Another story about global warming causing volcanoes…

From the National Post Is it volcano season? From Japan to Iceland, scientists probe the reasons why there are so many eruptions lately

Eruptions caused by climate change

In recent decades, it has become apparent that the consequences of planetary ice loss might not end with rising sea levels. Evidence has been building that in the past, periods of severe loss of glaciers were followed by a significant spike in volcanic activity.

Around 19,000 years ago, glaciation was at a peak. Much of Europe and North America was under ice. Then the climate warmed, and the glaciers began to recede. The effect on the planet was generally quite favourable for humankind. But, since the mid-1970s, a number of studies have suggested that, as the ice vanished, volcanic eruptions became much more frequent. A 2009 study, for example, concluded that between 12,000 and 7,000 years ago, the global level of volcanic activity rose by up to six times. Around the same period the rate of volcanic activity in Iceland soared to at least 30 times today’s level.

There is supporting evidence from continental Europe, North America and Antarctica that volcanic activity also increased after earlier deglaciation cycles. Bizarrely, then, volcanic activity seems — at least sometimes — to rise and fall with ice levels. But why? Again, this strange effect might come down to stress.

Eruptions cause by the melting of ice

Ice sheets are heavy. Each year, Antarctica’s loses around 40 billion metric tons of ice. The sheets are so heavy, in fact, that as they grow, they cause the Earth’s crust to bend — like a plank of wood when placed under weight. The corollary of this is that, when an ice sheet melts, and its mass is removed, the crust springs back. This upward flexing can lead to a drop in stress in the underlying rocks, which, the theory goes, makes it easier for magma to reach the surface and feed volcanic eruptions.

The link between climate change and volcanism is still poorly understood. Many volcanoes do not seem to have been affected by it. Nor is it a particularly pressing concern today, even though we face an ice-free future. It can take thousands of years after the glaciers melt for volcanic activity to rise.

Yet while it may not be an immediate hazard, this strange effect is a reminder that our planet can respond to change in unforeseen ways. Contrary to their brutish reputation, volcanoes are helping scientists understand just how sensitive our planet can be.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/09/30/is-it-volcano-season-from-japan-to-iceland-scientists-probe-the-reasons-why-there-are-so-many-eruptions-lately/

h/t to reader Cam_S

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
124 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 2, 2014 5:05 am

“The link between climate change and [fill in the blank] is still poorly understood.”
If I had a dime for every time I’ve read that sentence…

Reply to  inferiae4542 (@inferiae4542)
October 7, 2014 1:25 pm

Someone else did, unfortunately…

October 2, 2014 5:07 am

Also, global warming, with the corresponding rise in temperatures causes the crust to expand, making it easier for magma to reach the surface. /sarc
Anyone think I could get a nice hefty grant by proposing this little bit of snake oil?

Greg Woods
Reply to  Dave
October 2, 2014 5:09 am

Go for it!

ferdberple
Reply to  Dave
October 2, 2014 6:35 am

volcanoes started increasing about the same time we put satellites in orbit to observe them. strange coincidence or watt?

TomRude
Reply to  ferdberple
October 2, 2014 7:58 am

The gravitational pull of the satellites are causing widespread tensile stress in the crust liberating volcanic forces! /sarc

Caleb
Reply to  ferdberple
October 2, 2014 8:26 am

I think increasing temperatures caused the crust to expand, squeezing the vent of volcanoes, causing lava and ash to shoot higher, which slowed the speed of the moon, which caused it to fly lower, which raised the tides, which rolled a little ball down a Rube Goldburg ramp, and then…

LogosWrench
Reply to  ferdberple
October 2, 2014 8:55 am

You may be on to something. I wonder if we can decrease the amount of eruptions by satellite removal. There must be a correlation. Lol.

Keitho
Editor
Reply to  Dave
October 2, 2014 8:12 am

Alternatively we could say that increasing volcanic activity results in global warming. Hey, why not? It’s only super sophisticated statistical modelling after all.

DaveF
October 2, 2014 5:11 am

During the last ice age the UK, where I live, was under a mile of ice. This has now gone, and the resulting loss of weight on the land no doubt explains the dozens of volcanoes all over the country. Oh, hang on….

Muontau
Reply to  DaveF
October 2, 2014 5:47 am

Suspicious0bservers.org have quite a bit to say about volcanic activity and it’s links to the sun.
Silly I know !

October 2, 2014 5:12 am

Look everybody knows that the cooling caused by the warming is what is causing the volcanoes to erupt and cause more cooling. Its Science.

John
Reply to  S.E.Bailey
October 2, 2014 10:03 am

Maybe Not. If you consider the WUWT “reference pages”, there isn’t any attempt to quantify volcanic activity which is a significant factor Climate.
Including plate tectonics and volcanic activity is logical as it can directly impacts climate and weather patterns for years.
Tall ask I guess but here are a few links to some of the event monitoring:
– Threat monitoring (note Long Valley Caldra): http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/observatories/calvo/
– Earthquakes: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/#%7B%22feed%22%3A%221day_m25%22%2C%22search%22%3Anull%2C%22sort%22%3A%22newest%22%2C%22basemap%22%3A%22grayscale%22%2C%22autoUpdate%22%3Atrue%2C%22restrictListToMap%22%3Atrue%2C%22timeZone%22%3A%22local%22%2C%22mapposition%22%3A%5B%5B-60.93043220292333%2C-279.140625%5D%2C%5B83.31873282163234%2C79.1015625%5D%5D%2C%22overlays%22%3A%7B%22plates%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22viewModes%22%3A%7B%22list%22%3Atrue%2C%22map%22%3Atrue%2C%22settings%22%3Afalse%2C%22help%22%3Afalse%7D%7D

Reply to  John
October 2, 2014 4:31 pm

Im sorry, I was in full blown Ron Burgundy mode..

October 2, 2014 5:18 am

Seems to me we have another case of “the price of rum in Havana and the salaries of Presbyterian ministers in Massachusetts.”

kramer
October 2, 2014 5:18 am

If global warming causes more eruptions by volcanos and the particulate matter volcanos spew in the atmosphere cool the air temp, then isn’t this a form of natural feedback?

kramer
October 2, 2014 5:19 am

re, my last post: ..not saying I believe this article, just asking a question

Reply to  kramer
October 2, 2014 11:00 am

That was my first thought as well.
It is tidy and it makes sense but I didn’t think there was enough evidence to to back it up.
OK, I accept that Iceland has declining glaciers and is volcanic but I fail to see the link between volcanism in the Pacific and ice sheets.

Mike H.
Reply to  M Courtney
October 2, 2014 3:56 pm

Question: More ice, more friction at the subduction zone?

johnmarshall
Reply to  M Courtney
October 3, 2014 3:11 am

Has Iceland got declining glaciers? They have an ice sheet that seems not to have changed much over the years, apart from the odd glacier melt due to volcanic activity, and the normal northern winter snows. I certainly do not see many Icelanders getting ready for an extended ice free summer.

October 2, 2014 5:20 am

The stupid, it really does burn.

kenw
Reply to  philjourdan
October 2, 2014 7:05 am

and it breeds and votes, too.

mpainter
October 2, 2014 5:20 am

Cites no sources and reads like inventive journalism.

Bloke down the pub
October 2, 2014 5:21 am

Yet another negative feedback?

Jimbo
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
October 2, 2014 5:52 am

It’s being overpowered by co2.

AP
October 2, 2014 5:24 am

Perhaps the increase in volcanic activity in Greenland could be explained by the fact that it was no longer under a mile of ice?

AP
October 2, 2014 5:25 am

sorry, Iceland

Admad
October 2, 2014 5:27 am

Couldn’t the cause/effect relationship have been reversed? Like, maybe the VOLCANOES melted the ICE-SHEETS. Seems just as plausible to me….

Steve Crook
October 2, 2014 5:29 am

I don’t see anything controversial about this. I didn’t think they were suggesting we were seeing effects *now*, but in a few thousand years possibly…

Jimbo
Reply to  Steve Crook
October 2, 2014 6:12 am

The link between climate change and volcanism is still poorly understood. Many volcanoes do not seem to have been affected by it. Nor is it a particularly pressing concern today, even though we face an ice-free future. It can take thousands of years after the glaciers melt for volcanic activity to rise.

Where is going to be “ice-free” in the “future”?

Steve Crook
Reply to  Jimbo
October 2, 2014 7:21 am

Nebraska? I dunno….
It’s just the obligatory reference to climate change to ensure that Cookies 97% continues to be relevant.

Jeff
Reply to  Jimbo
October 4, 2014 1:46 pm

I think the operative phrase here is “is still poorly understood”…
If they don’t understand what is going on, how in the world can they model it (OK, rand(n)…)…
Why don’t they just be truthful and say “please send more money”…ok, expecting the truth is a bit of a stretch….
Reminds me of a joke my Dad told me when I was in college (probably only half-joking…)
Son: No mon, no fun, your Son….
Dad: Too bad, so sad, your Dad…

Leon Brozyna
October 2, 2014 5:29 am

The link between climate change and volcanism is still poorly understood.

Duh … You think?!!
It’s more like the link between climate change and anything else is still poorly understood.

njsnowfan
October 2, 2014 5:39 am

What’s the deal with people not living in reality.
It’s the Sun, Reconstructed TSI chart and world volcanic activity match up don’t you think??
http://lasp.colorado.edu/lisird/tsi/historical_tsi.html
http://iceagenow.info/2012/04/volcanic-activity-increasing/
BTW how do you post pictures, I have nobtabs to do so, thanks.

October 2, 2014 5:41 am

I like the idea that the end of the ice age was “generally quite favourable” to human life. What aspects were less favourable? The lack of ice at the equator for drinkies, perhaps? This article seems science-free, with its words like “bizarre”, “strange”, “brutish”, and the concept of ice being “heavy”! I also wonder where the author got the idea that Antarctica is losing 4b tons of ice annually?

Reply to  Peter Ward
October 2, 2014 11:43 pm

Peter, I imagine the sea level rise must have made some groups of people move away from rising waters. When I look at today´s bathymetry I wonder if we may not find archeological ruins a few meters inland from where the beaches used to be? A sea level rise like they had must have been the origin of the Flood stories?

George Tetley
October 2, 2014 5:41 am

This news must come:
From the worlds biggest feed lot,,,,500,000 truck-loads of B/S (and still counting )

jaffa
October 2, 2014 5:41 am

It doesn’t matter, what if volcanos, earthquakes, extinctions, migrations, deaths, sea level changes, heat, cold, floods, drought, hurricanes and tornados are all made “worse” by global warming. Global warming / climate change is natural until the A appears in front of it.
Stop accepting the bogus implied link to man, it gives the alarmists undeserved credibility. Events, however tragic, that have a natural cause are irrelevant to this debate.
Make these fools state explicitly that the cause is AGW – then ask them how they know.

Jimbo
October 2, 2014 5:45 am

Ice sheets are heavy. Each year, Antarctica’s loses around 40 billion metric tons of ice.

Does anyone know how much of that ice loss was CAUSED by volcanic activity?

Discovery – Jun 9, 2014
Hidden Volcanoes Melt Antarctic Glaciers from Below
Antarctica is a land of ice. But dive below the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, and you’ll find fire as well, in the form of subglacial volcanoes.
Now, a new study finds that these subglacial volcanoes and other geothermal “hotspots” are contributing to the melting of Thwaites Glacier, a major river of ice that flows into Antarctica’s Pine Island Bay. Areas of the glacier that sit near geologic features thought to be volcanic are melting faster than regions farther away from hotspots, said Dustin Schroeder, the study’s lead author and a geophysicist at the University of Texas at Austin.
http://news.discovery.com/earth/global-warming/hidden-volcanoes-melt-antarctic-glaciers-from-below-140609.htm
======================
National Geographic – November 18, 2013
The new volcano’s discovery was accidental. In January 2010, scientists set up a series of seismometers, or earthquake detectors, on Marie Byrd Land, a highland region of West Antarctica.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/131118-antarctica-volcano-earthquakes-erupt-sea-level-rise-science/

TomB
Reply to  Jimbo
October 2, 2014 8:13 am

Let me see if I understand this. A “scientific study” was required to determine that ice sitting on top of a volcano melts faster than ice that is not. That about right?

Bill Illis
October 2, 2014 5:49 am

There is a volcanic field in Germany which seems to erupt after the ice-load is lifted. The East Eifel volcanic field
Laacher see erupted with a VEI 6.0; 12,900 years ago (interesting Younger Dryas-type date) which formed a large caldera lake.
http://www.volcanodiscovery.com/laacher_see.html
http://esys.org/rev_info/Deutschland/laachsee-luftbild-hq.jpg

Reply to  Bill Illis
October 2, 2014 2:29 pm

No the Laacher See erupted about 200 varve years or tree-ring years before the onset of the Younger Dryas.
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ap/qr/2002/00000058/00000003/art02379
Also there wasn’t any ice sheet nowhere near the Laacher see. You’d have to go as far north as central Sweden for that. I’m trying to fgure out if the periodic active Eiffel periods do keep pace with the glacial/interglacial cycles. It could be.
Also interesting why the Volcaism in the Massif Central in France seem to have the same cycles, maybe.
Oh and one of the more important volcanic traces are found in the ice cores of Greenland.

Madman2001
October 2, 2014 6:03 am

As I had posted on WUWT a few years ago, I wonder whether the quiet sun, such as we are now experiencing, does not somehow trigger a higher level of volcanism. No, I offer no ideas how this could be causation rather than correlation (even if it IS correlation), but that’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it. Maybe we could call it the Madman Theory. : )

Jimbo
Reply to  Madman2001
October 2, 2014 6:17 am
jaffa
Reply to  Madman2001
October 2, 2014 6:19 am

I think my beer belly is involved, after rapid growth in the late 20th century it inexplicably paused about 15 years ago, recently there’s been a (very) slight downturn. I don’t believe in coincidence.

mpainter
Reply to  Madman2001
October 2, 2014 6:19 am

Good name for it.
The study of volcanoes is known as vulcanology and is a discipline if the geological sciences. Geologists who specialize in this discipline are known as vulcanologists. If you want to know about volcanoes and what causes them, best to ask a vulcanologist.

Reply to  mpainter
October 2, 2014 6:31 am

Live long and prosper.

Kenny
Reply to  mpainter
October 2, 2014 7:08 am

Vulcanology?…..I thought that was the study of Spock? /sarc

Gerry, England
October 2, 2014 6:11 am

Increase in solar wind speed and energy over the weekend and Japanese volcano erupts, more activity in Iceland, eruption in Russia and earthquake in Indonesia. Coincidence? Of course admitting that the sun does this just leads you along the path of what else it can affect and the collapse of the CO2 myth.

Jimbo
Reply to  Gerry, England
October 2, 2014 6:18 am
Alberta Slim
Reply to  Jimbo
October 2, 2014 7:13 am

This pic really makes me chuckle….
Great..

richard
October 2, 2014 6:12 am

As with all theses articles they do not have to be true , you just have to plant the suggestion again and again to keep the scam alive.

Wally
October 2, 2014 6:15 am

two scientific papers are drafted on volcanism. one refers to isostasy the other climate change.
Which one is more likely to get published?

1 2 3