From the University of Utah, an argument that makes you wonder “what started it 4000 years ago”? Looking at another similar study, Joltin Joe Romm called that study Bombshell: Study Ties Epic California Drought, ‘Frigid East’ To Manmade Climate Change
While they focus on the recent winter as being an example of this errant jet stream pattern and persistent ridges, they completely ignore an almost identical pattern in the winters of 1977/78 before global warming was even a funding twinkle in James Hansen’s eye.
In 1977, a nearly identical pattern set up with warmth in Alaska, drought in California, and cold in Florida. Arctic sea ice was near a peak at the time. (h/t Steve Goddard)
Warm US West, cold East: A 4,000-year pattern
Global warming may bring more curvy jet streams during winter
SALT LAKE CITY, April 16, 2014 – Last winter’s curvy jet stream pattern brought mild temperatures to western North America and harsh cold to the East. A University of Utah-led study shows that pattern became more pronounced 4,000 years ago, and suggests it may worsen as Earth’s climate warms.
“If this trend continues, it could contribute to more extreme winter weather events in North America, as experienced this year with warm conditions in California and Alaska and intrusion of cold Arctic air across the eastern USA,” says geochemist Gabe Bowen, senior author of the study.
The study was published online April 16 by the journal Nature Communications.
“A sinuous or curvy winter jet stream means unusual warmth in the West, drought conditions in part of the West, and abnormally cold winters in the East and Southeast,” adds Bowen, an associate professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah. “We saw a good example of extreme wintertime climate that largely fit that pattern this past winter,” although in the typical pattern California often is wetter.
It is not new for scientists to forecast that the current warming of Earth’s climate due to carbon dioxide, methane and other “greenhouse” gases already has led to increased weather extremes and will continue to do so.
The new study shows the jet stream pattern that brings North American wintertime weather extremes is millennia old – “a longstanding and persistent pattern of climate variability,” Bowen says. Yet it also suggests global warming may enhance the pattern so there will be more frequent or more severe winter weather extremes or both.
“This is one more reason why we may have more winter extremes in North America, as well as something of a model for what those extremes may look like,” Bowen says. Human-caused climate change is reducing equator-to-pole temperature differences; the atmosphere is warming more at the poles than at the equator. Based on what happened in past millennia, that could make a curvy jet stream even more frequent and-or intense than it is now, he says.
Bowen and his co-authors analyzed previously published data on oxygen isotope ratios in lake sediment cores and cave deposits from sites in the eastern and western United States and Canada. Those isotopes were deposited in ancient rainfall and incorporated into calcium carbonate. They reveal jet stream directions during the past 8,000 years, a geological time known as middle and late stages of the Holocene Epoch.
Next, the researchers did computer modeling or simulations of jet stream patterns – both curvy and more direct west to east – to show how changes in those patterns can explain changes in the isotope ratios left by rainfall in the old lake and cave deposits.
They found that the jet stream pattern – known technically as the Pacific North American teleconnection – shifted to a generally more “positive phase” – meaning a curvy jet stream – over a 500-year period starting about 4,000 years ago. In addition to this millennial-scale change in jet stream patterns, they also noted a cycle in which increases in the sun’s intensity every 200 years make the jet stream flatter.
Bowen conducted the study with Zhongfang Liu of Tianjin Normal University in China, Kei Yoshimura of the University of Tokyo, Nikolaus Buenning of the University of Southern California, Camille Risi of the French National Center for Scientific Research, Jeffrey Welker of the University of Alaska at Anchorage, and Fasong Yuan of Cleveland State University.
The study was funded by the National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and a joint program by the society and Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology: the Program for Risk Information on Climate Change.
![]() |
||||
Sinuous Jet Stream Brings Winter Weather Extremes
The Pacific North American teleconnection, or PNA, “is a pattern of climate variability” with positive and negative phases, Bowen says.
“In periods of positive PNA, the jet stream is very sinuous. As it comes in from Hawaii and the Pacific, it tends to rocket up past British Columbia to the Yukon and Alaska, and then it plunges down over the Canadian plains and into the eastern United States. The main effect in terms of weather is that we tend to have cold winter weather throughout most of the eastern U.S. You have a freight car of arctic air that pushes down there.”
Bowen says that when the jet stream is curvy, “the West tends to have mild, relatively warm winters, and Pacific storms tend to occur farther north. So in Northern California, the Pacific Northwest and parts of western interior, it tends to be relatively dry, but tends to be quite wet and unusually warm in northwest Canada and Alaska.”
This past winter, there were times of a strongly curving jet stream, and times when the Pacific North American teleconnection was in its negative phase, which means “the jet stream is flat, mostly west-to-east oriented,” and sometimes split, Bowen says. In years when the jet stream pattern is more flat than curvy, “we tend to have strong storms in Northern California and Oregon. That moisture makes it into the western interior. The eastern U.S. is not affected by arctic air, so it tends to have milder winter temperatures.”
The jet stream pattern – whether curvy or flat – has its greatest effects in winter and less impact on summer weather, Bowen says. The curvy pattern is enhanced by another climate phenomenon, the El Nino-Southern Oscillation, which sends a pool of warm water eastward to the eastern Pacific and affects climate worldwide.
Traces of Ancient Rains Reveal Which Way the Wind Blew
Over the millennia, oxygen in ancient rain water was incorporated into calcium carbonate deposited in cave and lake sediments. The ratio of rare, heavy oxygen-18 to the common isotope oxygen-16 in the calcium carbonate tells geochemists whether clouds that carried the rain were moving generally north or south during a given time.
Previous research determined the dates and oxygen isotope ratios for sediments in the new study, allowing Bowen and colleagues to use the ratios to tell if the jet stream was curvy or flat at various times during the past 8,000 years.
Bowen says air flowing over the Pacific picks up water from the ocean. As a curvy jet stream carries clouds north toward Alaska, the air cools and some of the water falls out as rain, with greater proportions of heavier oxygen-18 falling, thus raising the oxygen-18-to-16 ratio in rain and certain sediments in western North America. Then the jet stream curves south over the middle of the continent, and the water vapor, already depleted in oxygen-18, falls in the East as rain with lower oxygen-18-to-16 ratios.
When the jet stream is flat and moving east-to-west, oxygen-18 in rain is still elevated in the West and depleted in the East, but the difference is much less than when the jet stream is curvy.
By examining oxygen isotope ratios in lake and cave sediments in the West and East, Bowen and colleagues showed that a flatter jet stream pattern prevailed from about 8,000 to 4,000 years ago in North America, but then, over only 500 years, the pattern shifted so that curvy jet streams became more frequent or severe or both. The method can’t distinguish frequency from severity.
The new study is based mainly on isotope ratios at Buckeye Creek Cave, W. Va.; Lake Grinell, N.J.; Oregon Caves National Monument; and Lake Jellybean, Yukon.
Additional data supporting increasing curviness of the jet stream over recent millennia came from seven other sites: Crawford Lake, Ontario; Castor Lake, Wash.; Little Salt Spring, Fla.; Estancia Lake, N.M.; Crevice Lake, Mont.; and Dog and Felker lakes, British Columbia. Some sites provided oxygen isotope data; others showed changes in weather patterns based on tree ring growth or spring deposits.
Simulating the Jet Stream
As a test of what the cave and lake sediments revealed, Bowen’s team did computer simulations of climate using software that takes isotopes into account.
Simulations of climate and oxygen isotope changes in the Middle Holocene and today resemble, respectively, today’s flat and curvy jet stream patterns, supporting the switch toward increasing jet stream sinuosity 4,000 years ago.
Why did the trend start then?
“It was a when seasonality becomes weaker,” Bowen says. The Northern Hemisphere was closer to the sun during the summer 8,000 years ago than it was 4,000 years ago or is now due to a 20,000-year cycle in Earth’s orbit. He envisions a tipping point 4,000 years ago when weakening summer sunlight reduced the equator-to-pole temperature difference and, along with an intensifying El Nino climate pattern, pushed the jet stream toward greater curviness.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



William McClenney says:
April 16, 2014 at 9:55 am
Ever notice how no one even considers the possibility that the Holocene might be nearing its end?
=====
http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/histo3.png
Another banal study that adds the politically correct, obligatory references to future warming “may” make more for more severe weather intrusions into the US.
“…a longstanding and persistent pattern of climate variability,” Bowen says. Yet it also suggests global warming may enhance the pattern so there will be more frequent or more severe winter weather extremes or both.”
The simple use of “may enhance,” belies the truth that it “may” also reduce weather extremes (a less frequent curvy jetstream) if the Global warmists are to be believed. But then would that lead to the catastrophes they need to keep the public willing to fork over money for more of this “half-truth science”?”
Gabe Bowen is ready now to queue up the grant application submission for more anthropogenic climate change studies.
Have we re-defined the meaning of ‘jet stream’ at the expense of Rossby Waves?
Would not the phenom we see, in lieu of invoking ‘changes in the jet stream’ be termed rather: ‘an increase in the amplitude of Rossby Waves’, thereby resulting in more meridional (latitudinal) flow vs zonal (or longitude-inal) flow in the atmosphere?
Rossby waves – http://www.geogonline.org.uk/g3a_ki4.1.htm
Zonal vs Meridional – http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/159/
Instead of using proxies, why don’t they use something like the 20th Century Reanalysis product. This includes datasets of zonal and meriodonal winds over a 100+ year period. From this you can calculate the wind headings. I’ve done this and while there were some interesting results, nothing looked out of the ordinary.
William McClenney says:
April 16, 2014 at 9:55 am
Ever notice how no one even considers the possibility that the Holocene might be nearing its end?
Virtually every one of these “studies” rambles on and on about millennial or shorter patterns without one single word about the already half-precession cycle old Holocene. It’s like climate would just continue on and on like the present if it were not for us.
Fascinatingly, if they are right about CO2, would it not be the single most important atmospheric ingredient for fighting off glacial inception? Ever consider that?
If you compare the coldest weather patterns of these cycles with the distribution of ice during the LGM, the two appear rather remarkably similar. All it would require is a slight, extended persistence of the pattern over several years to trigger glacial and then ice sheet formation in northeastern Canada. Then, the question becomes, “what would a persistent cold air mass over eastern Canada have on weather patterns to the west?” I don’t think Las Vegas is in a Pluvial Lake basin, but Reno and Salt Lake city both are, and both lakes Lahontan and Bonneville was several hundred feet deep. The idea that CO2 might mitigate or prevent the onset of a glacial epoch was advanced at the end of the 19th or early 20th centuries. I don’t recall whether Arrhenius himself suggested it or not.
More support for the proposition that an active sun flattens the jet stream and a quiet sun makes it more circuitous which, as Stephen Wilde has been pointing out, should have a global warming and a global cooling effect respectively. I just find it hard to believe that they can get sufficient time resolution on lake sediments and stalagmite accretions to detect jet stream effects. Wouldn’t they have to identify individual sediment-years for comparison between the eastern and western U.S.? These are weather events, and as recent climate history shows, even if there is a tendency for these weather events to happen under certain conditions there will still be a lot of years where they are not happening. 1977 was a big “polar outbreak” year. This was a big year. But if the individual years are not detectable then the signal of temperature difference between east and west quickly becomes highly diluted.
We still had ice receding and forming the Great Lakes during the period referenced in the study. Ya think that having a large portion of the North American Continent covered with ice might have an impact on weather patterns? Talk about pulling a rabbit out of a hat. Where is my BS Button!
Unexpected Teleconnections in Noctilucent Clouds.
New data from NASA’s AIM spacecraft have revealed “teleconnections” in Earth’s atmosphere that stretch all the way from the North Pole to the South Pole and back again, linking weather and climate more closely than simple geography would suggest.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/16apr_teleconnections/
Noticed the term “teleconnection” in the article and ironically saw this article from NASA:
Unexpected Teleconnections in Noctilucent Clouds
“New data from NASA’s AIM spacecraft have revealed “teleconnections” in Earth’s atmosphere that stretch all the way from the North Pole to the South Pole and back again, linking weather and climate more closely than simple geography would suggest.
For example, says Cora Randall, AIM science team member and Chair of the Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at the University of Colorado, “we have found that the winter air temperature in Indianapolis, Indiana, is well correlated with the frequency of noctilucent clouds over Antarctica.”
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/16apr_teleconnections/
More evidence that no one has a clue as to what’s going on out there…
Warming causes cooling.
h/t: Mr. G. Orwell
Worth seeing what your current happens in the Arctic.
http://globalweatherlogistics.com/seaiceforecasting/gfs.850mb.vectors.atlantic.html
“In addition to this millennial-scale change in jet stream patterns, they also noted a cycle in which increases in the sun’s intensity every 200 years make the jet stream flatter.”
Wait – they are saying there is a solar influence ??? Heresy !
And there was “climate change” 4000 years ago without the help of manmade CO2 ???? Double heresy !
… but now it is all due to CO2 & AGW ???? …… seems like a there just might be a big logic flaw in here to me.
And Oh, BTW, my favorite “Joes” at Weatherbell forecasted this winter almost perfectly without any need to call on an mechanism related to CO2.
…. sounds like the science isn’t settled to me.
Let me see if I have this straight, and please let me knoe if I am understanding it improperly
“They found that the jet stream pattern – known technically as the Pacific North American teleconnection – shifted to a generally more “positive phase” – meaning a curvy jet stream – over a 500-year period starting about 4,000 years ago. In addition to this millennial-scale change in jet stream patterns, they also noted a cycle in which increases in the sun’s intensity every 200 years make the jet stream flatter.”
About 4000 years ago, the jet stream became Wavey but it must have been caused by ?Low Solar Activity? since the 200 year Cycles with increased activity make the jet stream flatter. So now the stream becomes wavey but it is warmng induced CO2 and not Low Solar Activity. Or was the prior wavey stream 4000 years ago induced by global warming?
The GCR/low-altitude-cloud connection was discovered by Svensmark, corroborated by Marsden & Lingenfelter and again by the CLOUD experiment at CERN.
The sensitivity of average global temperature (AGT) to low altitude clouds is calculated at http://lowaltitudeclouds.blogspot.com/ .
Application of the energy equation leads to the time-integral of sunspot numbers as a proxy for the above.
When combined with the surface temperature oscillation caused by the average of ocean oscillations, this calculates AGT since before 1900 with R^2>0.9 as demonstrated at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/
Bryan A says:
So now the stream becomes wavey but it is warmng induced CO2 and not Low Solar Activity. Or was the prior wavey stream 4000 years ago induced by global warming?
Changes in geomagnetic activity. Can you see the differences?
http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrsp-2010-1/fig17.png
I remember that winter well. We were on the cusp. It seemed like we got an ice storm every weekend. I have not seen one like it since (we get ice, but not just as many). Even this winter was a little better in that we got mostly snow (albeit not a lot each time).
I think they added too many zeros to their study. Maybe just wishful thinking as they were hoping for a few more zeros on their grant?
The gospel according to Gabe. I guess when he gave up Christianity he gave up his trumpet.
All bases covered with speculative drivel I see. Bollocks to this!
Not long ago they told us in no uncertain terms that global warming would lead to warmer winters not coldwarm winters.
I was lead to understand that this would lead to less extreme weather. Also consider the Great storms of the Little Ice Age in which climatologists, such as Lamb, blamed the enhanced temperature gradient.
In my job, if I “suggested” that my data “may” represent the target area or “may not” I would be out on my can.
Must be nice to get paid with my money even if your results don’t matter.
Anger.
I think Latitude said it best on another thread:
Latitude says:
April 12, 2014 at 3:07 pm
“It rain’d all night the day I left,
The weather it was dry,
The sun so hot I froze to death;
Susanna, don’t you cry.”
The Global Warming Musical
Stephen Foster (sadly) ended up where we’ll all be if we don’t stop this madness soon….
People who know their aft from their elbow refer to a jet stream that circles along lines of latitude as “zonal,” and the jet streams (caused by “blocks”) which curve north and south as “meridianal.”
If you insist upon talking a sort of baby-talk to ignorant civilians, you might as well invent vocabulary that children would appreciate, and children wouldn’t appreciate calling a meridianal jet-stream “curvy.” (Kids know when you are talking down to them.) “Loopy”, on the other hand, would get grins, for that sort of jet stream sure does cause loopy weather.
The most bizarre event I know of caused by a loopy jet stream occurred when things were thrown out-of-balance by the eruption of Tamboro in 1815. Dr. Tim Ball likely would know more, but apparently a large amount of the Arctic ice was flushed south into the North Atlantic, even coming ashore in Ireland. With the Atlantic so chilled, this may have contributed to the Year Without A Summer in Europe. However if Alarmists had been around back then, they would have insisted the world was warming, because there was less ice in the Arctic Ocean. (I got a fairly good discussion going on this topic with this post: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/08/1815-1816-and-1817-a-polar-puzzle/ )
A zonal jet stream creates a situation where it is relatively calm at the Pole. Ice may get a little thicker, but the water beneath is never exposed. Air temperatures in the calm get colder as well, but the air never charges south as arctic outbreaks to Chicago.
This past winter a loopy jet had strong winds over the arctic. The ice was shoved about and great cracks appeared. Ice got thicker where it was heaped up as pressure ridges, but was thinner where it had to freeze over several times because water was exposed by “leads” that could be miles across. The air was warmed by the exposure to sea-water, but the sea-water was likely chilled more than normal.
I heard a terrific example of the tabloid mentality today when reading the Facebook comments under a friend’s post from Chicago. The friend was cursing about the plunging temperatures and swirling snow that Chicago experienced yesterday, and a person stated it proved Global Warming was happening. This person noted the warmer temperatures at the Pole, and stated the “hidden heat in the ocean” was arising there, and “the cold air had to go someplace.” (IE: Chicago.) (I assume that when this fellow cooks and his kitchen warms up, he opens his fridge, because the “cold has to go someplace” and it might as well enter his refrigerator. Maybe he unplugs his fridge, when he cooks a lot.)
I get the sense the tabloid mentality talks through its hat a lot. On one hand they express the politically-correct concern about an ice-free Pole, but on the other hand they go jet-setting up there and land on an airstrip the Russian’s have constructed on the thin ice, to do a bit of cross-country-skiing in a landscape where the sun never sets:
http://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2014/04/13/%EF%BB%BFjets-landing-on-north-pole-ice/
The hypocrisy of Alarmists astounds me. Al Gore is not alone. They talk the talk but never walk the walk. The worst part is that, though they praise taxes, quite often they find a way around paying any. (I just paid mine, and am broke and bitter, in case you didn’t sense it already.)
Violent weather is SO Little Ice Age. We must act now!
I can’t recount the times I have been told that the Little Ice Age was just a northern hemisphere affair.
If this is so obvious then there has to be at least FIVE papers showing this. They would need to clearly show that such “increased weather extremes” are not driven mainly by natural climate variations. I keep asking Warmists for this evidence and they continue to fail to do so. Why????
I call BS on this claim until I am shown to be mistaken.
To put it another way
This is simply speculative drivel, driven by models and guess work. Einstein would be spinning in his grave.
[The mods will not tolerate any additional descriptive comments about Jimbo’s newly hippy curves. 8<) Mod]