Claim: Cause of California drought linked to climate change – not one mention of ENSO or El Niño

More despicable climate hype from Noah Diffenbaugh (press release follows) who is ignoring the obvious: California has had far worse droughts before “global warming” was a glimmer in a scientist’s eye, and these were driven by changes in weather patterns that happened long before CO2 became an issue. For example the worst drought of the past century doesn’t even make the top ten. And as this graph shows, our current California drought is but a blip in the larger historical scheme of things:

California_drought_timelineUPDATE: WUWT reader Jimbo adds in comments that the models are about a 50/50 split over wetter/drier:

To more directly address the question of whether climate change played a role in the probability of the 2013 event, the team collaborated with scientist Bala Rajaratnam, also of Stanford.

Rajaratnam applied advanced statistical techniques to a large suite of climate model simulations.

It’s called the weather and GIGO. Climate computer simulations are a pile of crap.

Abstract

The Key Role of Heavy Precipitation Events in Climate Model Disagreements of Future Annual Precipitation Changes in California

Climate model simulations disagree on whether future precipitation will increase or decrease over California, which has impeded efforts to anticipate and adapt to human-induced climate change……..Between these conflicting tendencies, 12 projections show drier annual conditions by the 2060s and 13 show wetter. These results are obtained from 16 global general circulation models downscaled with different combinations of dynamical methods…

http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00766.1


From NSF: Press Release 14-129

Extreme atmospheric conditions responsible for drought more likely to occur in current global warming

 

California_Drought_Dry_Riverbed_NOAA_f[1]The drought crippling California is by some measures the worst in the state’s history.

Credit and Larger Version

September 29, 2014

The atmospheric conditions associated with the unprecedented drought in California are very likely linked to human-caused climate change, researchers report.

Climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh of Stanford University and colleagues used a novel combination of computer simulations and statistical techniques to show that a persistent region of high atmospheric pressure over the Pacific Ocean–one that diverted storms away from California–was much more likely to form in the presence of modern greenhouse gas concentrations.

The result, published today in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, is one of the most comprehensive studies to investigate the link between climate change and California’s ongoing drought.

“Our research finds that extreme atmospheric high pressure in this region–which is strongly linked to unusually low precipitation in California–is much more likely to occur today than prior to the emission of greenhouse gases that began during the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s,” says Diffenbaugh.

The exceptional drought crippling California is by some measures the worst in state history.

Combined with unusually warm temperatures and stagnant air conditions, the lack of precipitation has triggered a dangerous increase in wildfires and incidents of air pollution across the state.

The water shortage could result in direct and indirect agricultural losses of at least $2.2 billion and lead to the loss of more than 17,000 seasonal and part-time jobs in 2014 alone.

Such effects have prompted a drought emergency in the state; the federal government has designated all 58 California counties as natural disaster areas.

“In the face of severe drought, decision-makers are facing tough choices about the allocation of water resources for urban, agricultural and other crucial needs,” says Anjuli Bamzai, program director in the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funded the research.

“This study places the current drought in historical perspective and provides valuable scientific information for dealing with this grave situation. ”

Scientists agree that the immediate cause of the drought is a particularly tenacious “blocking ridge” over the northeastern Pacific–popularly known as the Ridiculously Resilient Ridge, or “Triple R”–that prevented winter storms from reaching California during the 2013 and 2014 rainy seasons.

Blocking ridges are regions of high atmospheric pressure that disrupt typical wind patterns in the atmosphere.

“Winds respond to the spatial distribution of atmospheric pressure,” says Daniel Swain of Stanford, lead author of the paper.

“We have seen this amazingly persistent region of high pressure over the northeastern Pacific for many months, which has substantially altered atmospheric flow and kept California largely dry.”

The Triple R was exceptional for both its size and longevity.

While it dissipated briefly during the summer months of 2013, it returned by fall 2013 and persisted through much of the winter, California’s wet season.

“At its peak in January 2014, the Triple R extended from the subtropical Pacific between California and Hawaii to the coast of the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska,” says Swain, who coined the term “ridiculously resilient ridge” to highlight the persistent nature of the blocking ridge.

Like a large boulder that has tumbled into a narrow stream, the Triple R diverted the flow of high-speed air currents known as the jet stream far to the north, causing Pacific storms to bypass not only California, but also Oregon and Washington.

As a result, rain and snow that would normally fall on the West Coast were instead re-routed to Alaska and as far north as the Arctic Circle.

An important question for scientists and decision-makers has been whether human-caused climate change has influenced the conditions responsible for California’s drought.

Given the important role of the Triple R, Diffenbaugh and colleagues set out to measure the probability of such extreme ridging events.

The team first assessed the rarity of the Triple R in the context of the 20th century historical record.

Analyzing the period since 1948, for which comprehensive atmospheric data are available, the researchers found that the persistence and intensity of the Triple R in 2013 were unrivaled by any previous event.

To more directly address the question of whether climate change played a role in the probability of the 2013 event, the team collaborated with scientist Bala Rajaratnam, also of Stanford.

Rajaratnam applied advanced statistical techniques to a large suite of climate model simulations.

Using the Triple R as a benchmark, Rajaratnam compared geopotential heights–an atmospheric property related to pressure–between two sets of climate model experiments.

One set mirrored the present climate, in which the atmosphere is growing increasingly warmer due to human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

In the other set of experiments, greenhouse gases were kept at a level similar to those that existed just prior to the Industrial Revolution.

The researchers found that the extreme heights of the Triple R in 2013 were at least three times as likely to occur in the present climate as in the preindustrial climate.

They also found that such extreme values are consistently tied to unusually low precipitation in California, and to the formation of atmospheric ridges over the northeastern Pacific.

“We’ve demonstrated with high statistical confidence that large-scale atmospheric conditions similar to those of the Triple R are far more likely to occur now than in the climate before we emitted large amounts of greenhouse gases,” Rajaratnam says.

“In using these advanced statistical techniques to combine climate observations with model simulations, we’ve been able to better understand the ongoing drought in California,” Diffenbaugh adds.

“This isn’t a projection of 100 years in the future. This is an event that is more extreme than any in the observed record, and our research suggests that global warming is playing a role right now.”

The research was also supported by the National Institutes of Health. Rajaratnam was also supported in part by DARPA, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the UPS fund.

-NSF-

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
122 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
george e. smith
September 29, 2014 5:53 pm

I think it is climate cooling that results in droughts. You know; as in much less water in the atmosphere in all three phases (solid, liquid, Gas). Actually about 7% less for each deg. C lowering of global mean surface/lower troposphere Temperature. And what goes up must come down; ergo less rainfall/snowfall/sleetfall/hailfall/frogfall/whatever !
That’s measured actual real world observation made without any statistication of any number of terra-computer climate models.

george e. smith
September 29, 2014 6:03 pm

“””””…..‘Climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh of Stanford University and colleagues used a novel combination of computer simulations and statistical techniques to show that a persistent region of high atmospheric pressure over the Pacific Ocean–one that diverted storms away from California–was much more likely to form in the presence of modern greenhouse gas concentrations ….’……”””””
Howabout a SCIENCE model, using actual physics. I don’t care if you simulate, so long as you simulate operation of ALL of the laws of physics.
And forget “Statistical techniques” They give you Statistical Mathematics information about ANY set of EXACTLY known numbers (ANY numbers). They tell you EXACTLY nothing about ANY numbers that are NOT already members of that set.
We don’t need any statistical mathematics results. We need weather / climate information, which is not taught in ANY course on statistical mathematics; or in any other branch of mathematics that I’ve eve heard of.
I know it is not taught in classes on Projective Geometry, which as far as is known, has absolutely NO practical application for any purpose, except for sustaining teachers, of Projective Geometry.

H.R.
September 29, 2014 6:15 pm

I found a picture of the modelers whose ensembles were used to seed the models in this study for which the results will be used as inputs by the modelers for the next IPCC Climate Assessment.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/4308370012_47fa6fe1d0.jpg
OK. Maybe not, but that’s what my model came up with when I programmed it to find an anthropogenic fingerprint on the Klimate Kontrol Knob.

ECK
September 29, 2014 6:58 pm

This BS was featured on the evening NBC “news” this evening in the SF Bay area. Sigh!

September 29, 2014 7:17 pm

California will get rain in January-March 2015 if the coming El Niño is any good when the usual ENSO related rainfall pattern repeats.
http://www.oarval.org/ensorain-av.gif
“During El Niño, rainfall and thunderstorm activity diminishes over the western equatorial Pacific, and increases over the eastern half of the tropical Pacific. This area of increased rainfall occurs where the exceptionally warm ocean waters have reached about 28°C or 82°F. This overall pattern of rainfall departures spans nearly one-half the distance around the globe, and is responsible for many of the global weather impacts caused by El Niño.”
From El Niño Releated Rainfall Patterns (Climate Prediction Center – CPC, NOAA-NWS). See http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensocycle/ensorain.shtml

Reply to  Andres Valencia
September 29, 2014 9:48 pm

spot on. hold out until January, and then keep a raft, kayak, or small boat handy in you live in CA.

September 29, 2014 8:09 pm

It IS the worst drought this century, and this fourteen year millennium. In the 164 year San Francisco time series the 2014 drought did not even make the top ten. The deep sea drilling record and basic physics are unequivocal that warming causes stability and cooling causes amplified meridional outbreaks and blocking patterns. Unfortunately for the modelers theorems and for humanity in general, the odds are stacked against further warming for a human generation to come.

Wally
September 29, 2014 9:39 pm

So that’s not rain on my back?

September 29, 2014 9:44 pm

Fortunately good probability exists that the coming winter’s wimpy (failed) El Nino will at least deliver sizable moisture outbursts (pineapple expresses) through the backdoor of the R3. Quite Appropriate for Cal.

lawrence Cornell
September 29, 2014 10:00 pm

Jeez, I’m so glad I live here on Earth. That planet they keep calling Model sounds REALLY scary !

PeterInMD
Reply to  lawrence Cornell
September 30, 2014 7:06 am

I second that sentiment!!!

September 29, 2014 10:02 pm

Doe anyone have a link to the older NOAA chart that shows the effects on the US on an EL Niño and a La Niña, with the droughts and rain, etc?

September 30, 2014 1:11 am

What do you call a drought in a desert? My limited understanding is that the region between 20 and 40 degrees North is desert as is 20 and 40 degrees South. However, I would expect wet prevailing westerly winds to drop rain on the Rockies and considering that anywhere west of California is ocean, then a warming atmosphere should be picking up more water. Sounds like the conclusions of this study have a bit of confirmation bias.

Otter (ClimateOtter on Twitter)
September 30, 2014 1:21 am

‘What it does reveal is how crap liberals are at adapting to those variations and that should worry all of us.’
There, FIXED IT FOR YA.

knr
September 30, 2014 1:35 am

Once again an extreme but not usual weather event is jumped on has ‘proof’ of AGW , long gone are the days when weather was not climate , once it turned out that in reality climate was taken no notice of alarmists claims. California’s big issue is consumption not rain fall .

David A
Reply to  knr
September 30, 2014 6:09 am

No, Read the posts of policycritic above. California’s big problem is waste due to PC judges and PC liberal ideology making a bait fish more important then people.

Martin Lewitt
September 30, 2014 1:57 am

Here is a link to the actual report, but I can’t find the supplemental material. The article begins on page 11 of the pdf.
I would particularly like to investigate the pre-industrial controls climates, since the immediately pre-industrial time was the Little Ice Age. The appropriate controls would be much warmer climates than that, since much of the warming that has occurred since then was a natural and ongoing recovery, which according to climate commitment studies should contribute to warming for a few more centuries.
http://www2.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/bulletin-of-the-american-meteorological-society-bams/explaining-extreme-events-of-2013-from-a-climate-perspective/

richard
September 30, 2014 4:40 am

Time to copy Israel or maybe it is hard to scale up.
http://www.israel21c.org/environment/top-10-ways-israel-fights-desertification/

Kenny
September 30, 2014 4:45 am
John
September 30, 2014 4:45 am

And these people, who ignore some causes, if not the most important ones, want us to take them seriously? I’d rather read War and Peace that believe them.

Bill Illis
September 30, 2014 4:51 am

California Precipitation Anomaly versus the ENSO back to 1896. Pretty close correlation (but there are times they are not linked so well – overall the ENSO would be the best predictor – more rain during El Ninos, less during La Ninas).
http://s29.postimg.org/6v0b9ylg7/California_Precip_ENSO.png

Paul Pierett
September 30, 2014 6:34 am

As proven by scientists and observers a century ago, drought is the direct result of the lack of sunspot activity and that reduces upward atmosphere humidity per a earlier post of Dr. Watts a year or two ago. Now we are in the early phase of a sunspot minimum pointed out by Dr. D’Aleo. Its only going to get worst through 2035. As pointed out by Dr. Easterbrook, a lot is on the line with this global cooling. A farmer told.me.in new Zealand a lost of 4 degrees average temperature is significant to agriculture not to mention a shorter growing season.

TRM
September 30, 2014 7:02 am

I’m probably wrong but that top graphic looks like a 1000 year sine wave to me. Each half about 500 years. There are drops and peaks but I’d love to see some data over the entire last 10,000 years if possible/available.
The PDO going negative and California will at best have 1945-75 type weather with a lot more people. Good luck and get out the slide rulers because some serious engineering will be required very soon.

Resourceguy
September 30, 2014 8:29 am

In the early days they used analog systems like tree rings in flawed models. Today with modern computers and digital models, the simulations can be synthesized much faster for a cost-effective distortion of under-specified systems. The funding bias is the only constant.

JimS
September 30, 2014 9:46 am

That press release is a classic case of a half truth being a whole lie.

James at 48
September 30, 2014 9:50 am

Well the cold SSTs up until mid this year did not help. I hope …. pray …. dance … that the current little bump in SSTs lasts into the winter. Maybe it will break the drought.

September 30, 2014 10:31 am

I suppose this has been posted before, many times, but here goes:
“Every age has its peculiar folly; some scheme, project, or phantasy into which it plunges, spurred on either by the love of gain, the necessity of excitement, or the mere force of imitation. Failing in these, it has some madness, to which it is goaded by political or religious causes, or both combined.”
–Charles MacKay, Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, London 1852.

phlogiston
September 30, 2014 10:41 am

Climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh of Stanford University and colleagues used a novel combination of computer simulations and statistical techniques to show that the moon is composed 97% of green cheese.