Mystery of the sailing stones of Death Valley solved – 'climate change' immediately blamed for no good reason

Photo by Scott Beckner via Flickr CC license
Photo by Scott Beckner via Flickr CC license

The discovery of the mechanism that causes “sailing stones” in Death Valley is actually a great example of observational science, it just too bad these scientists ruined the announcement by blaming “climate change” instead of the things that ACTUALLY drive the flooding of the playa, like regional weather patterns, the PDO, and ENSO. Watch the video.

Here are frames of that video, with annotations, click for a very large image:

sailing rocks2_plosoneHere is how they describe it, from the Scripps Oceanograpgy website:

Racetrack Playa is home to an enduring Death Valley mystery. Littered across the surface of this dry lake, also called a “playa,” are hundreds of rocks – some weighing as much as 320 kilograms (700 pounds) – that seem to have been dragged across the ground, leaving synchronized trails that can stretch for hundreds of meters.

What powerful force could be moving them? Researchers have investigated this question since the 1940s, but no one has seen the process in action – until now.

In a paper published in the journal PLOS ONE on Aug. 27, a team led by Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, paleobiologist Richard Norris reports on first-hand observations of the phenomenon.

Because the stones can sit for a decade or more without moving, the researchers did not originally expect to see motion in person. Instead, they decided to monitor the rocks remotely by installing a high-resolution weather station capable of measuring gusts to one-second intervals and fitting 15 rocks with custom-built, motion-activated GPS units. (The National Park Service would not let them use native rocks, so they brought in similar rocks from an outside source.) The experiment was set up in winter 2011 with permission of the Park Service. Then – in what Ralph Lorenz of the Applied Physics Laboratory at the Johns Hopkins University, one of the paper’s authors, suspected would be  “the most boring experiment ever” – they waited for something to happen.

But in December 2013, Norris and co-author and cousin Jim Norris arrived in Death Valley to discover that the playa was covered with a pond of water seven centimeters (three inches) deep. Shortly after, the rocks began moving.

“Science sometimes has an element of luck,” Richard Norris said. “We expected to wait five or ten years without anything moving, but only two years into the project, we just happened to be there at the right time to see it happen in person.”

Their observations show that moving the rocks requires a rare combination of events. First, the playa fills with water, which must be deep enough to form floating ice during cold winter nights but shallow enough to expose the rocks. As nighttime temperatures plummet, the pond freezes to form thin sheets of “windowpane” ice, which must be thin enough to move freely but thick enough to maintain strength. On sunny days, the ice begins to melt and break up into large floating panels, which light winds drive across the playa, pushing rocks in front of them and leaving trails in the soft mud below the surface.

“On Dec. 21, 2013, ice breakup happened just around noon, with popping and cracking sounds coming from all over the frozen pond surface,” said Richard Norris. “I said to Jim, ‘This is it!’”

These observations upended previous theories that had proposed hurricane-force winds, dust devils, slick algal films, or thick sheets of ice as likely contributors to rock motion. Instead, rocks moved under light winds of about 3-5 meters per second (10 miles per hour) and were driven by ice less than 3-5 millimeters (0.25 inches) thick, a measure too thin to grip large rocks and lift them off the playa, which several papers had proposed as a mechanism to reduce friction. Further, the rocks moved only a few inches per second (2-6 meters per minute), a speed that is almost imperceptible at a distance and without stationary reference points.

“It’s possible that tourists have actually seen this happening without realizing it,” said Jim Norris of the engineering firm Interwoof in Santa Barbara. “It is really tough to gauge that a rock is in motion if all the rocks around it are also moving.”

Individual rocks remained in motion for anywhere from a few seconds to 16 minutes. In one event, the researchers observed rocks three football fields apart began moving simultaneously and traveled over 60 meters (200 feet) before stopping. Rocks often moved multiple times before reaching their final resting place. The researchers also observed rock-less trails formed by grounding ice panels – features that the Park Service had previously suspected were the result of tourists stealing rocks.

“The last suspected movement was in 2006, and so rocks may move only about one millionth of the time,” said Lorenz. “There is also evidence that the frequency of rock movement, which seems to require cold nights to form ice, may have declined since the 1970s due to climate change.”

Sigh. Surely they know better.

Here is the paper from PLOS One: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0105948

Sliding Rocks on Racetrack Playa, Death Valley National Park: First Observation of Rocks in Motion

Citation: Norris RD, Norris JM, Lorenz RD, Ray J, Jackson B (2014) Sliding Rocks on Racetrack Playa, Death Valley National Park: First Observation of Rocks in Motion. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105948. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105948

Abstract

The engraved trails of rocks on the nearly flat, dry mud surface of Racetrack Playa, Death Valley National Park, have excited speculation about the movement mechanism since the 1940s. Rock movement has been variously attributed to high winds, liquid water, ice, or ice flotation, but has not been previously observed in action. We recorded the first direct scientific observation of rock movements using GPS-instrumented rocks and photography, in conjunction with a weather station and time-lapse cameras. The largest observed rock movement involved >60 rocks on December 20, 2013 and some instrumented rocks moved up to 224 m between December 2013 and January 2014 in multiple move events. In contrast with previous hypotheses of powerful winds or thick ice floating rocks off the playa surface, the process of rock movement that we have observed occurs when the thin, 3 to 6 mm, “windowpane” ice sheet covering the playa pool begins to melt in late morning sun and breaks up under light winds of ~4–5 m/s. Floating ice panels 10 s of meters in size push multiple rocks at low speeds of 2–5 m/min. along trajectories determined by the direction and velocity of the wind as well as that of the water flowing under the ice.

h/t to WUWT reader Joel O’Brien

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

127 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sean Peake
August 29, 2014 7:53 pm

“You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know… morons.”

inMAGICn
Reply to  Sean Peake
August 29, 2014 9:17 pm

“And a laurel and hardy handshake goes to….Sean”

Greg
Reply to  inMAGICn
August 29, 2014 11:48 pm

Mel Brooks, Blazing Saddles

inMAGICn
August 29, 2014 8:00 pm

Hmm. Nasty ol’ global warming again. Odd thing is, it can rain heavily in the Death Valley area. The Racetrack is not in Death Valley, per se. It is to the north and is over 3500′ up. From personal experience over decades (1968 to 2013 off and on), it can get very chilly in the hills around those parts.

Editor
August 29, 2014 8:02 pm

If it’s any consolation, NBC made no mention of global warming in their article, http://www.nbcnews.com/science/weird-science/last-scientists-unravel-mystery-death-valleys-moving-rocks-n190441
Nor did their source, http://www.livescience.com/47585-death-valley-moving-rocks.html which has a nav bar item “global warming”.

mjc
August 29, 2014 8:02 pm

The researchers also observed rock-less trails formed by grounding ice panels – features that the Park Service had previously suspected were the result of tourists stealing rocks.
So is the NPS going to appologize to everyone it’s accused of collecting the rocks?

Reply to  mjc
August 30, 2014 6:26 am

I believe the term used was “tourists stealing rocks”.

eyesonu
August 29, 2014 8:03 pm

This is both interesting and amazing.

August 29, 2014 8:04 pm

How to turn a fascinating discovery into a platform for proselytizing. That’s just cheap crap. Makes their science seem completely accidental and worthless.

Jimbo
Reply to  Mike Bromley the Kurd
August 29, 2014 11:28 pm

How else would the Scripps Institution of Oceanography have got the funding? If you want money fast you must mention ‘climate change’.

Greg
Reply to  Jimbo
August 31, 2014 9:42 am

Good point Jimbo

August 29, 2014 8:07 pm

I’m disappointed. In his own article on the subject, Dr. Roy Spencer foretold the ‘blame Climate Change for changes in the rock movement’ meme would arise.Presumably, he missed that those words were in the article itself.
Still, it could be worse. If the rock’s movement increased, we’d be subject to prophecies from the faithful of all our homes going for Death-Valley style ‘walks’.

Richard G
Reply to  Leo Morgan
August 29, 2014 11:41 pm

They had this in my local paper and the article there made no mention of climate change. I’m assuming the article Dr. Roy Spencer read also did not contain it. It looks like they got the idea from the good doctor and are now including it.

Jeff
Reply to  Richard G
August 30, 2014 4:21 pm

They had a translation of the article over here in Germany, complete with the CAGW meme. Scripps is the academic (? gotta wonder sometimes) answer to journalism’s
“if it bleeds, it leads”. They’re way out left on the left coast of the US…..sad, they used to do really good work, and I think they’re associated with USC, who at least were a conservative University…sigh…

Ken
Reply to  Leo Morgan
August 30, 2014 6:38 am

If they had found that in recent years the rocks had been moved further and more frequently, they would have blamed that on … climate change, of course.

durango12
August 29, 2014 8:14 pm

Actually there is a “good reason.” Blaming AGW helps get the next grant. I kid you not. Everyone wants to cash in on the big ATM that is the government (taxpayer) funding machine.

TobiasN
Reply to  durango12
August 29, 2014 8:50 pm

If they get another grant, wow. “look, these meaningless rocks may be sliding on ice less”.

mark l
August 29, 2014 8:14 pm

Amateurs (not a negative connotation) looking to get their findings published and were told to enter the magic words.

ferdberple
August 29, 2014 8:17 pm

i read about this in scientific american or similar 30+ years ago. it was understood at the time that it was caused by ice. it is now recycled as global warming.

George A
Reply to  ferdberple
August 29, 2014 9:20 pm

Years ago I thought I saw a video, shot at night, of floating ice pushing these rocks around. Not a new discovery.

Eamon Butler
Reply to  George A
August 30, 2014 5:05 pm

Likewise George. I can’t remember what TV programme it cropped up on, but it was a few years ago.

Tom Harley
August 29, 2014 8:24 pm

So, would it be ‘global warming’ that moves rocks on Mars too? http://www.bubblews.com/news/664784-strange-stone-moving-in-mars

August 29, 2014 8:25 pm

Climate change is the catch-all excuse for anything deemed inexplicable, or negative, in any way! What ever happens to be bothering you, guaranteed, climate change caused it….97% of morons said so.

August 29, 2014 8:25 pm

Anyone check to see if they gathered any moss?

Climate Heretic
Reply to  Bob Greene
August 30, 2014 12:26 am

A rolling stone gathers no moss, so no the stones did not gather any moss!
Regards
Climate Heretic

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Climate Heretic
August 30, 2014 3:36 am

They don’t get no satisfaction neither.

Reply to  Climate Heretic
August 30, 2014 6:44 am

You may be correct wrt rolling stones but, what about sliding stones?

Aphan
Reply to  Climate Heretic
August 30, 2014 10:16 am

My poppa was a rolling stone…wherever he laid his hat was his home…:)

Alberta Slim
Reply to  Bob Greene
August 30, 2014 7:31 am

Rolling stones gather no moss. These are sliding stones, and they cannot be harmed by GPS units, or it’s off to jail. …. ;^D

Eamon Butler
Reply to  Bob Greene
August 30, 2014 5:09 pm

They might be linking stones and Greenhouses with this one.

GlynnMhor
August 29, 2014 8:27 pm

Well, they need their funding, so like “Carthago delenda es”, they have to slip in some mention of climate change.

Chris4692
August 29, 2014 8:29 pm

“There is also evidence that the frequency of rock movement, which seems to require cold nights to form ice, may have declined since the 1970s due to climate change.”
Neither more nor less than a plea for funding. Part of making a living from science.

rakman
August 29, 2014 8:38 pm

Back in the day of “nuclear winter”, papers that used that phrase were accepted for publication where those that didn’t have the “phrase that pays” were not published. I believe one enterprising scientist tested the theory by creating a particularly bogus screed, but included the “phrase that pays” and got the paper published.

Peter Miller
Reply to  rakman
August 30, 2014 2:02 am

And there you have it, “the phrase that pays” and why climate science research has now become so corrupted.

douptingdave
August 29, 2014 8:44 pm

From the scrpps institution of oceanography website Mmmm i wonder if this charming lady had anything to do with nudging these stones in the consensus direction. Naomi Oreskes adjunct professor of geo sciences at Scripps institution of oceanography

Bill Illis
Reply to  douptingdave
August 30, 2014 4:48 am

I imagine everyone who works at Scripps Institution of Oceanography or at the home university of University of California, San Diego, knows they have to mention climate change in everything they do or Ms. Oreskes will be coming after your job.

kim
August 29, 2014 8:44 pm

Well, climate change causes many things. Yes it does, furreal.
The problem is the assumption in the writer and the readers that this is ‘man-made climate change’. This erroneous meme is a metastasized cancer.
The only cure for this mass delusion is common cold. Sorry ’bout dat.
================

Travis Casey
Reply to  kim
August 29, 2014 8:56 pm

Well played.

dp
August 29, 2014 8:45 pm

Is there any profoundly ignorant thing they’re not willing to say?

charles nelson
August 29, 2014 8:52 pm

Yup, ice and rain in Death Valley, definitely Global Warming.

latecommer2014
Reply to  charles nelson
August 30, 2014 6:24 am

It also snows inDeath Valley. In 1988 I helped to make a snowman at Scotty’s Castle…global cooling?

August 29, 2014 9:31 pm

Sure, that’s what it was this time, with rocks under observation. But when no one else is looking and some kids from Caltech make a road trip with a few buckets of water and a flask of liquid nitrogen…

Reply to  kadaka (KD Knoebel)
August 30, 2014 7:10 am

Maybe they can do “crop circles” too !!

Leon Brozyna
August 29, 2014 9:42 pm

They were doing so good, solving a decade’s old science mystery … and then they had to go and invoke that old-time AGW religion.

Steve Oregon
August 29, 2014 9:43 pm

AGW rocks!

Jeff
Reply to  Steve Oregon
August 30, 2014 4:25 pm

Yeah, Scripps takes it for granite….

garymount
August 29, 2014 9:46 pm

“The National Park Service would not let them use native rocks…”
Did the National Park Service personnel and / or leadership believe the rocks were magical?

PiperPaul
Reply to  garymount
August 30, 2014 5:51 am

I do believe you should use the correct terminology: ‘First Rocks’ or ‘Aboriginal Rocks’.

Jeff
Reply to  garymount
August 30, 2014 4:27 pm

Is there a football team named after them somewhere?
(Probably would be a rather slow one….).

James the Elder
Reply to  Jeff
August 30, 2014 6:21 pm

The Toronto Rock pro lacrosse.

jorgekafkazar
August 29, 2014 10:07 pm

I still think the study should be replicated with garden gnomes.

1 2 3