Europe bails on green energy

Dr. Benny Peiser at The Australian: Europe pulls the plug on its green future

pull the EU green plug

Slowly but gradually, Europe is awakening to a green energy crisis, an economic and political debacle that is entirely self-inflicted.

The mainstream media, which used to encourage the renewables push enthusiastically, is beginning to sober up too. With more and more cracks beginning to appear, many newspapers are returning to their proper role as the fourth estate, exposing the pitfalls of Europe’s green-energy gamble and opening their pages for thorough analysis and debate. Today, European media is full of news and commentary about the problems of an ill-conceived strategy that is becoming increasingly shaky and divisive.

As country after country abandons, curtails or reneges on once-generous support for renewable energy, Europe is beginning to realise that its green energy strategy is dying on the vine. Green dreams are giving way to hard economic realities.

From: The Australian http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/europe-pulls-the-plug-on-its-green-future/story-e6frg8y6-1226694405337

also here: http://www.thegwpf.org/benny-peiser-europe-pulls-plug-green-future/

(Note: for the pirates of pendant – image updated to show EU style plug – Anthony)

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

153 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R. de Haan
August 9, 2013 3:01 pm

I don’t agree with the claims made in this article.
New wind parks are build, coal plants are run on 1/3 coal and 2/3 biomass (imported from the USA, there is no cancelation of the quest for electric cars, no cancelation of the quest for co2 reduction in conventional vehicles (Euro 6 will be obligatory in January 2014)
No cancelation of the insulation schemes for housing.
No cancelation of the biofuel scam.
MSM still pushing the AGW hoax full blown
So where is the beef apart from wishful thinking?

AndyG55
August 9, 2013 3:02 pm

“Additionally, it cuts down on raw material cost of production.”
Regards Ed
Thanks for the chuckle, Ed 🙂
ps why doesn’t WordPress remember my name any more.. I keep having to type my email address and name in.

Gail Combs
August 9, 2013 3:04 pm

Fred says: August 9, 2013 at 10:13 am
So . . . hundreds of billions of Euros have been squandered, wasted, flushed down the Great Greenie Composting Toilet because Public Policy in Europe was highjacked by a group of political power craving environmentalists and grubby, funding desperate scientists who realized their First Class ticket on the Fame and Gravy train could be realized by abject fear mongering about human influences on the climate…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What many people do not realize is Americans footed part of that bill via the ‘Bank Bailouts’ Remember how Ron Paul tried to get the Fed to tell Congress where the bailout money actually went and the FED stonewalled, then retaliated with veiled threats? Well the information was finally extracted from the FED. Some of that money went to bailout banks in the EU.

Bloomberg: Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks $13 Billion Undisclosed to Congress
The Federal Reserve and the big banks fought for more than two years to keep details of the largest bailout in U.S. history a secret. Now, the rest of the world can see what it was missing.
The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day. Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy. And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates….
Saved by the bailout, bankers lobbied against government regulations, a job made easier by the Fed, which never disclosed the details of the rescue to lawmakers even as Congress doled out more money and debated new rules aimed at preventing the next collapse.
A fresh narrative of the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 emerges from 29,000 pages of Fed documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act….

Bloomberg carefully does not mention the money that headed to Europe. Of the $16.1 trillion loaned out, $3.08 trillion went to financial institutions in the U.K., Germany, Switzerland, France and Belgium, the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) analysis shows.

….Additionally, asset swap arrangements were opened with banks in the U.K., Canada, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Mexico, Singapore and Switzerland. Twelve of those arrangements are still ongoing, having been extended through August 2012….
The audit also found that the Fed mostly outsourced its lending operations to the very financial institutions which sparked the crisis to begin with, and that they delegated contracts largely on a no-bid basis. The GAO report recommends new policies that would eliminate such conflicts of interest, and suggests that in the future the Fed should keep better records of their emergency decision-making process.
The Fed agreed to “strongly consider” the recommendations, but as it is not a government-run institution it cannot be forced to do so by lawmakers. The seven-member board of governors and the Fed chairman are, however, appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate.
The audit was conducted on a one-time basis, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, passed last year. Fed officials had strongly discouraged lawmakers from ordering the audit, claiming it may serve to undermine confidence in the monetary system….

Lose confidence? After the Cyprus Haircut, Nah, no one would lose confidence in our honest and loving banks.. /snark
(Quicky on the Cyprus Haircut for those who did not follow that news.)
Cyprus bailout deal with EU closes bank and seizes large deposits: Draconian terms aimed at keeping Cyprus in eurozone include closure of second-largest bank and big losses for wealthy savers
Bomb from Brussels: Cyprus Model May Guide Future Bank Bailouts… Cyprus Bank Bailout Model Has Increasing Numbers of Adherents
And The FEDs bailout of EU banks is still going on.

06/12/2011 The Fed’s $600 Billion Stealth Bailout Of Foreign Banks Continues At The Expense Of The Domestic Economy, Or Explaining Where All The QE2 Money Went
Courtesy of the recently declassified Fed discount window documents, we now know that the biggest beneficiaries of the Fed’s generosity during the peak of the credit crisis were foreign banks, among which Belgium’s Dexia was the most troubled, and thus most lent to, bank. Having been thus exposed, many speculated that going forward the US central bank would primarily focus its “rescue” efforts on US banks, not US-based (or local branches) of foreign (read European) banks: after all that’s what the ECB is for, while the Fed’s role is to stimulate US employment and to keep US inflation modest…..
… but that the only beneficiary of the reserves generated were US-based branches of foreign banks (which in turn turned around and funnelled the cash back to their domestic branches), a shocking finding which explains not only why US banks have been unwilling and, far more importantly, unable to lend out these reserves, but that anyone retaining hopes that with the end of QE2 the reserves that hypothetically had been accumulated at US banks would be flipped to purchase Treasurys, has been dead wrong, therefore making the case for QE3 a done deal. In summary, instead of doing everything in its power to stimulate reserve, and thus cash, accumulation at domestic (US) banks which would in turn encourage lending to US borrowers, the Fed has been conducting yet another stealthy foreign bank rescue operation, which rerouted $600 billion in capital from potential borrowers to insolvent foreign financial institutions in the past 7 months. QE2 was nothing more (or less) than another European bank rescue operation!

02/09/2013 The Fed’s Bailout Of Europe Continues With Record $237 Billion Injected Into Foreign Banks In Past Month
Last weekend Zero Hedge once again broke the news that just like back in June 2011, when as part of the launch of QE2 we demonstrated that all the incremental cash resulting form the $600 billion surge in the Fed’s excess reserves, had gone not to domestically-chartered US banks, but to subsidiaries of foreign banks operating on US soil. To be sure, various other secondary outlets picked up on the story without proper attribution, most notably the WSJ, which cited a Stone McCarthy report adding the caveat that “interpreting the data released by the Federal Reserve is a bit challenging” and also adding the usual incorrect attempts at interpretation for why this is happening. To the contrary: interpreting the data is quite simple, which is why we made an explicit prediction: ‘We urge readers to check the weekly status of the H.8 when it comes out every Friday night, and specifically line item 25 on page 18, as we have a sinking feeling that as the Fed creates $85 billion in reserves every month… it will do just one thing: hand the cash right over straight to still hopelessly insolvent European banks.”…

So Americans got roped into paying for part of the EU Green Energy Scam without even realizing it.

R. de Haan
August 9, 2013 3:22 pm

Keiser Report: Lab Rats of Bankster’s Policies
Posted on August 8, 2013 by Stacy Herbert
We discuss the lab rats of finance, economic, energy, health and agricultural policy.
As lab rats, choice is not an option, so the lab rat population must submit to the experimentation being done upon them – whether from Monsanto or the ‘healthcare’ industry. In the second half, Max talks to Ross Ashcroft of RenegadeEconomist.com about the Empire state of mind of the rentier economy in which predators are invited to feast on producers and a new Bank of England chairman, Mark Carney, hosts the rentiers with free money while the media discusses his stunning good looks and handsome neckties.
Watch the video:
http://www.maxkeiser.com/2013/08/kr481-keiser-report-lab-rats-of-banksters-policies/

August 9, 2013 3:26 pm

rogerknights says:

I’m curious: what’s the reason for those holes? Do they maybe pull out or sequester any lint or debris that may accumulate in the socket?

For use in Redneck extension cord applications (could be a ‘safety’ issue without the holes)?
Example: Here.
.

R. de Haan
August 9, 2013 3:27 pm

Europe doesn’t bail on green energy but they don’t bail on fossil fuels either: http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=84224
It’s all hog wash

Robert of Ottawa
August 9, 2013 3:38 pm

Why all this talk of the Pirates of Penzance?

Justthinkin
August 9, 2013 3:44 pm

“So Americans got roped into paying for part of the EU Green Energy Scam without even realizing it”
Well why not? You elected a president who is not even a proven American. Stupid is as stupid does.

R. de Haan
August 9, 2013 3:51 pm
DirkH
August 9, 2013 3:52 pm

Gail Combs says:
August 9, 2013 at 3:04 pm
“So Americans got roped into paying for part of the EU Green Energy Scam without even realizing it.”
Well thank you. But before 2008, American banks were selling toxic debt by the shipload to Euro banks, and S&P etc. assured everyone the debt was good as Gold…. you wouldn’t really want us to lose our *cough* trust *cough* in American institutions now would you?

Robert of Ottawa
August 9, 2013 3:53 pm

Michael Mann is the very model of a modern climate scientist:

Keep that phrase in mind 🙂

Sam The First
August 9, 2013 3:54 pm

William Fox asked “Where does this insane plan come from ??”
It comes from the EU where all of Europe’s energy policy is mandated. Our own ‘government; only has the choice of how to implement the insanity

RACookPE1978
Editor
August 9, 2013 4:06 pm

That’s interesting.
Despite many years of inflation since that first peace of ate floundered onto our diner plates, my pirate has arrrrghuably stayed the same: In round numbers, right at 3.1415969 ….

Just Steve
August 9, 2013 4:09 pm

Well, this comment thread clears up one thing; with all the nitpicky comments about a picture of an electrical plug, no wonder Willis took so much grief for a harmless reference to a woman’s looks.

August 9, 2013 4:19 pm

I haven’t stopped grinning since i read this. Thank you atoni and thand thank you pres bush for keeping us out of this as long as you did. Note to cape wind…. take your windmills and
….. and thanks to all you wuwt regulars. As soon as i see your na,mes i know i’m in for a treat!!!!

August 9, 2013 4:33 pm

RACookPE1978 says August 9, 2013 at 4:06 pm
… In round numbers, right at 3.1415969 ….

Oops … something didn’t quite look right out to, oh, say, past five digits … unless you weren’t specifying pi.
3.1415969… Yours
3.1415926… Actual
.

August 9, 2013 4:44 pm

Gail Combs says in another unreadable post on August 9, 2013 at 3:04 pm:
What many people do not realize is Americans footed part of that bill via the ‘Bank Bailouts’ Remember how Ron Paul tried to get the Fed to …

Have you ever heard the saying “Brevity is the soul of wit”? Presentations work the same way …
‘Presentations’ (and I use the word loosely) such as yours above would benefit through the use of a bullet point summarizing some idea or statement followed up by a couple of supporting facts, cites or events, lather rinse and repeat maybe three or four times and leave it at that … just a WTTW (Word to the Wise) …
.

Chad Wozniak
August 9, 2013 4:48 pm

@clivebest –
My estimate, when all subsidies and ancillary costs are factored in (land, new transmission, site preparation, equipment cost, maintenance, cost of backup fossil power, to name some of them) you get somewhere between 80 cents and $1.10 per delivered kWh, or 11 to 15 times as much as the 7 cents for coal-fired, and 9 to 12 times as much as the 9 cents for natural gas-fired (which, however, can vary somewhat with the momentary market price of natural gas).
These multiples are well concealed by the fact that most of the actual cost is paid by taxpayers. Even doubling consumer electric rates is nowhere near enough to cover it all
It’s a very effective method of redistributing wealth from poorer to richer, since low- and middle-income people are paying extra for electricity and the excess is going to wealthy investors – der Fuehrer’s crony capitalist buddies, to be exact – in otherwise uneconomic renewables projects. So much for green “social justice.”

William Astley
August 9, 2013 5:17 pm

Green scams do not work from an engineering standpoint (they do not substantially reduce CO2 emissions in the country where they are installed and make no difference in the world CO2 emissions) and from an economic standpoint, the cost of energy increases which reduces competitiveness in the country that subsides the installation, is a type of taxation due to higher energy costs and taxpayer funded subsides, and increases government deficits which pushes countries closer to default. Government subsidies for green scams therefore results in a net loss in jobs, in addition to an increase in the country’s deficit.
Spain is an example of the problem of green subsidies which is lose-lose-lose.
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21582018-sustainable-energy-meets-unsustainable-costs-cost-del-sol
Economist Jul 20th 2013
“ÁNGEL MIRALDA was proud of his 320 solar panels in a field near Benabarre, in northern Spain. They added 56 kilowatts of clean-energy capacity to a country that depended on oil imports. The panels cost €500,000 ($735,000): €150,000 from an early-retirement pay-off from IBM’s Barcelona office, the rest from a bank loan. The government promised a 10% annual return on such projects. That was in 2008. Five years later, after subsidies were cut on July 12th for the third time since 2012, his income is down by 40% and he is struggling to repay the loan. “There is no legal security in Spain,” he complains. ….
…Hoping to stimulate a new green industry, for which sunny Spain seems ideal, the government increased the prices it paid for solar power to 12 times the market price for electricity. …
But costs exploded, too. Subsidies to solar energy rose from €190m in 2007 to €3.5 billion in 2012 (an 18-fold increase). Total subsidies to all renewables reached €8.1 billion in 2012, see chart. Since the government was unwilling to pass the full costs on to consumers, the cumulative tariff deficit (the cost of the system minus revenues from consumers) reached €26 billion, having risen by about €5 billion a year. …. ….It has been a chastening experience. The government failed to cut subsidies when renewables were booming, so the cuts have had to be draconian. It imposed no cap on new capacity and stood by while that grew uncontrollably (this also happened in Germany). The promised jobs have vanished. The solar-energy business has lost tens of thousands of jobs from its peak. And after repeated retroactive cuts no one is willing to invest in renewable energy any more. Yet because projects often receive subsidies for 20 years, the costs remain. Even after the cuts, renewables subsidies are running at €7 billion-8 billion a year. It is not hard to think of better ways of spending such large sums of taxpayers’ money.”

RACookPE1978
Editor
August 9, 2013 5:29 pm

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh.
Me pirate’s been hijacked!

clipe
August 9, 2013 5:41 pm

AndyG55 says:
August 9, 2013 at 3:02 pm
[…] ps why doesn’t WordPress remember my name any more.. I keep having to type my email address and name in.
Might have something to do with http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/07/announcement-wuwt-success-earns-an-invitation-to-enterprise/
I’ve noticed some Gravitar faces showing up recently.

Janice Moore
August 9, 2013 5:45 pm

Dear Jim,
Your post at 4:44PM directed at Ms. Combs’ writing style had some good advice. Here is some for you (just a word to the wise). How about also including in a rather harsh criticism of one of your own allies something complimentary to soften your correction? Something like, “Your posts are always full of worthwhile reading;” or “thanks, Gail, for taking the time to research all that and share it with us — great stuff!”
Gail is a big girl and can take your rough treatment here, but, she is, after all, a human being. Why not treat her like one?
Good for you, nevertheless, to try to help us all (since many of us could use the advice you chose to bestow only upon her) make WUWT a place of good writing as well as of superb content.
Janice

Janice Moore
August 9, 2013 6:03 pm

Hey! At 5:45PM, I just used the “Preview” option for the first time here!
Comment: Not helpful. It simply copies the original text with-OUT my line returns to create double spacing. The only differences I saw were: 1) the blue background; and 2) what the published end of the lines would be. That wasn’t a significant help. (if the size of the font had been LARGER in the preview that would have been a benefit AND if the double spacing had been shown in the preview)
Anthony, I only wrote these criticisms in case you would prefer to return to the old format given the lack of benefit (and higher cost) of the new.

clipe
August 9, 2013 6:11 pm

Just came across an old letter.
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605
ps. “click to preview your comment before submission” is visible.

Gail Combs
August 9, 2013 6:16 pm

Gail Combs says:
“So Americans got roped into paying for part of the EU Green Energy Scam without even realizing it.”
…..
DirkH says: August 9, 2013 at 3:52 pm
Well thank you. But before 2008, American banks were selling toxic debt by the shipload to Euro banks, and S&P etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The US banks/Fed are still hosing everyone. The Latest American Export: Inflation – WSJ
Banks get all the profit and everyone else gets saddled with the repercussions of their bad business decisions.
How in the world can you mess up a business where you print 100% of the money out of thin air, loan it out at interest rates of up to 30% or more and charge the people you are fleecing monthly ‘transaction fees’ to cover your actual business expenses.
Congressman McFadden on the Federal Reserve Corporation Remarks in Congress, 1934 (McFadden had been a banker)