From the American Chemical Society
WASHINGTON, May 7, 2014 — Yesterday’s release of the third National Climate Assessment (NCA) should serve as a claxon [SIC] call for policymakers and the general public to take action to address and mitigate the observable and documented adverse climate disruption impacts being observed in every region and key economic sector of the United States.
These impacts, which have been observed and measured, are wreaking havoc with our society. This is a not a theoretical assessment; this report cites changes we are all observing and with which we are living. The future climate trends outlined in the report are even more dire. We should all be deeply concerned.
Of the report’s five major findings, the fifth describes the disturbing probable outcome of climate disruption currently being observed:
“Climate change threatens human health and well-being in many ways, including through more extreme weather events and wildfire, decreased air quality, and diseases transmitted by insects, food and water.”
ACS has long held the position that climate change is real and serious and that our nation needs strong policies and actions to protect against further adverse impacts, and we need to address the impacts we are already observing.
For 14 years, ACS has held a climate change policy position, which has been strengthened and updated routinely as new scientific analyses became available. The current public policy statement can be found by clicking on this link.
To assist its members, policymakers and the general public understand the science behind our climate, the ACS created an online Climate Science Toolkit of scientific information and resources.
The American Chemical Society is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 161,000 members, ACS is the world’s largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
One of the many reasons I refused to join the ACS.
Chemistry has fallen prey to the festering sore of dysfunction once called climate science.
This grotesque parasite metastasizes like cancer, infects like a pandemic and produces institutionalized mendacity on a scale mankind has never seen.
It seems almost like a science fiction evil empire but it’s non-fiction.
And that’s alarming.
The cancer that is bureaucracy will lay waste to even the most noble institutions.
A modicum of power is present in claiming to be the “voice” of a group of competent people.
What always amuses me, is the tendency of those lusting after this illusion of power, to strip the members of any say.
These closed shop unions are relics, pre internet oddities.
Thanks, asybot (11:44pm yesterday)!
#(:))
******************
@ur momisugly Michael Hart (4am) “LSD” — LOL.
************************************
“…ACS statement is just more group-therapy … .” (Orson 5:25am). And, boy do those poor co-dependents need it, lol.
*******************************************
“aC + aO2 + b! ↔ c$ … where b! is beaucoup Alarm! This reaction is reversible,” (Crispin & etc…). Good one! AND…. it is a runaway, positive feedback, cycle… heh, heh, heh. Soon, very soon….. IT WILL GET TO MILLIONS OF DEGREES AND FRY THE CIRCUS!!!
Something looks funny about that last sentence…. not sure…… meh, just post it anyway… .
*******************************
GOOD — FOR — YOU, Ed Mehelich (6:27am) — and JM (6:52am) — and Wolfman (7:19am) and Gibby (7:24am) and Dr. Torch at 8:03am.
**************************************************
“…but I will come around for my daily beer, and I will bring my gun, if you get my drift.” (Jim Clarke at 7:47am) — Yes. I do. If I don’t fork over my income tax…. and then…. refuse to go to prison when they execute the warrant for my arrest …. .Socialism (here, Envirostalinism/Enviroprofiteering, a.k.a. coerced charity) is ultimately enforced out of the barrel of a gun. Always.
***************************************************
Why all the fuss about that “claxon” thing (including the SIC in the article itself)?
Both klaxon and claxon are correct (please by yourself a dictionary)…
OK, here’s my action proposal:
1. Ban all private jets.
2. Ban all homes in excess of 5,000 sq. feet.
3. Ban all ownership of more than one home.
4. Ban all vacation travel in excess of 500 miles.
As soon as Al Gore, the Clintons, the Obamas, the entire US Senate and House and all their staff and every Hollywood actor who has said we need to take action complies with these rules for five years, you can impose them on the rest of us.
>>Patrick B says:
….
As soon as Al Gore, the Clintons, the Obamas, the entire US Senate and House and all their staff and every Hollywood actor who has said we need to take action complies with these rules for five years, you can impose them on the rest of us.<<
Make it ten years as there were the ten plagues of Egypt.
Al Gore alone is good for far more than 10 of these…
“We need to end the ignorant consensus that atmospheric CO2 is the prime mover of weather and climate. The acceptance of that one-dimensional, narrow view of meteorology and climatology by governments, scientific societies, educational institutions and the media in general, constitutes scientific and journalistic malfeasance on a grand scale.
Our common experience with hurricanes, tornadoes thunderstorms, blizzards, floods, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions should lead to the common sense conclusion that weather and climate are controlled by natural laws on an enormous scale that dwarfs human activity. Those laws engender forces and motions in our atmosphere and oceans that are beyond human control. Weather and climate existed long before humans appeared on Earth, and will continue to exist in the same way long after we are gone.
Those forces and motions are driven by the following: First, the motions of the Earth relative to the Sun: the periodic changes in its elliptical orbit, its rotation about its polar axis, changes in the tilt of that axis, and the precession of that axis. Second, the variation in solar activity that influences the radiant energy reaching the Earth and modulates cosmic ray activity which controls cloudiness. Third, the distribution of land and water on the Earth’s surface; which controls its temperature distribution, moisture availability, monsoon effects, hurricanes, and other storm tracks. Fourth, the topography of the Earth’s surface which causes copious precipitation on the windward side of mountains and aridity on the leeward side. Fifth, the fluid motions within the Earth’s oceans that determine moisture availability and ocean surface temperatures (El Nino and La Nina cycles). Sixth, volcanic eruptions that throw large amounts of dust into the atmosphere, increasing the Earth’s albedo and periodically blocking portions of solar radiation from reaching the Earth’s surface.
Water in all of its forms is a main agent through which those forces operate. It provides vapor in the atmosphere, heat transport by evaporation and condensation, and the enormous, circulating mass of the ocean whose heat capacity dominates. And finally it provides the cloud, snow, and ice cover that control the radiative balance between the Sun, the Earth, and free space.
While the presence of 0.04 % of CO2 in our atmosphere is essential for life in the biosphere, the notion that such a minor constituent of the atmosphere can control the above forces and motions, is absurd. There is, in fact, not one iota of reliable evidence that it does.”
Sincerely,
Dr. Martin Hertzberg
http://www.explosionexpert.com
coauthor of “Slaying the Sky Dragon–“, Stairway press, 2011
Dear Cho Cacao,
Re: “Both klaxon and claxon are correct (please by yourself a dictionary)…” (you at 11:05am)
Ahem. I don’t think it was the spelling that they were concerned about.
What does this phrase mean to YOU?
“…should serve as a claxon {} call for policymakers … .”
Here’s a book for you to buy: http://img1.imagesbn.com/p/9780198610212_p0_v1_s114x166.JPG
Happy reading (and writing)!
#(:))
Janice
Dear Janice,
you will find in this very thread, among others:
“Jaakko Kateenkorva says:
May 8, 2014 at 3:49 am
P.S. “Claxon” is how Spanish or Romanian native speakers would spell it.
”
So I do think that was the main issue here.
Thank you for the link, too. I do agree that the expression used is clumsy at best.
Yours,
Cho
Well stated! Your concise comment should be printed as a handout, for all those who are picking up, the climate debate. GK
Jim Clarke says: May 8, 2014 at 7:47 am
I shun you, and will no longer speak to you, but I will come around for my daily beer, and I will bring my gun, if you get my drift.
No, the current way is to buddy up to some connected lawmakers and get them to pass a few laws and insert some funding for a few sips of any beer it will bring. Lots easier than having to go out and get it your self. Hint, you really need some computer print out to make it work.
Dear Cho,
If you thought ” the main issue” was: c versus k, you mistake the trivial for the significant.
“Clumsy at best”? It was NONSENSE, at best, lol.
I suspect your first language is not English. If so, I highly admire your having a high fluency in at least 2 languages. I am only fluent in one.
With admiration and a wry smile,
Janice
1. The ACS should stick to chemistry.
2. Climate alarmism is hurting the credibility of scientists and the perception of science in general.
3. When/If a real climate or weather emergency is identified, it will mostly be ignored as more alarmism. The same goes for any other alarm put out by scientists. (Why is that people in authority feel compelled to frighten the population with false claims of impending doom. Is there something about the lure of power that turns people into liars?)
4. Most people are much more concerned about more immediate things that impact their daily lives, like filling their gas tanks, putting food on the table, and obtaining health care. The cost of health care is skyrocketing, gas prices remain higher than they need to be, and food prices (which are not included in core inflation) continue to rise faster than inflation while wages stagnate, none of which seems to be a concern of the current government. My opinion is that climate alarmism is a manufactured distraction, as indicated by the fact that political affiliation largely determines whether one is an alarmist or skeptic.
5. The “solutions” that the climate alarmists have put forward so far will have devastating impacts on the economies of the developed world, and keep people in the third world in the same or worse poverty than they are now. They apparently regard the intentional starvation of millions as an acceptable trade-off for a feeling of enviro-righteousness, and of course a way to wealth redistribution, the current holy grail of liberalism (as opposed to improving the economy so people can find work)
Janice, nice to see you back I am sure teenagers would find something to do, but our daylight hours won’t change, unless you still live in and around the Arctic circle. If anyone still lives there.
Klaxon is a trade name. It was the name of the company that invented the klaxon horn. See the etymology provided above. Claxon is an incorrect spelling, notwithstanding what your dictionary says…
As an ex research fellow in Chemistry, I believe this ACS politicking is a disgusting disgrace to science and to honest chemistry professionals.
Pure political activism masquerading as science. How bureaucratic of them.
I am a current member of the American Chemical Society (ACS). If you read the weekly professional journal for the ACS, “Chemical and Engineering News” (or C&EN) as I do, you would note that many ACS members have pushed back, through letters to the editor, against the Catastrophic Climate Change (CCG) policy pronouncements of its editorial board. But with no apparent effect.
My working hypothesis as to why there has been no effect is this: Many, but not all, of the ACS members are dependent on government grants from a variety of National Institutes. Given the current atmosphere (no pun intended, but it still…) in Washington, it would not be helpful to its members if their professional organization held a contrary position to the granting agencies’ position on CCG.
So, sadly and predictably, in this issue where science and politics meet, to understand it- follow the money.
The question that enters my mind: do I want to keep sending them my membership dues?
I ask whether I should support ACS and its increasingly political and unscientific positions. Please reply to the following editorial @ur momisugly http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/i16/Climate-Change-Revisited.html
Can someone explain 2 things to me? First, why does the settled science keeps changing? Isn’t that a contradiction? Second, since snow is a thing of the past here, what’s that weird frozen white stuff that keeps falling outside? I have to shovel it off the drive whenever it falls. I’d swear the stuff is snow but I read back in the year 2000 that snow was a thing of the past and that the science was settled so it must be an unknown substance that is identical to snow in every way.. My daughter theorizes that it’s dandruff from the snow queen. We need to buy her some Head and Shoulders. We used to get snow twice a year. Now we get this dandruff fall about every three to four weeks during winter and early spring. I hope she never suffers from scalp itch!
LOL well next year you might not get any snow. I think these alarmists think they are speaking to simpletons.
One contra-factual statement after another. The result: a steaming pile.