Computer model predicts vastly different ecosystem in Antarctica's Ross Sea in the coming century

NSF Press Release 14-028

Rising temperatures and changing wind patterns sure to affect predator-prey relationships, researchers say

Adelie penguins crossing ice floesAdelie penguins cross ice floes near a lead–or opening–in the sea ice at Cape Royds.

Credit and Larger Version

The Ross Sea, a major, biologically productive Antarctic ecosystem, “clearly will be extensively modified by future climate change” in the coming decades as rising temperatures and changing wind patterns create longer periods of ice-free open water, affecting the life cycles of both predators and prey, according to a paper published by researchers funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).

To make their predictions, the researchers used information drawn from the Regional Ocean Modeling System, a computer model of sea-ice, ocean, atmosphere and ice-shelf interactions.

While conceding that “predicting future changes in ecosystems is challenging,” the researchers note in a paper published in Geophysical Research Letters, the changes predicted by the computer model have the potential to create “significant but unpredictable impacts on the ocean’s most pristine ecosystem.”

The wind and temperature changes, the authors note, will affect the ecological balance at the base of the Antarctic food web–including changes in distributions of algae, shrimp-like krill and Antarctic silverfish–which, in turn, may be expected to cause disruptions in the upper portions of the food web, including penguins, seals and whales, which depend on those species for food.

A team of four researchers from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) at the College of William and Mary and the Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Va., jointly authored the paper.

Walker O. Smith, Jr., a professor at VIMS and the lead author of the study, said: “The model suggests that the substantial changes in the physical setting of the Ross Sea will induce severe changes in the present food web, changes that are driven by global climate change. Without a doubt the Ross Sea 100 years from now will be a completely different system than we know today.”

The research was funded by the Polar Programs (awards: 0838948 and 0944254) and the Ocean Sciences divisions in NSF’s Geosciences Directorate.

The U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) coordinates all U.S. research on the Southernmost Continent and in the Southern Ocean as well as providing the necessary logistical support for that science. NSF manages the USAP.

The researchers note that over the last 50 years the distribution and extent of Antarctic sea ice, or ice that floats on the ocean surface, have drastically changed. Among these changes are a documented decrease of sea ice in the Bellingshausen-Amundsen sector, but an increase of sea ice in the Ross Sea sector of Antarctica.

Observations show, they write, that “the duration of ice-free days on the Ross Sea continental shelf has decreased by over two months over the past three decades,” which may have had effects on the current balance of biological productivity and the roles of various creatures and microscopic plants in the ocean ecosystem.

But, they also note, “future projections of regional air temperature change, however, suggest that substantial warming will occur in the next century in the Ross Sea sector” while wind speeds are predicted to increase in some areas while decreasing in others.

“These changes are expected to reverse the sea-ice trends in the future; however the projected changes in heat content on the continental shelf and ecosystems dynamics that will occur as a result of such changes remain far from certain.”

The model, however, indicates that summer sea ice in the Ross Sea could decrease by more than half, or 56 percent, by 2050 and by more than three-quarters, or 78 percent, by 2100. At the same time, the summer mixing of shallow and deep waters in the region as a result of other changes is expected to decrease.

While increased open water would benefit diatoms, the preferred food source of many plant-eating predators such as krill, some krill species, such as crystal krill, prefer a habitat with more ice, which they use as a refuge from predators.

In turn, minke whales, Adelie and Emperor penguins and crabeater seals that feed on crystal krill would have less food available if the crystal krill population were reduced.

With less sea-ice cover, however, more humpback whales could enter the Ross Sea in the summer, increasing krill predation. Adelies, which prey on silverfish at the ice edge, would have to travel further from their nests and, as a result, be potentially more vulnerable to leopard seal predation.

While it is difficult to know specifically what changes the Ross Sea ecosystem will see, the model predictions, if they are accurate, suggest that they are likely to be far-reaching.

“Regardless of the exact nature of the alterations,” the researchers write, “substantial portions of the food web that depend on ice in their life cycles will be negatively impacted, leading to severe ecological disruptions.”

-NSF-

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tim
March 13, 2014 1:15 am

IT SEEMS: ‘may’, ‘possibly’, ‘it’s predicted’, ‘could’ and ‘good probability’ has now morphed along the lines of ‘clearly’, ‘without a doubt’ and ‘will be’.
Those models must surely be getting more accurate.

Admad
March 13, 2014 2:10 am

cd
March 13, 2014 2:22 am

Rising temperatures and changing wind patterns sure to affect predator-prey relationships, researchers say
This is as far as I got, we’ve heard it all before. No wonder the public switch off. Why are we wasting tax payers money on this.

David L
March 13, 2014 3:13 am

As soon as I see the phrase “computer models predict” I move on to something else. For anyone who was brave enough to push on past this phrase, did you find anything useful?

tom0mason
March 13, 2014 3:25 am

Ah yes, the argument of flora and fauna will be overstressed because of human actions. Sorry but a few iceages and very warm periods have elapsed before we (humans) became so abundant. Oddly preditors and prey survived in some form or another. I contend that they will still survive, certainly judging by the very small impact we have on these particular animals.
For their predictions, the researchers used information drawn from the Regional Ocean Modeling System, a computer model of sea-ice, ocean, atmosphere and ice-shelf interactions, and as we know so far such models are very poor at predicting actual events and worse when extrapolations in to other area of research are entertained.
If I had the money I would wager these ‘researcher’ their yearly wage on being profoundly wrong in 20 years time!

David L
March 13, 2014 3:28 am

Jim Clarke on March 12, 2014 at 7:52 pm
Yes indeed! I’ve had this same conversation with folks. You can extend this fascination of the static from climate to anything dealing with the environment. I never understood why the same scientific body that so adamantly requires everyone to believe in the theory of revolution so much laments and trys so hard to guard against the extinction of any species. Isn’t that part of the whole deal?
Pandas, spotted owls, and piping plovers are on their way out, but rats, roaches, and coyotes are coming on strong.
For those that slept through evolution class: change happens, species adapt or die.
“Oh but humans caused the change and that’s wrong”, why is that wrong? Are some forms of change okay and others aren’t. Humans are part of the natural world too.

Owen in GA
March 13, 2014 4:40 am

According to reliable models, unicorn farts and rainbows will swoop in at the last minute to save the cute animals and allow the non-photogenic species to expire. (My Little Pony – Nintendo DS, ooh that’s an old model but I stand by it.)

Owen in GA
March 13, 2014 4:40 am

did I need a /SARC?

March 13, 2014 5:00 am

“If changes are unpredictable, how do they know changes will be severe and significant. I can’t believe a paper like this can get published.”
No no… read it again. They have the POTENTIAL to be significant. They have no idea if they will be or not.

C.M. Carmichael
March 13, 2014 5:57 am

I wonder if fashion models could beat climate models in short term accuracy? They would be hard pressed to do any worse and they are so cute, and at least as much fun as the actors and every bit as informed.

beng
March 13, 2014 7:36 am

Models all the way down.

PeterinMD
March 13, 2014 8:45 am

Liz March 12, 2014 at 5:22PM
Great link!!! Where is Greenpeace and all the other green fanatics? Oh yea, “Do as I say, not as I do, we’re furthering science, so it’s ok if we pollute”
For those who missed the link, check this out!
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/trash-threatens-fragile-antarctic-environment-16230923/?no-ist

Dipchip
March 13, 2014 8:54 am

How do you write this in a manner that will confuse 99% of the readers? “Observations show, they write, that “the duration of ice-free days on the Ross Sea continental shelf has decreased by over two months over the past three decades,”
Why not simply say “Observations show, The amount of Antarctic sea ice in the Ross Sea has been decreasing each melt season for the past three decades and is now ice free for an additional two months each year.”

Dipchip
March 13, 2014 8:59 am

OOps : See what I mean
Why not simply say “Observations show, The amount of Antarctic sea ice in the Ross Sea has been increasing each melt season for the past three decades and is now ice covered for an additional two months each year.”

Doug
March 13, 2014 9:15 am

To sum up: “We don’t know what’s going to happen, but it’s gonna be bad.”

Brian H
March 13, 2014 9:32 am

It’s easy to see which orifice emitted this study.

Jimbo
March 13, 2014 11:59 am

They say publish or perish. It just seems too easy for climate ‘scientists’ to input data into the Climastrology models, churn, simmer for 5 minutes and voila! they have the makings of a paper. This is an endless money making machine as far as I’m concerned.

PeterK
March 13, 2014 11:53 pm

My computer model predicts that all people living today will die in the next 50 to 100-years. This is the only computer model that I know of that is 100% accurate!

March 14, 2014 8:42 am

Do these people ever go outside to actually look at how nature contradicts just about everything they claim?