Guest Post by Bob Tisdale
The CO2 obsessed are patiently awaiting the GISS and NCDC global surface temperature data for December 2014 and for the calendar year. GISS normally publishes their monthly updates on or around the 15th of the month, while NCDC publishes theirs about the same time. The UKMO updates their HADCRUT4 land+sea surface temperature product later in the month.
In the post here last month, we showed that the GISS Meteorological Annual Mean (December to November) surface temperature in 2014 was just shy of the 2010 value. See Figure 1.
Figure 1
I suspect there will be a noticeable increase in December 2014 so that the calendar mean of the GISS land-ocean temperature index in 2014 is slightly warmer in 2014 than in 2010…maybe by 0.01 deg C.
For NCDC, as shown in Figure 2, the meteorological annual mean (December to November) surface temperature in 2014 was 0.01 higher than the 2010 value.
Figure 2
And as illustrated in Figure 3, the HADCRUT4 data are the same as GISS, inasmuch as their Meteorological Annual Mean (December to November) surface temperature in 2014 was 0.01 deg C less than the 2010 value.
Figure 3
Will Gavin Schmidt, the new head of GISS, release their data early to steal the headlines, or will GISS and NCDC publish their long-anticipated press releases at the same time?
The suspense has to be driving the CO2 obsessed crazy…or should that be crazier?
To spoil their day, I’ve already written and prepared the graphs for a post titled The Uptick in Global Surface Temperatures in 2014 Doesn’t Help the Growing Difference between Climate Models and Reality. As you can well imagine, a swing in 2014 of a few hundredths of a deg C doesn’t noticeably change the outcome of that post, but I’m waiting for the December 2014 values to finalize it. I believe most of you will enjoy it.



What matters is what is going to happen going forward and it will not be a temperature trend which will be increasing.
“The suspense has to be driving the CO2 obsessed crazy…or should that be crazier?”
It’s not a drive; it’s a short putt.
The first three words in Bob’s article explains everything…
Chaos in motion …
The annotated GISP2 Holocene emperature reconstruction posted here by Gates unmistakably shows that since the invention of beer ~4500 years ago, the climate has become cooler. That is the by far the most profound discovery discussed here. 😉
Flagged up by real science a while back-
Fake temperatures are marked with an “E” in their final database, as seen below in the 2008-2011 January-June data for Cadiz, Ohio.
Nearly 40% of the 2014 final temperatures are marked with an “E” – which is even larger than the 29% percentage of stations which are completely fake. This indicates that they are also making up temperatures for a large number of stations which actually do have thermometer data.
With all this fakery and they can still only manage a .01 degree increase in temp! There must be significantly more uncertainty in the data than that in any event. Some forget all of the equipment, sampling, and various other potential sources of error not covered by the stated confidence intervals estimation.