Climate Craziness of the Week: 'climate denial is a form of murder'

Yes, really, some hopelessly brainwashed person named Barry Aubin (@SaintAubinN) really thinks this, and actually put that thought into words on his Twitter feed. h/t to Foxgoose for spotting this one….

Here is the Tweet:

Where do these people come from, and how is it they have such a warped sense of reality and scale?

 

 

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

189 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 3, 2015 8:10 pm

In honors chem we were supposed to learn the full name for DDT. A limerick helped [and it helps if you say it in a sing-song voice]:
A mosquito was heard to complain
That a chemist had poisoned his brain
The cause of his sorrow:
Para-dichhloro-
Diphenal-trichloro-ethane

Worthless knowledge. Everyone has some.

February 3, 2015 9:01 pm

Folks, we shouldn’t be angry at this guy. We should pity him. Seriously.
This poor sot wakes up every morning believing that everything on earth, including him and everybody he knows and loves, is going to die. So assured is he of this belief, that he thinks people should be charged with murder over it. What a nightmare it must be to wake up every morning believing that doom is just around the corner and there’s nothing that can be done to stop it.

highflight56433
Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 3, 2015 9:21 pm

Fortunately, he has a choice. Stop chewing his fingernails till they bleed, or take a trip to Oregon where one can free themselves of such worldly grief and peacefully enter the spiritual world. I’ll provide a map. I feel no pity.

Unmentionable
Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 3, 2015 9:21 pm

Sure David, but it was his responsibility to not end up that way, was it not?

mikewaite
Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 4, 2015 4:42 am

I can tell you that it is hell . I wake up each morning closer to the day when the author of the Climate Change Act becomes PM , and there is nothing that I can do to stop it .

highflight56433
February 3, 2015 9:42 pm

His twitter pals remind be of the 1960’s flower children: enhancement by hemp. I suppose none use any petroleum based amenities, nor toilet paper to which noble cause would save a tree. lol
Barry Aubin @SaintAubinN · 9h 9 hours ago
Petition: Sue #FossilFuels companies for damage to #environment
PLS sign/RT
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/The_United_Nations_Sue_Fossil_fuel_companies_for_global_environmental_damage/?wEqgpcb … …

Unmentionable
Reply to  highflight56433
February 3, 2015 10:18 pm

A cautionary tale of why drinking the bong water when your stash runs out is not a harmless habit.

dp
February 3, 2015 11:25 pm

2 billion years of climate stability recorded in the DNA: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150203104131.htm
Who are the deniers now?

Jimbo
Reply to  dp
February 4, 2015 7:41 am

dp I see that it’s “a type of deep-sea microorganism that appears not to have evolved over more than 2 billion years.” I suppose being in the deep-sea helped protect it from overhead extinctions and abrupt climate change.

IPCC – TAR – 2001
The warming phase, that took place about 11,500 years ago, at the end of the Younger Dryas was also very abrupt and central Greenland temperatures increased by 7°C or more in a few decades (Johnsen et al., 1992; Grootes et al., 1993; Severinghaus et al., 1998).
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/074.htm
—————–
Abstract
Systematics and Biodiversity – Volume 8, Issue 1, 2010
Kathy J. Willis et al
4 °C and beyond: what did this mean for biodiversity in the past?
…….temperatures in mid- to high-latitudes increased by greater than 4 °C within 60 years, and sea levels rose by up to 3 m higher than present. For these intervals in time, case studies of past biotic responses are presented to demonstrate the scale and impact of the magnitude and rate of such climate changes on biodiversity. We argue that although the underlying mechanisms responsible for these past changes in climate were very different (i.e. natural processes rather than anthropogenic), the rates and magnitude of climate change are similar to those predicted for the future and therefore potentially relevant to understanding future biotic response. What emerges from these past records is evidence for rapid community turnover, migrations, development of novel ecosystems and thresholds from one stable ecosystem state to another, but there is very little evidence for broad-scale extinctions due to a warming world. Based on this evidence from the fossil record, we make four recommendations for future climate-change integrated conservation strategies.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14772000903495833
—————–
Abstract
Richard B. Alley
Ice-core evidence of abrupt climate changes
…..As the world slid into and out of the last ice age, the general cooling and warming trends were punctuated by abrupt changes. Climate shifts up to half as large as the entire difference between ice age and modern conditions occurred over hemispheric or broader regions in mere years to decades…….
…The more dramatic of the warmings have involved ~8°C warming (8, 25) and ~2× increases in snow accumulation (9), several-fold or larger drops in wind-blown materials (17), and ~50% increase in methane, indicating large changes in global wetland area (5, 24)….
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/4/1331.full
—————–
Abstract
Reef drowning during the last deglaciation: Evidence for catastrophic sea-level rise and ice-sheet collapse
Elevations and ages of drowned Acropora palmata reefs from the Caribbean-Atlanticregion document three catastrophic, metre-scale sea-level-rise events during the last deglaciation…..
[paper]
…. Such drowning eventsmust have been truly catastrophic, involv-ing—to our knowledge—the fastest rates of glacio-eustatic sea-level rise yet reported…..The exact duration of the CREs is unknown but, given that the mini-mum rate of sea-level rise was >45 mm/yr,the duration of the 14.2 ka event must have been…..
academia.edu/200254/Reef_drowning_during_the_last_deglaciation_Evidence_for_catastrophic_sea-level_rise_and_ice-sheet_collapse

simple-touriste
February 4, 2015 12:28 am

Avaaz cancels two petitions in favor of people known for criticizing islamism and uncontrolled immigration for muslim countries (at least 90 % of immigration in France is from muslim countries):
http://www.l-union-fait-la-force.info/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=10501 (French)
Avaaz hosts a petition against anti-islamism protest by “Riposte Laïque” and “Résistance Républicaine” in Paris:
https://secure.avaaz.org/fr/petition/A_ceux_qui_refusent_la_stigmatisation_des_musulmanes_Non_a_la_manifestation_islamophobe_du_18_Janvier/?pv=19 (French)

Chris Wright
February 4, 2015 4:18 am

When this becomes law, all of us here should be just fine. I don’t think a single WUWT reader is a climate denialist. In fact most of us think that there has been an awful lot of climate change throughout history, including the 20th century.
However, Michael Mann and the IPCC could be in trouble. The flat part of the hockey stick is the very essence of climate change denial.
Chris

simple-touriste
Reply to  Chris Wright
February 4, 2015 4:23 am

What is a “climate denialist”?
Someone who says temp is 15° C when it’s -5 °C?
Someone who denies there are climateS?

February 4, 2015 4:31 am

Two things:
Can I sue this guy for getting first degree stupid burns?
Did you notice there’s no Arctic ice cap in the painting of the Earth?

Jimbo
February 4, 2015 6:59 am

A low carbon lifestyle in the UK where washing clothes was no longer a chore.
http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/images/content/laundryb.jpg
A low carbon lifestyle in New York city using horse power.
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/children-and-dead-horse-street-in-new-york-c-1895.jpg

johann wundersamer
February 4, 2015 7:46 am

‘#Climate #denial
is a form of #murder!’
OK, accousations like
‘Climate DENIAL’
are sort of attempted murder.
Regards – Hans

February 4, 2015 9:41 am

Climate has always changed … naturally. The last change is that it stopped warming.
Anyone with access to the CO2 and temperature data, who was paying attention in first year calculus, and can extrapolate the math to the physical world, can falsify the statement that CO2 causes significant warming.
See this explained and discover the two factors that do cause climate change (95% correlation since before 1900) at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com . The two factors which explain the last 300+ years of climate change are also identified in a peer reviewed paper published in Energy and Environment, vol. 25, No. 8, 1455-1471.

mwhite
February 4, 2015 11:19 am

Can’t afford to heat your home
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/11389012/Death-rate-third-higher-than-average-ONS-figures-reveal.html
“Some 28,800 deaths were registered in the fortnight ending January 23, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
This is 32 per cent higher than the average for that period over the previous five years (21,859).
The ONS suggested that the flu virus and the cold snap could be to blame for the increased death rate. ”
The Green Death.

E.M.Smith
Editor
February 4, 2015 11:29 am

All I can do is wonder why so many Warmers are pessimistic and death cult centered.
I’ve also noticed that Skeptics are generally far more optimistic and life centered. Also they often come from those professions most involved in solving problems, so are skilled at it. Engineers, geologists, even economists seem to be more represented. The other side? A lot of psych folks (who have high rates of suicide, BTW) and sociologists (often closet socialists, sometimes without the closet), along with a load of government employees who blow with the money wind.
But one does wonder why Warmers are so fixated on death instead of enjoying life… I’d wonder about it more but the sun is out and the pool is calling 😉 I really like Florida 😉

Die Zauberflotist
February 4, 2015 4:02 pm

I didn’t initially intend to sign, but when I saw the “#Koch” and learned that the petition is to be delivered to the UN (hope it’s the IPCC), I couldn’t help myself. Number 220 – .22% and counting!

bushbunny
February 4, 2015 7:43 pm

A wise person in the company of fools, is a fool. Who are the intended ‘victims’ in this account. Oh I am weary of this people.

David Cage
February 5, 2015 1:18 am

Forget the third world, here in the UK hundreds are being killed every year. Energy taxation is at the very least proven manslaughter and since engineers have long said the science was unsound is as much murder as when a man pulls the trigger after having been told the gun will kill and he says I know it is right to pull the trigger anyway for the good of the world.

Sull
February 5, 2015 5:56 am

Seems to me that these IPCC death cultists should go back to selling flowers at airports. Thanks for your tireless efforts exposing them and their pets for what they are. You are slowly winning this epic battle for true science. Us less educated, poor folk, need you more than WE realize. Too bad we are too cold and hungry to donate more than a meager token to help you.

WestHighlander
February 6, 2015 3:13 pm

” Think pre industrial society in the late 1800’s. Goods could still be moved cross country by Steam Locomotives and by horse drawn carts on a more localized basis.
Manufacturing could still take place but only through the limited basis allowed for by Wind, Solar, and Hydro facilities.”
HUH !! — in the part of the US that I live in [New England] the late 1880’s were a thoroughly industrial society entire cities such as Lowell and Lawrence are named after the industrialists who built them or provided the inspiration. The Amoskeag Manufacturing Company built at Amoskeag Falls on the Merrimack River in the city named Manchester after the English city produced more cotton fabric in 1860 than the entire Confederacy using cotton carried by rail from the south.
From the mid 1880’s on [certainly the late 1800’s] there were plenty of telephones, and by the end of the century there were electric motors providing public transportation on the Boston Subway powered by burning coal.
What we [New Englanders] didn’t have in 1899 was much in the form of petroleum powered transport — that came post 1900.
To summarize: Nearly everything about your understanding of the state of the pre-petroleum fueled world in these parts is wrong.
Anyway — the best Survivalist Solution to the inexplicable sudden loss of fossil fuels is to gather your colony members and fortify a local nuclear plant — you’ll then have copious hot water for heat and hydroponics, unlimited electricity and a pristine clean environment as a base to start the restart of civil society
The moonbats can try to drive their Leafs using solar and wind power — as for me Go Green — Go Nuke!

DirkH
February 6, 2015 6:53 pm

Climate? There’s no such thing as a climate.
(now I have publically denied Climate! Heh heh.)

Zeke
February 6, 2015 9:08 pm

We could sell him and his cohorts some of these:
http://steampunkworkshop.com/wp-content/uploads/Steampunk-organ-cockpit-desk%20(3).JPG
They run on steam from a garden hose run through a horse manure heap.
http://www.datamancer.net/steampunklaptop/datamancerlaptop-open.jpg
(No deviant a-t links. I don’t blame you.)