 29, 2015 6:13 pm

Shows what a meaningless term “climate change” is. Back then, it was certainly not man-made, was it. Of course, climate change is getting warmer OR getting cooler-a bet each way. wake up world, this is propaganda if there ever was. That such junk science is even written should be getting everyone deeply suspicious.

Chris Wright
April 30, 2015 6:47 am

I’ll give them some credit. Quite frequently, when research suggests that something bad happened because of a change in the temperature, they simply refer to it as “climate change”, probably because to acknowledge that bad things happened because of climate cooling is too inconvenient. The term “climate change” is great because it is so vague and can hide the simple fact that global warming is beneficial and global cooling is very, very bad for mankind and his civilisations.
But of course it all goes to pot when they feel they have to renew their vows to the climate change religion.
I find it difficult to believe that a region is now 6 whole degrees warmer compared to 200 years ago.
Still, ignoring the inevitable nonsense, this research does confirm the simple truth: warming is good, cooling is very, very bad.
Chris

Tim
April 30, 2015 7:09 am
tadchem
April 30, 2015 7:21 am

There is a lesson here on the risks of monoculture.