Three Global Warming Skeptics Win Awards

Recipients to be recognized at the 9th International Conference on Climate Change

for Speaking Truth to Power, Whistleblowing, and the Defense of Science

A total of nine awards will be handed out during plenary sessions at the conference, the largest gathering of scientists and policy experts who are skeptical of man-caused global warming.

Three distinguished global warming skeptics – Patrick Moore, Alan Carlin, and Willie Soon – will receive special recognition at the 9th International Conference on Climate Change July 7–9 at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas (ICCC9).

The conference is organized by The Heartland Institute and co-sponsored by 31 additional think tanks and other organizations. You can see the list of ICCC9 co-sponsors here. An updated list of award recipients can be found here.

“We’ve hosted eight successful conferences on climate change, and it’s long past time to publicly recognize some of the most important figures in the ongoing fight against climate alarmism,” said Joseph Bast, president of The Heartland Institute. “These are individuals who have put their careers at risk to speak their minds and report what the data actually show, not what computer models and politicians order them to show.”

“Such courage is worthy of praise,” Bast said.


The award winners:

Speaks Truth to Power Award: Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace

Presented by the EarthFree Institute

Patrick Moore, Ph.D. is an internationally renowned ecologist and environmentalist. Beginning his career as an activist/leader in the Greenpeace movement, he now concentrates on collaborative efforts aimed at finding environmental solutions. He speaks and lectures frequently at universities, community meetings, and conferences.

Through books such as Green Spirit – Trees Are the Answer and Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout, Dr. Moore is known around the world as an eloquent voice for sensible environmentalism.

Climate Science Whistleblower Award: Alan Carlin, EPA economist (retired)

Presented by the Don’t Tread on My Business Foundation

Alan Carlin, Ph.D., now retired, was a career environmental economist at EPA when the Competitive Enterprise Institute broke the story of his negative report on the agency’s proposal to regulate greenhouse gases in June 2009. Dr. Carlin’s supervisor had ordered him to keep quiet about the report and stop working on the global warming issue.

EPA’s attempt to silence Dr. Carlin became a highly publicized embarrassment to the agency, especially given Administrator Lisa Jackson’s and President Obama’s announced commitment to transparency and scientific integrity. Since 2009, Dr. Carlin has been an active and influential writer and speaker on the climate change issue.

In response to the award, Dr. Carlin expressed his great appreciation and said how important it is to oppose EPA’s new proposed power plant regulations resulting from the 2009 Endangerment Finding since they would have adverse economic and environmental effects and are based on invalid science and an attempt by EPA to rewrite the Clean Air Act itself.

Courage in Defense of Science Award: Willie Soon

Presented by the George C. Marshall Institute

Willie Soon, Ph.D., an astrophysicist and geoscientist, is a leading authority on the relationship between solar phenomena and global climate. His discoveries challenge computer modelers and advocates who consistently underestimate solar influences on cloud formation, ocean currents, and wind that cause climate to change.

Dr. Soon has faced and risen above unethical and often libelous attacks on his research and his character, becoming one of the world’s most respected and influential voices for climate realism.

“Science and its practice are no longer free and willing today but instead are constantly terrorized by research funding gravy trains and group thinking,” Soon said. “This is why science needs defending and it takes courage to cleanse science from those cancerous elements and to bring her forward in its rightful place again. I am humbled and honored by this recognition.”


Visit the Web site for the conference for more information about the 9th International Conference on Climate Change, including a list of speakers and a preliminary schedule.

 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steven Burnett
June 19, 2014 10:51 pm

Umm I hate to be the objective party pooper but honestly 3 skeptics winning awards at a skeptics conference isn’t exactly newsworthy. Just saying.

ullr1998
June 19, 2014 11:05 pm

Neither is the Nobel Peace Prize. Just sayin.

george e. smith
June 19, 2014 11:35 pm

“””””…..Steven Burnett says:
June 19, 2014 at 10:51 pm …..”””””
What idiocy; every year, the Optical society of America; a founding branch of the American Institute of Physics, presents at least a dozen prized awards, most named after major figures from the history of optics; and almost all of those awards go to members of the OSA, since oddly enough those people seem to be doing meritorious research, and other contributory services in the field of optics.
So far as I can determine, none of these medals and other awards has ever been presented to any member of the World Wrestling Federation; nor even to the World Wildlife Fund; neither of which discipline, has anything at all, to do with advanced optics research.
Funny thing that; recognizing people actually in the field for which the award is made.
So far, none of those medals for me; I watch too much of the World Wrestling Federation experiments.
I do have one medal, for doing what I do. I’m proud of that.

meltemian
June 20, 2014 3:17 am

All three are worthy recipients of the awards but there are many, many more equally deserving of recognition.

mikewaite
June 20, 2014 3:51 am

Dr Carlin’s criticisms of some EPA and US Govt policy , especially on the closure of coal fed power stations, seem to be justified by a 2012 paper that I stumbled upon whilst pottering around the literature :
• Regional warming from aerosol removal over the United States: Results from a transient 2010–2050 climate simulation
Mickley et al (Harvard and NASA Goddard)
Atmospheric Environment
Volume 46, January 2012, Pages 545–553,( DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.030)
► We perform two 2010–2050 climate simulations to examine the climate response to US aerosol removal. ► Removing US aerosols causes surface temperatures to increase by 0.4–0.6 K in the eastern US. ► Temperatures during summertime heat waves in the Northeast rise by as much as 1–2 K. ► The warming in the Northeast is amplified by feedbacks involving cloud cover and soil moisture. ► Reducing US aerosol sources to achieve air quality goals may lead to unintended regional warming
The authors are from Harvard and the NASA Goddard Institute , neither establishments being in the forefront of climate scepticism I believe.

Editor
June 20, 2014 6:05 am

ullr1998 says:
June 19, 2014 at 11:05 pm
> Neither is the Nobel Peace Prize. Just sayin.
Very good!

Coach Springer
June 20, 2014 7:05 am

The awards are a good strategic move to highlight both the substance of skeptics and the bias of alarmists and related profiteers.

Crispin in Waterloo but really in Ulaanbaatar
June 21, 2014 2:52 am

There has to be a sort of raspberry award for making/saying/doing something that is an example of how far beyond the pale exploiters of human misery are willing to go to promote climate alarmism. I note a possible candidate which is some guy on BBC TV yesterday talking about the unbearable condition of the multitudes, numbering in the millions, who are displaced by the fighting in Syria and Iraq. He included the words ‘climate refugees’ in his discussion of the unfolding horrors he anticipated.
As WUWT has often sought the ‘first climate refugees’ we know there are none (yet). If there ever was something lower than a snake’s belly in a wagon rut it is the BBC trying to exploit the pitiful position of war refugees to promote climate alarm about a non-existent problem. Their name should be changed to “BBC [spit]”.
The Speaking Truth award should go to the person who manages to get this sort of callous behavior off that public broadcaster’s agenda.

Tim
June 26, 2014 8:18 pm

An award ceremony whose only equal is The Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence.