Guest essay by Rolf E. Westgard
In his 2007 Noble Prize acceptance speech, former Vice President Al Gore warned that the “Arctic ice could be gone in as little as seven years.” Last week, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution reported:
“The North and South Poles are not melting.” In that report, oceanographer Ted Maksym noted that polar ice “is much more stable than climate scientists once predicted and could even be much thicker than previously thought.”
That Woods Hole study was confirmed by today’s NOAA Arctic radar map which shows the Arctic Ice Cap at more than 4,000,000 square miles, larger than on any December 28 in the past five years. Reaching the North Pole requires either a dog sled or a nuclear sub; Al Gore’s cruise ship will stay in the tropics. At the South Pole, Antarctic ice coverage is at the highest extent since radar measurement began 35 years ago.
NOAA’s Arctic Report Card; Update for 2014 provides similar data for the Earth’s other big ice sheet, Greenland. Data from the GRACE satellite and other sources has shown an annual average Greenland ice loss of more than 300 billion tons until 2013. That loss has now dropped sharply by 98% to 6 billion annual tons since mid 2013. A loss of 300 billion tons adds about one millimeter to sea level rise.
All this frigid data parallels the 17 year pause in global land and sea surface temperatures as reported by NASA, NOAA, the UK Climate Research Unit, and the University of Alabama Huntsville Remote Sensing Systems program. That pause is occurring despite our annual release of more than 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide(CO2) from burning fossil fuels, especially coal. Half of that CO2 release stays in the atmosphere. But CO2 remains a trace gas, as the atmosphere weighs several quadrillion tons, and a quadrillion is a million times a billion.
There are good reasons to limit coal burning, even if its CO2 emissions may be primarily plant food. Burning coal releases toxic products like mercury, sulfur, arsenic, soot, and unburned coal ash. But unfulfilled dire warnings coming from UN agencies about the effect of CO2 emissions are contributing to public skepticism about global warming. Global warming ranked 19th in a recent Pew Poll list of 20 issues which concerned the public.
In the most recent UN IPCC report, lead author Dr. Mark Howden said,
“There’s increasing evidence that climate change is also impacting on agriculture, particularly on some of the cereal crops such as wheat and maize. The negative impacts are greater and quicker than we previously thought.”
Farmers continue to ignore the IPCC. The US Department of Agriculture notes that world agricultural production set all-time records for all three major cereal crops in 2014, with rice output up 1.1 percent, wheat up 11.2 percent, and corn up a whopping 14.0 percent over 2013.
So hang on to that winter coat, our future as a tropical paradise may take awhile.
![global.daily.ice.area.withtrend[1]](https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/global-daily-ice-area-withtrend1.jpg?w=720&h=277&fit=720%2C277&resize=720%2C277)
The warmest region of Antarctica below where current mid-summer temperatures are still well below freezing at ~2000 m.
http://www.yr.no/place/Antarctica/Other/Antarctic_Peninsula/
Luke January 15, 2015 at 2:16 pm
The ice sheets are always moving towards the deep ocean and melting well away from Antarctica itself.This loss of ice has nothing to do with melting on Antarctica itself or near it’s coast. The increased weight of ice accumulations on the shelves cause the the ice to spread out/flow very slowly from the continent towards the ocean. The gravimetry data sets are far from accurate and should be treat with caution.
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/glaciers/questions/move.html
“The sheer weight of a thick layer of ice, or the force of gravity on the ice mass, causes glaciers to flow very slowly. Ice is a soft material, in comparison to rock, and is much more easily deformed by this relentless pressure of its own weight. Ice may flow down mountain valleys, fan out across plains, or in some locations, spread out onto the sea.”
Yes, I know that ice flows downhill and eventually ends up in the ocean but in the past that loss has been replaced by snow accumulation which over time compresses into ice maintaining an equilibrium. Recently, however, the ice sheets have lost ice at a greater rate than it has accumulated.The west Antarctic is losing mass at the rate of 70 Gt per year! Do you really think the gravimetry and other methods are that far off?.
Do you really think the gravimetry and other methods are that far off?.
Yes, especially over continents and near the poles. Human error can be large when using a model to estimate surface mass balance.
http://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:8704:3/component/escidoc:8703/0607.pdf
Particularly shows when this recent paper demonstrates ice mass stable or increasing over most of continental Antarctica.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X14005068
Scientists are measuring mass loss and elevation of glaciers and ice sheets with satellites and the two approaches are giving consistent answers. There is almost no chance of “human error” when using satellite measurements. If you think the models they use to develop the estimates are wrong, I encourage you to examine the data, the computer code and submit a paper to a peer-reviewed journal. That is how science progresses.
From Pritchard et al 2010
Strong summer melt on the Antarctic Peninsula also precipitated recent ice-shelf collapse and prompted rapid dynamic thinning of tributary glaciers at up to 70 m a–1. Thinning continued for years to decades after
collapse and propagated far inland.
http://www.igsoc.org:8080/journal/56/200/j10j221.pdf
That Al Gore it is perfect moron it was obviouse from the very begining.
About the mesurements; all are very wrong for one reason: the past(yesterdey ) never will be today and tomorrow. Therefore what they mesure.
The problem it is with the Internet:
the only achievement I could agree with, it is the fact that the stupidity and ignorance now it is evident because outthere it is an axiom which tell us “the intelligence on Earth it is CONSTANT=1, what it is growing it is the number of people using the internet now a days” with other words the stupidity grows to equal the infinity.
If we want the Earth as a Disneyland so be it! Nothing can stop the infinity to never realize what the \Nature it is !
Surely it is not a car or H-bomb or plastic food you are eating with such obiouse dameges for your brains I could easely see. Every 4 years you elect the same morons or worst to “lead ” you ! ..
Please consider this: try to think by your self, and never follow your imbecile leaders !
RACookPE1978 January 15, 2015 at 6:41 pm
Luke, (replying to Matt G)
There are two hypotheses to explain the increase in ice around Antarctica:
1) Ozone levels over Antarctica have dropped causing stratospheric cooling and increasing winds which lead to more areas of open water that can be frozen (Gillet 2003, Thompson 2002, Turner 2009),
Odd. I thought the ozone hole over the Antarctic had been steady the past few years.
OK. Why don’t you have any evidence of those increasing winds that have moved the ice pack? The wind charts I’ve have followed showed no such pattern. Oh – It makes a good theory. But there is no evidence of increased winds outward from the pole.
Try reading this:
http://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1627.epdf?referrer_access_token=lM1bFQos-akUzmU4pLW9htRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0OPXhlq5DA-8Svq5TI0QqkJfnOtHuQZVVHKD9vb6Kgo9VuH0gvMMlQSTGJp2OBYDpw%3D
And this:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/07/new-paper-shows-negative-cloud-feed-associated-with-sam/
Southern Annular Mode Index:
http://www2.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/news/2011/sam.jpg
Phil.
Thank you for replying. From your link to the 2012 article:
From UCAR:
The Southern oscillation (SAM) index has been steadily positive since the early 1990’s – indicating that it indeed matches well with a steadily increasing Antarctic sea ice anomaly DESPITE a steadily increasing CO2 levels, which are supposedly causing a global temperature change amplified by the cold polar temperatures that supposedly are going to melt the sea ice. Fine.
But, those very words describing the SAM above do NOT include the very wind changes that are being used to rationalize the increasing Antarctic sea ice. In fact, the positive modes “inhibit” release of air from the Antarctic polar land mass. “In the SAM’s positive mode, the ring is stronger and further south, inhibiting Antarctic air outbreaks”
in other words, the excuses contradict one another. Yes, the 24 year long increasing SAM index is co-related to a 22 year long increase in Antarctic sea ice, and a steadily decreasing Antarctic land air temperature. All three contradict ANY assumption that increasing levels of CO2 are to blame for global warming, and all three contradict ANY assumption that an increasing level of CO2 is causing ANY change in Arctic sea ice extent!
You lost me in your last sentence when you were talking about processes in the Antartcic and then finished with “and all three contradict ANY assumption that an increasing level of CO2 is causing ANY change in Arctic sea ice extent!” How do specific changes in wind speeds and temperatures limited to the antarctic have anything to do with the arctic ice loss? Just to be clear do you 1) agree that there has been a steady decline in arctic ice cover over the past 30 years, and 2) do you agree that as ice cover diminishes in the arctic that heat absorption in the arctic ocean increases? Given that and the fact that Kinnard et al 2011 have shown that the decline in arctic ice cover is substantially greater than anything we have seen in the past 1450 years, how do you explain the decline in arctic ice? Natural variability doesn’t cut it, this is well beyond the natural variation that has been observed in the past 1450 years.
OK. Why don’t you have any evidence of those increasing winds that have moved the ice pack?
You stated the above which the increased SAM clearly contradicts, I suggest you read up on the Coriolis effect.
No. The article quoted shows Antarctic winds, but they are outbound (flowing towards the equator away from the continent) strongly in only three places, and are very weakly flowing in a fourth area. That wind pattern – which was analyzed actually “backwards” by tracking the Antarctic sea ice movements between only 5 months of the year – does not explain the constant, all-season, year round increase in Antarctic sea ice for the past 22 years since 1992. For more than 60% of the continent shores, the winds are on-shore or parallel to the shore blowing the sea ice tighter together and reducing its average area.
Further, the article provides “data” for only a few year’s movement (2010 – 2012) which does NOT explain the “change” required to explain why the Antarctic sea ice is increasing earlier – because NO earlier data is provided for comparison or as a means to set a trend. Since recent Antarctic sea ice anomalies are producing reflective areas as larger as Greenland, it would seem important to find out “why” and “what will happen” if this trend continues.
It is interesting to see the “consensus hand wave” of admitting that Antarctic sea ice is ‘a few percent larger” – but at minimum the the past years’ “anomaly” are regularly 50% to 100% the size of the past entire sea ice minimum. And that Antarctic sea ice anomaly is closer to the equator evrey day of the year than the edge of the Arctic sea ice ever is. Something to reflect upon, no?
If you want cleaner coal, Wyoming has plenty of it, especially now that the EPA is closing our coal-fired power plants. Personally, I’d like to see them converted into modern clean natural gas-fuelled plants with their output run into four-season greenhouses, giving us the ability to start exporting food instead of importing it. Matt Mead is still, judging by his state of the state address, still learning to prepare for public speaking, so it might be asking too much for him to understand first year organic chemistry.
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/arctic-sea-ice/
CheckYourFacts:
But your NASA link above did not show the all-time record high sea ice extent around Antarctica last June. An “excess” sea ice area as large as Greenland, and an ever-increasing positive Antarctic sea ice trend since 1992.
Your NASA link above did not mention that Antarctic sea ice at its maximum in September (when Arctic sea ice is at its minimum) is receiving 5 times the solar radiation as the Arctic sea ice is receiving.
Your NASA link did not mention that – for seven months of the year – the Arctic ocean at the edge of the Arctic sea ice loses more heat energy from increased evaporation, increased convection, increased conduction, and increased LW radiation when NOT covered by sea ice than it gains from the sun. More Arctic sea ice loss? Seven months of the year = More heat heat lost to space!
So, what is NASA trying to hide by promoting propaganda and hiding half of the sea ice in the world? Why are you worried about Arctic sea ice loss? It only means a colder planet>
I think this cartoon captures the essence of this entire subject. See “Ice Capades” at http://www.maxphoton.com/ice-capades/
[Good graphic! .mod]
Thank you! While I’m here, gentle readers might also enjoy this cartoon: A Comment on Anthropogenic Climate Change at http://www.maxphoton.com/anthropogenic-climate-change/