Guest essay by Don J. Easterbrook, Dept of Geology, Western Washington University

The absence of global warming for the past 17 years has been well documented. It has become known as “the pause.” and has been characterized as the “biggest mystery in climate science,” but, in fact, it really isn’t a mystery at all, it was predicted in 1999 on the basis of consistent, recurring patterns of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and global climate.
Perhaps the easiest way to understand the causal relationship between global warming/cooling and the PDO and AMO is to recount how these correlations were discovered. In 1999, while studying recent glacial fluctuations on Mt. Baker in the North Cascade Range, a pattern of recurring advances and retreats became apparent. In the wee hours one night, I came across a 1997 paper by Mantua, et al., “A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production,” an early recognition of the PDO. The PDO is an index, not a measured value, based on about a dozen or so parameters that are related to cyclical variations in sea surface temperatures in the NE Pacific. The term “Pacific Decadal Oscillation” (PDO) was coined by Steven Hare (1996). It has two modes, warm and cool, and flips back and forth between them every 25 to 30 years.
The Mantua et al. curve looked so similar to my glacial curve that I superimposed the two and was surprised to see that they corresponded almost exactly. I then compared them to global temperature and all three showed a remarkable correlation (Fig. 1).
The significance of this correlation is that it clearly showed that the PDO was the driver of climate and glacial fluctuations on Mt. Baker. Each time the PDO mode flipped from one mode to another, global climate and glacier extent also changed. This discovery was significant in itself but was to lead to a lot more. At this point, it was clear that PDO drove global climate (Figs. 2,3), but what drove the PDO was not apparent.
Figure 2. 1945-1977 PDO cold mode and 1977-1998 warm mode. (Easterbrook 2011 modified from D’Aleo)
Figure 3. PDO fluctuations from 1900 to August 2012. Each time the PDO was warm, global climate warmed; each time the PDO was cool, global climate cooled. (modified from http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/)
In 2000, I presented a paper, “Cyclical oscillations of Mt. Baker glaciers in response to climatic changes and their correlation with periodic oceanographic changes in the Northeast Pacific Ocean” at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America (GSA). The following year at the GSA meeting, I presented another paper “The next 25 years: global warming or global cooling? Geologic and oceanographic evidence for cyclical climatic oscillations.”
Since this recurring pattern of PDO fluctuation and global climate held true for the past century, what might the future hold? If the pattern continued, then might we project the same pattern into the future to see where we are headed, i.e., the past is the key to the future. If we want to know where we are heading, we need to know where we’ve been. Each of the two PDO warm periods (1915-1945 and 1978-1998) and the three cool periods (1880-1915, 1945-1977, 1999-2014) lasted 25-30 years. If the flip of the PDO into its cool mode in 1999 persists, the global climate should cool for the next several decades. Using the past durations of PDO phases, I spliced a cool PDO (similar to the 1945-1977 cool period) onto the end of the curve and presented the data in a paper at the 2001 Geological
Society of America meeting in Boston. In this paper, I proposed that, based on the past recurring pattern of PDO and global climate changes, we could expect 25-30 years of global cooling ahead (Fig. 4). With memories of the 1998 second warmest year of the century, the audience was stunned at such a prediction, especially since it directly contradicted the IPCC predictions of global warming catastrophe.
Figure 4. (Top) PDO fluctuations and projections to 2040 based on past PDO history.
(Bottom) Projected global cooling in coming decades based on extrapolation of past PDO recurring patterns.
My first projection of future global cooling was based on continuation of past recurring PDO fluctuations for the past century. But what about earlier climate changes? Because climate changes recorded in the oxygen isotope measurements from the GISP2 Greenland ice core had such an accurate chronology from annual layering in the ice, it seemed a perfect opportunity to see if similar changes had occurred in previous centuries, so I plotted the oxygen isotope accelerator measurements made by Stuiver and Grootes (1997) for the past 450 years. Oxygen isotope ratios are a function of temperature, so plotting them gives a paleo-temperature curve. This was a real eye-opener because the curve (Fig. 4) showed about 40, regularly-spaced, warm/cool periods with average cycles of 27 years, very similar to the PDO cycle. There was no way to determine what the PDO looked like that far back, but the GISP2 warm/cool cycles were so consistent that correlation with PDO 25-30 year cycles seemed like a good possibility. Historically known warm/cool periods showed up in the GISP2 curve, i.e., the 1945-1977 cool period, the 1915-1945 warm period, the 1880-1915 cool period, the Little Ice Age, Dalton Minimum cooling, the Maunder Minimum cooling, and many others, lending credence to the validity of the GISP2 measurements.
Figure 5. Warm and cool periods to 1480 AD from oxygen isotope measurements from the GISP2 Greenland ice core. The average length of a warm or cool cycle is 27 years.
When I presented this data and my climate projections at the 2006 GSA meeting in Philadelphia, Bill Broad of the NY Times was in the audience. He wrote a feature article in the NY Times about my data and predictions and the news media went bonkers. All of the major news networks called for interviews, then curiously all except CNN, MSNBC, and Fox abruptly canceled, apparently because my data posed a threat to IPCC predictions of catastrophic warming.
Nine additional papers expanding the geologic evidence for global cooling were presented from 2007 to 2009 and several longer papers were published from 2011-2014, including
“Multidecadal tendencies in Enso and global temperatures related to multidecadal oscillations,” Energy & Environment, vol. 21, p. 436-460. (D’Aleo, J. and Easterbrook, D.J., 2010).
“Geologic Evidence of Recurring Climate Cycles and Their Implications for the Cause of Global Climate Changes: The Past is the Key to the Future,” in the Elsevier volume “Evidence-Based Climate Science; p. 3-51. (2011)
“Relationship of Multidecadal Global Temperatures to Multidecadal Oceanic Oscillations,” in the Elsevier volume “Evidence-Based Climate Science; p. 161-180. (D’Aleo, J. and Easterbrook, D.J., 2011)
“Observations: The Cryosphere,” in Climate Change Reconsidered II, Physical Science (Easterbrook, D.J., Ollier, C.D., and Carter, R.M., 2013), p. 645-728.
Reprints of any of these publications may be obtained from http://myweb.wwu.edu/dbunny/ or by emailing dbunny14 “at”yahoo.com.
During these years, important contributions were made by Joe D’Aleo, who showed that during warm periods, warm El Nino phases occurred more frequently and with greater intensity than cooler La Nina phases and vice versa. He also documented the role of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), which is similar to the PDO. The AMO has multi-decadal warm and cool modes with periods of about 30 years, much like the PDO.
So the question now becomes how could my predictions be validated? Certainly not by any computer climate models, which had proven to be essentially worthless. The obvious answer is to check my predictions against what the climate does over several decades. We’ve been within my predicted cooling cycle for more than a decade, so what has happened? We’ve now experienced 17 years with no global warming (in fact, slight cooling) despite the IPCC prediction that we should now be ~1° F warmer (Figs. 6, 7, 8). So far my 1999 prediction seems to be on track and should last for another 20-25 years.
Conclusions
The ‘mysterious pause’ in global warming is really not mysterious at all. It is simply the continuation of climatic cycles that have been going on for hundreds of years. It was predicted in 1999, based on repeated patterns of cyclical warm and cool PDO phases so it is neither mysterious nor surprising. The lack of global warming for the past 17 years is just as predicted. Continued cooling for the next few decades will totally vindicate this prediction. Time and nature will be the final judge of these predictions.
What drives these oceanic/climatic cycles remains equivocal. Correlations with various solar parameters appear to be quite good, but the causal mechanism remains unclear. More on that later.
Figure 6. Temperature trend (°C/century) since 1996. Red = warming, blue = cooling.
Figure 7. Global cooling since 2000 (Earth Observatory)
Figure 8. Winter temperatures in the U.S. 1998-2013. 46 of the 48 states were significantly colder.
==========================================================
UPDATE 1/24/14, Dr. Easterbrook writes in with this update:
Here is an updated version of my 2000 prediction. My qualitative prediction was that extrapolation of past temperature and PDO patterns indicate global cooling for several decades. Quantifying that prediction has a lot of uncertainty. One approach is to look at the most recent periods of cooling and project those as possibilities (1) the 1945-1975cooling, (2) the 1880-1915 cooling, (3) the Dalton cooling (1790-1820), (4) the Maunder cooling (1650-1700). I appended the temperature record for the 1945-1975 cooling to the temperature curve beginning in 2000 to see what this might look like (see below). If the cooling turns out to be deeper, reconstructions of past temperatures suggest 0.3°C cooler for the 1880-1915 cooling, about 0.7°C for the Dalton cooling (square), and about 1.2°C for the Maunder cooling (circle). We won’t know until we get there which is most likely.
This updated plot really doesn’t change anything significantly from the first one that I did in 2000.
===============================================================
REFERENCES
D’Aleo, J. and Easterbrook, D.J., 2010, Multidecadal tendencies in Enso and global temperatures related to multidecadal oscillations: Energy & Environment, vol. 21, p. 436-460.
Easterbrook, D.J. and Kovanen, D.J., 2000, Cyclical oscillations of Mt. Baker glaciers in response to climatic changes and their correlation with periodic oceanographic changes in the Northeast Pacific Ocean: Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, vol. 32, p.17.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2001, The next 25 years: global warming or global cooling? Geologic and oceanographic evidence for cyclical climatic oscillations: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, vol. 33, p. 253.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2005, Causes and effects of abrupt, global, climate changes and global warming: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, vol. 37, p. 41.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2006a, Causes of abrupt global climate changes and global warming predictions for the coming century: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, vol. 38, p. 77.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2006b, The cause of global warming and predictions for the coming century: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, vol. 38, p.235-236.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2007a, Geologic evidence of recurring climate cycles and their implications for the cause of global warming and climate changes in the coming century: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, vol. 39, p. 507.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2007b, Late Pleistocene and Holocene glacial fluctuations: Implications for the cause of abrupt global climate changes: Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, vol. 39, p. 594.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2007c, Historic Mt. Baker glacier fluctuations—geologic evidence of the cause of global warming: Abstracts with Program, Geological Society of America, vol. 39, p.13.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2008a, Solar influence on recurring global, decadal, climate cycles recorded by glacial fluctuations, ice cores, sea surface temperatures, and historic measurements over the past millennium: Abstracts of American Geophysical Union annual meeting, San Francisco.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2008b, Implications of glacial fluctuations, PDO, NAO, and sun spot cycles for global climate in the coming decades: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, vol. 40, p.428.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2008c, Global warming’ is over: Geologic, oceanographic, and solar evidence for global cooling in the coming decades: 3rd International Conference on Climate Change, Heartland Institute, New York.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2008d, Correlation of climatic and solar variations over the past 500 years and predicting global climate changes from recurring climate cycles: Abstracts of 33rd International Geological Congress, Oslo, Norway.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2009a, The role of the oceans and the sun in late Pleistocene and historic glacial and climatic fluctuations: Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, vol. 41, p. 33.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2009b, The looming threat of global cooling – Geological evidence for prolonged cooling ahead and its impacts: 4th International Conference on Climate Change, Heartland Institute, Chicago, IL.
Easterbrook, D.J., ed., 2011a, Evidence-based climate science: Data opposing CO2 emissions as the primary source of global warming: Elsevier Inc., 416 p.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2011b, Geologic evidence of recurring climate cycles and their implications for the cause of global climate changes: The Past is the Key to the Future: in Evidence-Based Climate Science, Elsevier Inc., p.3-51.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2011c, Climatic implications of the impending grand solar minimum and cool Pacific Decadal Oscillation: the past is the key to the future–what we can learn from recurring past climate cycles recorded by glacial fluctuations, ice cores, sea surface temperatures, and historic measurements: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs
Easterbrook, D.J., 2010, A walk through geologic time from Mt. Baker to Bellingham Bay: Chuckanut Editions, 330 p.
Easterbrook, D.J., 2012, Are forecasts of a 20-year cooling period credible? 7th International Conference on Climate Change, Heartland Institute, Chicago, IL.
Easterbrook, D.J., Ollier, C.D., and Carter, R.M., 2013, Observations: The Cryosphere: in Idso,C.D., Carter R. M., Singer, F.S. eds, Climate Change Reconsidered II, Physical Science, The Heartland Institute, p. 645-728.
Grootes, P.M., and Stuiver, M., 1997, Oxygen 18/16 variability in Greenland snow and ice with 10-3– to 105-year time resolution. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 102, p. 26455-26470.
Hare, S.R. and R.C. Francis. 1995. Climate Change and Salmon Production in the Northeast Pacific Ocean: in: R.J. Beamish, ed., Ocean climate and northern fish populations. Can. special Publicaton Fish. Aquatic Science, vol. 121, p. 357-372.
Harper, J. T., 1993, Glacier fluctuations on Mount Baker, Washington, U.S.A., 1940-1990, and climatic variations: Arctic and Alpine Research, vol. 4, p. 332‑339.
Mantua, N.J. and S.R. Hare, Y. Zhang, J.M. Wallace, and R.C. Francis 1997: A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 78, p. 1069-1079.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’m sorry. My impression of reading the material at Skeptical Science is that there is NO HIATUS
or Pause! The world is still warming, its just that the “heat” is going into the deep oceans, oh, and its hiding in the Arctic. I am assured by the “consensus” scientist that this is true. After all, I read it on Skeptical Science! I was also told by a reliable friend to ignore the man behind the curtain…
/sarc.
“… there is NO HIATUS.” (Aussiebear)
THAT IS CORRECT! #(:))
Temporary (remember: Earth has been, overall COOLING FOR MILLENIA) warming (to the extent even that was real) has
STOPPED.
“Hiatus” is a misleading term.
Bob Tisdale says:
January 17, 2014 at 8:47 pm
That is, cooling is not occurring from the peak around 2001 through 2010 as your color coding states.
I figured out what the author did here. Bob, you are of course correct that a change of +3.5 and +3.0 are not cooling, but what the author meant to show was that from 1992 to 2002, the slope was +3.5 and from 1993 to 2003, the slope was 3.0. So in this sense, cooling occurred from 2002 to 2003 (and up to the present). However it may not have been the best way to show it.
I was going to say, Tisdale’s Who Turned up the Heat shows where the heat came from and where it went. Seems ENSO is where it’s all manifested to me.
This is all very well but can you make money out of it?
Some time ago, someone coined the expression ‘Natural Climate Cycle Deniers’ for alarmist theory believers.
It is a pity such an accurate description has fallen into disuse.
This is the most amazing thing of all to me! Six years after the FAR (IPCC’s first assessment report) a biologist in the Pacific Northwest (US) figured out PDO (1996), Ever since then all it’s been is silly buggers games. Expensive silly bugger’s games.
It simply has to be some sort of testament to H. sapiens intellect that it took ANOTHER 2 decades or so to see the forest for the trees!
One can only shudder to think how much longer it will take H. sapiens to glom onto the current age of the Holocene and what that might mean…..
The curious thing here is what we will do about the heathen devil gas CO2. If it is as fugly as prognosticated the last thing one might want to do is remove it at the half-precession old Holocene.
If it isn’t as fugly as prognosticated then removing it or leaving it up there will not materially impede onset of the next glacial.
The most important late Holocene question of all is who gets that?
michaelwiseguy says:
January 17, 2014 at 8:43 pm
————————————
I watched almost all of that last night. I almost lost my monitor several times, when listening to Boxer speak.
cynical_scientist says:
January 17, 2014 at 8:45 pm
I remain somewhat skeptical about the projected cooling. Humans have immense ability to see patterns where there are none. The climate remains inherently unpredictable. Anyway I rather hope it stays warm. Cooling is going to hurt.
——————————————————-
With most of the world,s governments looking out the wrong window, a cooling could become worse than it should be given that our level of technology should be able to manage well enough to support world needs with a little bit of foresight.
Russ R. says:
January 17, 2014 at 6:13 pm
Well done.
Geologists ROCK!
************************************
When I was a geology student at the University of Tasmania in the 1980s, I played drums in a rock band. We used to put posters up in the Faculty: Friday night, Geology’s own rock band — The Stones
If carbon(sic) causes Global warming, who would deny that the sun causes ice ages? If the sun does NOT cause ice ages, what does?
I know it been mentioned that the BBC has run with this story ( is The MSM starting to shift position ?)
“Is a mini ice age on the way? Scientists warn the Sun has ‘gone to sleep’ and say it could cause temperatures to plunge”
But so it the the Daily Mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2541599/Is-mini-ice-age-way-Scientists-warn-Sun-gone-sleep-say-cause-temperatures-plunge.html
Just wait until Leif appears?
As an engineer I have relied on geologists to make accurate predictions for decades so this is not a surprise.
The Climate scientoligists have attempted to reinvent climate science in a shiny green agenda dress to steal it away from Geologists and Failed. LOL:)
From climategate emails:
Wils:[2007] “What if climate change appears to be just mainly a multidecadal natural fluctuation? They’ll kill us probably”
I think they all knew this was a distinct possibility.
This is the difference between driving a car over hills and valleys with your eyes open and driving up a hill with your eyes closed and thinking you’ll be going upwards forever!
Hmmm……….
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/26/bilderberg-group-discusses-global-cooling-at-2010-meeting/
goldminor says:
January 18, 2014 at 12:36 am
cynical_scientist says:
January 17, 2014 at 8:45 pm
“world needs with a little bit of foresight.”
The problem here is that there have only ever been two governance mechanisms practiced by H. sapiens on so large a scale; foresight and foreskin. Foresight necessarily includes hindsight: by knowledge (hindcast) we know with decent precision when we live; for instance, the half-precession+ old Holocene. Foreskin typically requires opportunity only. Being F’d around is not necessarily time dependent.
Life finds a way.
The intriguing thing is simply this: what role has/did flexible ethics play in our evolution?
We are what we are. We got here the way we did. Just how smart was/is that? Or was it opportunity only?
Only your hairdresser knows for sure……..
Bob Tisdale says:
January 17, 2014 at 8:47 pm
“That is, cooling is not occurring from the peak around 2001 through 2010 as your color coding states.”
You are indeed correct. But then so is he.
Sine = trend = Easterbrook
Cosine = value = Tisdale
Nobody seems to have mentioned the stadium wave hypothesis.
If 2014 is a cool year, it’ll break decisively below IPOCC’s 95%-confidence lower trend line, which will give us even more ammo.
When I look at the temperature record for the c20 I see a staircase. The temperature stays flat during the ‘cool’ periods and goes up during the ‘warm’ periods. So the picture is of a periodic process, like a sine wave, on which is superimposed an increasing trend. Where does the trend come from? Cycles so long that our data cannot reveal them, or CO2, or both?
The Mantua et al. curve looked so similar to my glacial curve that I superimposed the two and was surprised to see that they corresponded almost exactly.
I would be careful with statements like that – you could get Western Washington University shut down.
Ronald Daw says:
January 18, 2014 at 2:02 am
Nobody seems to have mentioned the stadium wave hypothesis.
Yes it would seem the decent human thing to do. There are very few decent human beings in academia.
Trust a geologist to get nearer to the truth. Thanks Dr Easterbrook but have a word with Bob Tisdale he is the resident PDO/ENSO expert.
Werner Brozek says: “So in this sense, cooling occurred from 2002 to 2003 (and up to the present). However it may not have been the best way to show it.”

Werner, not only is Figure 6 not the best way to show it, it’s misleading. After the peak in 10-year trends around 2001, the ten-year periods are simply warming at a lesser rate, until they drop below zero, then they’re cooling.
Additionally, as everyone knows, there are wide variations in 10-year trends. Why didn’t Easterbrook show them as well? So not only is Easterbrook’s Figure 6 misleading, it adds nothing of value to the discussion.