Thirteen members of the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) were trapped and in danger of freezing to death when their base, Halley VI, lost power. Power went down on July 30th and is now partially restored. The BAS waited to report the incident until power came back up, however now reports that the incident was so serious that all science activities have been suspended and emergency contingency plans to abandon some of Halley’s eight modules and attempt to shelter in a remaining few have been prepared.
The incident is particularly serious, as the station is likely completely cut off from rescue for months.
The incident occurred during the height of the Antarctic winter while southern sea ice is at or near record highs (Marc Morano has details at Climate Depot).
One Survey member, Anthony Lister, managed to send a out a “tweet” when power came back up, reporting that the outage occurred while the station was experiencing record cold temperatures of -55.4° C (-67.72° F). (h/t Rai news)

It is not possible to survive for long at the station without power, placing the 13 members of the expedition in danger of freezing to death, although they remain safe while they can keep the power running.
Halley VI is located on the Brunt Ice Shelf on 150 meter thick ice, just off the coast of Antarctica. Temperature there never climbs above freezing and this time of year the sun never climbs above the horizon.
Halley VI became operational in 2012 and consists of eight modules supported by hydraulic legs on skis. The skis are designed to permit the BAS to periodically reposition the station using bulldozers in the hopes of escaping the fate of past stations which were lost when they became buried under vast accumulations of ice and snow. In the past the station was a major source of reporting on the Antarctic “ozone hole.”
The Halley VI power loss serves as a stark reminder of the incredibly harsh and dangerous cold conditions Antarctic researchers brave. It also can’t help but remind us of Chris Turney’s ill-fated Antarctic expedition which became trapped in rapidly expanding sea ice last
December. Drama ensued when both the ice breaker carrying the expedition and the ice breaker initially sent to rescue it both became trapped. A third ice breaker was ultimately able to evacuate the passengers using a helicopter.
While the BAS researchers stationed at Halley VI have a higher degree of professionalism and are better prepared, their situation will be far more dire should they lose power again. Halley VI is located beyond the likely ability of rescuers to reach it until this year’s particularly cold and harsh Antarctic winter subsides.
Let’s all send our hopes and prayers that the BAS team at Halley VI will be able to keep the power running and remain safe until conditions improve and they can be reached.
============================================================
– See more at: http://www.cfact.org/2014/08/07/british-antartctic-survey-trapped-without-power-during-record-cold-55-4-c/#sthash.FTzHfe1g.dpuf
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

What? Air drops via parachute are impossible? As Gene Kranz said (at least in the movie), “Work the problem.”
The “bio-reactors” worry me. I can’t imagine them working when frozen solid… aside from the danger of freezing to death things might being getting unpleasant in other ways.
I’ve found 1960s paraffin heaters to be an excellent back up source of heat.
You can boil a kettle on this one. Problem is, its buyer collects, but there are always loads for sale on Ebay.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Paraffin-65-S-stove-heater-by-Valor-/251585413778?pt=UK_Home_Garden_Hearing_Cooling_Air&hash=item3a93a8c292
(For the benefit of Americans, paraffin is 28sec kerosene)
Paraffin is an excellent fuel. It doesn’t deteriorate over time or wax up.
From Coach Springer on August 8, 2014 at 6:26 am:
Everything is air-droppable at least once.
–Maxim 11
Way back when I was researching nuclear arsenals, I remember being impressed by how accurate the ICBM’s must be, when trying to get to a hardened bunker even a few city blocks off is too much. Nowadays we know how accurate GPS can be.
So I know it must be possible to deliver a payload of emergency supplies if they really really wanted to. Perhaps even with an attached parachute.
Alan the Brit says:
August 8, 2014 at 4:39 am
“On a more salutary & poignant note, Shackleton kept his men going with all sorts of antics & morale boosting efforts. ”
_______________
That is precisely why I made my nonsensical post at 7:14pm, August 7.
I figure that being scientifically minded, there will be someone among the Halley crew keeping abreast of info here at WUWT and amidst all the well wishes and 2nd guesses, a little merriment directed their way couldn’t hurt.
Made it to Drudge this morning. And I sent it to Rush. Let’s hope this gains traction.
Frankly I think this is a cover story , if you have seen ‘The Thing ‘ , you will know what is really going .
And I for one welcome our new shape shifting murderous overlords .
The ice grows from the side of the Atlantic.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/antarctic.seaice.color.001.png
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/antarctic.seaice.color.001.png
The people of New England will be wearing the same shoes next winter, if they get an arctic blast and the power-grid overloads, due to the government shutting down the coal-powered power plants. People in Ivory Towers are bad planners.
I wish everyone good luck surviving the cold.
Last winter (2013-2014) the #spiritofmawson ship of fools successfully interrupted Antarctica Ice bases’ re-supply missions.
One does wonder whether that supply failure (e.g. maintenance parts for generators) might have contributed to the dangers British Antarctic Survey (BAS) are encountering? Direct or indirectly the ‘ship of fools’ Antarctic summer holiday frolic continue to impact science.
wow.
I guess snark is allowed if its the right snark
…says the snarknado. ☺
Send in the team of Air Gore and Branson. They have experience visiting the rapidly melting area.
My father is a retired Naval officer who spend a year at McMurdo base as a scientist in 1960-61. (Operation Deep Freeze 61).
He would keep me spellbound for hours telling us harrowing tales of survival, and how dangerous the cold was.
He flew in on a Constellation turbo-prop aircraft. They would always fly in pairs in case one crashed.
The other one crash landed.
He said that they kept the big diesel cats and generators running 24/7 during the winter because otherwise the fuel would freeze up and they couldn’t get them started again.
It does make one wonder how they managed to change the oil!
Lank likes it warm says:
August 7, 2014 at 4:59 pm
“Life can be cruel without fossil fuels.”
I just Googled that with quotes and it appeared nowhere but WUWT. You should copyright that and make t-shirts. I need an XL please.
As a ham radio hobbyist living at Lake Tahoe, I was privileged and lucky enough to have a chat one evening in 1980 on the 20-meter band with the ham station operator at Amundson-Scott South Pole Station. He sent me a QSL card (postcard verifying the two-way contact) which contained a startling fact about the station – it stood then at an elevation of 9,301 ft above sea level, on an ice sheet about 9,350 ft thick! Believe it.
About 20 feet of snow has accumulated since then, and they had to build a ramp down through the snow to reach the entrance to that dome the ham station was in. How could that have been happening for all these decades in the face of global warming? Anybody? Bueller?
ROM says:
August 8, 2014 at 2:14 am
An isolated situation with lots of almost reliable wind far beyond the reach of a grid such as an Antarctic base, is about the only situation where wind turbines can be useful and perhaps even economical if maintenance in hostile conditions doesn’t kill it.
Your link directly contradicts what you say!
From your link [my emphasis]:
This highlights the need for the correct wind conditions for optimal performance, because while the wind turbines have a reduced capacity at low winds they also ramp down power output in higher wind conditions, having an optimum working range between 16-25 m per second. These are conditions that have been eluding us for the last two months but we wait and hope for better conditions (and fuel savings) in the months to come.
Also, take a look at the Station Management System (SMS) control panel picture. The windmills are supplying 24kW and the generators 168kW!
Have they got to the stage of wondering if you start with the fat ones , because they have plenty of meat on them , or starting with the thin ones because they may get to thin to eat , yet ?
knr says:
August 8, 2014 at 1:29 pm
Have they got to the stage of wondering if you start with the fat ones , because they have plenty of meat on them , or starting with the thin ones because they may get to thin to eat , yet ?
_________________
What about old Nantucket tales of rendering blubber to fire the cook stoves…
Billy Liar says:
August 8, 2014 at 12:41 pm
“These are conditions that have been eluding us for the last two months but we wait and hope for better conditions (and fuel savings) in the months to come.”
_________________
Which brings up questions: why are they concerned with fuel savings? Did they not bring enough fuel to give themselves a margin of error to meet worst case scenarios? Did the Ingsoc hands on the tiller short them on fuel, touting the goodthink of renewable wind power?
jones says: “the hydraulic legs so the entire station can be lifted to accommodate ice growth?”
Yes, you lift all the legs at once and let snow blow under it.
Seriously, the movie shows the legs being lifted one at a time and a bulldozer pushing a pile of snow under it. When all legs have new snow under then the entire station can lift itself. Rinse and repeat. The time-lapse movie is quite interesting to watch this process.
why did they wait to report it?
was it more an issue of due to loss they couldn’t report it?
It was now reported in a nation wide newspaper in Sweden: http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/minus-55-da-gick-strommen/
Walter Allensworth says:
August 8, 2014 at 12:27 pm
………………….
Continuous oil change system.
kadaka (KD Knoebel) says:
August 8, 2014 at 4:29 am
Re wood fire under a propane tank.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There was a time long ago when we used to light a small wood fire under the engine oil pan and tarp over the engine to keep the heat to get an engine to start with no electric block heater … Or on some older vehicles, they didn’t have block heaters. Plus old farm tractors. Not a recommended process especially if you have an oil leak but we never had a problem…