Global cooling as significant as global warming

From Newcastle University

Global cooling as significant as global warming

A “cold snap” 116 million years ago triggered a similar marine ecosystem crisis to those witnessed in the past as a result of global warming, according to research published today in Nature Geoscience.

The international study involving experts from the universities of Newcastle, UK, Cologne, Frankfurt and GEOMAR-Kiel, confirms the link between global cooling and a crash in the marine ecosystem during the mid-Cretaceous greenhouse period.

It also quantifies for the first time the amplitude and duration of the temperature change. Analysing the geochemistry and micropaleontology of a marine sediment core taken from the North Atlantic Ocean, the team show that a global temperature drop of up to 5oC resulted in a major shift in the global carbon cycle over a period of 2.5 million years.

Occurring during a time of high tectonic activity that drove the breaking up of the super-continent Pangaea, the research explains how the opening and widening of new ocean basins around Africa, South America and Europe created additional space where large amounts of atmospheric CO2 was fixed by photosynthetic organisms like marine algae. The dead organisms were then buried in the sediments on the sea bed, producing organic, carbon rich shale in these new basins, locking away the carbon that was previously in the atmosphere.

The result of this massive carbon fixing mechanism was a drop in the levels of atmospheric CO2, reducing the greenhouse effect and lowering global temperature.

This period of global cooling came to an end after about 2 million years following the onset of a period of intense local volcanic activity in the Indian Ocean. Producing huge volumes of volcanic gas, carbon that had been removed from the atmosphere when it was locked away in the shale was replaced with CO2 from the Earth’s interior, re-instating a greenhouse effect which led to warmer climate and an end to the “cold snap”.

The research team say this study highlights how global climate is intrinsically linked to processes taking place in the earth’s interior at million year time scales and that these processes can modify ecospace for marine life, driving evolution.

Current research efforts tend to concentrate on global warming and the impact that a rise of a few degrees might have on past and present day ecosystems. This study shows that if global temperatures swing the other way by a similar amount, the result can be just as severe, at least for marine life.

However, the research team emphasise that the observed changes of the earth system in the Cretaceous happened over millions of years, rather than decades or centennial, which cannot easily be related to our rapidly changing modern climate conditions.

“As always it’s a question of fine balance and scale,” explains Thomas Wagner, Professor of Earth Systems Science at Newcastle University, and one of the leaders of this study.

“All earth system processes are operating all the time and at different temporal and spatial scales; but when something upsets the balance – be it a large scale but long term natural phenomenon or a short and massive change to global greenhouse gases due to anthropogenic activity – there are multiple, potential knock-on effects on the whole system.

“The trick is to identify and quantify the initial drivers and consequences, which remains an ongoing challenge in climate research.”

###
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 17, 2013 10:45 pm

“Is there a ocean floor that is 2 million years old?”
Yes, there is ocean floor that is 270 million years old.
http://geosciencebigpicture.com/2013/01/06/charybdis-and-…floor-on-earth/

Kajajuk
June 17, 2013 10:56 pm

phlogiston says:
June 17, 2013 at 9:41 am
—————————-
Thanks for your post, especially the visual aid.

June 17, 2013 11:35 pm

Look, it is completely plausible that separating Pangea created more biological activity. The center of the Panthalassic ocean may have had huge “dead zones” like those we see today where a lack of nutrients limited plankton. Splitting the continents would have had the effect of creating nutrient rich runoff shelves teeming with life. Have you ever noticed weeds are taller at the edge of the freeway?
If proliferation of life and consequent drawdown of CO2 were sufficient to cause cooling it surely would have happened in the Devonian when plants colonized land. It did not. O2 skyrocketed and CO2 plummeted but no cooling occurred. Cooling awaited a random time in the late Carboniferous and continued into the middle Permian. This Carboniferous/Permian cooling episode is the most recent to the one we live in, the Pleistocene, beginning two or three million year ago.
There are Jurassic, and possibly even Cretaceous tillites indicating glaciation. Whether Siberasia actually crossed the north pole is debatable but clearly this was the closest any continent ever came to doing so.
The biosphere is carbon limited. Increased biological activity will draw down atmospheric CO2, but the geological record is quite clear that the only reliable relationship between temperature and CO2 is that a warming planet always increases atmospheric CO2 and a cooling planet decreases it.
What one should take home from this paper is that sudden episodes of unexplained cooling can happen at any time, in any continental configuration, even during 250 million year otherwise ice free periods, and we really don’t have any idea why.

phlogiston
June 18, 2013 12:56 am

gymnosperm says:
June 17, 2013 at 11:16 am
” it is very obvious here that the widening south Atlantic in the mid-Cretaceous established Arctic to Antarctic Atlantic circulation for the first time,”
Um, I think you might be forgetting about the Panthalassic Ocean covering the rest of the planet.
What I meant was that, in addition to the other big Pacific-like ocean, there was now a second ocean, the Atlantic, also extending from pole to pole, establishing the complex deep ocean global circulation that we now have. Note – although the Atlantic is (still) smaller than the Pacific, the largest site by volume of cold water downwelling which drives the thermo-haline deep circulation, is the Norwegian sea at the North Atlantic. This motor of global deep circulation may have started around the mid Cretaceous. If so, it would probably have cooled global climate. CO2 by contrast, cools or warms nothing.

Gail Combs
June 18, 2013 3:52 am

It seems this study has now made it onto a connection to google maps of all things. A click on ‘Climate Change; brought this up. The are really pushing this brainwashing aren’t they.

phlogiston
June 18, 2013 6:35 am

Gail Combs
Yes it would seem so.
If its all true, why do they need to push it so hard? “Methinks the king doth protest too much”.

phlogiston
June 18, 2013 6:45 am

gymnosperm says:
June 17, 2013 at 11:35 pm
Look, it is completely plausible that separating Pangea created more biological activity. The center of the Panthalassic ocean may have had huge “dead zones” like those we see today where a lack of nutrients limited plankton. Splitting the continents would have had the effect of creating nutrient rich runoff shelves teeming with life. Have you ever noticed weeds are taller at the edge of the freeway?
If proliferation of life and consequent drawdown of CO2 were sufficient to cause cooling it surely would have happened in the Devonian when plants colonized land. It did not. O2 skyrocketed and CO2 plummeted but no cooling occurred. Cooling awaited a random time in the late Carboniferous and continued into the middle Permian.

There is a nice PNAS paper by Beerling and Berner 2005 describing and modelling the brief period in the Devonian-Carboniferous of runaway feedback between, on one hand, the spread of plants – in particular trees – across land and the evolution of both increased height and leaf width plus stomatal density, and on the other hand, decreasing CO2 concentration in air. Plants before this period experiencing sky-high CO2 hardly even needed leaves, just a few holes here and there to take in CO2. CO2 supply and demand led to a CO2 crash and made trees and plants much more efficient CO2-gatherers. If ever there was a period in which to study how changing CO2 levels drove changing temperatures – this is it, where a clear cause – the spread and evolution of plants / trees – led to a clear effect – sharply falling CO2. But the CAGW palaeo-revisionists for some reason avoid this period. Why? The answer is as you state – there was no corresponding temperature fall with the CO2 fall. A sharp temperature drop did follow the CO2 decrease – about 60 million years later, thus it was clearly unrelated to the CO2 drop.

June 18, 2013 6:54 am

phlogiston says:
June 18, 2013 at 12:56 am
===========================
It is true that today Arctic bottom water can only escape into the north Atlantic because the Bearing Straight is effectively closed. This was not true in the Jurassic.

June 18, 2013 10:15 pm

Just one more thing…
This was a 2.5 million year episode. We have no way of knowing if our wimpy little Pleistocene at about the same time scale is one of these little hiccoughs or the beginning of a grander episode like the Ordovician or the Carboniferous/Permian glacial periods.. Your guess is as good as mine, but mine is that it is the beginning of a large scale event based on the steady decline over roughly 50 million years since the PETM.

Kajajuk
June 19, 2013 5:49 am

gymnosperm says:
June 17, 2013 at 10:45 pm
——————————-
I misread the article.
But the link i provided suggests the oldest ocean floor is 180 Ma and your link is dead.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Earth_seafloor_crust_age_poster.gif

phlogiston
June 19, 2013 3:03 pm

gymnosperm says:
June 18, 2013 at 10:15 pm
Just one more thing…
This was a 2.5 million year episode. We have no way of knowing if our wimpy little Pleistocene at about the same time scale is one of these little hiccoughs or the beginning of a grander episode like the Ordovician or the Carboniferous/Permian glacial periods.. Your guess is as good as mine, but mine is that it is the beginning of a large scale event based on the steady decline over roughly 50 million years since the PETM.

There is one school of thought that such a deep cooling millions of years long happens every 150 million years. This is approximately consistent with the following cold periods:
590 MYa (preCambrian, Marinoan glaciation)
440 MYa (end-Ordovician Saharan-Andean glaciation)
290 MYa (Carboniferous-Permian glaciation)
140 MYa (Jurassic-Cretaceous cold period)
10 MYa in future
The suggested reason is that 150 MY is the orbit period of our galaxy and that our arm of the galaxy flies through the same cloud of bad stuff in that part of space with every revolution. Its a Svensmark-related idea I believe.

June 19, 2013 7:46 pm

Kajajuk says:
June 19, 2013 at 5:49 am
=======================
Wikipedia is a wonderful service, but if you have ever tried to help them get up to speed on issues where you have some expertise, you quickly learn why they are not up to speed.
Try this:
http://wp.me/p1uHC3-7H
Failing that, geosciencebigpicture.com; archives; Charybdis and the Oldest Ocean Floor on Earth.

June 19, 2013 7:59 pm

phlogiston says:
June 19, 2013 at 3:03 pm
=========================
Yes, the idea predates Svensmark, and it is a good one. Even more interesting is the possibility we might get pelted by a lot of rocks out there in the spiral arm. Still, the periodicity seems forced to me, a la Milankovitch, and I am not yet prepared to buy into the Jurassic /Cretaceous episode as full fledged.

Kajajuk
June 20, 2013 7:47 pm

thanks for sharing gymnosperm,
i get frustrated by pay-walled boundaries or queries that return news releases and tend to settle on wiki for info. The page(s) your referenced are fascinating…
kjjk