Claim: Faint Young Sun Paradox solved

From the University of Colorado at Boulder a claim that computer modeling has solved the problem, with an atmosphere that is 20,000 parts per million of  CO2 and 1,000 ppm of methane.

This is an artist’s conception of the Earth during the late Archean, 2.8 billion years ago. Weak solar radiation requires the Earth have increased greenhouse gas amounts to remain warm. CU-Boulder doctoral student Eric Wolf Wolf and CU-Boulder Professor Brian Toon use a three-dimensional climate model to show that the late Archean may have maintained large areas of liquid surface water despite a relatively weak greenhouse. With carbon dioxide levels within constraints deduced from ancient soils, the late Archean may have had large polar ice caps but lower latitudes would have remained temperate and thus hospitable to life. The addition of methane allows the late Archean to warmed to present day mean surface temperatures. Credit: Charlie Meeks

CU study shows how early Earth kept warm enough to support life

Scientists tackle faint young sun paradox with 3-D climate models

Solving the “faint young sun paradox” — explaining how early Earth was warm and habitable for life beginning more than 3 billion years ago even though the sun was 20 percent dimmer than today — may not be as difficult as believed, says a new University of Colorado Boulder study.

In fact, two CU-Boulder researchers say all that may have been required to sustain liquid water and primitive life on Earth during the Archean eon 2.8 billion years ago were reasonable atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts believed to be present at the time and perhaps a dash of methane. The key to the solution was the use of sophisticated three-dimensional climate models that were run for thousands of hours on CU’s Janus supercomputer, rather than crude, one-dimensional models used by almost all scientists attempting to solve the paradox, said doctoral student Eric Wolf, lead study author.

“It’s really not that hard in a three-dimensional climate model to get average surface temperatures during the Archean that are in fact moderate,” said Wolf, a doctoral student in CU-Boulder’s atmospheric and oceanic sciences department. “Our models indicate the Archean climate may have been similar to our present climate, perhaps a little cooler. Even if Earth was sliding in and out of glacial periods back then, there still would have been a large amount of liquid water in equatorial regions, just like today.”

Evolutionary biologists believe life arose on Earth as simple cells roughly 3.5 billion years ago, about a billion years after the planet is thought to have formed. Scientists have speculated the first life may have evolved in shallow tide pools, freshwater ponds, freshwater or deep-sea hydrothermal vents, or even arrived on objects from space.

A cover article by Wolf and Professor Brian Toon on the topic appears in the July issue of Astrobiology. The study was funded by two NASA grants and by the National Science Foundation, which supports CU-Boulder’s Janus supercomputer used for the study.

Scientists have been trying to solve the faint young sun paradox since 1972, when Cornell University scientist Carl Sagan — Toon’s doctoral adviser at the time — and colleague George Mullen broached the subject. Since then there have been many studies using 1-D climate models to try to solve the faint young sun paradox — with results ranging from a hot, tropical Earth to a “snowball Earth” with runaway glaciation — none of which have conclusively resolved the problem.

“In our opinion, the one-dimensional models of early Earth created by scientists to solve this paradox are too simple — they are essentially taking the early Earth and reducing it to a single column atmospheric profile,” said Toon. “One-dimensional models are simply too crude to give an accurate picture.”

Wolf and Toon used a general circulation model known as the Community Atmospheric Model version 3.0 developed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder and which contains 3-D atmosphere, ocean, land, cloud and sea ice components. The two researchers also “tuned up” the model with a sophisticated radiative transfer component that allowed for the absorption, emission and scattering of solar energy and an accurate calculation of the greenhouse effect for the unusual atmosphere of early Earth, where there was no oxygen and no ozone, but lots of CO2 and possibly methane.

The simplest solution to the faint sun paradox, which duplicates Earth’s present climate, involves maintaining roughly 20,000 parts per million of the greenhouse gas CO2 and 1,000 ppm of methane in the ancient atmosphere some 2.8 billion years ago, said Wolf. While that may seem like a lot compared to today’s 400 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere, geological studies of ancient soil samples support the idea that CO2 likely could have been that high during that time period. Methane is considered to be at least 20 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than CO2 and could have played a significant role in warming the early Earth as well, said the CU researchers.

There are other reasons to believe that CO2 was much higher in the Archean, said Toon, who along with Wolf is associated with CU’s Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics. The continental area of Earth was smaller back then so there was less weathering of the land and a lower release of minerals to the oceans. As a result there was a smaller conversion of CO2 to limestone in the ocean. Likewise, there were no “rooted” land plants in the Archean, which could have accelerated the weathering of the soils and indirectly lowered the atmospheric abundance of CO2, Toon said.

Another solution to achieving a habitable but slightly cooler climate under the faint sun conditions is for the Archean atmosphere to have contained roughly 15,000 to 20,000 ppm of CO2 and no methane, said Wolf. “Our results indicate that a weak version of the faint young sun paradox, requiring only that some portion of the planet’s surface maintain liquid water, may be resolved with moderate greenhouse gas inventories,” the authors wrote in Astrobiology.

“Even if half of Earth’s surface was below freezing back in the Archean and half was above freezing, it still would have constituted a habitable planet since at least 50 percent of the ocean would have remained open,” said Wolf. “Most scientists have not considered that there might have been a middle ground for the climate of the Archean.

“The leap from one-dimensional to three-dimensional models is an important step,” said Wolf. “Clouds and sea ice are critical factors in determining climate, but the one-dimensional models completely ignore them.”

Has the faint young sun paradox finally been solved? “I don’t want to be presumptuous here,” said Wolf. “But we show that the paradox is definitely not as challenging as was believed over the past 40 years. While we can’t say definitively what the atmosphere looked like back then without more geological evidence, it is certainly not a stretch at all with our model to get a warm early Earth that would have been hospitable to life.”

“The Janus supercomputer has been a tremendous addition to the campus, and this early Earth climate modeling project would have impossible without it,” said Toon. The researchers estimated the project required roughly 6,000 hours of supercomputer computation time, an effort equal to about 10 years on a home computer.

###

h/t to Dr. Leif Svalgaard

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
209 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 11, 2013 2:22 pm

@Ox AO
even 15 cm/yr over a billion years will not amount to much.
radius Earth Orbit change (very high estimate) = 15 cm/yr
cm/km = 100000. cm/km
radius Earth Orbit change = 1.50E-04 km/yr
times 1 Billion years = 1.00E+09 yr
radius Earth Orbit change/ billion Years = 150000. km
Earth mean orbit = 1.50E+08 km
relative change in orbit/ billion years = 0.001
which is about 1/16 of the current eccentricity.

July 11, 2013 2:29 pm

Stephen Rasey says:
July 11, 2013 at 2:22 pm
even 15 cm/yr over a billion years will not amount to much.
510 cm/yr is required.

July 11, 2013 2:58 pm

@lsvalgaard 2:29 pm
510 cm/yr is required.
Required for what?
510 cm/yr = 5.1 million km/billion yr
or 15 million km in the Archean (2.8 Gya)
= 90% of current radius
(1/.9)^2 = 1.23.
So 23% more solar radiation to negate an sun at 80% of current output.

July 11, 2013 3:56 pm

Stephen Rasey says:
July 11, 2013 at 2:58 pm
So 23% more solar radiation to negate an sun at 80% of current output.
Yes, that is the general idea.

Robertv
July 12, 2013 4:12 am

And what if stars are not simplistic balls of gravitationally compressed hot gas with a self-sustaining nuclear reaction? Are they not composed of plasma? Plasma is ionized, meaning that one or more electrons have been stripped from the atoms in its substance, so it is electrically charged. Plasma does not behave like a pressurized gas, it behaves according to the tenets of plasma physics.

July 12, 2013 4:45 am

Robertv says:
July 12, 2013 at 4:12 am
Plasma is ionized, meaning that one or more electrons have been stripped from the atoms in its substance, so it is electrically charged.
Actually not as the electrons are still there in the plasma, so the plasma is electrically neutral.

July 12, 2013 10:45 am

The radiative and particulate loss of mass by the Sun, -9.13*10^-14 Solar masses per year or more…. [Noerdlinger-2008]

So even in a billion years, the sun looses 1 part in 10,000. I would have guess the solar wind would have amounted to much more than that.
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/574/1/412/fulltext/55336.text.html

The low density of the wind, corresponding to a mass-loss rate of only
Mdot = 2 × 10-14 Msol /yr (e.g., Feldman et al. 1977),
“mass loss per unit surface area is correlated with X-ray surface flux (FX). Fitting a power law to this relation yields Mdot proportional to FX^(1.15±0.20). ….. Since activity is known to decrease with age, the above power-law relation for solar-like stars suggests that mass loss decreases with time. We infer a power-law relation of Mdot proportional to t^(-2.00±0.52) This suggests that the solar wind may have been as much as 1000 times more massive in the distant past, ….[ t is stellar age in Gyr ]

Equation (4) suggests that the solar mass-loss rate was 30 – 330 times larger when the Sun was 1/10 its present age, while equation (6) suggests that the solar wind was 20 – 90 times larger at that time.

It still doesn’t amount to much. “Twice nothing is still nothing.”

Robertv
July 22, 2013 6:33 am

Leif Svalgaard says:
July 12, 2013 at 4:45 am
“the plasma is electrically neutral.”
So like a fluorescent lamp the moment you put energy in the system it starts to glow. But where does the energy come from?
http://youtu.be/HOIlIMdJV5k
http://youtu.be/AeRwIVpr8Dw

July 22, 2013 7:48 am

Robertv says:
July 22, 2013 at 6:33 am
“the plasma is electrically neutral.”
But where does the energy come from?

The energy derives from the nuclear fusion in the Sun’s core. The fusion process started when the Sun got hot enough due to gravitational contraction as the Sun was born.

1 7 8 9