Dilbert becomes skeptical of climate change disaster

Disaster-Recovery-Dilbert[1]From Scott Adams (creator of the Dilbert comic strip) blog, who seems to have stumbled across an interview with the author of this video we recently highlighted at WUWT. Scott Adams writes:

=================================

Fact Checking: Adams Law of Slow-Moving Disasters

I was watching Real Time with Bill Maher the other day. He had a professor on the show who said climate change can be fixed by making well-understood adjustments to how farmers raise cattle plus some other fairly ordinary changes. Apparently this is all explained in a documentary called Carbon Nation.

I’m skeptical of any claim so big and contrarian, but it does fit with The Adams Law of Slow-Moving Disasters. Simply stated, my observation is that whenever humanity can see a slow-moving disaster coming, we find a way to avoid it. Let’s run through some examples:  

Thomas Malthus famously predicted that the world would run out of food as the population grew. Instead, humans improved their farming technology.

When I was a kid, it was generally assumed that the world would be destroyed by a global nuclear war. The world has been close to nuclear disaster a few times, but so far we’ve avoided all-out nuclear war.

The world was supposed to run out of oil by now, but instead we keep finding new ways to extract it from the ground. The United States has unexpectedly become a net provider of energy.

….

(he continues with more items in the list)

In California, predicted ongoing droughts were supposed decimate the state. Instead, it rained.

Can anyone give me an example of a potential global disaster that the general public saw coming, with at least a ten year warning, and it actually happened as predicted?

==============================================================

Full story here: http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/fact_checking_adams_law_of_slowmoving_disasters/

WUWT readers surely can find some examples?

h/t to WUWT reader AJ

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
129 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Justthinkin
April 20, 2013 6:48 pm

Roger Sewell says “Yes, nuclear power plants. Three major disasters in less than 50 years. Each one, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, would not have happened if the warnings NOT to build these things had been heeded.”
Could you please cite,with links,the exact nomber of people directly killed by either TMI,Chernobyl,or Fukushima??
Thanks in advance.

A Crooks
April 20, 2013 7:03 pm

What about Gramscian Marxism?
Antonio Gramsci predicted the end of Western Capitalism and the left have been following his agenda ever since. I think we are nearly there.
What about Alexis de Tocqueville?
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”
(This quote appears to be attributed to several people in different forms?) He knew what he was talking about when he summed up democracy. Think about Greece Spain Italy, but also think Obama’s (47%) America and Gillard’s Australia. Think national debt and the culture of entitlement:
I think we are getting closer here too but maybe I’m just a bit premature.
Maybe you can put Mark Steyn on your list too.

April 20, 2013 7:08 pm

We shall see, what we shall see, but US’ $222 TRILLION unfunded liabilities and $85 billion/month FED money printing can’t last much longer…
DRIVES ME NUTS! Currency, coin or bills is like 1/500th of the economy. The Fed DOES NOT PRINT MONEY. It grinds me into the ground because there are PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE that actual PRINTING OF CURRENCY controls things.
It is MORE “hazardous” than that…i.e., the money supply is increased by POLICY and COMPUTERS.
However, money “adjusts” to fit circumstances. The things that count are: 1. Real-estate,
2. Resources, 3. Energy. Period.
Thats all!
Max

April 20, 2013 8:43 pm

@Justthinkin on April 20, 2013 at 6:48 pm
“Could you please cite,with links,” and blah blah…
No, I will not.
Do your own homework!
If you are a nuclear but, then you have my pity.

John Karajas
April 20, 2013 10:13 pm

How about the Australian Labor Party, the Australian Broadcasting Commission and most of the idiots in Canberra.

McComber Boy
April 20, 2013 10:22 pm

Roger Sowell says:
Roger,
We might call your second comment an argument from authority, but it isn’t. You stated the premise so the burden is on you to provide the proof of how bad those accidents were. If you don’t or won’t then it just becomes the argument of a curmudgeon.
Come on, man. Step up to the plate with some facts so others can take a whack at the piñata.
pbh

richardscourtney
April 20, 2013 11:05 pm

Jonathan Grove:
Thankyou for your answer to me which you provide at April 20, 2013 at 4:41 pm.
It confirms my suspicion that you do not know of any “problem” caused by the mis-named ozone hole. This confirmation does not surprise me because nobody has managed to find such a problem.
However, now reality is destroying the AGW-scare, I think it necessary to stamp-out all promotions of other false scares which may replace it.
Richard

Martin A
April 21, 2013 12:27 am

David, UK says:
April 20, 2013 at 3:51 am
I don’t think anyone could claim that the general public saw that one coming.

My dad said he listened, as a young man, to Chamberlain’s speech. His dad (my grandfather) said “Oh oh, theres a war coming”.

Patrick
April 21, 2013 1:24 am

“Roger Sowell says:
April 20, 2013 at 1:06 pm”
Not one single person died as a direct result of radiation from the TMI and Fukushima (Considering the plant survived one of the largest earth quakes in recorded human history AND a tsunami) events. Chernobyl, about 80. In 50 years, that’s a pretty good record for any industry.

Lightrain
April 21, 2013 1:51 am

Aren’t climate disaster predictions supposed to be forecast before the actual disaster event? Which is always followed by we knew that and its happening exactly as we forecast.

Bruce Cobb
April 21, 2013 5:11 am

You just need to preface all supposed coming disasters with the phrase “all things being equal”. Of course, they are not. The beauty of the hockey stick was an apparent ability to actually alter past history. Combine that with linear thinking, and you have the greatest you-know-what in history. The mother of all of them, and probably never to be repeated.

DirkH
April 21, 2013 5:43 am

Historian says:
April 20, 2013 at 9:13 am
“Some civilizations can survive massive climatic disasters without collapsing. East Rome coped with the catastropies of 535-545,”
yes, but got weakened to the point where the Umayads could conquer most of it some time later.
” and Renaissance Italy thrived in the Little Ice Age. This is a particularly impressive feat, since at the same time the Black Death caused Italian cities population losses of over 50%.”
They had a business model and a rich customer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade

rgbatduke
April 21, 2013 7:47 am

The clock is ticking on a devastating asteroid impact, but public awareness is only a couple of years old and it hasn’t happened quite yet. Put this in the check back later bin.
You mean that movies such as Armageddon or Deep Impact — (both over 15 years old at this point) or science fiction novels like Footfall or Lucifer’s Hammer (1978!) are only a couple of years old? Science fiction writers have been all over this concept for decades. The general public has been at least moderately aware of it since Alverez and his son discovered strong evidence that the Cretaceous exinction event was caused by, or at least associated with, a massive asteroid-scale impact (a BIG rock, not a small one). There is at this point even a specific crater with a 110 mile diameter associated with the event. Every person who ever watched “Walking with Dinosaurs” (1999) — which includes nearly every person who was a child or had a child younger than 15 over the last 14 years — has watched as the momma T Rex and her poor baby are blown to dust by the pyroclastic flow from the event.
Then there are the other umpty shows on BBC, the discovery channel, the science channel, even the history channel. In the US or Europe, one has to have lived in a cave for over a decade or (as noted above) simply be a bit dull, stupid, and disconnected from the flow of information not to know that asteroid falls can cause mass extinctions, have happened before, and will happen again.
Fortunately, they are rare. The Cretaceous event was 60 million years ago. Asteroid events large enough to affect world ecology appear to be roughly order of 100 million year occurrences and were likely more common early on in the Earth’s history than they are now. Events like Tunguska or the megaton-scale meteor that blew up over Russia earlier this year are a lot more common, perhaps decadal or century scale. And one expects a wide range in between, with more smaller and fewer bigger, all as probabilities.
These are, then, “Black Swan” events (a la Taleb). Very rare — downright unlikely, in fact — but enormously expensive if/when they occur.
They are far from our biggest risk of extinction or massive, globe spanning death. If you want risk factors there, they are probably something like:
a) Nuclear/biological war. This (sadly) is still probably likely with a probability of something like 1% in any given year. Who would be surprised if North Korea launched a nuke or more at South Korea, or Japan, or tried to reach the US? Who would be surprised if terrorists got a bomb and nuked Manhattan? Who would be surprised if Iran built a bomb and used it on Israel, if Pakistan (that has the bomb) used it on India or Israel? The risk is greatly diminished compared to the cold war peak, but it is still there. A completely foreseeable “catastrophe” for decades now, but one that no amount of technology can ameliorate.
b) The coming Pandemic. Nearly all of the physicians and epidemiologists I know are waiting for the pandemic shoe to drop. We are living at a critical time. Every year our list of effective antibiotics shrinks as antibiotic abuse and the evolution of resistance among the worst infections they are used on proceeds. The population of the Earth increases, essentially cranking up a “coupling constant” associated with a set of coupled ordinary differential equations (that I’ve actually studied and run a simulation on with my wife, back when she was an infectious disease fellow) that regulates “R”, the probability of an infected person transmitting the disease during the time they are infectious. Viruses constantly evolve — both known viruses such as flu and rare/unknown viruses or viruses that move over from animal reservoirs. One day one of these bugs WILL mutate into a form that has just the wrong characteristics — R > 1 (so the disease grows exponentially), infectious for a week or more before it becomes symptomatic, high lethal once it becomes symptomatic, and untreatable.
Note well that one needs all of these things. Ebola is extremely infectious and lethal and untreatable, but it has a very short window to be passed on before you are symptomatic, so it is self-limiting. Variations of the flu are infectious, easily transmitted, and only partially treatable, but are relatively rarely lethal. Flu killed almost 20 million people a century ago in a single global pandemic — that one could not be foreseen, but the next one is has already been foreseen, and while we aren’t “helpless to prevent it”, all we can really do is not prevent it but reduce the probability of its occurrence. And then there is the black swan event here — the evolution of a catastrophic pandemic out of an animal reservoir, a bug that we have no resistance at all to and have no technical defense against. Imagine HIV, only transmitted by mosquitoes. Imagine a resurgence of pneumonic form antibiotic resistant plague. Imagine smallpox unleashed from “secret” military stores into a world where we stopped innoculating everybody for it decades ago, so that 25% of everybody under the age of 20 or 30 gets the disease and 20% of them die.
c) Volcanoes. If you’ve never heard of Tambora, you might read the wikipedia entry on it. Everybody has heard of Krakatoa (its much younger, weaker, cousin) and Mount St. Helens (hardly in the running as these things go) and Vesuvius and many others. Also celebrated in singularly bad disaster movies, there is an ongoing probability order of or a bit less than 1% of a catastrophe associated with a volcano large enough to be global in its effects (Tambora affected global climate for years, even decades afterwards, Krakatoa for years, Mount Pinatubo (again, a teeny one as these things go) for a year or two. Volcanic events cannot specifically be foreseen site by site, but at the same time we are quite certain that given centuries for them to happen in happen they will.
Note well that even gigaton of TNT scale Tambora is far from the worst that the Earth is capable of here. If Yellowstone should wake up again as a thousand year supervolcano, it could singlehandedly trigger an instant ice age and kill 2/3 of the world’s population in a mix of starvation and global war as the northern nations look south for food as the world’s breadbaskets ice up — Siberia, Canada and the Northern US, China — and as countries like India with enormous populations suffer from killing frosts and failure of the monsoon as the rain they expect falls as northern ice and snow. Yellowstone would have other dire consequences — think of it as an asteroid collision that just keeps happening — most of them foreseeable and indeed foreseen, but there is damn all we can do about it if it happens. Or if a similar supervolcano opens up somewhere else. See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberian_Traps. More than capable of causing global extinction events and of lasting for a million years (as did this event). Fortunately, these appear to be billion year events.
Yellowstone, however, is not that rare:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera
142 massive eruption events over the last 17 million years is one every 100,000 years or so, on average. There have been major but not supervolcanic events twice over the last 200,000 years, the last one some 70,000 years ago, with a “hiccup” of sorts that left a 5 km crater 13,000 years ago. If it started to crank up, I’m guessing that we would be able to tell a decade or more before it went critical and exploded into SUPERvolcanic activity, although a plain old eruption could occur with at most months of notice. I don’t know what we could do about it, though. These things are associated with forces and energy accumulations utterly beyond our control. Even if we attempted to use thermonuclear devices to release energy less catastrophically, a ten or hundred year non-explosive eruption is EXPECTED from magma upwellings of this sort of scale, and would be truly catastrophic.
Asteroids and gamma ray bursts are way down the list, as you can see. If Betelgeuse explodes (rather, exploded a few hundred years ago so that the supernova shockwave is about to reach us), it is probably too far away to sterilize the Earth but it might affect the Earth “catastrophically” — or not. Asteroids we MIGHT be able to see and deal with.
There are, however, other “black swans” out there. We have no idea what caused e.g. the Ordovician-Silurian transition from a hot Earth with enormously high CO_2 levels — levels over 10 times the present concentration throughout the ice age itself — into an ice age lasting millions of years. Over the last 50 million years BEFORE the current Pliestocene ice age that started 3 million years ago there have been several bursts of completely inexplicable ice age — single glaciations lasting for hundreds of thousands of years or longer. A few exotic theories that might explain them include stuff like the sun itself wandering into neighborhoods of more or less interstellar dust, very long term chaotic variability in solar output (“chuffing” in its nuclear furnace as it were), possibly associated with new physics. We don’t know what dark matter or dark energy are, but they appear to be distributed throughout galaxies and in between. Does this stuff ever interact with normal matter outside of through gravitation? If so, can it affect climate?
As you can see, a far better game than Scott Adams slow catastrophes that haven’t happened one is to meditate upon the next slow catastrophe that could, and eventually will, happen.
Oh, I forgot in my previous list (and so did everyone else, it appears):
4) The Great Depression. Oh, boy was that one foreseeable and avoidable. And one of the direct “causes” of World War II and the current shape of the political world. If it hadn’t happened, who knows where we would be today?
rgb

April 21, 2013 8:10 am

Jimbo says: April 20, 2013 at 9:26 am
Rising UK excess winter deaths. It has been a disaster and we saw this coming 3 years ago with higher energy prices to tackle global warming climate change. 🙁
Hello Jimbo,
We predicted most of this debacle more than a decade ago. See below, note especially points 1, 8 and 9.
Regards, Allan
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/16/onset-of-the-next-glaciation/#comment-1079770
[excerpts]
We predicted global cooling by 2020-2030 in an article written in 2002. I think there is a reasonable probability that this cooling will be severe enough to affect the grain harvest. Urgent study of this question is appropriate, but the climate science community is so contaminated by warmist hysteria that it is apparently incapable of objective analysis.
A full Ice Age is not required to hurt the developed world. More moderate global cooling could suffice.
Modern Western society is complex, so moderate global cooling, together with a crippling of our food and energy systems through green-energy nonsense, could have devastating effects. (Add a collapse of major global currencies due to excessive money-printing by central banks in the UK, Europe, the USA and Japan.)
Is this just more alarmist nonsense? Perhaps, but we have a strong predictive track record, unlike the warmists who have none.
__________________
Here are some background notes:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/23/ar5-climate-forecasts-what-to-believe/#comment-1064602
[excerpts]
Prediction Number 9
In a separate article in the Calgary Herald, also published in 2002, I (we) predicted imminent global cooling, starting by 2020 to 2030. This prediction is still looking good, since there has been no net global warming for about a decade, and solar activity has crashed. If this cooling proves to be severe, humanity will be woefully unprepared and starvation could result.
This possibility (probability) concerns me.
8 Successful Predictions from 2002 (these all happened in those European countries that fully embraced global warming mania):
See article at
http://www.apegga.org/Members/Publications/peggs/WEB11_02/kyoto_pt.htm
Kyoto has many fatal flaws, any one of which should cause this treaty to be scrapped.
1. Climate science does not support the theory of catastrophic human-made global warming – the alleged warming crisis does not exist.
2. Kyoto focuses primarily on reducing CO2, a relatively harmless gas, and does nothing to control real air pollution like NOx, SO2, and particulates, or serious pollutants in water and soil.
3. Kyoto wastes enormous resources that are urgently needed to solve real environmental and social problems that exist today. For example, the money spent on Kyoto in one year would provide clean drinking water and sanitation for all the people of the developing world in perpetuity.
4. Kyoto will destroy hundreds of thousands of jobs and damage the Canadian economy – the U.S., Canada’s biggest trading partner, will not ratify Kyoto, and developing countries are exempt.
5. Kyoto will actually hurt the global environment – it will cause energy-intensive industries to move to exempted developing countries that do not control even the worst forms of pollution.
6. Kyoto’s CO2 credit trading scheme punishes the most energy efficient countries and rewards the most wasteful. Due to the strange rules of Kyoto, Canada will pay the former Soviet Union billions of dollars per year for CO2 credits.
7. Kyoto will be ineffective – even assuming the overstated pro-Kyoto science is correct, Kyoto will reduce projected warming insignificantly, and it would take as many as 40 such treaties to stop alleged global warming.
8. The ultimate agenda of pro-Kyoto advocates is to eliminate fossil fuels, but this would result in a catastrophic shortfall in global energy supply – the wasteful, inefficient energy solutions proposed by Kyoto advocates simply cannot replace fossil fuels.
[end of excerpts]

ferdberple
April 21, 2013 9:43 am

Roger Sowell says:
April 20, 2013 at 8:43 pm
If you are a nuclear but, then you have my pity.
=========
how about cars? they kill more people every day.
how about bathtubs? most dangerous item in a house. more deadly than a handgun, yet no license is required to own or operate a bathtub.
give up driving and bathing to save lives.

April 21, 2013 10:20 am

rgbatduke says April 21, 2013 at 7:47 am

4) The Great Depression. Oh, boy was that one foreseeable and avoidable. …
rgb

Oh, you mean the GREAT GOVT Caused Depression that preceded WW2. Kinda like we’re seeing now .. if you LOOK CLOSELY you should gain some INSIGHTS as to how these things work, how they build (or built) up. Whose “brain trust” of eggheads was it that advised the chief exec at the time?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_Trust#Roosevelt.27s_.22Brains_Trust.22

Franklin Roosevelt’s speechwriter and legal counsel Samuel Rosenman suggested having an academic team to advise Roosevelt in March 1932.
This concept was perhaps based on The Inquiry, a group of academic advisors President Woodrow Wilson formed in 1917 to prepare for the peace negotiations following World War I.

The core of the first Roosevelt brain trust consisted of a group of Columbia law professors (Moley, Tugwell, and Berle). These men played a key role in shaping the policies of the First New Deal (1933). Although they never met together as a group, they each had Roosevelt’s ear. Many newspaper editorials and editorial cartoons ridiculed them as impractical idealists.

Quoting myself earlier in this post: “if you LOOK CLOSELY you should gain some INSIGHTS as to how these things work, how they build (or built) up” … well, maybe not. Not everyone can read the ‘tea leaves’ and come away with the ‘gist’ of what happened/is happening …
.

April 21, 2013 11:06 am

Roger Sowell says April 20, 2013 at 1:06 pm

With more reactors being built, in more countries with less than top-notch technical ability, more nuclear disasters are inevitable.
Future generations, living with radioactive dead zones and horrible radiation effects on living tissue,

AS IF K40 hasn’t had its impact on humanity (and ALL things biological for that matter!)
(Remember the question: “What is a Banana Equivalent Dose?”)
Not to mention the perennial affect of various ‘cosmic rays’ that make their way down through the atmosphere (WHO HERE has not seen ‘cloud chamber’ demonstrations and seen the accounts of experiments at high altitudes?)
Yes, Virginia, there *is* such a thing as “naturally originating radiation”.
There are even natural nuclear reactors, e.g. “The Oklo Reactor” – Oklo’s Natural Fission Reactors
Nuclear reactions and life on earth – the early formative ‘years’:
Could Natural Nuclear Reactors Have Boosted Life on This and Other Planets?
Fission reactors may have been burning for billions of years
.

Hoser
April 21, 2013 11:52 am

SAMURAI says:
April 20, 2013 at 3:52 am

Debt crisis
The simple answer is called DEFAULT. That means people and institutions who lent money won’t get paid. There is such a thing as risk, after all. But the reality is much more complicated.
Then how did this all come about?
Otter says:
April 20, 2013 at 2:50 am

Communism.
Not exactly. There were and are dreamers who believe tales of eternal joy living in the collective. Many have been working madly to craft their dream by trying to simultaneously make the dream real (sharing the wealth) and wrecking the system (destroying the wealth). And what we are getting isn’t even socialism, where the state owns the means of production. It is fascism, where the state orders the private sector to produce what the state requires. Regulations, laws, and taxes produce the benefit on the one hand of crushing competition, and on the other a real treat of having government crush your existing business. These forces drive companies to fall into line and do what government tell them to do.

How do we avoid the true slow disaster of giving up sovereignty and freedom?
Another Adams, Douglas has the answer. Don’t Panic.
When they say we have to do X, we ask why? Some powerful people want to get paid. Forget it. They bet wrong. Baby boomers, you had a great run, but the promises were a lie. Pensions won’t last, and savings will be robbed by inflation. The power-elite created the mess on purpose to trap us.
Banks? Get out now (keep your account, but only maintain a small balance). Pay off your debts, or default and settle. Abandon credit at all costs. Convert cash to real assets, but be careful. Gold? Who is going to trade that? Even silver – $30 of silver per Morgan Dollar. How many can you keep? When they are gone, they’re gone.
Consider creating a business that functions in the underground economy. Cash and barter only. I hope doctors figure that out soon. There is a shadow economy now, and it will likely grow. Of course when it gets big enough, you’ll see government try to crack down hard on it, albeit with difficulty. They’ve already started with food. New laws and regulations technically could ban farmers’ markets, restricting offering any food for sale or even sharing food we produce without testing for pathogens first. You can still grow food in gardens, at least for now. Although, who knows how to grow food anymore? Certainly not the 48 million people with EBT cards (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-11/foodstamp-recipients-hit-record-alongside-record-dow-jones-and-record-debt-20-eligib). A limiting factor will be enforcement. You have to be discovered first. Drones? Expect a few highly publicized scary crack-downs. However, if people demand something, they’ll get it. They probably want food more than their cannabis.
NEVER give up your guns. Hide them, say they were stolen if you have to. Get several thousand rounds of ammunition for each weapon. When the bad times come, what else can you do to protect what you have? Decide what you can defend. Plan. Band together with friends so you can protect each other. (Even though it seems very unlikely now, it could get really bad really fast.)
If the disaster happens
(Five years ago, I never thought it would make sense to actually try to think this through as having any chance at all – it’s still a remote possibility, but the chance is no longer zero).
Scenario A. Massive riots, police can’t handle it, not even National Guard.
That’s why you need your guns. Hope you stashed food somewhere that won’t easily be found or burned. Your biggest problem will be water. Hope you have like-minded friends.
Scenario B. People do panic, and want more government to ‘save’ them. Now a new aggressive system begins to crush the population.
You can’t fight government gone insane. If you get noticed, they will crush you and grind you up. Then do whatever you can to survive. Pretend to go along if you have to. It will take roughly 3 generations for the new system to crash. Do what you need to do for your grandchildren.
Unless the authorities begin rounding up millions of people and killing them (including slowly in gulags), nonviolent resistance is the answer. Think of ways around the system. There is no bureaucracy big enough to monitor and control everyone in every aspect of life. And you might think of subtle ways to disable the system too (incompetence is probably the best). Just don’t get noticed. Work your way up in the system to undermine it.
Scenario C. War. Yikes. No answer for that. It is the typical step taken to distract from national government incompetence. The young people are going to have the worst time of it. It seems unlikely the power elite actually want to destroy the means of production. Government will be allowed to do almost anything to support the war effort, and people will have to ‘sacrifice’. And America will lose (planned ahead of time – why else move manufacturing overseas to support your most likely future enemy). This option may be taken to eliminate the Constitution.
Back to the Debt Crisis.
Are we going to give up our freedom to pay back anyone? Are we going to let politicians sell us out using that excuse? We shouldn’t. Ordinarily, the ballot is the best control over the politician. However, our system is extremely distorted (deliberately) with millions of people dependent on government services. They will vote to support the current regime, because they have no other clear alternative. “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money”, is incorrectly attributed to de Tocqville (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville). The likely original quote may be better,

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.” (ibid., Elmer T. Peterson in The Daily Oklahoman, 9 December 1951)
The size of government must be reduced to the point it no longer competes with the people, or the private sector. If the debt crisis forces a contraction of government, then we should welcome it. On the other hand, the crisis may lead to a loss of freedom, or war. How we deal with the crisis is important. It may require non-democratic methods to preserve our freedom given a majority who will never vote to reduce their “benefits”. Does that mean a second Revolution? A second Civil War? We must do whatever we can to avoid such disasters. An Atlas Shrugged-inspired strike by the producers would be better.
Preferably, there would be a clearly articulated and compelling plan to get us out of our economic troubles. Unfortunately, our best options have been demonized, and these relate to inexpensive reliable energy resources. Climate change is the main tool used to scare the public. Unless the public can understand the stark choices before us, and realize their freedom and possibly their lives depend on getting past their fears of technology, we will be looking at nothing but bad options. That is why fora like WUWT are so important.

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we’ve been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden.
R.W. Reagan

Hoser
April 21, 2013 11:53 am

Ack! What happened to the close blockquote?

David L. Hagen
April 21, 2013 12:35 pm

26 False Alarms

The validity of the manmade global warming alarm requires the support of scientific forecasts of (1) a substantive long-term rise in global mean temperatures in the absence of regulations, (2) serious net harmful effects due to global warming, and (3) cost-effective regulations that would produce net beneficial effects versus alternatives such as doing nothing. Without scientific forecasts for all three aspects of the alarm, there is no scientific basis to enact regulations. In effect, it is a three-legged stool. Despite repeated appeals to global warming alarmists, we have been unable to find scientific forecasts for any of the three legs.
. . .we have, to date, identified 26 historical alarmist movements. None of the forecasts for the analogous alarms proved correct. In the 25 alarms that called for government intervention, the government impost regulations in 23. None of the 23 interventions was effective and harm was caused by 20 of them.

J. Scott Armstrong, Kesten C. Green & Willie Soon Research to date on Manmade Global Warming Alarm (2011)
Testimony to Subcommittee on Energy and Environment Committee on Science, Space and Technology–March 31, 2011

David L. Hagen
April 21, 2013 12:43 pm

Scott, Green & Soon’s False Alarm List from Research to date on Manmade Global Warming Alarm (2011)

Exhibit 5: Analogies to the alarm over dangerous manmade global warming
(Thumbnail descriptions available for italicized analogies)
Analogy Year
1 Population growth and famine (Malthus) 1798
2 Timber famine economic threat 1865
3 Uncontrolled reproduction and degeneration (Eugenics) 1883
4 Lead in petrol and brain and organ damage 1928
5 Soil erosion agricultural production threat 1934
6 Asbestos and lung disease 1939
7 Fluoride in drinking water health effects 1945
8 DDT and cancer 1962
9 Population growth and famine (Ehrlich) 1968
10 Global cooling; through to 1975 1970
11 Supersonic airliners, the ozone hole, and skin cancer, etc. 1970
12 Environmental tobacco smoke health effects 1971
13 Population growth and famine (Meadows)1972
14 Industrial production and acid rain 1974
15 Organophosphate pesticide poisoning 1976
16 Electrical wiring and cancer, etc. 1979
17 CFCs, the ozone hole, and skin cancer, etc. 1985
18 Listeria in cheese 1985
19 Radon in homes and lung cancer 1985
20 Salmonella in eggs 1988
21 Environmental toxins and breast cancer 1990
22 Mad cow disease (BSE) 1996
23 Dioxin in Belgian poultry 1999
24 Mercury in fish effect on nervous system development 2004
25 Mercury in childhood inoculations and autism 2005
26 Cell phone towers and cancer, etc. 2008

See their methodology at Public Policy Forecasting

Harold Pierce Jr
April 21, 2013 2:52 pm

Leo Geiger says on April 20, 2013 at 5:38 am:
“The question asked about disasters seen coming. That assumes people recognized the problem they faced. If some people claim there isn’t a problem, they have enough influence to prevent anything getting done, but they are wrong and there actually *is* a big problem, does that count as “seen coming”?
That scenario has played out with fish stocks. The inshore Atlantic cod fisherman knew what was coming, but false arguments about economics won (like large factory trawlers), wiping out what could have been a sustainable fishery.”
The most likely cause of the cod fishery collapse was about 6.5 million seals gobbling up about 13 billion pounds of sea food per year. The Europeans started the seal hunt protests because they knew the seals would eventually destroy the fishery and thus keep cheap Canadian fish out of their markets.

Steve in SC
April 21, 2013 6:03 pm

With apologies to the Kingston Trio
“They’re rioting in Africa
They’re starving in Spain
There’s hurricanes in Florida
and Texas needs rain
The whole world is festering with unhappy souls
The French hate the Germans The Germans hate the Poles
Italians hate Yugoslavs South Africans hate the Dutch
And I don’t like anybody very much
But we can be tranquil and thankful And proud
for man’s been endowed With a mushroom shaped cloud
And we know for certain that Some lovely day
someone will set the spark off
And we will all be blown away
They’re rioting in Africa
There’s strife in Iran
What nature doesn’t do to us
will be done by our fellow man”

redc1c4
April 21, 2013 9:09 pm

they told me that if i voted for Mitt Romney, the economy would tank and the US would be a laughingstock on the world stage.
i voted for hm anyway, and, sure enough, the economy is getting worse, and our foreign policy is idiotic.

John Bonfield
April 22, 2013 5:22 am

AIDs was foreseeable, as the first case was discovered in the 1960s.
The rise of Islamic militancy was foreseeable.
On a more personal note, the decision to plant an acacia tree so close to my pool a decade ago was ill advised, and I am now living with the disaster of many, many acacia seeds clogging my pool filter.