Guest essay by Joseph D’Aleo, CCM
Last month was the hottest June since record keeping began in 1880, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said Monday. It marked the third month in a row that global temperature reached a record high. According to the NOAA data, April and May were also global record-breakers. The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for June 2014 was record high for the month at 16.22 degrees Celsius, or 0.72 degree Celsius above the 20th century average of 15.5 degrees Celsius,’ the NOAA said in its monthly climate report. “This surpasses the previous record, set in 2010, by 0.03 degrees Celsius.”.
Nine of the ten hottest Junes on record have all occurred during the 21st century, including each of the past five years, the U.S. agency said.
However as we have shown here, the warming is all in the questionable adjustments made to the data, with a major cooling of the past and allowance for UHI contamination in recent decades. The all time record highs and days over 90F tell us we have been in a cyclical pattern with 1930s as the warmest decade.
NOAA and NASA (which uses data gathered by NOAA climate center in Asheville) has been commissioned to participate in special climate assessments to support the idealogical and political agenda of the government. From Fiscal Year (FY) 1993 to FY 2013 total US expenditures on climate change amounted to more than $165 Billion. More than $35 Billion is identified as climate science. The White House reported that in FY 2013 the US spent $22.5 Billion on climate change. About $2 Billion went to US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). The principal function of the USGCRP is to provide to Congress a National Climate Assessment (NCA). The latest report uses global climate models, which are not validated, therefor speculative, to speculate about regional influences from global warming.
The National Climate Data Center and NASA climate group also control the data that is used to verify these models which is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house. At the very least, their decisions and adjustments may be because they really believe in their models and work to find the warming they show – a form of confirmation bias.
Please note: This is not an indictment of all of NOAA where NWS forecasters do a yeoman’s job providing forecasts and warnings for public safety.
NCEP gathers real time data that is used to run the models. When we take the initial analyses that go into the models and compute monthly anomalies, we get very small departures from normal for the 1981 to 2010 base period on a monthly or year to date basis.
The satellite data from RSS and UAH only available since 1979 also shows no warming for over a decade (two in the RSS data). It needs no adjustments that NOAA claims are required for station and ocean data.
This government manipulation of data may be simply a follow up to the successful manipulation of other government data that has largely escaped heavy public scrutiny.
Over the last 12 months, the CPI has increased 2.1%. Real inflation, using the reporting methodologies in place before 1980, hit an annual rate of 9.6 percent in February, according to the Shadow Government Statistics newsletter. The BLS U6 measure, the total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force is 12.1%.
CPI is used to adjust social security benefits and military pay and to a large degree as one factor in industry wages. if you are feeling you are falling behind, it is because the real costs of goods and services have risen more than any income or benefits you receive. That is why the GDP actually fell early this year – between the high cost of energy and food, the discretionary income for spending retail and in restaurants fell.
Unemployment fell to 6.1% according to the government but the real unemployment is much higher. Inflation, using the reporting methodologies in place before 1980, hit an annual rate of 9.6 percent in February, according to the Shadow Government Statistics newsletter. Using the employment-population ratio, the percentage of working age Americans that actually have a job has been below 59 percent for more than four years in a row. That means that more than 41 percent of all working age Americans do not have a job.
The sad news is if NOAA keeps providing the government with tainted data to justify its EPA assault on our country’s only reliable energy sources, inflation will skyrocket and unemployment will follow.
![201406[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/2014061.gif?resize=640%2C494)
![screenhunter_1225-jul-22-08-14[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/screenhunter_1225-jul-22-08-141.gif?resize=640%2C544)
![ncep_cfsr_t2m_anom_062014[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ncep_cfsr_t2m_anom_0620141.png?resize=640%2C512&quality=75)
![Screen_shot_2014-07-21_at_11.38.43_PM[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/screen_shot_2014-07-21_at_11-38-43_pm1.png?resize=576%2C437&quality=75)
![ncep_cfsr_t2m_anom_ytd_%281%29[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ncep_cfsr_t2m_anom_ytd_281291.png?resize=640%2C512&quality=75)
![cfsr_t2m_2005[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/cfsr_t2m_20051.png?resize=640%2C480&quality=75)
![Screen_shot_2014-07-16_at_10.47.07_AM[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/screen_shot_2014-07-16_at_10-47-07_am1.png?resize=618%2C463&quality=75)
dbstealey says:
July 30, 2014 at 3:31 pm
How is this?
…
Global warming stopped 10,000 years ago.
..
That better?
dbstealey says:
July 30, 2014 at 3:31 pm
Opps.
..
I forgot,
…
Global warming stopped 125,000 years ago, it stopped 225,000 years ago, it stopped 325,000 years ago, and 400,000 years ago.
..
It stopped even more often the further back you go.
Do you still think I’m an “alarmist?
chuck says:
Do you still think I’m an “alarmist?
Yep.
Global warming has started and stopped lots of times. But of course, we have been discussing the past twenty years. <–[another alarmist trait: move the goal posts].
There were endless predictions by the alarmist clique that global warming would continue, and accelerate — until that didn't happen.
Now, the alarmist crowd is trying to mis-label the halt to warming as a "pause". Wrong term. It cannot be a pause unless / until warming resumes. Which may happen. Or not. Or, cooling may commence. No one knows.
What we do know is that "pause" is the wrong word. For the past 17+ years, global warming has stopped. But alarmists still call it a pause.
chuck says:
July 30, 2014 at 8:49 am
[snip]
..
The Standard Error measurement of a population mean can be made more accurate by increasing the number of observations.
———————————————————————-
That is only true when the population distribution is the same. This would be similar to increasing the number of temperature stations from areas with the same climate profile. It does nothing to improve accuracy. In fact it would increase bias.
Steve from Rockwood says:
July 30, 2014 at 5:11 pm
“That is only true when the population distribution is the same”
..
No, the rule applies irrespective of the the distribution of the population.
dbstealey says:
July 30, 2014 at 4:59 pm
” But of course, we have been discussing the past twenty years.”
…
The jury is still out with regard to the past 20 years. In fact Monckton just published an article that says it is 13 years and 4 months . So, you’ve got another 6 years to deal with.
Chuck,
“The jury is still out with regard to the past…”
===================================
‘But how can you stop people remembering things?’ cried Winston again momentarily forgetting the dial. ‘It is involuntary. It is outside oneself. How can you control memory? You have not controlled mine!’
O’Brien’s manner grew stern again. He laid his hand on the dial.
‘On the contrary,’ he said, ‘you have not controlled it. That is what has brought you here. You are here because you have failed in humility, in self-discipline. You would not make the act of submission which is the price of sanity. You preferred to be a lunatic, a minority of one. Only the disciplined mind can see reality, Winston. You believe that reality is something objective, external, existing in its own right. You also believe that the nature of reality is self-evident. When you delude yourself into thinking that you see something, you assume that everyone else sees the same thing as you. But I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party. That is the fact that you have got to relearn, Winston. It needs an act of self-destruction, an effort of the will. You must humble yourself before you can become sane.’
He paused for a few moments, as though to allow what he had been saying to sink in.
‘Do you remember,’ he went on, ‘ writing in your diary, “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four”?’
‘Yes,’ said Winston.
O’Brien held up his left hand, its back towards Winston, with the thumb hidden and the four fingers extended.
‘How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?
‘Four.’
‘And if the party says that it is not four, but five point seven three four — then how many?’
http://msxnet.org/orwell/1984 [with some precise adjustment]
===================================.
MODERATOR
Please send an email to “c_u_late_r@yahoo.com” and “chuck” will reply
[Reply: no need, your new email address has been verified as legit. Thank you for changing it. ~mod.]
MODERATOR
..
But the “c_u_late_r@yahoo.com” address is also valid.
Are you censoring the discussion?
[Reply: your former email address came back as “Bad”. The verification site is here. Deal with them, we just go by our site Policy. That ends the discussion. ~mod.]
[Snip. More sockpuppetry. ~ mod.]
dbstealey & richardscourtney
I’m still here, if you wish to continue discussing the physics of your “lagging thermal expansion” theory
Sorry, chuck, you’re a broken record. You don’t debate in good faith. Run along now, and argue with the Australian government’s scientists. Maybe you can convince them, because you are certainly not convincing anyone here that thermal expansion is instantaneous.
chuck says:
July 30, 2014 at 4:02 pm
You have a couple of choices as to when global warming stopped during the current interglacial, which even at its height during the Holocene Climatic Optimum wasn’t as warm as the previous interglacial, the Eemian (130 to 114 Ka), or MIS 11 (424 to 374 Ka). The HCO ended about 5000 years ago, but the Minoan Warm Period, c. 3000 years ago, may have been as hot, though for nowhere near as long.
So for at least the past 3000 years, Earth has been in a cooling trend, with ups & downs, but mainly down. The Roman Warm Period, c. 2000 years ago, was cooler than the Minoan WP; the Medieval WP, c. 1000 years ago, was cooler than the Roman WP & so far the Modern WP has been cooler than the Medieval.
“chuck” says:
August 1, 2014 at 3:53 pm
It’s not a theory. It’s a fact.