Antarctica Has Sea Ice Rabbit Ears, a V for Victory or Maybe It's a Peace Sign?…

Antarctic sea ice
National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) – Click the pic to view at source

Image Credit: NSIDC

WUWT Regular “Just The Facts”

As you can see from the Southern Hemisphere Sea Ice Extent With Anomaly map above, there are currently two large fingers of anomalous Sea Ice protruding out in the Weddell Sea. This is the same Weddell Sea that in 2012 it was claimed that;

“Warm ocean currents are projected to melt the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea area of Antarctica opening instabilities in the West Antarctic Ice sheet (WAIS) which will impact global sea level rise. Climate change is waking up the sleeping giant of Antarctica.

Significant scientific research has been published in recent weeks on the impact of global warming on changing wind patterns and southern ocean currents and the flow-on impact on Antarctic ice shelves and glaciers. The most recent studies reveal the potential instability of the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea area. But the real questions to be asked concern the long term stability of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) and how rapidly it could collapse raising global sea levels by up to 6 metres.” Climate Citizen

So there are no apparent signs of the “warm ocean currents” that “are projected to melt the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea area of Antarctica opening instabilities in the West Antarctic Ice sheet”. If fact those fingers still look reasonably concentrated;

Cryosphere Today – University of Illinois – Polar Research Group – Click the pic to view at source

and Antarctic Sea Ice Extent – 15% or Greater has remained above two Standard Deviations of the 1981 – 2010 average for the entire melt season:

National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) – Click the pic to view at source

Additionally, Southern Hemisphere Sea Ice Area Anomaly has been above the 1979 – 2008 Average for the last two years:

Cryosphere Today – Arctic Climate Research at the University of Illinois – Click the pic to view at source

Southern Hemisphere Sea Ice Area Anomaly is in the midst of its third large spike since 2007;

Cryosphere Today – Arctic Climate Research at the University of Illinois – Click the pic to view at source

and there is a clear trend towards larger Southern Sea Ice Area Minimums:

Cryosphere Today – Arctic Climate Research at the University of Illinois – Click the pic to view at source

The result is Global Sea Ice Area had its highest maximum since 2006 and remained stubbornly average for the entirety of 2013:

Cryosphere Today – University of Illinois – Polar Research Group – Click the pic to view at source

However, in terms of the large fingers of Sea Ice protruding into the Weddell Sea;

Antarctic sea ice
National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) – Click the pic to view at source

I think they may be a sign from Antarctica telling us that we’ve beat global warming, or at least that the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea is safe from collapse for another year… What do you think?

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

120 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
richardscourtney
January 19, 2014 2:35 pm

Leo Geiger:
At January 19, 2014 at 2:15 pm you write saying in total

Maybe that was keeping it too simple…
Mass loss from ice shelves is primarily driven by basal melting from warm (relatively speaking) water, and to a lesser extent calving. That means basal melt rates (derived from changes in surface elevation) and calving rates would be better things to use to draw conclusions about the temperature of the deeper water (which is hard to measure directly) and the health of ice shelves.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/earth20130613.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6143/266
But apparently you believe simply looking at sea ice extent is all you need to do to declare “there are no apparent signs of the “warm ocean currents” “.
I don’t think that simple assertion has much factual support.

Oh, but you have provided cogent evidence for “that assertion” with your links.
The first says

Ocean waters melting the undersides of Antarctic ice shelves are responsible for most of the continent’s ice shelf mass loss, a new study by NASA and university researchers has found.

and the second says

We compare the volume flux divergence of Antarctic ice shelves in 2007 and 2008 with 1979 to 2010 surface accumulation and 2003 to 2008 thinning to determine their rates of melting and mass balance. Basal melt of 1325 ± 235 gigatons per year (Gt/year) exceeds a calving flux of 1089 ± 139 Gt/year, making ice-shelf melting the largest ablation process in Antarctica. The giant cold-cavity Ross, Filchner, and Ronne ice shelves covering two-thirds of the total ice-shelf area account for only 15% of net melting. Half of the meltwater comes from 10 small, warm-cavity Southeast Pacific ice shelves occupying 8% of the area. A similar high melt/area ratio is found for six East Antarctic ice shelves, implying undocumented strong ocean thermal forcing on their deep grounding lines.

The ice shelves are growing, and your links each says that warm ocean currents under the ice are the major cause of “ice shelf mass loss”.
Thanks for providing such clear evidence that your assertions are rubbish.
Richard

Jimbo
January 19, 2014 2:41 pm

Leo Geiger says:
January 19, 2014 at 1:47 pm

That’s not an additional “fact”…

Keep is simple then. Is the grounding line of Pine Island glacier retreating? No computer models needed to answer that. Is it retreating while Antarctic sea ice extent has grown?…..

Leo, you might be interested in the following. Furthermore check out 2,200 year ago volcanic explosion spreading ash, got buried and is today causing much slip and slide.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fngeo106
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/21/new-research-sheds-light-on-antarcticas-melting-pine-island-glacier/
It must be global warming, hot, bubbling magma just cannot melt a damned thing.
http://www.livescience.com/2242-buried-volcano-discovered-antarctica.html

Angech
January 19, 2014 2:44 pm

Leo. Ice mass in Antarctica has been increasing over the last 30 years based on record levels of sea ice extent ie above average over this time.

John F. Hultquist
January 19, 2014 2:44 pm

Do these “fingers of ice” break off and later melt or do they melt without breaking off? Would not a long ice sheet undergo stress (is that the correct word?) from tides and shoaling waves?

rogerknights
January 19, 2014 2:45 pm

Clay Marley says:
January 19, 2014 at 11:40 am
From the BBC article. My comments in brackets.
The scientists compiled data from records kept at Byrd station, established by the US in the mid-1950s and located towards the centre of the West Antarctic ice sheet (WAIS).
Previously scientists were unable to draw any conclusions from the Byrd data as the records were incomplete. [Probably meaning the existing data did not show a warming trend. We can fix that by…]
The new work used a computer model of the atmosphere and a numerical analysis method to fill in the missing observations. [And add the missing warming trend.]
The results indicate an increase of 2.4C in average annual temperature between 1958 and 2010.
“What we’re seeing is one of the strongest warming signals on Earth,” says Andrew Monaghan, a co-author and scientist at the US National Centre for Atmospheric Research. [Tada! Its worse than we thought!]
Unfortunately the Nature article is behind a paywall. I wouldn’t mind doing a reanalysis of their reanalysis, but I don’t care to spend the $32. Perhaps the raw Byrd data is available elsewhere.

I believe there was a WUWT thread rebutting that study a few years ago. I searched but couldn’t find it. If anyone remembers it, please post a link.

Matt G
January 19, 2014 2:53 pm

Is the Antarctic rabbit going to eat all the grass from South America?
“Keep is simple then. Is the grounding line of Pine Island glacier retreating? No computer models needed to answer that. Is it retreating while Antarctic sea ice extent has grown?…..”
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/tmp/gistemp/STATIONS/tmp_700891250008_14_0/station.txt
This is one of the nearest stations based there, do you think it will melt at between -10 c and -15 c during the warmest month January?

Jimbo
January 19, 2014 2:59 pm

Leo, check this out. In February 2013 a paper finds Antarctica has been gaining surface ice mass over past 150 years. You see, we can all find papers to back our positions. Just lean back and think about Antarctica. It’s not really doing what you want, so leave it alone. It’s a very thick slab of ice with growing extent and more snow is likely there in a warming world.
http://www.the-cryosphere.net/7/303/2013/tc-7-303-2013.html
http://joannenova.com.au/2013/04/antarctica-gaining-ice-mass-and-is-not-extraordinary-compared-to-800-years-of-data/

Leo Geiger
January 19, 2014 3:01 pm

So would I, as I have no recollection of declaring “that sea ice extent tracks deeper ocean temperatures (not surface temperatures) along the margins of Antarctica.” Can you please highlight where I made such a declaration?

You said this,

As you can see from the Southern Hemisphere Sea Ice Extent With Anomaly map above, there are currently two large fingers of anomalous Sea Ice protruding out in the Weddell Sea…
So there are no apparent signs of the “warm ocean currents” that “are projected to melt the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea area of Antarctica opening instabilities in the West Antarctic Ice sheet”.

How do you get from “A” to “B” if you aren’t using sea ice extent to draw conclusions about ocean currents and basal ice shelf ocean temperatures? I gather this is the logic:

…if there were “signs of warm ocean currents”, then one would expect those to also affect sea ice extent.

It’s that simple, eh? But, at the same time, somehow not so simple that one would expect those warm ocean currents to impact observations of calving rates or basal melt (ice shelf elevations)…

Clay Marley
January 19, 2014 3:01 pm

FWIW the Larsen B Ice Shelf appears to have regrown since it famously broke up in 2002. Of course the entire area is encased in fast ice, but there does appear to be a clear ridge where the shelf boundary is. A good image date is Dec 19, 2012.

Crispin in Waterloo
January 19, 2014 3:02 pm

“What we’re seeing is one of the strongest warming signals on Earth,” says Andrew Monaghan, a co-author and scientist at the US National Centre for Atmospheric Research.”
And that ‘warming signal’ is from a computer model that was used to “infill missing data”. It seems to me in the real world the infilling is being done by ice.

Gail Combs
January 19, 2014 3:30 pm

Leo Geiger says:
January 19, 2014 at 3:01 pm
…It’s that simple, eh? But, at the same time, somehow not so simple that one would expect those warm ocean currents to impact observations of calving rates or basal melt (ice shelf elevations)…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WHAT warm ocean currents?
I think you are mixing up the Arctic that has warm water from the Gulf Stream head in its direction vs the Antarctic with its Antarctic Circumpolar Current or ‘West Wind Drift’ that completely isolates the Continent form waters from the equator.
The opening of Drake Passage at the tip of South America (Cape Horne) allowed this current that completely circles the continent to form plus the closing of the Isthmus of Panama is thought to be the geologic events that sent the earth into the present ice age.

From some of my recent searches:
The Cape Horn Current: “…The Cape Horn Current is a cold water current that flows west-to-east around Cape Horn. This current is caused by the intensification of the West Wind Drift as it rounds the cape….” WIKI

The Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) is the most important current in the Southern Ocean, and the only current that flows completely around the globe. The ACC, as it encircles the Antarctic continent, flows eastward through the southern portions of the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans…. The Antarctic Circumpolar Current’s eastward flow is driven by strong westerly winds. The average wind speed between 40°S and 60°S is 15 to 24 knots with strongest winds typically between 45°S and 55°S. Historically, the ACC has been referred to as the ‘West Wind Drift’
http://oceancurrents.rsmas.miami.edu/southern/antarctic-cp.html

From another source that I trust a heck of a lot more, Maritime Safety Information CHAPTER 31 OCEAN CURRENTS: TYPES AND CAUSES OF CURRENTS I start at the beginning of the passage which talks of the southern Atlantic. The chapter also has a map that shows that some of the cold water heads up along the west coast of South America. And it show the West Wind Drift as COLD water going round and round the continent of Antarctica.

…That branch of the South Equatorial Current which curves toward the south off the east coast of South America, follows the coast as the warm, highly-saline Brazil Current, which in some respects resembles a weak Gulf Stream. Off Uruguay it encounters the colder, less-salty Falkland or Malvinas Current forming a sharp meandering front in which eddies may form. The two currents curve toward the east to form the broad, slow-moving, South Atlantic Current in the general vicinity of the prevailing westerlies and the front dissipates somewhat. This current flows eastward to a point west of the Cape of Good Hope, where it curves northward to follow the west coast of Africa as the strong Benguela Current, augmented somewhat by part of the Agulhas Current flowing around the southern part of Africa from the Indian Ocean. As it continues northward, the current gradually widens and slows. At a point east of St. Helena Island it curves westward to continue as part of the South Equatorial Current, thus completing the counterclockwise circulation of the South Atlantic. The Benguela Current is also augmented somewhat by the West Wind Drift, a current which flows easterly around Antarctica. As the West Wind Drift flows past Cape Horn, that part in the immediate vicinity of the cape is called the Cape Horn Current. This current rounds the cape and flows in a northerly and northeasterly direction along the coast of South America as the Falkland or Malvinas Current….
During the northern hemisphere summer, a weak northern branch of the South Equatorial Current, known as the New Guinea Coastal Current, continues on toward the west and northwest along both the southern and northeastern coasts of New Guinea. The southern part flows through Torres Strait, between New Guinea and Australia, into the Arafura Sea. Here, it gradually loses its identity, part of it flowing on toward the west as part of the South Equatorial Current of the Indian Ocean, and part of it following the coast of Australia and finally joining the easterly flowing West Wind Drift. The northern part of New Guinea Coastal Current both curves in a clockwise direction to help form the Pacific Equatorial Countercurrent and off Mindanao turns southward to form a southward flowing boundary current called the Mindanao Current. During the northern hemisphere winter, the New Guinea Coastal Current may reverse direction for a few months….

RoHa
January 19, 2014 3:45 pm

The two finger salute is used in Australia as well, so this could be Antarctica’s message to Chris Turney.

RACookPE1978
Editor
January 19, 2014 4:20 pm

Chad Wozniak says:
January 19, 2014 at 11:30 am (Edit)

More likely that the Drake Passage will ice over completely in coming winters, than the Filchner-Ronne ice shelf melting, methinks.

At today’s rate of Antarctic sea ice extents increase, and that positive rate of Antarctic Sea Ice extent has been positive since May 2011 so it crosses now nine seasons of sea ice melting (November, December, January), sea ice minimums (February-March), Sea ice freezing (April, May, June, August) and sea ice maximums (September-October) each year …..
if this trend continues, the Drake Passage, Straits of Magellan, and Cape Horn (56-58 south latitude) could be closed to ship traffic for weeks at a time due to excessive Antarctic Sea Ice in as few as 8-12 years.
Unlike others, I do not believe that even a solid cover of ice across Cape Horn for two months will stop currents from flowing under the ice. The depths at mid-strait are simply too deep, and the inertia of the remaining part of the sea is enough the keep currents circling. Maybe.
Now, will today’s trends continue?
We don’t know. But – unlike the Arctic where “only” 3.5 million square km’s of sea could melt (2012 record low was being declared a disaster!) – there is an absolute minimum of 0.0 of sea ice left in September – there is no possible maximum to antarctic sea ice extents.
But it is worse than you think!
At today’s levels of Arctic sea ice, the Arctic sea ice is restricted to a small “cap” almost – but not exactly -centered around the pole between latitudes 82 north and 85 north.
At that latitude, at the time of minimum sea ice extent in the Arctic when even the maximum solar elevation angles cannot get over 8-10 degrees above the horizon, thermodynamics, heat absorption calcs, and heat transfer calculations show that more energy is lost from the open ocean from increased evaporation losses, increased convection and conduction losses, and increased long wave radiation losses from the open ocean that can be gained by the small change in albedo between open ocean and dirty sea ice.
So, in today’s world, increased Arctic sea ice loss cools the planet.
But it is even worse than you think!
In today’s world, the Antarctic land ice covers some 14.0 Mkm^2 of ice.
The Antarctic Ice Shelves add an additional 3.5 Mkm^2 of ice.
The Antarctic Sea ice surrounds both of these with an extra 19.0 – 20.0 Mkm^2 of additional reflective surfaces.
The total (14.0 + 3.5 + 20.0 = 37.5 mkm^2 of reflective ice surface) is greater than ALL other land areas combined in the southern hemisphere. It represents a single solid area from the pole up to latitude 60 south. And between latitude 60 south (Antarctic sea ice maximum) and latitude 70 south (Antarctic sea ice minimum) ALL of the changing sea ice surface is exposed to sunlight at 20 to 40 degrees EVERY daylight hour of every day of daylight through the year. Air mass is reduced, losses are reduced, albedo of the ocean is reduced, and the sea ice is “cleaner” and more reflective.
Under those conditions, every square kilometer of “extra” Antarctic sea ice reflects MORE energy from the planet …. And increases global cooling.
Simply comparing a “minus” Arctic anomaly to a “plus” Antarctic anomaly is wrong.
Adding the two together for a “net ice anomaly” is wrong.
Under today’s conditions of sea ice and day-of-year minimums and maximums, BOTH anomalies cool the planet.

RACookPE1978
Editor
January 19, 2014 4:46 pm

Gary Pearse says:
January 19, 2014 at 2:06 pm

I’ve predicted (during the voyage of the Ship of Fools) that the cooler ocean and 1.2Mkm^2 extra ice will bring on more rapid freeze up. We won’t have to wait until Feb 22nd for this; how about 3 weeks from now?

Yes, reflective (Arctic amplification) theory says that every extra sq km of sea ice will cool the planet more than “normal” during every day that we find an Antarctic “positive” anomaly. But nobody can assure you of whether or not that will actually happen on a month-month basis.
But … We have seen continuous positive Antarctic sea anomaly rates for more than 2-1/2 years now ….

Gail Combs
January 19, 2014 4:47 pm

RACookPE1978 says: January 19, 2014 at 4:20 pm
I will agree that the current will continue under the ice if Drake Passage freezes. However the current is wind driven and with the ice you have more of a constriction. Will this push more cold water up along the coast of South America and causing more La Ninas?
As I already pointed out today. South America has been getting some pretty nasty winter weather in recent years. Could this be from additional cold water during the winter?
Brazil: Ice Age Now
Peru: Ice Age Now
Bolivia: Ice Age Now
Argentina: Ice Age Now
Chile: Ice Age Now

Gail Combs
January 19, 2014 5:06 pm

A comment from Jinlum Zhang at Harris-Mann Climatology

….On Saturday, September 28, the icepack reached 19.51 million square kilometers, according to data posted on the National Snow and Ice Data Center website. That figure topped the 19.48 million square kilometers set on September 23, 2012. Records on Antarctic sea ice began in October of 1978.
According to a new study in the Journal of Climate by a University of Washington scientist, Jinlum Zhang, “strengthening and converging winds around the South Pole can explain 80 percent of the puzzling increase in Antarctic sea ice.”
Zhang adds, “the polar vortex that swirls around the South Pole is not just stronger than it was when satellite observations were begun in the late 1970s, but it likewise has more ‘convergence,’ meaning it shoves the sea icepacks together causing ridging. This creates thicker, longer-lasting ice while exposing surrounding open waters and thin ice to blisteringly cold winds that result in additional ice growth.”

….scientists have likewise witnessed a similar growth of the continental land ice, particularly in the eastern half of Antarctica.
Antarctic cold fronts have been pushing much farther north than usual during the winter months, sometimes actually reaching areas of South America north of the Equator.
This past winter across much of South America was one of the coldest and snowiest winter seasons on record dating back, in some cases, more than 200 years. Parts of northern Argentina, Paraguay and southeastern Brazil saw their first measurable snowfalls in at least a century. A hard freeze last month in central Argentina killed at least 22 percent of the 2013 winter wheat crop.
Australia and New Zealand likewise had colder than normal winter temperatures as did parts of South Africa, where ‘rare’ snowfalls fell in Johannesburg. Some glaciers in extreme southern Argentina and Chile, as well as in New Zealand, are showing “definite signs” of advancing after an extended period of retreat….

The actual paper: Modeling the Impact of Wind Intensification on Antarctic Sea Ice Volume

David L. Hagen
January 19, 2014 5:44 pm

Will this form the largest iceberg in the satellite era?

Leo Geiger
January 19, 2014 5:58 pm

justthefactswuwt says:

Why would surface ice measurements help “draw conclusions about the temperature of the deeper water.”?

Ice shelves float. 9/10 below water, 1/10 above water. If the surface elevations are observed to decrease with time, it means the ice shelf is getting thinner below, and vice versa. Ice shelf surface measurements tell you if the bottom is melting or growing, and at what rate, which indicates basal temperature.
It is more complicated than that, but that is the general idea. Pine Island has been thinning continuously for decades. Does that count as observational evidence of warm currents?
But the real point here is that it *is* complicated. Enough so that drawing conclusions about ice shelves based on sea ice extent is a very bad idea. Consider the paper you quoted:

The thermocline in the sea adjacent to the glacier calving front (where ice is discharged) lowered by 250 meters in the austral summer of 2012. This change exposed the bottom of the ice shelf to colder surface waters rather than to the warmer, deeper layer, thereby reducing heat transfer from the ocean to the overlying ice and decreasing basal melting of the ice by more than 50% compared to 2010.

Here is the press release:
http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/press/press_releases/press_release.php?id=2452
“It is not so much the ocean variability, which is modest by comparison with many parts of the ocean, but the extreme sensitivity of the ice shelf to such modest changes in ocean properties that took us by surprise…”
Consider that. On top of the decadal thinning because of the Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW), a change in the depth of the thermocline, in two short years, lowered the temperature enough to decrease the basal melting rate by 50%. Would your plot of sea ice extent have told you either of those things?
The reason there are “no apparent signs” is because you are looking at sea ice extent. It’s the wrong tool for the job.
I’m sorry if the Pine Island glacier example is too far removed from Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea, but it is the area I’m most familiar with.

MattS
January 19, 2014 6:02 pm

“Antarctica Has Sea Ice Rabbit Ears, a V for Victory or Maybe It’s a Peace Sign?…”
Maybe it’s a message in Australian to the warmists.

Leo Geiger
January 19, 2014 6:02 pm

richardscourtney says:

The ice shelves are growing, and your links each says that warm ocean currents under the ice are the major cause of “ice shelf mass loss”. Thanks for providing such clear evidence that your assertions are rubbish.

The ice shelves are growing? You wouldn’t by chance be confusing sea ice and ice shelves, would you? Not the same thing.

Box of Rocks
January 19, 2014 6:13 pm

David L. Hagen says:
January 19, 2014 at 5:44 pm
Will this form the largest iceberg in the satellite era?
***************************************************************************************************************************Quick – break on of the ears off and tow it to California….

Box of Rocks
January 19, 2014 6:17 pm

“….A hard freeze last month in central Argentina killed at least 22 percent of the 2013 winter wheat crop…”
Good maybe wheat in Kansas City will stay above $7.00/bushel.