Oh, darn, that’s not supposed to happen. Ove Hoegh-Guldberg will be outraged.
Marine scientists working on the coral reefs of Palau have made two unexpected discoveries that could provide insight into corals’ resistance and resilience to ocean acidification.
From the National Science Foundation via Eurekalert:
Press Release 14-010
Palau’s coral reefs surprisingly resistant to ocean acidification
![]()
Corals living in more acidic waters are healthy, but is the situation one-of-a-kind?
Corals living in more acidic bays around Palau’s Rock Islands are surprisingly healthy.
|
Marine scientists working on the coral reefs of Palau have made two unexpected discoveries that could provide insight into corals’ resistance and resilience to ocean acidification.
The team collected water samples at nine points along a transect that stretched from the open ocean, across a barrier reef, into a lagoon, and into the bays and inlets around the Rock Islands of Palau in the western Pacific Ocean.
With each location they found that the seawater became increasingly more acidic as they moved toward land.
“When we first plotted those data, we were shocked,” said chemical oceanographer Kathryn Shamberger of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). “We had no idea the level of acidification we would find. We’re looking at reefs today that have levels that we expect for the open ocean in that region by the end of the century.”
Shamberger conducted the fieldwork with other WHOI researchers, including biogeochemist Anne Cohen, as well as with scientists from the Palau International Coral Reef Center.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the research through its Ocean Acidification Program, part of the agency’s Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability Investment.
“This important study documents a coral reef system that’s apparently resistant to the effects of ocean acidification,” said David Garrison, program director in NSF’s Division of Ocean Sciences. “Understanding what factors account for this will be critical follow-on research.”
While ocean chemistry varies naturally at different locations, it is changing around the world due to increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
The ocean absorbs atmospheric carbon dioxide, which reacts with seawater, lowering the water’s overall pH and making it more acidic.
This process also removes carbonate ions needed by corals and other organisms to build their skeletons and shells.
Corals growing in low pH conditions, both in laboratory experiments that simulate future conditions and in other naturally low pH ocean environments show a range of negative effects.
These include juveniles of various species with difficulty constructing skeletons, fewer varieties of corals, less coral cover, more algae growth and more porous corals with greater signs of erosion from other organisms.
The new research results, published in a paper in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, explain the biological and geomorphological causes of the more acidic waters near Palau’s Rock Islands.
The paper also describes a surprising second finding–that the corals living in those more acidic waters were unexpectedly diverse and healthy.
The unusual finding, contrary to what has been observed in other naturally low pH coral reef ecosystems, has important implications for the conservation of corals in all parts of the world.
“When you move from a high pH reef to a low pH neighboring reef, there are big changes, and they are negative changes,” said Cohen, a co-author of the paper and principal investigaor of the project.
“However, in Palau wherever the water is most acidic, we see the opposite. There’s a coral community that is more diverse, hosts more species and has greater coral cover than in the non-acidic sites.
“Palau is the exception to other places scientists have studied.”
Through analysis of the water chemistry in Palau, the scientists found that the acidification is primarily caused by the shell-building done by organisms living in the water, called calcification, which removes carbonate ions from seawater.
A second reason is the organisms’ respiration, which adds carbon dioxide to the water when they breathe.
“These things are all happening at every reef,” said Cohen. “What’s critical is the residence time of the seawater.”
“In Palau’s Rock Islands, the water sits in the bays for a long time before being flushed out,” said Shamberger. “This is a big area that’s a maze with lots of channels and inlets for the water to wind around.
“Calcification and respiration are continually happening at these sites while the water sits there, allowing the water to become more and more acidic. It’s a little bit like being stuck in a room with a limited amount of oxygen–the longer you’re in there without opening a window, you’re using up oxygen and increasing carbon dioxide.”
Ordinarily, she added, without fresh air coming in, it would become harder and harder for living things to thrive, “yet in the case of the corals in Palau, we’re finding the opposite. Coral cover and diversity actually increase from the outer reefs into the Rock Islands.”
The next steps are to determine whether the corals are genetically adapted to low pH, or whether Palau provides a “perfect storm” of environmental conditions.
“If it’s the latter, it means that if you took those corals out of that specific environment and put them in another low pH environment that doesn’t have the same combination of conditions, they wouldn’t be able to survive,” said Cohen. “But if they’re genetically adapted to low pH, you could put them anywhere.”
“These reef communities have developed under these conditions for thousands of years,” said Shamberger. “These are conditions that are going to be occurring in a lot of the ocean by the end of the century.
“We don’t know if other coral reefs will be able to adapt to ocean acidification–the time scale might be too short.”
The scientists are careful to stress that their findings in Palau are different from every other low pH environment that has been studied.
“When we discover a reef like Palau where the coral communities are thriving under low pH, that’s an exception,” said Cohen.
“It doesn’t mean that coral reefs around the globe are going to be fine under ocean acidification conditions. It does mean that there are some coral communities out there–and we’ve found one–that appear to have figured it out. But that doesn’t mean that all coral reef ecosystems are going to figure it out.”
This research was also funded by the WHOI Ocean Life Institute and The Nature Conservancy.
-NSF-
Corals living in more acidic bays around Palau’s Rock Islands are surprisingly healthy.
Yeah but according to Ove Hugh, even if we find that the world’s coral reefs are resistant to acidification, we still have to worry about the ones that haven’t been found that may not be resistant. We also have to worry about the effect that their resistance has on other organisms. We also have to worry about why they are resistant, whether this will continue indefinitely, and whether this will make people complacent about climate change.
It’s the logic of the ever-expanding research grant.
Carbon dioxide loves to swim, but warm water will have none of this frolicking and is way too busy outgassing the excess it has to absorb any of the nasty gas from the atmosphere. One needs to understand that most of the CO2 in water does not form Carbonic acid or otherwise chemically change. It just enjoys the dip treading water as molecular CO2.
There is a strict lifeguard in the form of water temperature.
Corals have been around a looong time. They can make their carbonate in different ways. Some of the modern genera may have got soft in the middle, but they will toughen up.
This is peer reviewed science? Where are the numbers describing standard ocean pH and the variations they found? According to Wikipedia: Between 1751 and 1994 surface ocean pH is estimated to have decreased from approximately 8.25 to 8.14,[5] representing an increase of almost 30% in H+ ion concentration in the world’s oceans. That’s not higher levels of acidification, that’s slightly less alkaline.
The pH scale measures how acidic or basic a substance is. The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic. A pH greater than 7 is basic.
The pH scale is logarithmic and as a result, each whole pH value below 7 is ten times more acidic than the next higher value. For example, pH 4 is ten times more acidic than pH 5 and 100 times (10 times 10) more acidic than pH 6. The same holds true for pH values above 7, each of which is ten times more alkaline (another way to say basic) than the next lower whole value.
Pure water has a pH of 7. So sea water is more than 10 times more alkaline.
I found a chart at the Center for Ocean Solutions that predicts ocean pH may each 7.85 by 2100 – how can real scientists call that acidification?
Wow. So, the ecosystem isn’t actually a super delicate balance that can be devastated by the slightest parameter change? Amazing. Who’d have thunk it.
Of course not. We only assume things are true when in doubt that promote the Cause after all.
Time for the academics to get in touch with amateur coral propagators amongst the ranks of marine aquarists … they’d be in for one hell of a surprise, Acropora sp. grow just fine in pH as low as 7.6 and with quite rapid swings between night and day as well.
I’ve had an academic researcher from Ove Hugh-Goldberg’s mob being quite surprised at the result we achieve, even conceding that they are not able to replicate such positive growth.
I would say, the previous studies showing harm, should be re-examined for error (tomfoolery). Might save a ocean of time. GK
The news release didn’t contain any numbers but……
“Through analysis of the water chemistry in Palau, the scientists found the acidification is primarily caused by the shell building done by the organisms living in the water, called calcification, which removes carbonate ions from seawater. A second reason is the organisms’ respiration, which adds CO2 to the water when they breathe”.
Or so they say. Might be true.
You’ve killed the NSF web servers. Even the main nsf.gov page won’t load.
This is modern science?
No measurements required, no PH value given, oh joy.
It’s called metabolic power. Coral reefs have been around for 600 million years and evolved under much higher CO2 concentrations. What idiot would think that they could not withstands the effects of a slight increase of low concentration CO2? We are lucky that CO2 is not low enough to kill them off altogether. We live in a particularly Co2 deficient time. It should be much higher.
the scientists found that the acidification is primarily caused by
1. the shell-building done by organisms living in the water, called calcification, which removes carbonate ions from seawater.
2. the organisms’ respiration, which adds carbon dioxide to the water when they breathe.
In other words, if the ocean is getting more acidic (less basic) a possible reason is that life in the oceans in general and shell building life in particular is INCREASING.
Cancel the panic.
I would have like to see the pH levels along the transect. How low is low?
How much did pH vary by tidal cycle, by lunar month, by season.
It appears the Palau corals are more adaptable…. and more intelligent than the chemical oceanographer Kathryn Shamberger and the biogeochemist Anne Cohen.
The corals produce calcite in closed sections where pH is controlled by the organism. This developed long ago when seas were much more cid than now. There’s no problem.
Over the past 250 million years, the average ocean pH has been around 7.7 and all sea life thrived.
From 1750 to the present, ocean pH dropped from 8.2 to 8.1, which is still the most alkaline the oceans have ever been since multicellular life evolved.
If anything, an excellent case could be made that oceans are now too alkaline, but why anyone would wish to make such a silly claim is ludicrous.
Wouldn’t it be ironic if after the CAGW hypothesis is finally thrown on trash heap of failed ideas, the next doom and gloom hypothesis is that oceans are becoming too alkaline and humans need to emit more CO2 to save the dolphins? Screw the Polar Bears! They’re man eaters anyway! LOL!
Any ideas on what the next contrived anthropogenic crisis will be since CAGW is already toast?
My money is on Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Cooling… All these soon to be unemployable CAGW alarmists need a new crisis to propagandize.
The … press release(?) states:
The ocean absorbs atmospheric carbon dioxide, which reacts with seawater, lowering the water’s overall pH and making it more acidic.
========================================
Umm. Don’t the satellite data bases show the oceans are out-gassing? That means
CO2 is not being absorbed.
When I last did chemistry, (quite a long time ago…) CO2 entering water INITIALLY
forms Carbonic acid, H2CO3, which, in the presence of more water molecules,
immediately dissociates into bicarbonate ions, some of which, in the presence of
even more water molecules, further dissociates into carbonate ions. Both the
bicarbonateand carbonate ions are powerfully alkaline.
ie; CO2 + H2O -> HCO3- + H3O+ (which is weakly acidic) and
HCO3- + H2O -> CO3= + H3O+
giving an overall pH of 8.2 – 8.8. which is alkaline.
From my biology and zoology studies, animal lifeforms are predominately acidic
and thrive in non-alkaline environments. The alkalinity of the sea requires life
forms to take “steps” to not only survive but thrive, eg: the mucus/slime secretions
of eels.
Also, a paper recently reviewed here claims the oceans “… are at their most alkaline
in the last 200,000 years.”
If that is so, and the satellites detecting the oceans are out-gassing, then all this
‘ocean acidification” baloney is intellectual ‘self-pleasuring.’
I would like to get their data, especially their pH measurements…
Adding CO2 to sea water makes it more acidic.
In exactly the same way that giving $1 to a homeless bum makes him more wealthy.
So called ”acidified” sea water is STILL ALKALI. These claims fly in the face of the facts. Ocean water has a pH between 7.6 and 8.3 and ALL ocean surface water lies between these well known figures. Even areas where CO2 is bubbling up from rocks below the pH remains in the alkali area.
It is about time this rubbish was squashed.
just had a look at lovely pics of puerto rico coral
“Puerto Rico: For Class SB and SC waters, in no case the pH will lie outside the range of 7.3-8.5 standard
pH units, except when caused by natural phenomena. Class SA waters are coastal and estuarine waters of
high quality and/or exceptional ecological or recreational value”
higley7 says: @ur momisugly January 23, 2014 at 9:29 pm
“… What idiot would think that they could not withstands the effects of a slight increase of low concentration CO2? We are lucky that CO2 is not low enough to kill them off altogether. We live in a particularly Co2 deficient time. It should be much higher.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Now there is the heart of the matter. Carbon starvation in glacial trees recovered from the La Brea tar pits, southern California
What the heck are kids taught in school these days?
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
Seems Orwell was prophetic.
just looked at some lovely coral off the florida coast.
“Florida: For Class II and III (marine) waters, pH shall not vary more than one unit above or below
natural background of coastal waters, provided that the pH is not lowered to less than 6.5 units or raised
above 8.5 units. If natural background is less than 6.5 units in marine waters, the pH shall not vary below
natural background or vary more than one unit above natural background levels. If natural background is
higher than 8.5 units, the pH shall not vary above natural background or vary more than one unit below
natural background”
some lovely reefs at American Samoa.
“US EPA Region 9
American Samoa: “pH range is 6.5-8.6 (+/- 0.2 pH units of that which could naturally occur).”
hmmm, Guam coral reefs,
“Guam: “For open ocean waters where the depth is substantially greater than the euphotic zone, the pH
should not be changed more than 0.2 units from the naturally occurring variation, or in any case outside
the range of 6.5 to 8.5.”
“When we first plotted those data, we were shocked. We had no idea the level of acidification we would find.” – Chemical oceanographer Kathryn Shamberger of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI).
Seriously? I’m shocked the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has ‘chemical oceanographers’ who are so blatantly ignorant of ocean chemistry.
They need to quickly clear out this dead-wood and hire some real chemists.
““When we discover a reef like Palau where the coral communities are thriving under low pH, that’s an exception,” said Cohe”
uh no, not really.
• Today’s atmospheric co2 levels are around 400ppm.
• The early Ordovician had high co2 levels at around 7000 ppm and fell to just over 4000ppm. •
• An ice age began in the Ordovician.
• Corals began to evolve during the Ordovician.
Is it just possible that corals can survive in the oceans with the projected levels of business as usual co2 rise by the end of this century of no more than 950ppm? It is possible that the biosphere will continue greening?
Back to the future. We must act then! Time ‘had’ running out!
“Ordovician corals from Ida Bay, Queenstown and Zeehan, Tasmania”
University of Tasmania
http://eprints.utas.edu.au/13964/1/1955_Hill_Ordovician_corals_Ida_Bay.pdf
http://paleobiology.si.edu/geotime/main/htmlversion/ordovician2.html