No mays, coulds, or mights here in this press release headline from UEA. They say “will“. As usual, they assume nature so poorly equipped her creations that they can’t adapt. That’s some ballsy certainty.
Climate change will cause widespread global-scale loss of common plants and animals
More than half of common plants and one third of the animals could see a dramatic decline this century due to climate change – according to research from the University of East Anglia.
Research published today in the journal Nature Climate Change looked at 50,000 globally widespread and common species and found that more than one half of the plants and one third of the animals will lose more than half of their climatic range by 2080 if nothing is done to reduce the amount of global warming and slow it down.
This means that geographic ranges of common plants and animals will shrink globally and biodiversity will decline almost everywhere.
Plants, reptiles and particularly amphibians are expected to be at highest risk. Sub-Saharan Africa, Central America, Amazonia and Australia would lose the most species of plants and animals. And a major loss of plant species is projected for North Africa, Central Asia and South-eastern Europe.
But acting quickly to mitigate climate change could reduce losses by 60 per cent and buy an additional 40 years for species to adapt. This is because this mitigation would slow and then stop global temperatures from rising by more than two degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial times (1765). Without this mitigation, global temperatures could rise by 4 degrees Celsius by 2100.
The study was led by Dr Rachel Warren from theTyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at UEA. Collaborators include Dr Jeremy VanDerWal at James Cook University in Australia and Dr Jeff Price, from UEA’s school of Environmental Sciences and the Tyndall Centre. The research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC).
Dr Warren said: “While there has been much research on the effect of climate change on rare and endangered species, little has been known about how an increase in global temperature will affect more common species.
“This broader issue of potential range loss in widespread species is a serious concern as even small declines in these species can significantly disrupt ecosystems.
“Our research predicts that climate change will greatly reduce the diversity of even very common species found in most parts of the world. This loss of global-scale biodiversity would significantly impoverish the biosphere and the ecosystem services it provides.
“We looked at the effect of rising global temperatures, but other symptoms of climate change such as extreme weather events, pests, and diseases mean that our estimates are probably conservative. Animals in particular may decline more as our predictions will be compounded by a loss of food from plants.
“There will also be a knock-on effect for humans because these species are important for things like water and air purification, flood control, nutrient cycling, and eco-tourism.
“The good news is that our research provides crucial new evidence of how swift action to reduce CO2 and other greenhouse gases can prevent the biodiversity loss by reducing the amount of global warming to 2 degrees Celsius rather than 4 degrees. This would also buy time – up to four decades – for plants and animals to adapt to the remaining 2 degrees of climate change.”
The research team quantified the benefits of acting now to mitigate climate change and found that up to 60 per cent of the projected climatic range loss for biodiversity can be avoided.
Dr Warren said: “Prompt and stringent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally would reduce these biodiversity losses by 60 per cent if global emissions peak in 2016, or by 40 per cent if emissions peak in 2030, showing that early action is very beneficial. This will both reduce the amount of climate change and also slow climate change down, making it easier for species and humans to adapt.”
Information on the current distributions of the species used in this research came from the datasets shared online by hundreds of volunteers, scientists and natural history collections through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).
Co-author Dr Jeff Price, also from UEA’s school of Environmental Studies, said: “Without free and open access to massive amounts of data such as those made available online through GBIF, no individual researcher is able to contact every country, every museum, every scientist holding the data and pull it all together. So this research would not be possible without GBIF and its global community of researchers and volunteers who make their data freely available.”
‘Quantifying the benefit of early climate change mitigation in avoiding biodiversity loss’ is published by the journal Nature Climate Change on Sunday May 12, 2013.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Overpopulation with humans and their destruction of the environment is the principal and very obvious cause of changes to the British fauna and flora. That is the elephant in the room that these bozos will not recognise.
This might be of interest – it’s in the Norwich local paper:
Climate change expert steps in at the last minute to help give talk.
A climate change expert has stepped in at short notice to give a special talk for the United Nations Association (UNA) in Norwich after the original speaker pulled out.The Norwich and District branch of the UNA is hosting a special talk on Saturday, May 18 at 11am in the Curve at the Forum in the city centre. The talk, entitled “Patterns for a Sustainable Planet” will be given by Professor Le Quéré, who is professor of Climate Change Science and Policy at the UEA and director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Marguerite Finn, UNA vice-chairman, said: “We are exceptionally lucky and privileged to have Professor Corinne Le Quéré come and talk to us. “She has stepped in at the last minute when our original speaker could not make it, and I hope we can get a good audience for her.” Professor Le Quéré co-chairs the Global Carbon Project, a non‑governmental organisation that fosters international research on the carbon cycle and publishes annual updates on global emissions and sinks of carbon dioxide. This new international research programme, Future Earth, will coordinate international research on sustainability for the next 10 years.
“…if nothing is done to reduce the amount of global warming and slow it down…”.
Um. What warming would that be? Is that the adjusted/malleable/fixed/fiddled/altered/amended/made-up HADCRUT 4.whatever.0?
stop global temperatures from rising by more than two degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial times (1765)
How can anyone suppose that our Earth had a constant surface temperature before the beginning of the industrial revolution? Outright nonsense.
Climate change will cause widespread global-scale loss of common plants and animals?
Maybe the green cult should worry about a real environmental threat to plant life: the loss of bees caused by neonicotinoid pesticide pollution. Maybe we should be engineering more GMO crops that are resistant to pests and have no need for pesticides. But real environmental pollution is not a concern for the enviro-marxists.
You have to ask what business UEA or any other institution of (higher? seems more like lower to me) learning has employing people as ignorant, delusional and mean-spirited as the authors of thies so-called “research.”
How this bunch of feces can be called “research” blows the mind of any rational person.
Sooner or later, the schools and universities are going to have to purge themselves of these mollusks, and make them go do some honest work such as cleaning bus station toilets – that is, if they’re not put on the prison rockpile making little ones out of big ones 12 hours/day 7 days/week.
Cruel? Any more so than what they’re doing to old people who can’t afford to heat their homes because of carbon taxes and other alarmist crimes?
RockyRoad: I know a Geology perfesser who believes & promotes this warmist nonsense. Geologists are not immune, just look at the amount of proAGW material at the recent AGU conference in the US!
The only species being affected by global warming alarmism is the human race?
The Tyndall centre and UEA are experts in uneducated guesses.
Bob Carter gave emtertaining lectures – probably still does – in which he put up graphs of temperature and pointed out all the hot times when Earth’s present species went extinct. If I remember it correctly, the poor wretched polar bears went extinct at least 5 times.
Seriously, though, it’s worth reflecting on how evolution operates. As I understand it, it goes like this : As climate changes, species adapt or perish. In a stable climate period, successful species proliferate and dominate and biodiversity in all probability decreases. In periods of rapidly changing climate (especially cooling), as existing species retreat, new species emerge. ie, even though numbers may decline, biodiversity increases.
I like to get a look at the face of the researcher. It seems to make their data more substantial somehow.
So which of these do you think is the scientist?
http://www.open.edu/openlearn/files/ole/ole_images/people/named%20individuals/profiles/other%20contributors/rachel-warren/rachel%20warren_1_0.jpg
http://pinterest.com/rvictoria/activity/
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
Yet more predictions of doom, Doom, DOOM!! from the climate alarmist crowd. I’m willing to bet these will be as accurate as all the prior “Climate Astrology” predictions — not at all.
God knows how a plant survives winter and summer temperature changes.
Obviously they never raised tomatoes or kittens.
Oh, I get so disinterested in their latest “scientific results”. Why don’t they say the earth will stop spinning, or the Sun will go dark or the universe end, if they don’t get more funding?
Oh, wait, the Earth IS spinning out of control, so I guess it COULD stop spinning, with no-one controlling it.
Adam Soereg says May 13, 2013 at 1:20 pm
How can anyone suppose that our Earth had a constant surface temperature before the beginning of the industrial revolution?
Precisely! The people who label us climate change deniers are actually deniers of natural climate change. They persistently refuse to state their reasons and evidence as to how the current climate is unatural.
So many lulz. The good part is these (presumably) very very young activist types will live long enough to see their paper a laughing stock for the world.
They start with a chart that shows warmenation from 2000. Hello??? Surely that itself would have been enough for peer reviewers to throw it out?
Reptiles?? F***ing REPTILES can’t handle the heat now???
Quote from Prof Lord Winston (Fertility expert and famous for various TV series and, I think, a warmist)
“I know scientists who are amazingly stupid”
Couldn’t have put it better!
Plants are adapted to a wide range of temperatures, every day. It’s the introduction of pests and diseases that is the biggest threat to their survival, and humans are often the cause of that in this age of travel: http://pindanpost.com/2013/05/13/damaging-plant-fungi-alert/
I heard these comments on the BBC Radio 2 News at 16:00 as I was driving back to work in the North East of England; the temperature on the outside of the car was, wait for it! 6.0 Celsius! In the middle of May?
Are these cretins for real??
This apparently happens during EVERY interglacial, and particularly right at their ends!
Honestly, after Climategate, and especially after the HARRY_READ_ME.txt file, ANYTHING, ANYTHING AT ALL that has Hadley, CRU or UEA associated with it I simply cannot be bothered to even read. Fool me once, shame on you, but fool me twice? Somewhat unlikely. The Title was all I needed to see.
Go do some reading on the high resolution studies that have in just the past 5 years been published on the Eemian and Holsteinian interglacials. Sweeps of vegetation responding to to climate change, dramatic climate changes, WITHIN these interglacials:
http://www.clim-past.net/9/679/2013/cp-9-679-2013.pdf
http://www.clim-past.net/9/567/2013/cp-9-567-2013.pdf
http://www.clim-past.net/6/131/2010/cp-6-131-2010.pdf
just for a taste.
” Tom Harley says: It’s the introduction of pests and diseases …”
Birds have been doing that a lot longer than we have.
Hasn’t Mother Gaia stopped her own global warming all by herself?
The Three Climateers.
Dr Warren’s paper was reported in the DT and her temperature rise for 2100 was 39F. A somewhat impossible rise given that it is a rise 21.67C. I have asked her if this is a mosplaced decimal point which would give 2.1C rise and within the IPCC claim. So no real scare then.
Typical scaremongering reports on the very real decline in Hedgehogs and UEA at it again. You guys don’t have them in the USA but they hold a very special place in the British psyche.
As you can see climate change is associated in this first report from the BBC but look at the later reports that show the more likely reasons, particularly habitat.
SCARE
“The UK’s landscape and wildlife are under threat like never before, a new report into climate change has revealed.
The research shows many of the UK’s birds, bugs, butterflies and small mammals are in a “freefall decline”, with last year the worst on record for breeding birds.
The report, compiled with the help of researchers from the Norwich-based the University of East Anglia, also shows that hedgehogs are disappearing as fast as the tiger, dropping from 36 million in 1950, to just one million today.
BBC Look East’s Kevin Burch reports.”
??? If you look at the CET temperatures for England we went though a cold period after 1950,
The Guardian can’t resist the climate change tag.
“Ecologists stress more work needs to be done to pinpoint the reasons behind the decline, but said likely candidates are habitat loss, poor management of hedgerows and fragmentation of habitat, due to new roads, housing and other developments. Tens of thousands of hedgehogs are killed by road traffic each year.”
Climate change, which increases the likelihood of extreme weather such as heavy rainfall that can flood the homes of animals, is also considered a potential factor.”
This more objective study looks at reasons for decline
Throughout the United Kingdom (UK) hedgehogs are considered common and widespread; however, studies conducted over the past 20 years show they have been subject to significant decline (Hof and Bright, 2012: 79-88). If this rate of depletion continues research indicates the hedgehog population could become extinct by 2020 (The Mammal Society, 2012). The primary cause of their decline is unclear, although contributing factors include road mortality and anthropogenic disturbances, such as habitat destruction and fragmentation (Dowding et al., 2010a: 13-21). Secondary poisoning due to pesticide applications has also been established as another factor impacting on the species decline (Dowding et al., 2010b: 161-66