Celebrate it at the 9th International Heartland Conference, Las Vegas
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
Don’t miss this spectacular conference in the City of American Culture 2014. The Ninth International Heartland Conference on Climate Change is the biggest and best of all the skeptical conferences. And it is being held at a vital moment.
It is now evident to every honest scientist that the official estimates of climate sensitivity on the basis of which governments are squandering trillions are exaggerations. Yet governments – particularly on the hard Left – are doubling down on robbing taxpayers and regulating out of existence their political opponents’ principal funders, the fossil-fuel corporations.
Climate-extremist governments are going for broke – or, rather, going for making you and me broke – because they, too, know perfectly well by now that our effect on the climate is insufficient to be actually or potentially dangerous. But, after all their bilious, whining rhetoric about the urgent need to Save The Planet, they cannot be seen to have been entirely wrong. The daylight must not be let in on the magic. Ignore the man behind the curtain. Pay no attention to any evidence from the real world.
The only escape from the humiliation that Leftist governments and their cronies in academe, the scientific community, and the news media will otherwise inevitably face is to bully and cajole non-Left governments into collective action to cut CO2 concentrations worldwide. Then, when global temperature fails to rise as they now know it will fail to rise, they will claim that their CO2 reductions Saved The Planet, when the Planet was not at risk in the first place. It is a simple but wicked strategy, which will never be described, still less challenged, in the Marxstream news media.
They may yet get away with it. In Paris next year (if they do not succeed in catching us by surprise this year), they will hope to persuade governments to sign up to a binding climate treaty in all material respects indistinguishable from that which was defeated at Copenhagen.
All the people who may yet stop them will be in Las Vegas. Will you be among them? If so, you will need to reserve your room at the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino at once. The closing date for the special rate of $80 (suites $100) a night plus taxes is Tuesday, June 10. More details at Heartland.com. Be there or be square.
If you want a flutter at the tables, Mandalay Bay is part of the group that has the largest floor space for pit games in town. If you’re not a mathematician, the one thing you need to know is what the game theorists colorfully but aptly call the “mean expected duration until ruin”. It is the number of unit stakes in your starting capital, divided by the house edge (known locally as the “vig”, after the Yiddish word vyiguryish, winnings).
At American roulette, for instance, the vig is 5.3%. If your capital is $1000 and your mean stake is $10, you have 100 staking units. Divide this by 5.3% and your mean expected duration until ruin is 1900 spins of the wheel (often known as “coups” in Monte Carlo or, bizarrely, as “hands” in Vegas.
Though the proof that the mean expected duration until ruin is simply the staking units in your capital divided by the vig is quite complicated, it is a well established result in probability theory. From that result, one can readily demonstrate that, in any casino game with a table staking limit, no system based on varying the stakes (e.g. by continuous doubling) leads to a positive expectation for the player where there is a house edge. The proof consists in treating all stakes at each staking level as a separate game with an expected duration until ruin based on the multiple of that particular stake represented by the starting capital, divided by the vig.
To win, therefore, one needs to turn the vig to one’s favour. One can do this by counting cards at blackjack, which, however, takes guts, skill, long practice, and a considerable theatrical ability to disguise the fact that one is card-counting. My own method, when I was young enough to get away with it, was to chat up the female dealers. That worked every time. I didn’t make a lot, because the casinos would have noticed, and I had to stop doing it when I joined Ten Downing Street.
The casinos have known blackjack can be beaten by a skilled player since the 1950s, when Edward Oakley Thorp, a math professor, published his famous book Beat The Dealer.
Casinos continue to offer blackjack because, although the vig in a game that allows early surrender, dealer peeking, resplit, and double after split can be as small as 0.4% – just about the best one can find at any casino game – the number of players who have the guts to follow the correct basic strategy, which often involves drawing cards or even doubling down when instinct would suggest standing, is very small. The house edge against unskilled or cowardly blackjack players is very large.
Another reason to go to Vegas is that it has gradually become the world’s capital of magic. David Copperfield is at the MGM Grand, and will become the world’s first magician billionaire this year or next. Penn and Teller also have a long-standing Vegas show. If the mood is right, I may even start my own speech – at lunchtime on the last day of the conference – with a simple but baffling illusion.
I have recently been developing various illusions never before attempted, and am putting the finishing touches to a remarkable way to make the moon disappear from the sky – or, as it is known in the trade, to “vanish” the moon. As far as I know, the largest object “vanished” so far is the Statue of Liberty.
The moon is a far more difficult proposition, and the set-up costs would be the most expensive for any illusion not developed for use in warfare [“All warfare is deception” – Sun Tzu]. But, for the privileged few who would pay a lot of money for the experience, it would be utterly unforgettable – and utterly impenetrable.
At one level, the very existence of Las Vegas – not just a gambling joint but the whole hog – is a paradigm of what we are up against in the climate debate – the exploitation by the well-organized few of the insufficiently educated many.
At Harrow, under the wise headmaster Dr James, we were all taught elementary probability theory just at the point where we might be tempted to show what lads we were by ruining ourselves putting bets on at the casinos or, worse, with the bookies, whose vig is a crippling 20% at major races.
My math master, Sir Alan Outram, an unassuming baronet, taught us all how to calculate the bookies’ overround. At one stage they were getting away with 80% at a local point-to-point racecourse.
In a casino, the vig is related to the fraction of the drop (i.e. total buy-in) that the house holds. At American or double-zero roulette, for instance, the vig is 5.3%, but the fraction of the drop held by the house works out at around 25% because of staking and restaking by the players as they work their way along the curve of mean expectation until ruin.
My late beloved father’s housemaster discovered he was putting money on the bookies and shrewdly ordered him, for the rest of that term, to place bets with him instead, at the odds quoted by the bookies.
My father was horrified to discover how much he owed his housemaster at the end of the term. He never gambled systematically again. He was never taught the math, but he was taught a lesson.
Later in life, he was offered the post of head of security at a prominent casino in London. He turned an enormous salary down flat when the then owner of the club offered to pay him half his salary across the tables by way of “winnings” as a way of avoiding tax. A decade or so later, the club’s gambling licence was revoked for alleged irregularities.
In Nevada, if you win big the house is obliged to deduct a swingeing withholding tax. In the UK, if you work or save you are taxed, but if you gamble your winnings – however large – are completely tax-free.
See you in Vegas – and, unless you want to buy me a beer, leave your cash at home.
===============================================================
To register, go here
here’s some bright news to impart at the Conference!
6 June: BBC: Matt McGrath: Upset at UN climate talks as ministers go missing
Negotiators and campaigners have reacted angrily to the failure of many environment ministers to attend UN talks in Bonn.
They say governments gave an undertaking last year to come here and update plans to cut emissions.
But so far, around 50 ministers have turned up, with representatives from the UK, France and Brazil notably absent.
Over 130 turned up in Warsaw for the last major talks session…
But campaigners here say an undertaking was given at the COP in Doha in 2012 that ministers would meet here in Bonn and review their commitments to the Kyoto Protocol…
Mohammed Adow from Christian Aid: “It undermines their commitment to craft a global deal when they don’t show up, it sends a distressing signal.”…
Activists staged a small demonstration in the conference centre to highlight the lack of ministers in attendance.
According to Ambassador Jumeau, many of those who did come had no new commitments on emissions or climate finance to show in their presentations.
“I think what we saw on the screens and the lack of ministers goes together. They didn’t have anything to put up there or they were ashamed to do it.”
Other observers speculated that countries were keeping back announcements for the special conference being called by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon in New York in September.
Ministers from some of the most significant economies like Brazil, India and South Africa didn’t travel. Neither did those from the US, UK or France…
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27726510
it’s so bad in Bonn, BBC’s McGrath has to resort to reporting this!
7 Dec: BBC: Matt McGrath: Climate change helps seas disturb Japanese war dead
Rising sea levels have disturbed the skeletons of soldiers killed on the Marshall Islands during World War Two.
Speaking at UN climate talks in Bonn, the Island’s foreign minister said that high tides had exposed one grave with 26 dead.
The minister said the bones were most likely those of Japanese troops…
“These last spring tides in February to April this year have caused not just inundation and flooding of communities but have also undermined regular land, so that even the dead are affected,” said foreign minister Tony De Brum, speaking on the sidelines of the UN climate negotiations.
“There are coffins and dead people being washed away from graves, it’s that serious.”…
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27742957
it will all end with this stoush, so don’t budge folks. our promise was as phony as the CAGW “science”:
6 June: Reuters: Alister Doyle: China says aid a key to climate deal, not just CO2 cuts
Promised aid of $100 bln/yr said key to UN climate pact
China, EU disagree over legal conditions for money
BONN, Germany, June 6 (Reuters) – China led calls by emerging economies on Friday for the rich to raise financial aid to the poor as a precondition for a United Nations deal to combat global warming…
“When the financing is resolved, this will set a very good foundation to negotiate a good agreement,” China’s chief negotiator Xie Zhenhua told delegates from about 170 nations…
Xie said developed nations, which have promised to raise aid to $100 billion a year by 2020, should have legally binding obligations to provide finance and technology to emerging economies, along with legally binding cuts in emissions.
But European Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said it would be hard to treat promises for cash in the same legal way as cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases.
“More than one finance minister would say: ‘how are we going to do that?’” she told a news conference…
Developed nations agreed in 2009 to raise aid to developing nations to the $100 billion target by 2020 from an initial $10 billion a year from 2010-12.
But austerity cuts in many nations mean they have not set clear milestones for raising aid between 2012 and 2019, money meant to go to everything from expanding the use of solar power plants to flood defences along vulnerable coastlines.
Last month, a “Green Climate Fund” – a U.N. body based in South Korea due to channel billions of dollars to developing nations – said it was ready to start accepting cash after agreeing details of how it will work.
Donors will also meet in July, in a venue yet to be decided.
Peru’s Environment Minister Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, who will host a U.N. climate conference in late 2014, said he hoped for contributions for the Green Climate Fund of $10 billion this year.
Alix Masounie, of the French branch of international environmental network Climate Action Network, said: “The Green Climate Fund is finally open for business … but it remains an empty shell,” adding that developed nations should come up with $15 billion as a first payment.
Berlin said on Friday it would provide cash, but gave no details…
Rich nations say the private sector is most promising. “We should use public resources to mobilise far greater sums of private finance,” said Trigg Talley, the U.S. representative…
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/06/06/idUKL6N0ON2WS20140606
And they reckon the Green Climate Fund will save the planet? Robbing the rich/poor of developed countries to give to the rich/poor of underdeveloped countries. Gee, I give up.
“There’s no good reason to think that Obama for example, isn’t wholly convinced that he’s on the side of the angels.”
……………………….
That’s laughable, recall Bengazi, Obamacare, and Bergdahl as examples of Obama’s mendacity.
I wonder who’s going to lose the bet, they can control the population of the entire planet with their man-made global warming scam?
Living in Las Vegas myself, I won’t miss the opportunity to attend this event (and buy Lord Monckton a beer if he would permit).
Andrew, the web address to Heartland Institute is Heartland.org. In the sixth paragraph of Lord Monckton’s article it is incorrectly given as Heartland.com.
Argggggh. Sorry, I meant Anthony. I’ve been dialoging with my best friend Andrew and had his name stuck in my mind.
Most amusing for me is how Heartland invited your humble commenter and occasional WUWT guest poster here to be a panel speaker:
First off, my accoldes to Lord Monckton for his as usual ebullient and unmatchable oratory.
Next, bushbunny says:
June 6, 2014 at 9:06 pm
Thanks, bushbunny. Actually, it’s not illegal … but the casinos will assuredly blackball you from their casino and circulate your photograph to all the other casinos where you will be blackballed as well. There is no “right to gamble”.
w.
Max Hugoson As a refugee that moved down to Arizona a few years back and now live in Mesa, come down to visit out development is a 55 and old with at least thirty to forty homes for sale the you own you own lot and the double vary from 80,000 to about 150,000. The stick built run from 150,000 on up to a little over 300,000. Most the older manufactured homes are being replaced with stick build, we do have a golf course running thorough out the lots on the course have a 25,000 to 50,000 premium in the price, a couple years ago it was 10,000 to 15,000. If you get down here to Mesa look up Apache Wells you might find something to your like. As far as Las Vegas goes, I am tempted but I have all ready made my annual Las Vegas trip and it would be fun to meet you Lord Monckton and yes I would by you a beer although I am a bit of a beer snob. I won’t touch most of the large america brewery swill. As far as gambling goes It seem last time I was there my loses were about five dollars and I had no winnings, We did go to the Blue Man group for a show and it was great, Pen & teller also put on a good show.
It goes like this.
IF a single deck of cards is used in blackjack, then – as the cards are dealt out, they are visible, right?
So a “very skillful” player would be able to see all of the dealt-out cards previously played, know that those are NOT going to be able to be used again, and thus forecast what cards are left in the deck – but unseen.
So, that same “card-counting” player would then change his/her prediction of what cards are left unknown in the deck, what cards are on the table right now, and thus begin to be able to predict what cards “might” be more likely to be coming up in future deals from the deck, right?
Nothing illegal, unethical, immoral, or fattening so far – right? Just a good memory and fast eyes.
Now, a 52-card deck is – after all- easy to count – even if only by hand. So teh casino’s early on started using 2 decks, then 3 decks, tehn 3-4 decks and re-shuffling early on in the card-couting era. (Early 50’s ??? mid 60’s ??)
Early “cheaters” caught on to this multi-deck scheme and invented toe-operated computer keyboards and hand-in-pants computer counter links to keep track of more cards and more decks automatically by radio and very, very easrly wireless. THAT “extra-legal” behavior is what allowed/made/influenced the casino’s to force Las Vegas Nevada legislatures to write laws making card-counting illegal.
The card-counters were winning too much.
I’m not sure how you wanted your message above to be issued, but let us assume it was as-changed.
YES! They CAN control the planet through their scheme IF they ALSO control the media and the political “message” of their CAGW scheme/scam/propaganda.
And, unfortunately, “YES” they DO control the mass ABCNNBBCBS media.
(Now, I have to confess to our Aussie and Ozzie and Indian readers (China has “no” free media at all)
… If the United States mass-monopoly of ABC, CNN, NBC, CBS, TV networks can so easily be added to the BBC’s abbreviation, how do I add the Canadian, Aussie, and New Zealand state-run media networks? )
“regulating out of existence their political opponents’ principal funders, the fossil-fuel corporations”
Is that a claim that sceptics are funded by fossil-fuel interests?
I hope it stays in Vegas.
Rational Db8 says:
June 6, 2014 at 7:45 pm
@ur momisugly Ric Werme says: June 6, 2014 at 6:48 pm
The average high temperature in Las Vegas in early July is 102°F. If you can vanish (vanquish?) the sun for the duration of the conference I’d be most appreciative.
102 actually isn’t all that bad here because it’s so dry – but you can count on some added UHI on the strip – along with added humidity there too from all the different fountains, etc. I’d take 100 here over 90 back east or in the southeast pretty much any time.
The word is enthalpy. Temperature does not measure the heat content of the atmosphere due to the presence of water vapor caring latent heat. Heat content of air should be measured in kilojoules per kilogram. The heat content of Las Vegas dry air at 100F is around half that of Louisiana bayou saturated air at 75F.
CAGW hypothesis is based on heat being ‘trapped’ by ‘greenhouse gasses’ so the metric that should be used is kj/kg but that would immediately falsify the hypothesis, so instead they incorrectly use temperature as the metric and fiddle about with homogenization and TOB as a distraction.
“Then, when global temperature fails to rise as they now know it will fail to rise…”
No one honestly knows what will happen to temperatures going forward. They may rise, may continue to stand still, or may fall. The issue is whether man has a hand in any of this, and if so is this CO2 driven.
One thing that may alter the die, is ENSO. If there is a repeat of the 1998 super El NIno with an associated step change in temperature, then for many a year, one can expect climate scientist to argue that the temperature change is of a consequence of the increase in CO2, and not the result of a wholly natural event in which man played no part. If there is a step change of 0.15 to 0.2degC then model projections will not appear that far apart from observed temperature anomalies. We should be looking closely at ENSO and any resultant step changes in temperature so that there is no slight of hand with the pea under the cup.
I just posted this at Bishop Hill:
After years of pulling my hair out at the endless stream of fake science purporting to prove Global Warming TM, and hoping that the integrity of its practioners will result in the hyopthesis being categorically refuted, I now see where the problem lies.
The NERC (Natural Environment Research Council) and its overseas equivalents are corrupting science. They have such vast amounts of public treasure to throw around that its recipients have every interest in keeping the gravy train rolling and none in declaring Global Warming to be within millennia-old natural cycles. The Bishop’s quote above – “There is still plenty of great work ahead” – portrays this beautifully.
This Climategate link was posted yesterday at the top of Christopher Mockton’s WUWT article on the coming Heartland Conference: http://www.ecowho.com/foia.php?file=0014.txt&search=funding
This confidential email shows the great sophistication of milking the public purse under a veneer of scientific enquiry, and I suspect that the author was distressed when it was leaked, only to find that his email with its revealing inverted commas made nary a ripple after Climategate. I recommend reading it: the MO of this great heist is revealed.
A vist to the NERC website illustrates the process: they trumpet “£200m for new UK Polar Research Ship”. This vast sum will benefit a whole supply chain, from the lifejacket makers to the crew’s pension funds. What’s not to like? Well this: that same £200m put to good use, or left in the hands of the taxpayer, would be of greater benefit to the many. What are the chances of this latest Ship of Fools reporting record Antarctic ice, and the absence of Global Warming, and sailing her back to Pompey to be sold off?
8 years ago, at a Nottingham Uni seminar, I witnessed the head of a different Research Council say, “Don’t come to me for a lousy million”. He had, IIRC, £120m to give away and was finding it hard to find enough takers.
In summary, the idiots who gather our taxes and hand them out in mindboggling tranches to “good causes”, have created a culture as addictive as that of the narcotics industry. Only if senior politicians grasp this, and shut off the floodgates, will the ruinous Global Warming hoax collapse.
Complete with neo-cons.
Ewwww
Village idiot
You are right that, to make a claim of zero, it is possible to keep changing the start date. If we have a cold period, the start date can be pushed backwards and if we have some warm months, shortening the period would still allow the zero claim to continue.
But you are missing the big picture here. For a period approaching 2 decades, there hasn’t been any global warming as measured by these temp datasets. Its not about picking this month start point or that month. Its about the ridiculously obvious. The measured temps of these data sets have not increased as predicted. And if the temperatures haven’t risen, you can’t attribute any other effects to man made global warming. So to run around talking about increases in extreme weather (even if that were true, which it isn’t) as being a product of human induced climate change, is not just obviously wrong …. it’s ludicrous.
Thanks Ric Werme: “The average high temperature in Las Vegas in early July is 102°F.”
I seem to remember that, some 20 years ago, Paul Ehrlich suggested that humans had done pretty OK without air conditioning throughout history and therefore, as a superfluous producer of naughty gas, it was unnecessary.
I hope the organisers are true to their principles.
Paris hotel/casino is offering rooms for £23 a night… (Their breakfast buffet is something to behold – and you won’t need to eat for two days after it…!)
Just sayin’…
pokerguy says:
June 6, 2014 at 6:49 pm
Paranoia requires delusion. It isn’t paranoia if it’s true. And those bums have proven who they are and what they do for over a century. Millions of people are dead because of their power cravings. Millions more are living in tyranny so the masters can keep the masses down. It’s happening here, right now, and this climate paranoia (it is delusional) is just one more method being used to complete the power grab. Go along with their gambit if you think you will be a winner by taking part in it (a rude awakening awaits), or if you are gullible. I am being as nice and polite about this issue as I can be, because the nonsense threatens me and my family.
The only card game I have ever played for money is three card brag, which has the peculiarities that the cards are never shuffled, and if a player goes blind – ie doesn’t bother to view their hand – the other players have to put in twice what the blind player stakes.
Astonishingly, there is a never-ending supply of marks who are completely unaware of the implications of that, they bought me a huge amount of beer while I was at university..
pokerguy says:
June 6, 2014 at 6:49 pm
“There’s no good reason to think that Obama for example,
isn’t wholly convinced that he’s on the side of the angels.”
Watch the facial expressions and eye movements, and
say that Obama isn’t an utter shill for these extant frauds
about the climate system and the role of CO2.
“Get the American People”
“Force their Representatives”
“Under MY Plan of a Cap & Trade System”
“Electricity Prices would necessarily SKYROCKET”