From the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , another “carbon as planet killer” scenario.
MIT researchers find that the end-Permian extinction happened in 60,000 years — much faster than earlier estimates
The largest mass extinction in the history of animal life occurred some 252 million years ago, wiping out more than 96 percent of marine species and 70 percent of life on land — including the largest insects known to have inhabited the Earth. Multiple theories have aimed to explain the cause of what’s now known as the end-Permian extinction, including an asteroid impact, massive volcanic eruptions, or a cataclysmic cascade of environmental events. But pinpointing the cause of the extinction requires better measurements of how long the extinction period lasted.
Now researchers at MIT have determined that the end-Permian extinction occurred over 60,000 years, give or take 48,000 years — practically instantaneous, from a geologic perspective. The new timescale is based on more precise dating techniques, and indicates that the most severe extinction in history may have happened more than 10 times faster than scientists had previously thought.
“We’ve got the extinction nailed in absolute time and duration,” says Sam Bowring, the Robert R. Shrock Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at MIT. “How do you kill 96 percent of everything that lived in the oceans in tens of thousands of years? It could be that an exceptional extinction requires an exceptional explanation.”
In addition to establishing the extinction’s duration, Bowring, graduate student Seth Burgess, and a colleague from the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology also found that, 10,000 years before the die-off, the oceans experienced a pulse of light carbon, which likely reflects a massive addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. This dramatic change may have led to widespread ocean acidification and increased sea temperatures by 10 degrees Celsius or more, killing the majority of sea life.
But what originally triggered the spike in carbon dioxide? The leading theory among geologists and paleontologists has to do with widespread, long-lasting volcanic eruptions from the Siberian Traps, a region of Russia whose steplike hills are a result of repeated eruptions of magma. To determine whether eruptions from the Siberian Traps triggered a massive increase in oceanic carbon dioxide, Burgess and Bowring are using similar dating techniques to establish a timescale for the Permian period’s volcanic eruptions that are estimated to have covered over five million cubic kilometers.
“It is clear that whatever triggered extinction must have acted very quickly,” says Burgess, the lead author of a paper that reports the results in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, “fast enough to destabilize the biosphere before the majority of plant and animal life had time to adapt in an effort to survive.”
Pinning dates on an extinction
In 2006, Bowring and his students made a trip to Meishan, China, a region whose rock formations bear evidence of the end-Permian extinction; geochronologists and paleontologists have flocked to the area to look for clues in its layers of sedimentary rock. In particular, scientists have focused on a section of rock that is thought to delineate the end of the Permian, and the beginning of the Triassic, based on evidence such as the number of fossils found in surrounding rock layers.
Bowring sampled rocks from this area, as well as from nearby alternating layers of volcanic ash beds and fossil-bearing rocks. After analyzing the rocks in the lab, his team reported in 2011 that the end-Permian likely lasted less than 200,000 years. However, this timeframe still wasn’t precise enough to draw any conclusions about what caused the extinction.
Now, the team has revised its estimates using more accurate dating techniques based on a better understanding of uncertainties in timescale measurements.
With this knowledge, Bowring and his colleagues reanalyzed rock samples collected from five volcanic ash beds at the Permian-Triassic boundary. The researchers pulverized rocks and separated out tiny zircon crystals containing a mix of uranium and lead. They then isolated uranium from lead, and measured the ratios of both isotopes to determine the age of each rock sample.
From their measurements, the researchers determined a much more precise “age model” for the end-Permian extinction, which now appears to have lasted about 60,000 years — with an uncertainty of 48,000 years — and was immediately preceded by a sharp increase in carbon dioxide in the oceans.
‘Spiraling toward the truth’
The new timeline adds weight to the theory that the extinction was triggered by massive volcanic eruptions from the Siberian Traps that released volatile chemicals, including carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere and oceans. With such a short extinction timeline, Bowring says it is possible that a single, catastrophic pulse of magmatic activity triggered an almost instantaneous collapse of all global ecosystems.
To confirm whether the Siberian Traps are indeed the extinction’s smoking gun, Burgess and Bowring plan to determine an equally precise timeline for the Siberian Traps eruptions, and will compare it to the new extinction timeline to see where the two events overlap. The researchers will investigate additional areas in China to see if the duration of the extinction can be even more precisely determined.
“We’ve refined our approach, and now we have higher accuracy and precision,” Bowring says. “You can think of it as slowly spiraling in toward the truth.”
“Not being a volcanologist I tried to find out what volcanoes emit?
The most abundant gas typically released into the atmosphere from volcanic systems is water vapor (H2O), followed by carbon dioxide (CO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). Volcanoes also release smaller amounts of others gases, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S), hydrogen (H2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen chloride (HCL), hydrogen fluoride (HF), and helium (He).
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/
The IPCC has informed of the following.
IPCC
Water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas, and carbon dioxide (CO2) is the second-most important one.
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-1-3.html
I hear there was life threatening global warming at the time too.”
I really have a problem with the claim that global warming 252 million years ago killed all life in a great zone on both sides of equator.
Well we know today that getting above 30 deg C is pretty difficult without getting clouds, Cu, Cu nimbus that effectively stops the sun from warming the surface and atmosphere further. Further warming could only possible if the source of the warming was on Earth?
Hoser says:
February 11, 2014 at 6:42 pm
The Antarctic’s Wilke’s Land under ice crater could be up to four times the size of the Chicxulub crater. Some years ago I spent some time in trying to follow the movements of the continental plates over the last 250 million years and it appears that the Antarctic Wilkes Land impact if it actually occurred, was almost opposite or antipodal some 250 million years ago, to the location of the Siberian traps.
Wiki has quite a write up on the Wilkes land crater and it’s possible association with the Siberian Traps volcanic province and the extinction event all of about the same era.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkes_Land_crater
Bill Illis says:
February 11, 2014 at 6:51 pm
daddylonglegs says:
February 11, 2014 at 12:38 pm
Bill Illis says:
February 11, 2014 at 12:33 pm
Its hard to describe just how big the Siberian Traps volcanoes were.
Do we have any idea what initiates such flood basalts?
———————————
Some of the newest continental plate reconstructions have 3 plates converging right at the main Siberian Traps region to form the new large plate of EurAsia. Europe/Eastern Russia, East Siberia and SouthEast Asia were separate plates which came together in one big collision right at the time of the eruptions and at the location of the Siberian Traps.
I imagine large sections of the crust got rapidly subducted deep into the mantle where they were melted completely and being of higher water concentrations and lighter material, these sections were then rapidly ejected back out.
Some of the larger flood basalts (including the slightly earlier Emeshian Traps of southeast Asia at 260 million years ago which is likely tied into this very same collision) may be the result of similar large-scale subduction events. It might take several million years for the mantle melting to fully come into effect after the collisions. The process either happens at a very, very large scale in a short time (flood basalt event) or it happens more slowly over time and there is just new volcano created island/subcontinents.
Thanks. So when plates converge or collide head on, either you get a flood basalt linked to subduction, or sometimes you get up-thrusted mountains as in the case of India and the Himalayas. What factor would determine which? Sorry for all the questions!
Put another way, how do you determine the NHTSA / NCAR “crash-test” rating of a tectonic plate?
daddylonglegs says:
February 12, 2014 at 5:49 am
There are important differences between collision of continental plates & a continental plate overriding an oceanic plate. Oceanic crust subduction produces volcanoes, as here in Chile & in the Pacific NW, or the whole Ring of Fire for that matter. Continental collisions crumble up hard rock mountains rather than igneous basalt, as in the case of the Himalayas you cite.
The margins of the colliding North American & Eurasian plates lie in NE Siberia, east of the Verkhoyansk Range. Meanwhile, the same two plates are pulling apart near Iceland.
The Miocene flood basalts of the Pacific NW are widely thought to have been caused by the North American plate´s passage over the Yellowstone hotspot.
It is far more likely that the sun caused it but they don’t dare examine that because there is no way they can tax us to ‘fix’ the sun.
Steve In Tulsa says:
February 12, 2014 at 7:40 am
Maybe not solar magnetic field flux, but change in earth’s might have contributed to the disaster, thanks to the cosmic ray effect on clouds:
http://ea.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/earth/Members/Isozaki/09Illawarra-GR.pdf
Not what the carbon dioxide crowd wants to read.
In the 1990s, Isozaki studied evidence of progressive anoxia in Panthalassa, starting in its depths & creeping toward the surface. In this century, he looked at a mantle superplume to explain both the Middle Permian and end Permian extinctions, with associated Large Igneous Provinces.
CO2 comes off as more of a bit player than the main driver in his scenario.
milodonharlani says:
February 11, 2014 at 4:37 pm
What might be a big but not well dated crater has been found under Wilkes Land ice, but evidence for ET impact, not so much.
Australian-Oregonian paleopedologist (paleosol expert) Dr. Gregory Retallack has IMO pretty conclusively shown that the Wilkes Land feature is not a mass extinction killer from outer space:
Well, what he says sounds a bit different:
“We investigated the possible role of impact by an extraterrestrial bolide through chemical and mineralogical characterization of boundary breccias, search for shocked quartz, and analysis for iridium in Permian-Triassic boundary sections at Graphite Peak and Mount Crean, Antarctica, and Wybung Head, Australia.”
According to his investigation
– the breccias “at all three locations are interpreted as redeposited soil rather than impact ejecta.”
– “shocked quartz”,…. “is an order of magnitude less abundant (0.2 vol%) and smaller (only as much as 176 micrometers m diameter) than shocked quartz at some Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary sites.”
– ” iridium “anomalies”” … ” are an order of magnitude less than iridium anomalies at some Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary sites. ”
he does not find convincing evidence for the impact theory and concludes: “The idea that impact caused the extinctions thus remains to be demonstrated convincingly. ”
This is not yet enough to prove the event did not happen but is evidence against it. When looking at an impact crater:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/05/small-asteroid-slams-into-mars-impact-captured-by-orbiter/
it is obvious that ejecta is not distributed uniform around it. We do not know exactly how an impact of this magnitude would have behaved.
If one looks at the positions, it is a long way from Wilkes Land to Graphite Peak, Mount Crean and Wyburg Head too, so it might be that he simply had bad luck.
Lars P. says:
February 12, 2014 at 10:46 am
On Pangaea, Australia & Antarctica were contiguous. In the K/T impact, which would have been much less energetic, ejecta went from Mexico to Europe, if not beyond.
His finding is almost as good as saying it did not happen. At least not in Wilkes Land.
Dear kcrucible,
In geological terms 108,000 years is close to instantaneous.
It is 0.043% of the time interval between the present day and the end of the Permian.
Bill Illis:
“Plate” convergence does not cause flood basalts. Subduction fractionates, dare I say, lighter components like serpentine and granite. Not basalt. Basalt is ocean floor stuff. The entire concept of “plates” is misguided. There is ocean floor, and there is the flotsam of continents. We construe the ocean spreading centers as “plate ” boundaries, but actually the ocean ridges are in constant motion. They are waves, fronts if you will.
http://geosciencebigpicture.com/2014/02/02/the-pacific-triangle-revisited-the-impact-the-wave/
Anyway, there is isotopic evidence that the Siberian province is anomalously silicic, having had to burrow through the craton to get up.
kcrucible: As GregK says: 108,000 years is close to instantaneous. To you and the average man on the street that amount of time is “meaningless”. However, to geologists (I am one) it has meaning. Geologists are always aware of the overall time frame of the age of the earth (4. 54 billion years). We deal with it constantly. The only way we can make it understood in terms the layman can understand it to resort to analogy’s like the 24 hour clock I referred to. And by the way: The Earth has been around for approximately 1/3 of the age of the Universe (13.8 billion years). And how would you describe an event that on that time scale that takes less than one second of a day to happen. I saw nothing in that report that even hinted at trying to paint a scary picture. It was a simple statement of a conclusion from the evidence.
All mass extinctions were initiated by changes in surface gravity as explained by the Gravity Theory of Mass Extinction.
Pangea’s center of mass was moving north crossing the equator. As explained by the GTME this moved the Earth’s core elements, which were previously offset from Earth-centricity, toward their current central position causing a pulse of increasing surface gravity on Pangea.
This caused a pulse of terrestrial/marine extinction and also lowered sea level sufficiently to disassociate methane from the sea bottom which further increased extinction.
See http://www.dinoextinct.com/page13.pdf
An example of the sort of marvelous creatures already evolving within four million years of the end Perman catastrophe:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0088640
While the marine reptiles, including turtles, were evolving at sea, on land the ancestors of mammals, birds, crocs, lizards, snakes, etc. were also developing. This greatest disaster of the past 540 million years made it possible for the Mesozic/Cenozoic fauna & flora, such as flowering plants, to emerge & flourtish.