District attorney becomes 'noble cause corrupted', drops charges against climate activists

You may have heard about the climate activists who had charges and a trial pending over obstruction of commerce by blocking a coal barge to the Brayton Point electric power plant with a lobster boat?  Well the DA just caved, and announced he drank the kool-aid, and is going on the climate march. Video follows

From WBGH Boston:

It was intended to be a show trial, with climate scientist-turned-activist James Hansen and 350.org founder Bill McKibben both slated to testify. Ward and O’Hara planned a necessity defense, arguing that climate change presented such a crisis – and federal climate action was so inadequate – that they had no alternative but to place their lobster boat between the barge and the power plant. Whether or not the defense was successful, it would be a statement.

Instead, Bristol County District Attorney Samuel Sutter made a surprise appearance in court Monday morning with a statement of his own. Sutter announced that his office was dropping all criminal charges, and that he, himself, would be attending the People’s Climate March in New York City later this month. He called climate change “one of the gravest crises of our time.”

Ward and O’Hara still face civil charges.

And from The Nation:

And what happened, the truly remarkable thing, was this: the prosecutor, Bristol County District Attorney Sam Sutter, not only dropped the charges (which could have resulted in months, or even years, of jail time), he then proceeded out to the courthouse plaza where he made a statement to the media and to the hundred or more people gathered in support of Ken and Jay. Here’s what he said:

The decision that Assistant District Attorney Robert Kidd and I reached today was a decision that certainly took into consideration the cost to the taxpayers in Somerset, but was also made with our concerns for their children, and the children of Bristol County and beyond in mind.

Climate change is one of the gravest crises our planet has ever faced. In my humble opinion, the political leadership on this issue has been gravely lacking. I am heartened that we were able to forge an agreement that both parties were pleased with and that appeared to satisfy the police and those here in sympathy with the individuals who were charged.

I am also extremely pleased that we were able to reach an agreement that symbolizes our commitment at the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office to take a leadership role on this issue.

Source: http://bristolda.com/2014/09/statement-on-the-disposition-of-the-brayton-point-protest-case/

Another victim of noble cause corruption: Bristol County District Attorney Sam Sutter website: http://bristolda.com/

The definition of noble cause corruption is:

Noble Cause Corruption is a mindset or sub-culture which fosters a belief that the ends justify the means.

– source: Public Agency Training Council

A recent tweet says its something they feel strongly about:

https://twitter.com/NJRob973/status/509160517865570304

LadyJusticeImage[1]Lady Justice was forced to take her blindfold off by this action:

Lady Justice has often been depicted wearing a blindfold. The blindfold represents objectivity, in that justice is or should be meted out objectively, without fear or favour, regardless of identity, money, power, or weakness; blind justice and impartiality.

This was how the 14th amendment came about, when law enforcement officials would not prosecute racial crimes committed in the south.

Article VI requires that “all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution”.  So this DA has, by this statement, arguably tendered his resignation from his office, since he is asserting that he will not be bound to his duties under the 14th Amendment.  Someone should accept his resignation, on behalf of the people.

I do hope the voters remember that he discarded the law in favor of his own beliefs when it comes time for re-election.

h/t to WUWT reader Tom McClellan

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TBraunlich
September 9, 2014 5:50 am

Leading by Obama’s example. Enforcing only the laws he personally approves of, or exempting from the laws whomever he wants.

hunter
Reply to  TBraunlich
September 9, 2014 7:23 am

Yes. This is corruption of the worst sort. The deliberate, arrogant flouting of the law, the oath of office, and ethics.

September 9, 2014 5:55 am

The Rule of Law is not perfect, but it is to be preferred over the ‘law’ of Rulers.
When rulers hold themselves above the law (and are permitted to persist in this by their ‘subjects’), not only do we lose the Rule of Law, but we start down the authoritarian high road to tyranny where the laws have no importance compared to the whims of self-important egomaniacal rulers.

bandit
September 9, 2014 6:13 am

Living in MA is so embarrassing

kenw
Reply to  bandit
September 9, 2014 2:12 pm

Come on down. We have jobs in Texas. Those that the Californian transplants haven’t beat you to…

Sweet Old Bob
September 9, 2014 6:52 am

I think this DA is a Nam Nutter…..!

Markopanama
September 9, 2014 6:52 am

Look at the bright side – Hansen et al have been deprived of their show trial and a good deal of PR at the public expense. The march to wherever was going to take place anyway and now will get even less attention.

George Steiner
September 9, 2014 9:08 am

Remove him!

johann wundersamer
September 9, 2014 9:17 am

So for at least the next 3 generations you have documented proof for corrupted, biased representativs of ‘LAW’.
Dont let this sword get rusted.
Hans

September 9, 2014 9:29 am

course the feds won’t enforce the blocking waterways laws on this one either.

PeteLJ
September 9, 2014 10:37 am

Apparently, it is all about POLITICS, at least according to the NYTs:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/09/us/charges-dropped-against-climate-activists.html?_r=0

more soylent green!
September 9, 2014 11:10 am

District Attorney is an elected position. He’s thinking about the big money donors he will lose if he follows through with actually enforcing the law.
Hey, wait a darn minute! I thought the big money was from the climate-change-d-word industrial-complex! What the heck is going on here?

Editor
September 9, 2014 11:30 am

I sent the following email to Sutter’s email contact person, ashley.l.bendiksen@state.ma.us, and asked her to forward it to District Attorney Sutter:

Mr. Sutter:
Your job is to uphold the rule of law, not to provide unequal justice based on alignment or divergence from your own political views. Your official acquiescence in the criminal behavior of the climate activists who tried to forcibly impose environmental policies that have been rejected by the people’s representatives is a disgrace to your office.
Sincerely,
Alec Rawls
Palo Alto, CA

Bob Kutz
September 9, 2014 11:48 am

I am pretty sure that refusing to prosecute a crime based on your political beliefs or the political beliefs of the perpetrators is grounds to dismiss a DA in every single state in the union.
If your legal justice system is controlled by a political persuasion bent on using it to destroy their political enemies, you are living in troubled times. Armed insurrection will no doubt follow.

more soylent green!
Reply to  Bob Kutz
September 9, 2014 1:52 pm

Bob, there was a time I was sure it was an impeachable offense to launch a war without Congressional authorization, or use the IRS to intimidate political opponents or to let an American ambassador be killed because the events on the ground didn’t match the president’s reelection store line.

kenw
September 9, 2014 2:10 pm

by the same logic, me and my trusty cutoff saw can wreak havoc on some nearby eagle shredders/wind turbines.Timber!

Bitter&twisted
September 9, 2014 3:27 pm

Jeez what a jizzweasel (Sam Sutter)

Chris in Calgary
September 11, 2014 4:16 pm

Odd … if this was intended to be a show trial, why did the fervent DA louse up the show trial by dropping the charges?
The end result seems to be less publicity for the cause, and less credibility for the DA’s office. How is that a win for McKibben et al.?

Mervyn
September 15, 2014 12:51 am

What????? Bristol County District Attorney Samuel Sutter made a surprise appearance in court Monday morning with a statement of his own… that his office was dropping all criminal charges, and that he, himself, would be attending the People’s Climate March in New York City later this month????????
What an intolerable blatant conflict of interest!!!!!! I cannot believe this sort of behaviour is tolerated in the US.
Why hasn’ this man been stood down from his position for gross derelict of his legal duty… to remain impartial, objective and non-partisan?

Verified by MonsterInsights