From the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , another “carbon as planet killer” scenario.
MIT researchers find that the end-Permian extinction happened in 60,000 years — much faster than earlier estimates
The largest mass extinction in the history of animal life occurred some 252 million years ago, wiping out more than 96 percent of marine species and 70 percent of life on land — including the largest insects known to have inhabited the Earth. Multiple theories have aimed to explain the cause of what’s now known as the end-Permian extinction, including an asteroid impact, massive volcanic eruptions, or a cataclysmic cascade of environmental events. But pinpointing the cause of the extinction requires better measurements of how long the extinction period lasted.
Now researchers at MIT have determined that the end-Permian extinction occurred over 60,000 years, give or take 48,000 years — practically instantaneous, from a geologic perspective. The new timescale is based on more precise dating techniques, and indicates that the most severe extinction in history may have happened more than 10 times faster than scientists had previously thought.
“We’ve got the extinction nailed in absolute time and duration,” says Sam Bowring, the Robert R. Shrock Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at MIT. “How do you kill 96 percent of everything that lived in the oceans in tens of thousands of years? It could be that an exceptional extinction requires an exceptional explanation.”
In addition to establishing the extinction’s duration, Bowring, graduate student Seth Burgess, and a colleague from the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology also found that, 10,000 years before the die-off, the oceans experienced a pulse of light carbon, which likely reflects a massive addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. This dramatic change may have led to widespread ocean acidification and increased sea temperatures by 10 degrees Celsius or more, killing the majority of sea life.
But what originally triggered the spike in carbon dioxide? The leading theory among geologists and paleontologists has to do with widespread, long-lasting volcanic eruptions from the Siberian Traps, a region of Russia whose steplike hills are a result of repeated eruptions of magma. To determine whether eruptions from the Siberian Traps triggered a massive increase in oceanic carbon dioxide, Burgess and Bowring are using similar dating techniques to establish a timescale for the Permian period’s volcanic eruptions that are estimated to have covered over five million cubic kilometers.
“It is clear that whatever triggered extinction must have acted very quickly,” says Burgess, the lead author of a paper that reports the results in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, “fast enough to destabilize the biosphere before the majority of plant and animal life had time to adapt in an effort to survive.”
Pinning dates on an extinction
In 2006, Bowring and his students made a trip to Meishan, China, a region whose rock formations bear evidence of the end-Permian extinction; geochronologists and paleontologists have flocked to the area to look for clues in its layers of sedimentary rock. In particular, scientists have focused on a section of rock that is thought to delineate the end of the Permian, and the beginning of the Triassic, based on evidence such as the number of fossils found in surrounding rock layers.
Bowring sampled rocks from this area, as well as from nearby alternating layers of volcanic ash beds and fossil-bearing rocks. After analyzing the rocks in the lab, his team reported in 2011 that the end-Permian likely lasted less than 200,000 years. However, this timeframe still wasn’t precise enough to draw any conclusions about what caused the extinction.
Now, the team has revised its estimates using more accurate dating techniques based on a better understanding of uncertainties in timescale measurements.
With this knowledge, Bowring and his colleagues reanalyzed rock samples collected from five volcanic ash beds at the Permian-Triassic boundary. The researchers pulverized rocks and separated out tiny zircon crystals containing a mix of uranium and lead. They then isolated uranium from lead, and measured the ratios of both isotopes to determine the age of each rock sample.
From their measurements, the researchers determined a much more precise “age model” for the end-Permian extinction, which now appears to have lasted about 60,000 years — with an uncertainty of 48,000 years — and was immediately preceded by a sharp increase in carbon dioxide in the oceans.
‘Spiraling toward the truth’
The new timeline adds weight to the theory that the extinction was triggered by massive volcanic eruptions from the Siberian Traps that released volatile chemicals, including carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere and oceans. With such a short extinction timeline, Bowring says it is possible that a single, catastrophic pulse of magmatic activity triggered an almost instantaneous collapse of all global ecosystems.
To confirm whether the Siberian Traps are indeed the extinction’s smoking gun, Burgess and Bowring plan to determine an equally precise timeline for the Siberian Traps eruptions, and will compare it to the new extinction timeline to see where the two events overlap. The researchers will investigate additional areas in China to see if the duration of the extinction can be even more precisely determined.
“We’ve refined our approach, and now we have higher accuracy and precision,” Bowring says. “You can think of it as slowly spiraling in toward the truth.”
A gas of a sort, yes possibly. Volcanic eruptions, yes possibly. 60,000 years, yes possibly. Carbon dioxide exclusively, unlikely. Look forward to further research to determine more about that. And I would like to know how they can determine with such precision, on this time distance, that the gas was in the oceans “immediately preceding”.
Yeah, right. It was CO2 that “acidified” the oceans, not sulfur dioxide. /sarc
“…will compare it to the new extinction timeline to see where the two events overlap. ”
Correlation does not imply causation.
CO2 molecule threatens humankind: Women disproportionately affected!
Kcrucible @ur momisugly 5:26 am says:
From the standpoint of geological time scales, that’s a time of about 1.2 seconds. (assuming 4.5 bn years = 1 day). Is that close enough for instantaneous for you?
The key message being that CO2 is a “volatile” pollutant, they are trying to psych everyone in to a new meme.
A long time ago I was told in high school chemistry that Sulfuric acid is more than 100000 times more acid than CO2 dissolved in water. How do they know the volcanoes emitted only CO2, and not a smidgeon of Sulfur?
Just for comparison: Assuming and age of approxiimately 2. 2 million years for the first humans on Earth, human beings did not show up in the geologic record till about 45 seconds before midnight. We are truly “Johnny-come-lately’s” btw: the figures are not exact ,but are just for relative purposes.
Yup, John Boles, they are getting desperate – demonizing CO2 for past catastrophic climate changes. We can expect more and more of this nonsense as the pause continues.
How does anyone believe any of this. These pseudo scientists always say 95% of species were eliminated during every extinction. At least come up with a new number if want some credibility.
Negrum says:
This paper would be best appreciated by Spielberg and Lucas 🙂
Yes, I thought I was reading a Hollywood script as well.
GeeJam: Dinosaurs did not show up in great numbers until after the end-Permian extinction event. ie. in the early Triassic.
hmmm. A pulse of light carbon with a jump to “likely” reflects a “massive” addition of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. What if it was just carbon soot from all those burning forests? Sounds like a massive particulate aerosol load into the atmosphere which created freezing temperatures. To use their word, it “likely” has nothing to do with CO2 and everything to do with what we know happens when huge volcanic eruptions obscure the sun with soot and ash (and any CO2 from catastrophic hemispheric burnnig stuff pales in comparison to the atmospheric muck). If that same load drastically reduced equatorial solar shortwave infrared (IE what gets to the surface after slogging through that thick atmosphere) we would also have reduced energy recharge into the oceans.
Upticks in atmospheric or oceanic CO2, even big ones, won’t lead to rapid catastrophic die off in sea life or flora and fauna. No Sun and cold land and ocean temperatures will. Ask the manatees in Florida.
Hoser says:
February 11, 2014 at 5:56 am
A crater has long been searched for, but not found. Ocean floor is almost all less than 200 million years old (let alone 250 M), so odds of finding a crater if it existed are low.
Possibility exists that the Siberian Traps themselves were started by an impact however. This is unlikely, though, since a bolide crashing clear through continental crust to the mantle would on its own probably produce an abrupt mass extinction event.
Solomon Green says:
February 11, 2014 at 5:24 am
If volcanic eruptions can be strong enough to eliminate 96% of marine species and 70% of life on land, why do climate models place so little emphasis on them?
—
Because they haven’t figured out how to tax volcanoes yet.
There you have it, CO2 is NOW a volatile chemical!!!
AND…if they found light carbon it was from organic matter which is isotopically light. It likely did not come from CO2 being taken in by the oceans.
Took seconds to find a source that explains light carbon. And I “likely” am less qualified to know this about light carbon than the authors. Which says far more about the authors than it says about me.
http://ethomas.web.wesleyan.edu/ees123/carboniso.htm
Addition of CO₂
The addition (or removal) of CO₂ to a solution does not change the alkalinity. This is because the net reaction produces the same number of equivalents of positively contributing species (H+) as negative contributing species (HCO₃- and/or CO₃²-).
At neutral pH values:
CO₂ + H₂O → HCO₃− + H+
At high pH values:
CO₂ + H₂O → HCO₃ ²- + 2H+
So there you have it. Next time a Warming “chicken little” screams at you about “ocean acidification” and CO2, just point out that the ocean is alkaline and adding more CO2 to the ocean does not change the alkalinity at all… and wait for it…
The above from a recent Chiefo post. http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/02/09/co2-makes-the-ocean-more-alkaline/
Eric @ur momisugly 6:42 am says
There have been 5 major extinction events in the geologic record.
1) Odrovician-Silurian event (439 mya) 25% of all marine life and 60% of all marine genera
2) Late-Devonian event (364 mya) 22% of all marine families and 57% of all marine genera.
3) Permian-Triassic event (251 mya) The Biggie: 95% of all species including 57% of all marine families 84% of all marine genera and 70% of land species (plants, insects and vertebrates
4) end-Triassic even (199-214 mya) 22% of all marine families, 56% of marine genera, and an unknown percent of vertebrates
5) Cretaceouse-Tertiary [K-T] (65 mya) 46% of marine families, 47% marine genera and 19% of land vertebrates (yes that includes the dinosaurs)
So they are not claiming each event killed off 95% of species for each event.
mya – million years ago
ref: http://www.endangeredspeciesinternational.org/overview.html
I TOTALLY blame it on Gamma-ray bursts or a stray rogue planet coming too close. I saw it on the Weather Channel.(/sarc)
“volatile chemicals, including carbon dioxide” This alone shows the agenda behind the article.
There are other much more toxic and climate inducing molecules released by volcanic activity yet the one emphasised is CO2.
Oh, it is published in PNAS, say no more.
And mkelly, you are wrong. HCl also produces the same number of positively and negatively charged species. It is the production of H+ what reduces the pH.
Carbon Dioxide equals Plant Food
Zircon U-Pb geochronology has resulted in many conflicting analyses and interpretations. There are a number of reasons for errors not the least of which is inheritance which might be a problem when using zircons from ash beds (zircons are quite resiliant so actually may be older than the ash bed itself). Largely the results come down to an interpretation of the amount of scatter of individual measures and decisions made on inclusion or exclusion of data.
Bowring (co-author of this latest report) was in the centre of an argument regarding U-Pb zircon geochron for the P/T boundary sometime ago. Roland Mundil from Berkeley Geochronology Centre had argued that Bowring (who ended up with a younger date for the P/T boundary ) had conducted arbitrary data culling whereby he tossed out half of his measurements before averging the remainder. Bowring disagreed and the end result, of course, is uncertainty.
Just because this paper is more recent doesn’t make it more correct than previous work. It is an interpretation of data fraught with potential error.