New telescope brings the power of Hubble down to Earth

From the University of Arizona

UA astronomers take sharpest photos ever of the night sky

MAGAO_telescope
The Magellan Telescope with MagAO’s Adaptive Secondary Mirror (ASM) is mounted at the top looking down some 30 feet onto the 21-foot diameter primary mirror, which is encased inside the blue mirror cell. Credit: Yuri Beletsky, Las Campanas Observatory

Using a new camera and a telescope mirror that vibrates a thousand times each second to counteract atmospheric flickering, astronomers have achieved image resolution capabilities that could see a baseball diamond on the moon

Astronomers at the University of Arizona, the Arcetri Observatory near Florence, Italy and the Carnegie Observatory have developed a new type of camera that allows scientists to take sharper images of the night sky than ever before.

The team has been developing this technology for more than 20 years at observatories in Arizona, most recently at the Large Binocular Telescope, or LBT, and has now deployed the latest version of these cameras in the high desert of Chile at the Magellan 6.5-meter telescope.

“It was very exciting to see this new camera make the night sky look sharper than has ever before been possible,” said UA astronomy professor Laird Close, the project’s principal scientist. “We can, for the first time, make long-exposure images that resolve objects just 0.02 arcseconds across – the equivalent of a dime viewed from more than a hundred miles away. At that resolution, you could see a baseball diamond on the moon.”

The twofold improvement over past efforts rests on the fact that for the first time, a telescope with a large diameter primary mirror is being used for digital photography at its theoretical resolution limit in visible wavelengths – light that the human eye can see.

“As we move towards shorter wavelengths, image sharpness improves,” said Jared Males, a NASA Sagan Fellow at the UA’s department of astronomy. “Until now, large telescopes could make the theoretically sharpest photos only in infrared – or long wavelength – light, but our new camera can take photos that are twice as sharp in the visible light spectrum.”

Equipped with the newly developed MagAO adaptive optics system, the Magellan Telescope revealed details about the Orion nebula. The background image, taken with the Hubble Space Telescope, shows the Trapezium cluster of young stars (pink) still in the process of forming. The middle inset photo reveals the binary nature of the Theta Ori C star pair. The bottom insert shows a different binary young star pair shaped by the stellar wind from Theta 1 Ori C. Credit: Laird Close and Ya-Lin Wu; NASA, C.R. O’Dell and S.K. Wong

 

These images are also at least twice as sharp as what the Hubble Space Telescope can make, because with its 21-foot diameter mirror, the Magellan telescope is much larger than Hubble with its 8-foot mirror. Until now, Hubble always produced the best visible light images, since even large ground-based telescope with complex adaptive optics imaging cameras could only make blurry images in visible light.

To overcome atmospheric turbulence, which plagues earth-based telescopes by causing the image to blur, Close’s team developed a very powerful adaptive optics system that floats a thin (1/16th of an inch) curved glass mirror (2.8 feet across) on a magnetic field 30 feet above the telescope’s primary mirror.

This so-called Adaptive Secondary Mirror (ASM) can change its shape at 585 points on its surface 1,000 times each second, counteracting the blurring effects of the atmosphere.

“As a result, we can see the visible sky more clearly than ever before,” Close said. “It’s almost like having a telescope with a 21-foot mirror in space.”

The new adaptive optics system, called MagAO for “Magellan Adaptive Optics,” has already made some important scientific discoveries, published today in three scientific papers in the Astrophysical Journal. As the system was being tested and received what astronomers call “first light,” the team pointed it to a famous and well-studied massive star that gives the Great Orion Nebula (Object M42) most of its UV light. The Orion Nebula, located just below Orion’s Belt visible as smudge of light even with regular binoculars.

Considered young at about 1 million years old, this star, called Theta 1 Ori C, has been previously known to be in fact a binary star pair made up of two stars called C1 and C2. However, the separation between the two is so small – about the average distance between Earth and Uranus – that astronomers had never been able to resolve the famous pair in a direct telescope photo.

Once MagAO and its visible science camera called VisAO were pointed towards Theta Ori 1 C, the results were immediate.

“I have been imaging Theta 1 Ori C for more than 20 years and never could directly see that it was in fact two stars,” Close said. “But as soon as we turned on the MagAO system it was beautifully split into two stars.”

In another result, MagAO has shed light on another mystery: How do how planets form from disks of dust and gas affected by the strong ionizing light called stellar wind coming from a massive star like Theta 1 Ori C, which has about 44 times the mass of the sun?

The team used MagAO and VisAO to look for red light from ionized hydrogen gas to trace out how the strong UV radiation and stellar wind from Theta 1 Ori C affects the disks around its neighboring stars.

The power of visible light adaptive optics: On the left is a “normal” photo of the theta 1 Ori C binary star in red light. The middle image shows the same object, but with MagAO’s adaptive optics system turned on. Eliminating the atmospheric blurring, the resulting photo becomes about 17 times sharper, turning a blob into a crisp image of a binary star pair. These are the highest resolution photos taken by a telescope. Credit: Laird Close/UA

“Close to Theta 1 Ori C, there are two very young stars surrounded by disks of gas and dust,” said Ya-Lin Wu, a graduate student and lead author on one of the publications. “Theta 1 Ori C pummels those disks with stellar wind and UV light. It looks like they are being bent backwards by a strong wind.”

MagAO’s photo revealed that the two stars and their protoplanetary disks are heavily distorted into teardrop shapes as the strong UV light and wind create shock fronts and drag gas downwind of the pair.

The distribution of gas and dust in young planetary systems is another unsolved problem in planet formation. The team used VisAO’s simultaneous/spectral differential imager, or SDI, to estimate the mass of another intriguing object in the Orion Nebula: one of a few stars in Orion sporting a rare “silhouette disk.” The SDI camera allowed the light from the star to be removed at a very high level—offering, for the first time, a clear look at the inner regions of the silhouette.

“The disk lies in front of the bright Orion nebula, so we see the dark shadow cast as the dust in the disk absorbs background light from the nebula,” said Kate Follette, a graduate student and lead author of one of the three papers published in the Astrophysical Journal. “Picture a moth flying across a bright movie screen: Its body will appear opaque, while the wings will be partially transparent. Our SDI instrument allows us to peer into the silhouette and trace how much dust is at each location in the disk based on how transparent or opaque it is.”

“We were surprised to find that the amount of attenuated light from the nebula never reached an opaque point,” she said. “It seems as though the outer parts of this disk have less dust than we would have expected.”

“It is important to understand how dust is laid out in these objects because that dust and gas is what nature uses to build planets,” Close explained. “Our new imaging capabilities revealed there is very little dust and gas in the outer part of the disk.”

According to Close, the silhouette disk might have been close to the massive star Theta 1 Ori C at some point, which might have blown away its outer dust and gas.

“This tells us something about planet-forming disks in these dense, stellar nurseries,” Close said. “There appears to be a limit to the formation of massive planets very far away from their parent stars. One possible explanation might be the presence of a massive star like Theta 1 Ori C stripping away the outer gas and dust.”

###

The MagAO system was developed with support of the National Science Foundation MRI, TSIP and ATI grant programs. The Adaptive Secondary Mirror itself was produced by Microgate and ADS of Italy, with the UA’s Steward Observatory Mirror Lab. The MagAO pyramid wavefront sensor was developed at the Arcetri Observatory, Italy. The Magellan telescopes are operated by a partnership between the Carnegie institute, the UA Harvard University, MIT and the University of Michigan. The work of NASA Sagan Fellows Jared Males and Katie Morzinski was performed in part under contract with the California Institute of Technology and was funded by NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program executed by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute. The work of Kate Follette was funded in part by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship program.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 26, 2013 7:53 am

This seems to be the month for new high resolution telescope cams:
http://scitechdaily.com/subaru-telescopes-hyper-suprime-cam-displays-its-capabilities-views-m31/

george e. smith
August 26, 2013 7:26 pm

“”””””……Randy says:
August 25, 2013 at 10:16 pm
George, you are advertently or inadvertently splitting hairs here .
1.22 lambda is the basic rule, FOR EXACTLY the reason you stated. But if you don’t give us a little tutorial on MTF, your STATEMENT IN CAPS saying I’m wrong really means nothing. In fact, I’m saying you are wrong, categorically stating what the resolution limit is when you apparently are not aware of what a narrow condition those criteria apply to. …………”””””””
Well Randy, I don’t quite understand what your beef is.
This thread is about the resolution of astronomical telescopes. Or more significantly how adaptive optics is allowing earth bound very high resolution telescopes, with very large apertures, to achieve almost their theoretical resolution capability, while imaging through earth’s turbulent atmosphere.
The atmosphere does NOT (or not if you prefer) alter the resolution limit of large earthbound telescopes; well no more than the change in wavelength caused by the non unity refractive index of the atmosphere; but it does distort images, as a result of the turbulence.
Now I made NO statement in caps; and the resolution limit of diffraction limited telescopes has nothing whatsoever to do with MTF, but just incidentally, that happens to be 1 for all such instruments.
Moreover, a three bar Air Force chart, will not yield MTF values; you need a sinusoidal bar chart for that. Yes you can infer what the resolution might be from an Air Force chart image.
Warren Smith says the following: Page 139 6.10 Resolution of Optical systems.
“When the image separation reaches 0.61 lambda / N.A. the maximum of one pattern coincides with the first dark ring of the other and there is a clear indication of two separate maxima in the combined pattern. This is Lord Raleigh’s criterion for resolution and is the most widely used value for the limiting resolution of an optical system ”
Conrady cites the Astronomer Royal G.B. Airy as having first computed the diffraction pattern of a perfect system, and states that the diameter of the first dark ring is 1.22 lambda/N’sinU’ on page 132 of Vol 1 of the Dover paperback edition; which you, with a professional career in the subject, would certainly have a copy of; so of course you would also recognize Conrady’s standard notation; so I don’t need to explain that. Well I have two copies, so I’m sure you have at least one.
I lost my hard bound copy from high school, in a missing box, that contained ALL of my high school and university text books, from a trans-pacific ship voyage in 1961.
I would have to dig through a big pile to find the correct volume of Rudolph Kingslake’s books; and the only text I have of Welford, is his collaborative one with Roland Winston on non-imaging optics, which doesn’t even deal with the subject of resolution, as it is quite irrelevant to non-imaging optics.
But none of them give 1.22 lambda/D as the “basic resolution limit” as you assert.
But then I’ve only been dabbling in the subject since 1954, so you probably know a lot more about it than I do; so I”ll go with your value, so as to not confuse Anthony’s readers.
And I almost forgot, it was Conrady who said the visually apparent Airy disk diameter is
0.5 lambda / N’sinU’; also on page 132. Warren Smith uses Conrady’s plot and photographic image, in HIS textbook.

Verified by MonsterInsights